Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

GRO Records

11113151617

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,151 ✭✭✭✭josip


    This project should be used as an example when teaching IT students in college.
    It doesn't matter how well you've delivered the first 95% of the work.
    If you fail to deliver the final 5% and treat the users with disdain, then your project will rightly be considered a failure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,537 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Scotland's private sector (robbery priced) site can switch in new records on NYD every year. Have handed them their pieces of silver to get some a few early Januaries. Anyone with basic database development experience could work out how to do it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Wasn't it said that just one person is involved in transcription on the site? I'd love to sit him/her down with a pot of tea and say 'look, can I help you iron some wrinkles out or at least type irrup for ya please?'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,537 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    We know they have the data for the years to be added, as it was there before - it should take minutes to re-add it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Then its just someone nervous about data protection.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    Wasn't it said that just one person is involved in transcription on the site?

    Is that one person not just in relation to the correction of errors?
    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    Then its just someone nervous about data protection.

    Wouldn't have thought there'd be a data protection issue as in the main we're talking about 19th century records for a jurisdiction that no longer exists.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    One person is working on the submitted census corrections - different project.

    There is one person managing this civil records project, as far as I know, but it's not his only job.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,151 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Excuse the French, but it's embedded in the pic.

    L3bgHXT.png


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    One person is working on the submitted census corrections - different project.
    Thtat's John Grenham - I wasn't thinking of him.
    There is one person managing this civil records project, as far as I know, but it's not his only job.

    But that one person surely isn't transcribing thousands of birth, marriage and death records? Wasn't that farmed out to India?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I don't actually know how many people, if any are working on transcriptions. Will see if I can find anything out through industry contacts.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 45 Cyrus T Buford


    Any updates on the "November or thereabouts " records being uploaded ?!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Any updates on the "November or thereabouts " records being uploaded ?!
    November - which year?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    November - which year?

    I thing he is on about the 1917/1918 births
    1942/1943 marriages
    1967/1968 deaths

    It was said at some point that they hoped to have them ready for November 2018.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,162 ✭✭✭Wyldwood


    Kanadams123, I think pedroeibar1 was speaking tongue-in-cheek as in.. they said November or thereabouts but didn't specify November of which year :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    Oh haha! I understand!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Claire Santry's latest post on the subject was not encouraging.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 Cyrus T Buford


    Ugh ! I dont understand why the "top up" years havnt been added .
    As someone here already said , as they were online before, they should be available at a click!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Well, feel free to email them and moan. The civil service will always do things in their own time.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Anything stirring? :confused:


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Nothing - not even a mouse.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭VirginiaB


    Ah, gee, you beat me to it Hermy.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Ah now!

    I might have to lock this thread to stop blood pressure rises.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    BowWow wrote: »
    GRO site down this morning.

    Down again for me.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    No problem for me.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 ursa actos


    Working for me


  • Registered Users Posts: 623 ✭✭✭QuiteInterestin


    Ahh, got excited there for a minute, thought they might be uploading the next batch of records, the wait continues.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    They're teasing us!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Not working for me right now.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    An update of sorts...

    From irishgenealogy.ie
    Update to the Civil Records

    Published: Friday, 11 January 2019 11:13

    We are pleased to advise that in early 2019, an additional 2 years of records of births, marriages and deaths will be added to the www.irishgenealogy.ie website. The marriage Index data along with additional images will also be updated for the years 1864-1869 inclusive.

    The years covered by the release of the historic records of Births, Marriages and Deaths after this update will be:

    Births: 1864 to 1918

    Marriages: 1864* to 1943

    Deaths: 1878* to 1968

    * The General Register Office will continue to work on updating further records of Marriages dating back to 1845 and Deaths dating back to 1864. These will be included in future updates to the records available on the website.

    The General Register Office is dealing with the feedback on the records – where records required correction this will be included in this updated release. Further details of this release will be confirmed early in 2019.

    So the promised delivery of all absent records by November has been well and truly kicked to touch. :(

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 591 ✭✭✭Garlinge


    Disappointed .... I am interested in 1869 death but I suppose I could get self to Werburgh Street and pay up!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭VirginiaB


    Some good news is better than no good news. But it's those early deaths that are so useful in taking us back into the 1700s, if the person was elderly when they died.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Pleased to hear this, even if it's not what was promised.

    Just yesterday I wanted to check a 1918 birth and it seems like I'll be able to do it soon.

    Semantics question: at which month does "early" end? I suspect April.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,708 ✭✭✭Waitsian


    Immature it may be, I know, but my only response is to roll my eyes and mutter 'whatever...'

    I'd rather they said nothing and announced when it was done. :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    mod9maple wrote: »
    I'd rather they said nothing and announced when it was done. :rolleyes:

    Exactly.

    If anything needed to be said it was an apology for the delay instead of presenting a retrograde step as a development.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭montgo


    Hi, I'm trying to locate the civil marriage record of Conway and Lyston (Liston) who were married in Kilteely/Dromkeen, Co. Limerick on 11 April, 1869 according to parish register? I'm looking for fathers' names. Thanks


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    That year's marriages aren't online yet. You can get it from the GRO.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,108 ✭✭✭pedroeibar1


    Hermy wrote: »
    Exactly.

    If anything needed to be said it was an apology for the delay instead of presenting a retrograde step as a development.


    Welcome to the world of ‘spin’.
    • 1. Minister announces a ‘great news’ project A, but fails to give deadline date or quantify the resources dedicated to it.
    • 2. Civil servants get stuck with the next flavour of the month project B, are told to run with it and they forget about/have insufficient resources for project A. (Got to keep the boss happy.)
    • 3. Electorate asks about project A, is generally ignored or fed a line of waffle. The original end-date was hazy anyway!
    • 4. Cognizant of possible fall-out, the Minister’s minders issue a press statement in which earlier promises/delays/mistakes/negatives are totally ignored and a ‘new’ (i.e. revised) statement is issued. It of course says much the same thing, watered down, but announced as new ‘good news’.
    • 5. A journalist is asked by an editor to cover a topic s/he knows little or nothing about (and has no interest in) so s/he copies/cuts/pastes the ministerial line out of laziness/lack of interest/a hangover.
    The Minister for Arts Heritage and the Gaeltacht has one role and one set of minders. The benefits of the GRO project accrue mainly to Tourism, which has a different minister & minders, about whom the former 'crew' cares not a fig. The fact that Tourism is an Independent makes it even less interesting and that it is Shane Ross is even worse.

    Ministers will only apologise when backed against a wall by a baying media/electorate. It takes several deaths for that (maybe) to happen; certainly a series of missed deadlines is not sufficient!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Sad but true Pedro.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,151 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Ministers will only apologise when backed against a wall by a baying media/electorate. It takes several deaths for that (maybe) to happen; certainly a series of missed deadlines is not sufficient!


    But where would you find more deaths than in the GRO records?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 717 ✭✭✭limericklad87


    We are pleased to advise that in early 2019, an additional 2 years of records of births, marriages and deaths will be added to the www.irishgenealogy.ie website. The marriage Index data along with additional images will also be updated for the years 1864-1869 inclusive. The years covered by the release of the historic records of Births, Marriages and Deaths after this update will be:

    Births: 1864 to 1918
    Marriages: 1864* to 1943
    Deaths: 1878* to 1968


    At least it's something


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Already mentioned in a thread on the matter some weeks back.

    One could reasonably argue that it's less than something as what they're promising is less than what was supposed to have been delivered two months previous to this announcement.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Also there's no date! It's a non-announcement.

    I'll merge the threads so everyone can have a collective heart attack.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    Also there's no date! It's a non-announcement.

    I'll merge the threads so everyone can have a collective heart attack.


    My heart actually skipped a beat for a second! :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    Happy April Fool's Day


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I might ban you for that!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Alright, I don't want to alarm people but I just found many 1869 marriages imaged online!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,151 ✭✭✭✭josip


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    Alright, I don't want to alarm people but I just found many 1869 marriages imaged online!

    Please elaborate on 'found' ?
    An 1869 marriage in Kilkenny/Wexford is still imageless for me.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I was doing a random wide-ranging search and there was an 1869 image, so I did a wider search for any marriage anywhere in 1869 and there were lots of images, but not all.
    I'd say they're testing.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
Advertisement