Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Why are women allowed to smoke while pregnant?

Options
123457

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,683 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Ok so a person reports what appears to be a pregnant woman smoking. The guards arrive but there is no sign of her so they review CCTV footage. It's not clear if she is just overweight or pregnant. So do they then release images on crimeline or something to track her down just to even determine if a crime has been committed?

    Or someone reports that they saw their pregnant neighbour smoking. The guards arrive and the woman denies it. What do they do? Get a search warrant to look for evidence? Say they find cigarettes but the woman claims they belong to her partner. What then? In the meantime, waiting for her court appearance a perfectly healthy child is born, as is the most likely outcome even amongst smokers. It all just seems like it would be a huge waste of time and police resources.


    Well it does when you present specific hypothetical scenarios like that which appear at least to make it a huge waste of time and police resources. I don’t think anyone has argued that the Gardai follow pregnant women around for the duration of their pregnancy to ensure they don’t smoke (how handmaids tale would that be? :D). No, rather when a complaint is made, a decision is made that depending upon the circumstances whether it is worth pursuing an investigation or not. Very simple, and Gardai do that sort of thing all the time when someone makes a complaint to them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Redsky121 wrote: »
    Levels are low already so that means the law would work according to your definition.

    The law shouldn’t be needed then. Just seems like a waste of time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,116 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    jackboy wrote: »
    The law shouldn’t be needed then. Just seems like a waste of time.

    And you have to wonder if the prospect of being charged with a crime would actually deter women from smoking or deter those who want to stop from admitting it to their midwife or doctor. It's just a stupid idea tbh


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Redsky121 wrote: »
    Let's make it legal to kill people then :pac:

    Well I think it is worth chasing down the few murderers but not worth chasing pregnant women smokers. Resources have to be prioritized.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,683 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    And you have to wonder if the prospect of being charged with a crime would actually deter women from smoking or deter those who want to stop from admitting it to their midwife or doctor. It's just a stupid idea tbh


    If people actually want to stop smoking, that’s a different issue entirely from prohibiting people from smoking. The prospect of being criminalised for a behaviour certainly does act as a deterrent for people who would wish to engage in that behaviour. It shouldn’t be the case that we shouldn’t introduce laws because it might discourage people from admitting they want to violate those laws. Surely that’s entirely their own responsibility?

    People throwing their cigarette butts out of cars for instance, DCC are issuing them with fines as this article says like it’s going out of fashion :D (and it is is going out of fashion to throw cigarette butts out of their cars, likely because they know they’ll be fined if they’re caught) -


    Drivers must obey the litter of the law . . .


    EDIT: Updated quite a bit since 2006 :o


    Since 2009, Irish anti-smoking campaigners and scientists had been urging the government to introduce such a ban. In July 2011 the Minister for Health said that he was considering a ban where children are present in the car. On January 1st 2016, regulations make it an offence for a person to smoke in a private vehicle when there is more than one person present and there is a person under the age of 18 present. The offence would fall on the person smoking regardless of their age.

    The senator and oncologist John Crown put a bill before parliament in 2012 to ban smoking in a car with children. This bill was passed into law in December 2014 with an expectation that enforcement by Gardaí would commence in 2015.



    Ban on smoking in private vehicles


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,134 ✭✭✭Lux23


    I suppose because women are adults and are free to make their own decisions, but it is a disgusting thing to see.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Doesn't bother me one bit. An attractive women puffing on a cigarette is a beautiful thing to see. If she has a bun in the oven so be it. Little tyke can decide not to smoke as an adult if that's what floats his boat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭bingbong500


    What kind of investigation could there be? You walk into a cop shop and say you saw a woman who you think is pregnant was smoking. Then what? What would they DO?
    And if they did "investigate" and found that a pregnant woman did actually smoke, what then would be the punishment?


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭bingbong500


    knipex wrote: »
    So until the the moment of birth a baby is not a life or a person and has no legal rights?? Is there a specific moment, when it crowns ? When the head emerges ? When the full body emerges ? When the cord is cut ?

    I am no religious nut, I votes yes in the referendum but that's just nonsense..


    When it's fully born and detached, it's legally a person. It's not nonsense, its a fact of law.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,312 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    You would imagine they would want to give their kid the best start in life so it's a bit selfish not to ditch the fags for the 9 months until they push it out.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 147 ✭✭Lily_Aldrin7


    That’s a matter of personal choice- I believe most pregnant women smokers are aware of the risks. I believe doctors will help them to quit if they want to.
    That’s said, I’m a non- smoker but I hated it when someone would tell me “you shouldn’t eat/drink that” when I was pregnant. I’d walk with a cup of coffee at work and there would be 5 people telling me I can’t have coffee while I’m pregnant. Mind your own business


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Doesn't bother me one bit. An attractive women puffing on a cigarette is a beautiful thing to see. If she has a bun in the oven so be it. Little tyke can decide not to smoke as an adult if that's what floats his boat.

    So it's illegal to smoke with kids in the car but it's fine if the kid is in the womb where it can't even open a window?

    It's illegal to sell children Alcohol but it's fine to force them consume it in the womb.

    Am I missing something here?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,683 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    So it's illegal to smoke with kids in the car but it's fine if the kid is in the womb where it can't even open a window?

    It's illegal to sell children Alcohol but it's fine to force them consume it in the womb.

    Am I missing something here?


    Yes - context.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,268 ✭✭✭✭uck51js9zml2yt


    Yes - context.

    What context would you like?


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,683 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    What context would you like?


    I’m not asking for any context, I can see the context in which you’re making a comparison between two different circumstances already. You asked what you were missing in the two circumstances you presented, and I simply pointed out that what you’re missing is context if you can’t see that they are two different circumstances.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    So it's illegal to smoke with kids in the car but it's fine if the kid is in the womb where it can't even open a window?

    It's illegal to sell children Alcohol but it's fine to force them consume it in the womb.

    Am I missing something here?

    Yes. Legally there is only one person smoking or drinking, the pregnant woman.
    With the child in the car, there is another person involved.

    And whatever you may think of that, there are very good reasons for that distinction. As Nicaragua, El Salvador and even to some extent Ireland have thoroughly demonstrated to the rest of the world over the last few years.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,465 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    Because cigarettes make too much money for the gubbermint and the powerful people connected to it, so banning them outright or enforcing smoking bans, even on pregnant women, will be detrimental to their bank balances.

    Actually Ireland spends more money on smoking related health issues then cigarettes take in tax. So government isn't rolling in it by any means from them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Don’t mind about the cigs and booze

    It’s when the baby is born and the hospital have to ween it of coke or heroine that I would be more concerned about


  • Registered Users Posts: 113 ✭✭bingbong500


    So it's illegal to smoke with kids in the car but it's fine if the kid is in the womb where it can't even open a window?

    It's illegal to sell children Alcohol but it's fine to force them consume it in the womb.

    Am I missing something here?


    Yes you are missing the already explained fact: its not a person before its born. One woman can do as she likes to her own body.

    You don't have to like it, or approve. You just have to understand the irrelevance of your opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭Gimme A Pound


    4pm they're not a person, 9pm they're a person.

    The self delusion...

    Foetal alcohol syndrome, heroin addicted newborns - fuq em, they weren't people and the woman can do what she likes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    4pm they're not a person, 9pm they're a person.

    The self delusion...

    Foetal alcohol syndrome, heroin addicted newborns - fuq em, they weren't people and the woman can do what she likes.

    You are just wrong if you think pregnant women generally "do what they like" with no care for the health of their future baby. IME the vast majority do everything they can, in fact the problem is often that the information given is so contradictory and confusing that it's very hard to know what the right thing to do is.

    For the tiny minority who don't take care, it's hard to see how making a law would help. When it's because of psychological or other personal issues, criminalising her would only add to the problem by making it harder for a woman to seek help during her pregnancy.

    Separately, it's offensive in the extreme for the vast majority of women who are desperate to do everything they can to protect their baby if the default legal position is that all women need to be treated as potential criminals who do not have the best interests of their children at heart. That would also set a dangerous precedent for parental rights after birth.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭Gimme A Pound


    volchitsa wrote: »
    You are just wrong if you think pregnant women generally "do what they like" with no care for the health of their future baby.
    I of course don't think that. Just can't stand when people say "she can do what she likes, it's her body - there's no baby until it's born". It's absurd.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    I of course don't think that. Just can't stand when people say "she can do what she likes, it's her body - there's no baby until it's born". It's absurd.

    In the context of what women are allowed to do (ie this thread) it's the only correct answer.

    But literally nobody thinks that women should be encouraged to smoke, drink or take drugs during their pregnancy.

    The other thing is that Ireland has a shameful record of criminalising women over reproductive issues (including contraception), and a pretty poor record of caring for vulnerable children once they're born, so it's disingenuous to pretend that what's behind this authoritarianism is concern for children. It's about controlling women.

    Hence the rather blunt replies.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Just can't stand when people say "she can do what she likes, it's her body - there's no baby until it's born". It's absurd.
    Because that's the ideological position. We have no other choice except to allow pregnant women to do what they like. Any other position is fascism.

    The reality is that women on the whole, do the right thing with this choice. They bulk of their energy is focussed on ensuring optimal health and well-being so that they can have a healthy baby.

    You won't hear anyone saying, "We should celebrate and encourage women who act like they're not pregnant and do whatever they want!". Which is what you seem to be implying.

    It is possible to say, "You are free to choose what to do", and "here's the information you need to make an informed choice" without being contradictory.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    prior to 12 weeks the foetus has no right to live. Post 12 weeks it can only be killed under certain circumstances. But no where does it say it has a right to a healthy smoke free life. Once the foetus is born and becomes a baby, it has a right to proper care, you cant smoke in the car with it etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Stab*City


    Everybody seems to be able to do what they want with there own bodies. I still cant even smoke a joint in peace.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,019 ✭✭✭volchitsa


    Stab*City wrote: »
    Everybody seems to be able to do what they want with there own bodies. I still cant even smoke a joint in peace.

    Portugal shows that there are very good reasons for decriminalising drugs, so off you go and start a campaign, you have quite a good case.

    What you don't have though is any case for making abortion illegal just because drugs are. It's a totally different issue. Women don't ever have their first abortion because they think it sounds like fun, for one thing. Nor are abortions even potentially addictive.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,413 ✭✭✭Stab*City


    volchitsa wrote: »
    Portugal shows that there are very good reasons for decriminalising drugs, so off you go and start a campaign, you have quite a good case.

    What you don't have though is any case for making abortion illegal just because drugs are. It's a totally different issue. Women don't ever have their first abortion because they think it sounds like fun, for one thing. Nor are abortions even potentially addictive.

    I actually think there are campaigns out there already.


  • Registered Users Posts: 43 LittleMissLogic


    "Why are women allowed..."

    hush now child.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    hush now child.

    thats what they say to the babies screaming from withdrawals


Advertisement