Harry and Meghan - OP updated with Threadbanned Users 4/5/21

Seriously, you think that it is a negative that this guy Dan Evans is prepared to be a witness in a court of law for Harry (and many others who were hacked by The Sun and other tabloids)?

Do you think that Harry is paying him to do that or something because if he is, both Harry and his lawyers would be in very serious trouble with the Courts.

Even Piers Morgan and Dan Wootton know to keep themselves out of court and hide behind their newspapers lawyers because they will have to tell the truth, unlike what they do in the newspaper articles.

Omid Scobie testified as to what he saw Piers Morgan up to in a court of law. That takes guts as a journalist because it might make it very difficult for him to get work for having testified against a newspaper employer.

Family Guy etc. is irrelevant and the rest of what you say.

Do you not find it interesting that Harry wrote to Charles offering to give up all his titles (published by Dan Wootton) - hardly the actions of a 'big shot' action clinging onto his position as a member of the Royal Family.

And just to be clear, there were credible death threats against Harry and Archie from white supremists (according to the Met Police), some of whom has since been put in prison.

Convicted phone hacker who served time in prison and who thinks its wrong that the people behind the phone hacking and other dubious methods of obtaining information like Piers Morgan and Dan Wootoon got off scot free? If he has the evidence, he has the evidence. The judge will decide, but bearing in mind that the newspapers main defence is that it happened over six years ago, seems to me to be an admission of guilt.

Do you think they were guilty of phone hacking and obtaining information illegally? A yes or no answer will suffice.

Harry has proof that his Aide (Christian Jones) was leaking private information to Dan Wootton through Jones' partner who received payment from Wootton of £3,000. We know about the payment because a Sun staff member who worked in the Sun's accounts blew the whistle on him. You cant pay public officials for information (thats corruption). Christian Jones is a public official. When it was investigated by Palace (and the Met Police) - Harry reported it to the police. The Palace (Simon Case, Williams Aide and now Head of Civil Service) investigated what happened and cleared Chrisian Jones from wrongdoing because Jones claimed that although he had met Dan Wootton, he didn't know him. That was a lie. And Bylinetimes produced the evidence to prove it was a lie (a photo taken at a small party of Dan Wootton's closest friends on Instagram - Jones was in a group photo of 4 or 5 with Dan Wootton, which was on Instagram - so no dodgy stuff getting the photo evidence that he had lied by Bylinetimes).

Wootton is in trouble as well as Christian Jones! Custodial could be on the way.

Harry handwrote a letter to Prince Charles where he offered to return the Titles. He didn't tell anyone else about this, so the leak did come from the Palace.

As for the co-operation with Omid Scobie - the judge ruled that this information was irrelevant to the court case. Meghan apologised to the court for forgetting that she had consented to Knauf speaking to Omid Scobie and that is the last she heard about it. She didnt speak to Omid herself.

Why would Meghan tell/leak to Dan Wootton who absolutely hates her and Harry anything? Omid Scobie didn't break that particular story - Wootton did. You do realise that Harry and Meghan are sueing most of the British tabloids, so would hardly be leaking anything to them anyway as it could be used against them in court🙄

Its ok to brief the press. Millions of organisations, presidents, charities, politicians, kings etc. brief the press. Harry briefs the press about Invictus or whatever. That is all above board.

What is wrong is for the the RF/their staff to brief private information to the press without the consent of those involved. For instance, that Jones chap leaked about who Archie's godparents were when they knew that H&M wanted to keep that private. Or leaking information about Megxit when they were only discussing it.

They have proof now that they were leaking private information (re the handwritten letter Harry wrote to his father in which he offered to return his titles. The people who knew about that were Harry (possibly Meghan) and Prince Charles (and possibly some of Charles staff). Of all of those, who do you think would have told Dan Wootton so that he could publish it

Please do answer this question (and by the way, I'm still waiting for an answer on whether you think the tabloids were phone hacking and obtaining private information illegally or whether they are innocent of all that illegal stuff

As for your comment about perjury. What happened in the privacy court case was that Jason Knauf said that Meghan briefed the press (or got her staff to do so). The judge said that this was irrelevant to this particular case. Meghan apologised to the court because she had forgotten that she knew that Knauf was going to meet with Scobie to discuss the book. She said she didnt know what was said in that meeting as she didnt hear back from Knauf about it.

Christoper Jones lied about his connection to Dan Wootton (and there is photo evidence of his friendship on Wootton's Instagram Account. The Sun (ordered by Wootton) made payments to Jones' partner. There is a money/paper trail. That is illegal. The Sun, Wootton & Jones are snookered but it really isn't good for the Firm as it is now public knowledge that they are (like all the British politicians in the pocket of the press barons.

Yea, he is about to go make a speech (with no notes)!

How do you make greeting someone in a group making the event about themselves? What would one achieve by doing that? Do you think it worked?

The only people making the event about her is people like you who can't stop yourselves talking about her.