Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anti-vaxxers

199100102104105120

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,821 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose



    Is there anything special about this particular muppet? An Irish politician? As anti-vax droolage goes, this is pretty mild and common. Take a look at the Kerryman facebook page comments on the latest Covid outbreaks, if you want to be disappointed in your fellow Irish citizen.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Is there anything special about this particular muppet? An Irish politician? As anti-vax droolage goes, this is pretty mild and common. Take a look at the Kerryman facebook page comments on the latest Covid outbreaks, if you want to be disappointed in your fellow Irish citizen.
    Oops. Ian Brown was the singer with the Stone Roses and is now a solo artist


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,568 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Vaccines are fine. The ones that work and have no long term health consequences.

    However, what if anti vaxxers are correct, at least in part. How do we know that there are not potentially dangerous vaccines on the market and how would we know before taking them?

    We don't know 100%, but the science tells us that it's probably safe.

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    CramCycle wrote: »
    It's a bit head wrecking to be honest. They present them as if everyone who has a slight rash, numbness or a slight immune reaction as if they have developed a life changing illness. I wouldn't even call them an adverse reaction, they are what is expected to happen in many cases.
    I dunno quite what the threshold for what's counted as such. I've had rashes on my arm simply from donating blood, so at that level evidently you can get a 'reaction' regardless of any actual substances being injected.

    And having an immune reaction... well, that's sorta the whole point, isn't it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,224 ✭✭✭alaimacerc


    Igotadose wrote: »
    As anti-vax droolage goes, this is pretty mild and common.

    What I find especially disspiriting, though, is that it's not merely anti-vax (in advance of there even being one) it's anti-everything-public-health-measure, too. If we had vax-deniers who could manage to specialise in that, and simtaneously cover their faces, socially distance, get tested, and play ball with contact tracing, we'd have a fighting chance of them not being fast-breeder-reactor super-spreaders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    alaimacerc wrote: »
    What I find especially disspiriting, though, is that it's not merely anti-vax (in advance of there even being one) it's anti-everything-public-health-measure, too. If we had vax-deniers who could manage to specialise in that, and simtaneously cover their faces, socially distance, get tested, and play ball with contact tracing, we'd have a fighting chance of them not being fast-breeder-reactor super-spreaders.

    Dispiriting but not surprising. If you're prone to one type of toxic nonsense then it stands to reason that you'd accept the lizard people guff, the 5G twaddle or the anti-masker with little hesitation as well.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,821 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Interesting thread on why not to trust the rushed Covid vaccines being spouted about by the #IMPOTUS and his merry band. For the record, I am firmly in the anti-anti-vax camp. I have more use for genital herpes than anti-vaxxers and I am very pro-vaccine.

    However, I share this doctor's concerns that the #IMPOTUS is rushing a vaccine approval any way he can. He's abusing the EUA process and doing anything possible to get a vaccine announced before 3 Nov 2020 in order be reelected, Getting reelected to save himself from prolonged litigation and hopeful incarceration that will happen should the #IMPOTUS not be reelected.

    https://twitter.com/PeterHotez/status/1301275248248139778


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    Oops. Ian Brown was the singer with the Stone Roses and is now a solo artist

    Kind of ironic as this would help him to socially distance...


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭paul71



    That kind of reminds me of the Greenpeace stunt pulled back in the 80s. The "perfectly safe" sand from the beach at Sellafield was dumped in central London and London council workers dressed in radiation protection suits to clear it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭hcf500


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Interesting thread on why not to trust the rushed Covid vaccines being spouted about by the #IMPOTUS and his merry band. For the record, I am firmly in the anti-anti-vax camp. I have more use for genital herpes than anti-vaxxers and I am very pro-vaccine.

    However, I share this doctor's concerns that the #IMPOTUS is rushing a vaccine approval any way he can. He's abusing the EUA process and doing anything possible to get a vaccine announced before 3 Nov 2020 in order be reelected, Getting reelected to save himself from prolonged litigation and hopeful incarceration that will happen should the #IMPOTUS not be reelected.

    https://twitter.com/PeterHotez/status/1301275248248139778


    Fully agree. Good reason to avoid this vaccine. Drumph being able to rush the vaccine also shows that the regulatory bodies for pharmaceuticals are not to be trusted!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Igotadose wrote: »
    Interesting thread on why not to trust the rushed Covid vaccines being spouted about by the #IMPOTUS and his merry band. For the record, I am firmly in the anti-anti-vax camp. I have more use for genital herpes than anti-vaxxers and I am very pro-vaccine.

    However, I share this doctor's concerns that the #IMPOTUS is rushing a vaccine approval any way he can. He's abusing the EUA process and doing anything possible to get a vaccine announced before 3 Nov 2020 in order be reelected, Getting reelected to save himself from prolonged litigation and hopeful incarceration that will happen should the #IMPOTUS not be reelected.

    https://twitter.com/PeterHotez/status/1301275248248139778

    Bit of a scaremongery vibe off that to be honest. That's the US as well so a giant mountain of salt needed. Europeans tend to be significantly more stringent with safety testing.

    If we can't see the clinical trial data when the vaccine is out then there's cause to panic but I can't see that happening.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,821 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    An interesting read on what happens when a Covid-19 vaccine actually becomes available. The article is focused on 'who gets it when' and is a bit tongue-in-cheek, but I found these two early paragraphs enlightening:
    "

    The supply of a new COVID-19 vaccine is limited by many factors – regulatory review (yes, the FDA and other regulatory agencies must approve the manufacturing facilities for new drugs after the company receives approval to market their drugs), manufacturing bottlenecks, the number of doses required for “immunity,” and distributions problems, especially the need to store these vaccines at extremely low temperatures (no, your home refrigerator won’t get that cold).

    In fact, that last point is something that everyone overlooks – your average physician does not have the ultra-low temperature freezers, usually only hospitals and major health departments. And they aren’t cheap. Furthermore, vaccines just don’t show up at a physician’s office or hospital directly from Big Pharma – they are delivered by a massive distributor network that may not have delivery vehicles that can properly store the vaccines as they drive their trucks across the deserts of Arizona in October.

    This isn’t just an issue in the USA, it’s across the world. People magically believe that once a vaccine is approved it will suddenly be available to hundreds of millions of people. Nothing could be further from the truth."

    https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/coronavirus-vaccine-priority-list-if-i-were-elected-the-emperor-of-vaccines/


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭seligehgit


    Dispiriting but not surprising. If you're prone to one type of toxic nonsense then it stands to reason that you'd accept the lizard people guff, the 5G twaddle or the anti-masker with little hesitation as well.

    I definitely believe the cohort of such individuals is growing on a very worrying basis in Ireland.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    seligehgit wrote: »
    I definitely believe the cohort of such individuals is growing on a very worrying basis in Ireland.

    I'd say they're just getting more vocal and brazen rather than more numerous to be honest.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 148 ✭✭demello


    Igotadose wrote: »
    An interesting read on what happens when a Covid-19 vaccine actually becomes available. The article is focused on 'who gets it when' and is a bit tongue-in-cheek, but I found these two early paragraphs enlightening:
    "

    The supply of a new COVID-19 vaccine is limited by many factors – regulatory review (yes, the FDA and other regulatory agencies must approve the manufacturing facilities for new drugs after the company receives approval to market their drugs), manufacturing bottlenecks, the number of doses required for “immunity,” and distributions problems, especially the need to store these vaccines at extremely low temperatures (no, your home refrigerator won’t get that cold).

    In fact, that last point is something that everyone overlooks – your average physician does not have the ultra-low temperature freezers, usually only hospitals and major health departments. And they aren’t cheap. Furthermore, vaccines just don’t show up at a physician’s office or hospital directly from Big Pharma – they are delivered by a massive distributor network that may not have delivery vehicles that can properly store the vaccines as they drive their trucks across the deserts of Arizona in October.

    This isn’t just an issue in the USA, it’s across the world. People magically believe that once a vaccine is approved it will suddenly be available to hundreds of millions of people. Nothing could be further from the truth."

    https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/coronavirus-vaccine-priority-list-if-i-were-elected-the-emperor-of-vaccines/


    The very low temperatures are only needed for certain types of vaccines. Classical vaccines need only be stored at 4oC, and these will form most of the supply when they are approved. So it is misleading to say that very specilized storage will be needed for Coronavirus vaccines, this will be rarely be the case


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    demello wrote: »
    The very low temperatures are only needed for certain types of vaccines. Classical vaccines need only be stored at 4oC, and these will form most of the supply when they are approved. So it is misleading to say that very specilized storage will be needed for Coronavirus vaccines, this will be rarely be the case

    Even at 4C, it will be a mammoth operation, particularly for air freight. Refrigeration in aircraft is not so straight forward, and globally many thousands of aircraft are grounded, vastly reducing the lift capacity available.

    https://www.biopharma-reporter.com/Article/2020/09/11/Delivering-COVID-19-vaccines-the-mission-of-the-century-for-air-cargo-industry


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,167 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Many of the big pharma companies that are looking at vaccines can turn many of their local continent operations to this. An expensive job but as described, increases capacity, speed and reduces transport issues.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,473 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Even at 4C, it will be a mammoth operation, particularly for air freight. Refrigeration in aircraft is not so straight forward, and globally many thousands of aircraft are grounded, vastly reducing the lift capacity available.

    https://www.biopharma-reporter.com/Article/2020/09/11/Delivering-COVID-19-vaccines-the-mission-of-the-century-for-air-cargo-industry
    A third of the world's population live in India and China where vaccines are made. So a few days by road or rail gets you to a third of the worlds population. Other vaccine production areas are near major population centres too.


    How big is a single dose if you remove all the retail packaging ?

    1g each works out at 1Kg per 1,000 and a tonne per million doses.
    One cargo 747 could manage 100 tonnes.

    Refrigeration is easier if you use refrigerated containers.

    And there's still time to figure it out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭ProfessorPlum


    A third of the world's population live in India and China where vaccines are made. So a few days by road or rail gets you to a third of the worlds population. Other vaccine production areas are near major population centres too.


    How big is a single dose if you remove all the retail packaging ?

    1g each works out at 1Kg per 1,000 and a tonne per million doses.
    One cargo 747 could manage 100 tonnes.

    Refrigeration is easier if you use refrigerated containers.

    And there's still time to figure it out.


    The article I linked references IATA, and they probably know what they’re talking about!
    It’s a massive operation, and as IATA point out, we need to start planing for it now.

    You can’t just remove all the packaging - most of the weight of a vaccine is the vial, and you can’t just leave that out. You might get typically 5-10 doses per vial, depending on what the formulation ends up at. That doesn’t include any of the outer packing, which is mandatory for air transport.
    Not every aircraft can carry refrigerated ULDs. They also need regulatory approval for carriage.
    Other than refrigerated ULDs, you are relying on dry ice for refrigeration, and that is quantity (and time) limited on aircraft.
    I’ve no experience in road transport, but for example aircraft refrigerated UKDs are self contained battery operated, if similar are used for road/rail transport, will the refrigeration last for days? I don’t know, but it might not be as straight forward as loading it up and putting it on a train for a 10 day trip across for example continental Russia, or 5 days across China. In any case, the IATA estimation was based on 50% of the supply needing air carraige.

    You will not get anything even remotely approaching 100 tonnes of vaccine on a 747 - it will bulk out long before getting anywhere near that.

    There are huge supply chain issues involved here - there is also apparently a global shortage in the glass vials used for vaccines - those in the industry reckon it could take years to even make enough vials!

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-vaccine-glass-vial-shortage-could-delay-global-rollout-2020-5%3famp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭paul71




  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭hcf500


    Looks like the h1n1 narcolepsy cases will finally be settled. They will receive a long list of benefits as well as the compensation payout. The Irish taxpayer will have a big bill coming their way. I imagine it will cost at least 200 million, probably a lot more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,942 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    These people should have to wear something that identifies them to the public.
    In this day and age they are such a health risk.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭hcf500


    eagle eye wrote: »
    These people should have to wear something that identifies them to the public.
    In this day and age they are such a health risk.

    How are people with narcolepsy a health risk to others?


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭COVID


    hcf500 wrote: »
    How are people with narcolepsy a health risk to others?

    I'm sure your local, garrulous taxi driver will tell you...before he suddenly falls asleep! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,646 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    eagle eye wrote: »
    These people should have to wear something that identifies them to the public.
    In this day and age they are such a health risk.

    Maybe a big star sewn onto their clothes? :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭COVID


    Maybe a big star sewn onto their clothes? :rolleyes:

    ....or an alarm clock! :)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    hcf500 wrote: »
    So you think these children with narcolepsy should be branded? Will the next logical step see them end up naked in a trench with bullets in their heads?

    He said that he wants the pro-plaguers branded and I think he's being facetious.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭hcf500


    He said that he wants the pro-plaguers branded and I think he's being facetious.

    What makes you think they are pro plaguers? Only about one in five people in Ireland were vaccinated against H1N1. They certainly weren't pro plaguers then and I don't think there is any indication that they are pro plaguers now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    hcf500 wrote: »
    Looks like the h1n1 narcolepsy cases will finally be settled. They will receive a long list of benefits as well as the compensation payout. The Irish taxpayer will have a big bill coming their way. I imagine it will cost at least 200 million, probably a lot more.


    yup only had to fight for 10years for it
    10 years of pain and hassle.


    I'd rather my health and the lack of a 10year fight against the state myself


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    hcf500 wrote: »
    What makes you think they are pro plaguers? Only about one in five people in Ireland were vaccinated against H1N1. They certainly weren't pro plaguers then and I don't think there is any indication that they are pro plaguers now.

    I didn't say they were pro-plaguers.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 52,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭Necro


    Mod:

    Folks I understand this is a polarising issue but there is no need to make such tasteless comparisons like the one I deleted.

    I understand this is an emotive topic for some so no need to antagonise the opposing side.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    He said that he wants the pro-plaguers branded and I think he's being facetious.

    Pro Plaguers!!! :D

    You never disappoint with your utter drivel ...


  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Howard Beale


    I have met many people from all walks of life from doctors/counselors to unemployed all of whom are against a Covid19 vaccine but not one of them would I call anti vaccine as they are not.

    In fact they would be happy for people to take 10 if they want but what they are is pro choice.
    Bodily autonomy so they want choice over what is injected into their bodies permanently. Anyone of sound mind would want a choice surely? Being forced to be injected to take something is 1984 on steroids.

    People need to ask 3 questions on the covid19 vaccine.

    1. What EXACTLY is in it and what are these substances?
    2. What is the testing that has been done and what are the protocols for measuring these people?
    3. I should have a choice over these items being injected into me and if not why not?


    Whatever happened to my body my choice?

    Either way anti vaxxer is such a lazy intellectually ignorant and moronic term for those who simply want a say of what's put into their bodies. I'm sure if given a choice again people who took things like thalidomide would refuse it.


    Once this covid19 vaccine crap is in you there is no going back and me thinks the people making it aren't rushing to indemnify themselves against prosecution if nothing couldn't go wrong!.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Either way anti vaxxer is such a lazy intellectually ignorant and moronic term for those who simply want a say of what's put into their bodies.

    That's like saying that using the word "rain" to describe the phenomenon of water droplets falling from clouds is lazy and intellectually ignorant. It's an easy term to use because it's concise and accurate.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I have met many people from all walks of life from doctors/counselors to unemployed all of whom are against a Covid19 vaccine but not one of them would I call anti vaccine as they are not.
    I'd be curious to know why a doctor would hold such a view and what their view is on the flu vaccine.
    I guess, I don't really believe you though.
    People need to ask 3 questions on the covid19 vaccine.

    1. What EXACTLY is in it and what are these substances?
    2. What is the testing that has been done and what are the protocols for measuring these people?
    3. I should have a choice over these items being injected into me and if not why not?
    1. would the average person know or understand the response to this question?
    2. Again, what difference would this make to the average person and their understanding of how vaccines are developed and tested?
    3. You do - you are not being forced to take it. However, should you choose to refuse a vaccine against a virus that has caused a pandemic then expect the repurcussions including not being allowed mix with others in confined spaces e.g. airlines not allowing unvaccinated passengers, etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Howard Beale


    That's like saying that using the word "rain" to describe the phenomenon of water droplets falling from clouds is lazy and intellectually ignorant. It's an easy term to use because it's concise and accurate.

    Accept it isn't.

    'Anti vaxxers' aren't really 100% against ALL vaccines. Never met one like that actually.

    They overwhelmingly want a say in such matters and don't want to be forced or pushed into vaccines for them or their kids.

    Perfectly reasonable if you ask me not to want to be forced against your will to take something is it not?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,646 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    I have met many people from all walks of life from doctors/counselors to unemployed all of whom are against a Covid19 vaccine but not one of them would I call anti vaccine as they are not.

    In fact they would be happy for people to take 10 if they want but what they are is pro choice.
    Bodily autonomy so they want choice over what is injected into their bodies permanently. Anyone of sound mind would want a choice surely? Being forced to be injected to take something is 1984 on steroids.

    People need to ask 3 questions on the covid19 vaccine.

    1. What EXACTLY is in it and what are these substances?
    2. What is the testing that has been done and what are the protocols for measuring these people?
    3. I should have a choice over these items being injected into me and if not why not?


    Whatever happened to my body my choice?

    Either way anti vaxxer is such a lazy intellectually ignorant and moronic term for those who simply want a say of what's put into their bodies. I'm sure if given a choice again people who took things like thalidomide would refuse it.


    Once this covid19 vaccine crap is in you there is no going back and me thinks the people making it aren't rushing to indemnify themselves against prosecution if nothing couldn't go wrong!.

    1: I'm sure the answer to that will be readily available, would you know what they mean if they listed the ingredients?

    2: They have already put this out there including numbers of people in the test and how many were in the placebo groups. Do you want their names and addresses?

    3: Has anyone forced you to have a vaccine? Of course you have a choice.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Accept it isn't.

    'Anti vaxxers' aren't really 100% against ALL vaccines. Never met one like that actually.

    They overwhelmingly want a say in such matters and don't want to be forced or pushed into vaccines for them or their kids.

    Perfectly reasonable if you ask me not to want to be forced against your will to take something is it not?

    There are over 5,000 pages of this thread now and I've got a pretty good idea of what anti-vaxxers are for and against. Dressing it up dinsingenuously and unconvincingly as a freedom of choice issue while pushing disinformation shows what their intentions are IMO.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,190 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I have met many people from all walks of life from doctors/counselors to unemployed all of whom are against a Covid19 vaccine but not one of them would I call anti vaccine as they are not.

    I don't really believe you.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Accept it isn't.

    'Anti vaxxers' aren't really 100% against ALL vaccines. Never met one like that actually.

    They overwhelmingly want a say in such matters and don't want to be forced or pushed into vaccines for them or their kids.

    Perfectly reasonable if you ask me not to want to be forced against your will to take something is it not?
    They want a say in such matters? What kind of say and on what medical or scientific grounds will they provide such input?
    The issue is that you have malicious attention seekers spreading incorrect information and then when this is read on the likes of FB by morons it becomes interpreted as some kind of fact. It is dangerous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭storker


    COVID wrote: »


    I'm sure your local, garrulous taxi driver will tell you...before he suddenly falls asleep! :D

    "I want to die peacefully in my sleep like my grandad, and not screaming in terror like his passengers..."


  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Howard Beale


    They want a say in such matters? What kind of say and on what medical or scientific grounds will they provide such input?
    The issue is that you have malicious attention seekers spreading incorrect information and then when this is read on the likes of FB by morons it becomes interpreted as some kind of fact. It is dangerous.

    What drivel. Do you do logic or reason at all?

    People want a say over what goes into their bodies but somehow they need medical and scientific grounds for this???? Why??? It's their phucking body!

    Do you have no consideration for bodily autonomy or freedom at all? These just silly old fashioned words to you like codswallop or shillings?

    Attention seekers? Pretty sure anyone who goes against the grain gets very little attention but the likes of Luke O Neill who tells you to bring your own dishes to Christmas and to live as a hermit til you are vaccinated gets on RTE/Newstalk/thejournal/Independent on a weekly basis. Surely anyone seeking attention be all FOR the vaccines they never be off RTE!

    People can believe as they please.

    Calling them morons shows your unbelievable narcissism and unwillingness to accept alternative opinion.

    Also I have said nothing against vaccines, other than heaven forbid people may not want them of which they are entitled to say no to any crap in a syringe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 318 ✭✭Howard Beale


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I don't really believe you.

    You don't have to.

    You assume ALL doctors on planet Earth are for a covid19 vaccine?
    I don't believe you on that.

    Here's some VERY high profile doctors completely against covid vaccines.

    Dr Heiko Schöning
    Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
    Dr Anne McCloskey
    Dr Phil Hammond
    Dr Rashid Buttar etc etc


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Personally I couldn't care less if they choose not to take a vaccine. They're welcome to take on natural selection without any assistance from science.
    However, in doing so, they are making a potentially dangerous choice for their kids based on ignorance or paranoia.
    They are also making a choice that could impact on vulnerable who are medically unable to take a vaccine.

    Ultimately, in my view, they are selfish morons.
    I haven't accused you of being part of that group but you seem to be going out of your way to defend their actions..


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,964 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    I don't really believe you.

    Do doctors of theology count?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You don't have to.

    You assume ALL doctors on planet Earth are for a covid19 vaccine?
    I don't believe you on that.

    Here's some VERY high profile doctors completely against covid vaccines.

    Dr Heiko Schöning
    Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
    Dr Anne McCloskey
    Dr Phil Hammond
    Dr Rashid Buttar etc etc
    Of those I only am familiar with one: Anne McCloskey is also against the use of face masks.
    I can only assume that despite being a GP, her personal beliefs do not include the use of scientific knowledge. :rolleyes:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement