Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

24567141

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    MoeJay wrote: »
    When did he say that?
    Mr Walsh confirmed that Aer Lingus’ staff numbers are likely to be 20% smaller by next year.

    He stopped short of confirming that 900 job cuts are being sought at Aer Lingus, as was reported last week. That figure, however, is 20% of its total 4,500 workforce.

    I'm sure, he'd be able to tell you he is consulting with elected representitives.

    https://www.breakingnews.ie/business/willie-walsh-no-prospect-for-and-no-need-of-aer-lingus-re-nationalisation-998263.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,499 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    Random post so as to subscribe to the new thread;

    Aer-Lingus-747-Steve-Williams-1103x640.jpg

    Flying the (Ivory Coast) flag :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    fullstop wrote: »
    Flying the (Ivory Coast) flag :D

    Or following the internationally recognised protocol for displaying national flags on the side of aircraft, it's not a regulation here and operators can do whatever they want but this is the common protocol.
    In the states it's a federal regulation.

    https://thepointsguy.com/news/planes-display-american-flag-backwards/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    To avoid copyright breach, here is the original photo with credit:
    https://www.airliners.net/photo/Aer-Lingus-Irish-International-Airlines/Boeing-747-148/251985/L


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,469 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    EchoIndia wrote: »
    To avoid copyright breach, here is the original photo with credit:
    https://www.airliners.net/photo/Aer-Lingus-Irish-International-Airlines/Boeing-747-148/251985/L

    A truly majestic photograph. Thanks for uploading it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,817 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    EchoIndia wrote: »
    To avoid copyright breach, here is the original photo with credit:
    https://www.airliners.net/photo/Aer-Lingus-Irish-International-Airlines/Boeing-747-148/251985/L

    An excellent photograph. The EI 747s looked very elegant in that delivery scheme. I always thought the later green-top livery didn't do them justice.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭Kcormahs




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    Kcormahs wrote: »

    I'm guessing this would only be an option if Aer Lingus went asking for state support. It wouldn't go down well with IAG, after all, the Spanish government has already agreed a loan for Iberia without even considering taking a stake in the airline.

    Would be short sighted and more trouble than it's worth for the government in my opinion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 142 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    Hearing speculation that EI has secured a PPE contract to South Korea.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    Hearing speculation that EI has secured a PPE contract to South Korea.

    The HSE has indeed sourced PPE from there so perhaps EI has won the delivery contract.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭Qprmeath


    sherology wrote: »
    The HSE has indeed sourced PPE from there so perhaps EI has won the delivery contract.

    Peking PPE flights running until June 21st.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    sherology wrote: »
    The HSE has indeed sourced PPE from there so perhaps EI has won the delivery contract.

    At least they can stopover there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 21 Elaine762


    Kcormahs wrote: »

    It doesn't mean nationalising though


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    joeysoap wrote: »
    At least they can stopover there.

    I'm guessing a similar operation would be preferable to EI. Flight time isn't too dissimilar to PEK. (very roughly looks to be about 1000km beyond Beijing)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Tenger wrote: »
    I'm guessing a similar operation would be preferable to EI. Flight time isn't too dissimilar to PEK. (very roughly looks to be about 1000km beyond Beijing)

    360nm-666km


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,918 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I'm guessing this would only be an option if Aer Lingus went asking for state support. It wouldn't go down well with IAG, after all, the Spanish government has already agreed a loan for Iberia without even considering taking a stake in the airline.

    Would be short sighted and more trouble than it's worth for the government in my opinion.

    Yes, I agree on that. But as a last resort...

    And you can bet the EU will have something to say.

    But if it's good enough for France they should be told to take a hike. The French have smashed every EU rule on state support across a range of industries in recent weeks.

    I don't think it will be needed though, hopefully.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭Kcormahs


    Yes, I agree on that. But as a last resort...

    And you can bet the EU will have something to say.

    But if it's good enough for France they should be told to take a hike. The French have smashed every EU rule on state support across a range of industries in recent weeks.

    I don't think it will be needed though, hopefully.


    Hopefully to save jobs as hundreds to be made redundant


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    EI-EIN on its first revenue flight today, operating EI123 to Chicago. Presumably giving 'EIM a rest which has been alternating between ORD and JFK since its arrival into the fleet.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    360nm-666km

    Pro Tip;
    Don't use nail of little finger as a measure of scale while using Google maps on the bus to work!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭john boye


    I saw a pic somewhere of the ex Qatar A332 with its Irish reg (EI-EIK) applied, does that suggest EI are taking it or does it mean nothing?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,252 ✭✭✭joeysoap




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    EI-LRD parked at Dublin sans a sharklet.
    49902565532_90b6565099_b.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    EchoIndia wrote: »
    EI-LRD parked at Dublin sans a sharklet.
    49902565532_90b6565099_b.jpg

    Any reason as to why they have been removed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,070 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    Only one has - some vibration issues, apparently.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    john boye wrote: »
    I saw a pic somewhere of the ex Qatar A332 with its Irish reg (EI-EIK) applied, does that suggest EI are taking it or does it mean nothing?

    I saw it parked in mid-March with A7-AEH still applied.


    Saw this posted elsewhere, I checked and its on the EI website now;
    https://www.aerlingus.com/support/flight-disruption-information/?rrid=4364421&rmid=20200515_Face_Covering_Notification_Pre&utm_source=general_offers&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20200515_Face_Covering_Notification_Pre&utm_term=all&mi_ecmp=20200515_Face_Covering_Notification_Pre

    Face coverings required on board
    Maintaining a safe and healthy environment for our customers and our staff is our number one priority.

    From Monday 18 May all customers flying with us will be requested to use a mask or suitable face covering from the point of boarding the aircraft until they are inside the destination airport. This will be a mandatory requirement from Thursday 21st May. This is a temporary measure to enable us collectively play our part in keeping everyone safe on board.

    We recommend that customers bring sufficient face coverings for the duration of their journey. Face coverings can be reusable cloth masks or disposable masks. Wearing of face coverings is mandatory while boarding and for the duration of the flight. Customers who are unable to keep a face covering in place, including children, are exempt from the mandatory application of the policy.

    We recommend that customers consider wearing a face covering from the time of entry into the departure airport.
    Our cabin crew will also be wearing suitable face coverings during flight.

    The wearing of a face covering will be mandatory until August 31, 2020.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Peking shuttle, there's 6 330's in the air at the moment, 4 inbound, 2 outbound. Mind boggling to think how much PPE is being used at the moment, as there are other carriers also bringing items in from China and other places.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    EI past the 100 round trip marker over the weekend.

    1300+ tons so far moved


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,270 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    EI past the 100 round trip marker over the weekend.

    1300+ tons so far moved
    13,000 kgs per FLIGHT? This is insane, how can this be considered cost effective?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 691 ✭✭✭hurikane


    smurfjed wrote: »
    13,000 kgs per FLIGHT? This is insane, how can this be considered cost effective?

    Is the PPE bulky rather than heavy? Are there any freighters available?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    smurfjed wrote: »
    13,000 kgs per FLIGHT? This is insane, how can this be considered cost effective?

    It remains to be seen what the cost will be.

    IAG have the taxpayer bent over the barrel.

    You can be sure they are being paid handsomely.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    A330-300 passenger could lift 45 tons if you could fit it in the hold, the limiting factor is volume not weight. A330-300 has a pretty decent underfloor cargo capacity compared to other jets.

    EI has a fleet and crew available to go when needed and can scale up and down the operation more or less same day. The rumor was 250-300k per trip. The lease on a new A330 is close to a million a month...

    There just isn't a large number of cargo hulls out there. All the major carriers are running freight ops with passenger aircraft. Since it looks like -LAX will never fly again with passengers, rip out the seats and come up with a solution to pack in light cargo?

    The next gig, the HSE has ordered face masks from South Korea? Will EI be sent to ICN to collect, its only 500km further than PEK


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,181 ✭✭✭PukkaStukka


    Negative_G wrote: »
    It remains to be seen what the cost will be.

    IAG have the taxpayer bent over the barrel.

    You can be sure they are being paid handsomely.

    I think you'll find COVID19 has the whole feckin world over a barrel. IAG are doing the flights at cost.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    Yes, it's bulk rather than weight, they are packing boxes into the cabin on the seats as well to maximise the quantity being shipped on each flight.

    I just wish Simon Harris would introduce massive fines for the morons that are dumping used masks and gloves all over the place, it's not hard to take it home and dispose of it properly.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    I think you'll find COVID19 has the whole feckin world over a barrel. IAG are doing the flights at cost.

    Has this been published anywhere officially?

    I know Harris was asked at a press briefing or in the Dail some weeks ago but was unable to answer.

    Companies are in the business of making money. I'd be very skeptical of any claims to be doing this operation at cost.

    It's a big PR win for IAG anyway regardless even if the initial media fawning was a little OTT.


  • Registered Users Posts: 404 ✭✭NH2013


    Negative_G wrote: »
    It remains to be seen what the cost will be.

    IAG have the taxpayer bent over the barrel.

    You can be sure they are being paid handsomely.

    You’ll probably also find COVID-19 has IAG bent over the barrel, may as well use money to keep an Irish company going rather than pay a foreign airline to do the work and then end up spending the money anyways to bail out Aer Lingus 6 months down the road. This way the money is actually put to good use and keeps the jobs and taxes in the country.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,931 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    smurfjed wrote: »
    13,000 kgs per FLIGHT? This is insane, how can this be considered cost effective?

    Im pretty sure that EI are making some revenue on this, even if it is less than there would on "normal" flights. They arent a charity, even with the kudos they have received. Those pilots and engineers need to be paid and fuel covered.

    But the supplies being brought in are bulky rather than heavy. (Imagine a cardboard box with 1000 masks) From looking at the couple of videos about the operation you can see the staff throwing boxes around with very little discernable effort.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,270 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    This is one of the problems of using statistics, if they said xxx,xxx masks etc per flight it mightn’t sound so bad :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,357 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    NH2013 wrote: »
    You’ll probably also find COVID-19 has IAG bent over the barrel, may as well use money to keep an Irish company going rather than pay a foreign airline to do the work and then end up spending the money anyways to bail out Aer Lingus 6 months down the road. This way the money is actually put to good use and keeps the jobs and taxes in the country.

    I don't wish to get into semantics but just in the interest of clarity, Aer Lingus is no longer an "irish company" and is fully owned by IAG.

    As for any potential bailout, that's for IAG to be concerned about. Not sure how legal or practical it would be to provide state aid to a specific part of a privately owned commercial business but who knows. These are not ordinary times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Negative_G wrote: »
    I don't wish to get into semantics but just in the interest of clarity, Aer Lingus is no longer an "irish company" and is fully owned by IAG.

    As for any potential bailout, that's for IAG to be concerned about. Not sure how legal or practical it would be to provide state aid to a specific part of a privately owned commercial business but who knows. These are not ordinary times.

    Well for someone trying to be clear, you’re not doing a good job.

    Last time I checked, it may be owned by IAG, but Aer Lingus is still an Irish registered company with its management based in Dublin.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,191 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    LXFlyer wrote: »
    Well for someone trying to be clear, you’re not doing a good job.

    Last time I checked, it may be owned by IAG, but Aer Lingus is still an Irish registered company with its management based in Dublin.

    The arm of the company I work for is registered in Dublin too and the management is based in Ireland but is 100% an American company. Companies are registered in Ireland for tax reasons.
    EI is 100% owned by a foreign company, so is no longer an Irish company.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,642 Mod ✭✭✭✭Graham


    EI is 100% owned by a foreign company, so is no longer an Irish company.

    Aer Lingus Limited and Aer Lingus Group Designated Activity Company both registered in Ireland.

    Ownership doesn't change that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,924 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The arm of the company I work for is registered in Dublin too and the management is based in Ireland but is 100% an American company. Companies are registered in Ireland for tax reasons.
    EI is 100% owned by a foreign company, so is no longer an Irish company.

    I’m not going to dwell on this beyond this post, but it is still legally an Irish company.

    IAG may control the overall strategic direction, but local management still have a large amount of discretion in how the company is run.


  • Registered Users Posts: 404 ✭✭NH2013


    Negative_G wrote: »
    I don't wish to get into semantics but just in the interest of clarity, Aer Lingus is no longer an "irish company" and is fully owned by IAG.

    As for any potential bailout, that's for IAG to be concerned about. Not sure how legal or practical it would be to provide state aid to a specific part of a privately owned commercial business but who knows. These are not ordinary times.

    Well, yes owned by IAG which is a European (Spanish) company with shareholders all over Europe and the world; Ireland , the UK, Spain, Qatar, Germany, Norway, America, Switzerland, Bermuda etc, (https://www.msn.com/en-ie/money/stockdetails/ownership/fi-amfx3m?ownershipType=institutional) but the company itself is run from Dublin, it pays it's corperation taxes in Ireland, it's employees all pay tax in Ireland, it sources all of its food for inflight catering from Ieland, it's registered with the IAA in Ireland, it brings people to and from Ireland, it's head office is in Ireland etc, it's an Irish company as much as many others.

    It's of strategic importance to the nation as part of our national infastucture, even if no longer owned by the State, the same as many of our toll roads aren't owned by the State, but still form an important part of our infastructure.

    When it comes down to it, it's important to the State and I can't see it being let go bankrupt, so with that in mind my point was more along the lines of if we're going to have to spend money on it to keep it afloat, we may as well get value back in the form of it being used to transport PPE here, rather than having to hire in a foreign company such as a Chinese airline to fly the PPE here for 5-10% less say, we'll still end up paying for it in the end so may as well kill two birds with one stone and get better value for the taxes we're going to have to spend on this issue either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The arm of the company I work for is registered in Dublin too and the management is based in Ireland but is 100% an American company. Companies are registered in Ireland for tax reasons.
    EI is 100% owned by a foreign company, so is no longer an Irish company.

    99.99...% actually the state retains a single share. (And that could be helpful if things go wrong in coming months)
    The Minister for Finance will retain a share in the company,
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/transport-and-tourism/cabinet-agrees-to-sell-state-s-25-stake-in-aer-lingus-1.2226921

    Doesn't matter who owns you, its where you are registered and Aer Lingus DAC is an Irish company registered with the CRO in Dublin (its one of the oldest on the register). Its principal shareholder is Spanish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    I see we have the weekly ''not an Irish company'' mantra back again.:D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    https://flyinginireland.com/2020/05/repatriation-flights-continue-as-restrictions-begin-to-lift/

    Just in case anyone thinks strokes are being pulled for EI in the PEK PPE transport flights, Finnair won the contract for the CAN flights, and Delta won the big one for ICN (120 million masks plus other PPE). These are put out for tender as per EU legislation, nobody is getting a free ride with tax payers €. EI got the PEK contract fair and square.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,397 ✭✭✭CBear1993


    Are AL’s June flights actually going to run are what I’d like to know? Considering Ryanair aren’t going again until 1st July.

    Hard to imagine how they’ll get a different rule. Have seen already ****ty customer behaviour where Aer lingus have cancelled flights without telling customers with very little notice


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,270 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    I would love sometimes if someone in Government just said “screw it”, we are giving this contract to an Irish company regardless, because as NH2013 said above, we are going to pay for it anyway.

    Hearing that DELTA won it, is rather surprising. What happened to BUY IRISH:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    smurfjed wrote: »
    I would love sometimes if someone in Government just said “screw it”, we are giving this contract to an Irish company regardless, because as NH2013 said above, we are going to pay for it anyway.

    Hearing that DELTA won it, is rather surprising. What happened to BUY IRISH:)

    Buy Irish is illegal under EU rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 708 ✭✭✭A320


    Bloody yanks and Finns stealing our jobs,will they have the delta and Finnair crew on the late late show????


  • Advertisement
Advertisement