Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

News and views on Greystones harbour and marina [SEE MODERATOR WARNING POST 1187]

Options
12467106

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    2FB825AE053F413DB13B112C414227ED-800.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    B64AB7A7479A48E291AFD285F223999E-800.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    C4DFA49DEFCC45C895794857C7DA8931-800.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 452 ✭✭Welsh Wizard


    Wow... some zoom on your lens..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Blanchflower


    pixbyjohn wrote: »
    Fiachra2,
    I don't have complete documentary evidence of coastal erosion and would find it very tedious to compose a timelapse video to cover a hundred years.
    John

    Pixbyjohn, I came across an interesting analysis by Professor Andrew Cooper of the impact of the new breakwaters given during the oral hearing on the harbour development which may be of some interest to you

    http://greystonesmarina.blogspot.com/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    Blanchflower,
    Thank you for that, an interesting side to the argument against the harbour development.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Blanchflower


    pixbyjohn wrote: »
    Blanchflower,
    Thank you for that, an interesting side to the argument against the harbour development.

    Increased coastal erosion outside the new breakwaters is a very serious impact of the development.

    It is in all our interests to ensure that the developer, concillors and Wicklow County Council are held accountable to ensure they fulfill the commitment they made to the people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    D3C4EBCCDF904E8893A62C766D886D49-800.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    2885A15B51EA40AEA59EAB606A775798-800.jpg


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,692 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    pixbyjohn wrote: »
    C6DBF804569F437DB1A0F58EFC8478A1-800.jpg

    When was this photo taken?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    Dyflin wrote: »
    When was this photo taken?

    Date and Time (Original) 2010:04:16 17:38:35


  • Registered Users Posts: 76 ✭✭Tinker13


    it would be nice if we could at least get the hoardings taken down asap.


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭Huntthe


    Ciaran Hayden said.
    Full steam ahead at Greystones Habour. New plan unveiled today which will see HSE take a large block for a Primary Care Centre, this will help finance club facilities and see a substantial part of the project being completed by end 2011. Happy Days


  • Registered Users Posts: 328 ✭✭Langerland


    Key changes to Greystones plan

    Amendments to the Greystones harbour redevelopment plan would include the development of a primary care medical centre (left) and additional car parking and public gardens next to the civic square. Also envisaged are 34 additional new homes and an additional 800sq m of commercial space.

    BUILDERS OF the €300 million redevelopment scheme under way at Greystones harbour in Co Wicklow are to seek increases in the residential and commercial elements of the project.

    Sispar, a consortium involving John Sisk and Company and house builders Park Developments, in partnership with Wicklow County Council, is proposing to increase the number of new homes in the scheme from 341 to 375.

    It also proposes to increase the commercial area to 6,425sq m – an addition of about 800sq m. Car parking at the €300 million redevelopment project is to be increased from 953 spaces to 1002.

    Because of the involvement of Wicklow County Council the application is be decided by Wicklow county councillors under Part VIII of the Planning and Development Act, which does not provide for an appeal against the local authority’s decision.

    Sispar had initially sought planning permission for 375 homes, the maximum allowed under the County Development Plan. But this was reduced by An Bord Pleanála to 341 in a move designed to reduce the bulk of the new homes at the front of the project and create a larger civic square.

    Sispar said the use of Part VIII of the Planning and Development Act was not a move to undermine the planning board’s decision. Spokesman Paraic Keogh said the board’s decision had been designed to create a civic square and this would be retained in the project. The additional apartments would be located to the rear of the development, on part of a site reserved for a 16-acre park. The move would utilise about three acres of the park.

    The commercial changes proposed include the redesignation of most of a block of apartments known as “block D” fronting on to the civic square, for commercial purposes.

    This increased commercial space would then be used for a primary care, medical centre. Mr Keogh said a deal had already been agreed with healthcare company Meret, which had an agreement with the HSE.

    Wicklow County Council director of services Seán Quirke said the application would be the subject of four weeks of public consultation, followed by two weeks for objections.

    The decision would ultimately be made by a vote of elected councillors and there was no provision in Part VIII of the Planning Act to appeal the decision either to the council or to the planning board.

    The application to reconfigure block D is to be made next week, followed in July by the application to change the number of new homes. Work on the existing harbour walls is due to be completed by this October.

    Should planning permission be granted, work will then get under way on the development of the reconfigured block D, car parking and the civic square.

    Work would also continue on the provision of facilities for local clubs.

    By the end of 2011 hoardings opposite the Beach House pub and Bayswater Terrace would come down and the public would have access to the square and the waterfront.

    No date for the start or completion of the housing elements of the plan was given.

    According to Mr Keogh the application to vary the development represented a firm commitment to complete the project. “Sispar are prepared to finish with this subject to achieving the necessary amendments,” the company said.

    The alternative is that the harbour walls would be completed with an unfinished public square and routes through the site to the sea for boat users, the developers said.


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭Huntthe


    Thanks for that, pretty typical of a politician to take the bits that suit him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 741 ✭✭✭MyPerfectCousin


    Huntthe wrote: »
    Thanks for that, pretty typical of a politician to take the bits that suit him.

    ???

    If you mean Ciaran Hayden, he's not a politician. He's head of the local chamber of commerce.


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭Huntthe


    ???

    If you mean Ciaran Hayden, he's not a politician. He's head of the local chamber of commerce.

    Wannabe


  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fiachra2


    ???

    If you mean Ciaran Hayden, he's not a politician. He's head of the local chamber of commerce.

    Ciatran is not president of the chamber of commerce. That is Mark Felton (if his term of office is not over) and he, Ciaran, is a Fianna Fail member of Greystones town Council.


  • Registered Users Posts: 741 ✭✭✭MyPerfectCousin


    Fiachra2 wrote: »
    Ciatran is not president of the chamber of commerce. That is Mark Felton (if his term of office is not over) and he, Ciaran, is a Fianna Fail member of Greystones town Council.

    I stand corrected (twice over) :o


  • Registered Users Posts: 12 greygardens


    Hi interesting article in todays Irish Times, page two - had trouble with link.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 65 ✭✭micandre




  • Registered Users Posts: 970 ✭✭✭dr ro


    reading that article it seams that sispar's exit strategy is to reapply for something they've either already been refused or something they've no chance of getting so they can settle on the cheapest option of doing nothing and cutting their losses. I hope i'm wrong. Sounds like it's going to be a shambles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 117 ✭✭nobby grande


    According to Mr Keogh the application to vary the development represented a firm commitment to complete the project. “Sispar are prepared to finish with this; subject to achieving the necessary amendments,” the company said.
    The alternative is that the harbour walls would be completed with an unfinished public square and routes through the site to the sea for boat users, the developers said.


    What a joke. Sispar will finish the job providing the council lets them change the original plans. Should the developer not be allowed to move the goal posts they will start packing up and get their coats.

    No sympathy for sispar, but i think it is shameful that Greystones has been railroaded into having these plans put into place after having had a vote and a petition stating the community did not want it to go ahead. Now we have a mess made by the developers and the people that live in the town have to look at that eyesore and go through at least another two summers without harbour access.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Blanchflower


    Is this a case of "Call my Bluff" .

    The dogs on the street realise that the property bubble is well and truely burst and that the expected prices on which this bubble era project was based have fallen by 50% and are still in feeefall. Throughout Ireland there are ghost estates of empty houses and apartments which are now to be demolished by NAMA.

    Sispar are now looking for an excuse to break their contract with Wicklow County Council by proposing a variation to the plan which was already rejected by An Bord Pleanala.

    To finish this development the number of structures should be drastically reduced and not increased.


  • Registered Users Posts: 328 ✭✭Langerland


    According to Mr Keogh the application to vary the development represented a firm commitment to complete the project. “Sispar are prepared to finish with this; subject to achieving the necessary amendments,” the company said.
    The alternative is that the harbour walls would be completed with an unfinished public square and routes through the site to the sea for boat users, the developers said.


    What a joke. Sispar will finish the job providing the council lets them change the original plans. Should the developer not be allowed to move the goal posts they will start packing up and get their coats.

    No sympathy for sispar, but i think it is shameful that Greystones has been railroaded into having these plans put into place after having had a vote and a petition stating the community did not want it to go ahead. Now we have a mess made by the developers and the people that live in the town have to look at that eyesore and go through at least another two summers without harbour access.

    Indeed. My jaw dropped to the floor yesterday when I read this. I cannot believe our local councillors signed over the jewel in the Greystones crown with such a flakey contract. This surely cannot be true to say Sispar can withdraw and stop works without even a completed square if they don't get their way? Surely some legal action can be taken against them if this happened? Or is that too common sense? Who will be voting these councillors back in???:(


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    Next Local elections in 4 years


  • Registered Users Posts: 328 ✭✭Langerland


    pixbyjohn wrote: »
    Next Local elections in 4 years

    And chances are, the harbour will still be a building site even then....

    They all seem to be very, very sheepish on this issue......apart from Tom Fortune.....I've seen a few paragraphs in the Council report of the People every now and then where some councillors voice some mild concerns regarding the issue, but apart from that? Nothing. The silence is deafening considering the big WhoHaa they were all making when so many locals were objecting to the project....I remember Councillor jones even coming on here regularly to preach about the greatness of the project and how it would improve the town......

    It's ohhh so quiet now.....kind of like the harbour for the foreseeable future.


  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭Huntthe


    Is this a case of "Call my Bluff" .

    The dogs on the street realise that the property bubble is well and truely burst and that the expected prices on which this bubble era project was based have fallen by 50% and are still in feeefall. Throughout Ireland there are ghost estates of empty houses and apartments which are now to be demolished by NAMA.

    Sispar are now looking for an excuse to break their contract with Wicklow County Council by proposing a variation to the plan which was already rejected by An Bord Pleanala.

    To finish this development the number of structures should be drastically reduced and not increased.

    I think your right it is. Call their bluff and tell them to go ahead and see what happens. They won't do it because it doesn't make commercial sense to do bui;d more properties that no one will buy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fiachra2


    Is this a case of "Call my Bluff" .

    .

    I think its less a case of "call my bluff" as "chance my arm"

    When the current project was unveiled in 2005, Sean Quirke, the council official responsible for the project, when asked could it not be smaller than the proposed 375 dwellings stated categorically that if even one apartment were removed the project would not be viable.
    In 2007 when an Bord Pleanala reduced it to 340 the same Mr. Quirke was reminded of his earlier comment but stated that the project had been planned at 2004 prices and so it was viable at 340 given the uplift in house prices.
    He was recently quoted in the times re-iterating this claim in the context of the sugestion that the project might no longer be viable in the light of falling house prices. It will be interesting to see how he now defends the need to go back up to 375!

    What is really staggering is the fact that the decision of An Bord Pleanala can be overturned by the Council themselves!
    After two lengthy oral hearings and all the work that went into the submisions made by the community. The project was permitted but on a reduced scale in order -to quote the Bord- "to reduce the quantum of the development". Now the council can-without recourse to anyone- reverse that decision. Many will ask why did we bother going to An Bord Pleanala in the first place?

    What is equally amazing is the veiled threat quoted in the last paragraph of the IT article where the developers said basically "if you dont give us this we will leave you with a building site forever and a day"

    An the response of Councillors- other than Tom Fortune- is basically "arent we lucky that they are being so nice to us"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 480 ✭✭Huntthe


    Shortly after it's finished we'll have a lovely road running from the top of windgates across the green belt to the new developement as there is no way the current road network can cope with that volume of increased traffic. There will be no alternative....and who will pay for it !


Advertisement