Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

LG CX on special in Harvey Norman this weekend only. Can pay deposit.

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    grogi wrote: »
    I haven't used the Sony your mentioning here. I bet you'd be equally happy with the picture quality of both and if there are any differences, you will have to have both TV side by side and overanalyze it massively to see any difference. From practical point of view they are identical.

    However, TV is not only about picture quality. Picture quality is important, but you can enjoy it only if the TV around the screen works fine.

    The amount of bugs (gamma curves was broken in on of the updates and never fixed, WiFI hasn't been working after upgrade etc.), annoyances (exp. forgetfulness of the TV about your sound settings after you connect and disconnect BT headset), incompatibilities (ARC/eARC implementation causes a lot of trouble with receivers that otherwise work perfectly fine, delays of ~1 second that make it unusable, now lack of DTS even in passthrough), false promises (magic remote only theoretically can control other devices over Ir - it is far to slow to do that) and ergonomically questionable solution in the LG, plus the most appalling CS of the Korean brand which will not only not help you, but also lie in to your face make me say the Sony is a better TV.

    I have the Sony a90j. It’s awesome but it’s a 3k tv.. LG have a g1 model which is comparable to to a90 which is 500 euro cheaper. The cx and c1 from LG are solid TVs and at much cheaper I wouldn’t be to upset with either of them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    I have the Sony a90j. It’s awesome but it’s a 3k tv.. LG have a g1 model which is comparable to to a90 which is 500 euro cheaper. The cx and c1 from LG are solid TVs and at much cheaper I wouldn’t be to upset with either of them
    ?

    You don't mention anything in the Sony that actually doesn't work. All the examples I have you are my personal issues and experiences with LG, you'll find much more online.

    Sony's on the other hand are generally solid, only the x900f/xf90 (that's LCD I know) was too slow, before Sony upped the Android version on it. That wouldn't have happened with LG. I also don't know what you mean by 3K TV, is there an artificial aliasing filter that reduces horizonal resolution? Coukd you tell the difference in a blind test?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    grogi wrote: »
    ?

    You don't mention anything in the Sony that actually doesn't work. All the examples I have you are my personal issues and experiences with LG, you'll find much more online.

    Sony's on the other hand are generally solid, only the x900f/xf90 (that's LCD I know) was too slow, before Sony upped the Android version on it. That wouldn't have happened with LG. I also don't know what you mean by 3K TV, is there an artificial aliasing filter that reduces horizonal resolution? Coukd you tell the difference in a blind test?

    I mean the a90 costs 3 thousand euro :)

    I had an LG 2017 e series which was also excellent. If you could buy a cx for half the price of the Sony I’d be very tempted. It’s definitely not twice as good as the LG but it’s like anything. The ten percent extra performance costs a lot more

    Also I everyone online will have issues with various TVs. There is no perfect tv


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    I mean the a90 costs 3 thousand euro :)

    I had an LG 2017 e series which was also excellent. If you could buy a cx for half the price of the Sony I’d be very tempted. It’s definitely not twice as good as the LG but it’s like anything. The ten percent extra performance costs a lot more

    Also I everyone online will have issues with various TVs. There is no perfect tv

    True. LG however cuts corners in places where it costs them nothing. Like the non-detachable power cable. Or breaks things that were fine before. I won't be buying LG.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,244 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    grogi wrote: »
    The amount of bugs (gamma curves was broken in on of the updates and never fixed, WiFI hasn't been working after upgrade etc.), annoyances (exp. forgetfulness of the TV about your sound settings after you connect and disconnect BT headset), incompatibilities (ARC/eARC implementation causes a lot of trouble with receivers that otherwise work perfectly fine, delays of ~1 second that make it unusable, now lack of DTS even in passthrough), false promises (magic remote only theoretically can control other devices over Ir - it is far to slow to do that) and ergonomically questionable solution in the LG, plus the most appalling CS of the Korean brand which will not only not help you, but also lie in to your face make me say the Sony is a better TV.

    I've a CX and experience none of those issues. If I'm too lazy to get the Sky or another remote, I just use the LGs one and there's no delay, TV doesn't forget its settings after I've used a bluetooth headset, WiFi was never an issue. ARC/eARC issues are industry wide and the only thing that gives me problems is when I try use Atmos on the Xbox which introduces lag, and like I said, that's across the manufacturers with the finger pointing to Microsoft on that. Can't say I'd even noticed the lack of DTS, nor would the majority of people, had they not read about it or weren't audiophiles. I haven't even read about the WiFi or issues after using bluetooth on the big LG threads on the likes of AVforums.

    It's the nature of software and hardware compatibility on everything, it's not unique to TVs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    I've a CX arriving tomorrow. Please be more positive guys so I feel better about spending €1,400 on a TV haha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    I've a CX arriving tomorrow. Please be more positive guys so I feel better about spending €1,400 on a TV haha

    Alot of the issues are stuff 90% of users will never notice.
    I think the debate is more picking out the difference between LG and their competitors in a similar price bracket.

    It will be a massive upgrade on any tv you have had previously. Well wear , just make sure you make the most of it and remember the best content for these tvs will be a UHD blu ray player and some movies to go with it . The streaming services are all compressed and wont achieve the same quality as a UHD player.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,254 ✭✭✭✭km79


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    I've a CX arriving tomorrow. Please be more positive guys so I feel better about spending €1,400 on a TV haha

    I’ve 2 LGS and one Samsung . I find the lgs excellent. No issues whatsoever . The Samsung on the other hand ........
    We are building a new house and will be replacing Samsung with another LG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭Bigmac1euro


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    I've a CX arriving tomorrow. Please be more positive guys so I feel better about spending €1,400 on a TV haha

    Well since buying mine I have not looked back or regretted the purchase.
    The tv looks insane and the actual the design of the unit makes a gorgeous feature in my living room.

    The magic remote works flawlessly to turn up my Sony 5.1 and control my firestick. The pointer can be annoying at times is my only one complaint.

    Casting any device in my house on the WiFi to the tv is flawless as well.
    The operating system is extremely responsive and funnily enough even without my Sony 5.1 the sound is actually very good on this tv providing plenty of bass.

    I watched a live gig yesterday and am still in awe looking at this tv.

    You won’t regret this purchase and I am yet to come across any of the issues mentioned in this thread above.
    No WiFi issues, no issues with remote, it doesn’t support DTS but I knew this going in, for 99% of people they won’t notice or care about some trivial issues mentioned above. I paid 1250 for the tv and I’m happy out. If I paid 1400 I’d still be pleased with my purchase. What a beauty.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    km79 wrote: »
    I’ve 2 LGS and one Samsung . I find the lgs excellent. No issues whatsoever . The Samsung on the other hand ........
    We are building a new house and will be replacing Samsung with another LG

    Samsung TVs are a completely different league all right :D I love their simple remote, but that's about it. They will even put different panels - sometimes IPS, sometimes VA, in exactly same TV model. You never know what you get with Samsung, much worse than LG all right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    Do you have any issues with the brightness of the tv? OLED's cannot get nearly as bright as most tvs when it comes bright full picture scenes. How does it fair in daylight watching something?


  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    grogi wrote: »
    Samsung TVs are a completely different league all right :D I love their simple remote, but that's about it. They will even put different panes - sometimes IPS, sometimes VA panel, in exactly same TV model. You never know what you get with Samsung, much worse than LG all right.

    I am in between Samsungs lowest rung (TU7000) and an Oled :D Impossible to tell which panel the Sammys have until you get it alright.

    Currently I am using a 27 inch 4k LG IPS monitor as the tv. The colours are great on it but the ips glow and just general greyness is absolutely infuriating tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    Do you have any issues with the brightness of the tv? OLED's cannot get nearly as bright as most tvs when it comes bright full picture scenes. How does it fair in daylight watching something?

    No problem with that, it is an overblown complain IMHO.

    OLEDs can get to approximately ~750 nits of brightness, that it perfectly usable in a very bright room.
    I am in between Samsungs lowest rung (TU7000) and an Oled :D Impossible to tell which panel the Sammys have until you get it alright.

    I had the NU7400. My first impressions were very good: I got a good VA panel with great uniformity. Decent picture quality it had. I also loved the smart solutions to guide cables through the stand and in the grooves on the back of the TV. Better ergonomy of the OS, fantastic remote with much bigger device database than in the LG that replaced it. Built-in Steam client was another plus.

    But.... It wouldn't install any apps, because it didn't have any capacity left. From the box! (https://eu.community.samsung.com/t5/tv/apps-storage-space-issue/td-p/808085). Had to send it back, it was unusable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    Alot of the issues are stuff 90% of users will never notice.
    I think the debate is more picking out the difference between LG and their competitors in a similar price bracket.

    It will be a massive upgrade on any tv you have had previously. Well wear , just make sure you make the most of it and remember the best content for these tvs will be a UHD blu ray player and some movies to go with it . The streaming services are all compressed and wont achieve the same quality as a UHD player.

    I'll be using it solely for PS5 and Netflix. I heard good things about it on the PS5 but as you said, streaming services are compressed but I should still notice an upgrade from my Sony 43KDL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    I'll be using it solely for PS5 and Netflix. I heard good things about it on the PS5 but as you said, streaming services are compressed but I should still notice an upgrade from my Sony 43KDL

    If you're using external sound source, such as AVR, connect the PS5 through it. You'll avoid sound delays, even if it means you'd need to game at 1080p/120Hz instead of 4K. Picture quality degradation is more psychological than anything else, but sound delays ARE objectively seen.

    Lack of DTS in the TV will not affect you, as Netflix is using DD+ (although you cannot setup the TV to send only the vanilla DD over ARC/eARC if your receiver/soundbar has issues with DD+).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    grogi wrote: »
    If you're using external sound source, such as AVR, connect the PS5 through it.

    Lack of DTS in the TV will not affect you, as Netflix is using DD+ (although you cannot setup the TV to send only the vanilla DD over ARC/eARC if your receiver/soundbar has issues with DD+).

    Being an electronics geek.. sound has surprisingly not been something I cared about. Up until very recently, I played PS5 through TV speakers. Now using a headset.

    I saw lots of chat about DTS here but it's definitely not something I'm concerned about. I can't wait to get the TV tomorrow. Just hope Harvey Norman don't delay my order again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    Being an electronics geek.. sound has surprisingly not been something I cared about. Up until very recently, I played PS5 through TV speakers. Now using a headset.

    Sound is a weird one, all right. You don't care about it until someday it clicks and you cannot stop caring.

    It is also much more difficult to quantify, which means it can easily turn into slippery slope :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    grogi wrote: »
    Sound is a weird one, all right. You don't care about it until someday it clicks and you cannot stop caring.

    It is also much more difficult to quantify, which means it can easily turn into slippery slope :D

    I think there is more effort being put into it now also with the likes of Dolby Atmos being utilised on alot of the new TV shows. Having a good setup really helps create the cinema feel.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    In my experience, my LG C9 is absolutely magnificent. I can't recommend highly enough LG OLED's to people.

    I've honestly not experienced any of the issues grogi has listed, frankly they are laughably niche (other then DTS), like seriously, non replaceable power cord and who the hell cares about IR anymore when you have a Bluetooth remote and CEC!

    Also I've had no problems with Firmware upgrades, they have been great, adding extra functionality like Airplay, Homekit and fixing minor issues.

    No TV is perfect of course, for instance the Sony mentioned here only has 2 HDMI 2.1 ports (versus 4 on LG) and doesn't support VRR, which are both mad emissions in a 3k TV in 2021.

    Don't get me wrong, both are fantastic TV's, hardly surprising as in the end they both use the same LG Display OLED panel, which will mean similar picture quality. Sure CPU, firmware, etc. can make a difference. But I've been extremely impressed by Webos, the firmware updates and the great magic remote, etc.

    The LG really makes for a fantastic all round TV. Amazing PQ, every streaming app from UK and Ireland you would want, saorview + freesat, fantastic remote, Google Home, Amazon Alexa, Apple Airplay, etc.

    I'm sure the Sony is just as amazing a TV too. When I bought my LG C9, I also looked at the Sony, but it was over €1000 more at the time and I really didn't see anything to justify that extra money. You are basically paying 1,000 more for the same LG Display OLED panel! The way I looked at it is, the €1,000 I saved went to buying an amazing Dolby Atmos soundbar, which frankly made vastly more difference then any differences between the LG and Sony.

    I think this is an important point, if upgrading to a top of the line premium TV's like this, you should be budgeting for all the other parts that go with it too. A decent Dolby Atmos soundbar/AV + speakers, a PS5/XSX or other UHD bluray player, a bunch of your favourite movies in UHD bluray and probably paying for a couple of the streaming services like Netflix, Disney, etc. in UHD. All to take advantage of such nice TV's

    Of course this is all first world problems territory. We are talking about 2 to 3k TV's here. Both are amazing. It is like people arguing which is the better Hyper sports car. I think anyone who buys either of these TV's will be blown away by them.

    I can highly recommend LG OLED's, but do your homework, compare them on rtings.com, watch the HDTest video reviews on youtube and of course consider the price difference and your overall budget.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭KeRbDoG


    Do you have any issues with the brightness of the tv? OLED's cannot get nearly as bright as most tvs when it comes bright full picture scenes. How does it fair in daylight watching something?
    I never heard of this being a thing - I've a 65" LG OLED from 2016/17ish and never noticed any issues in full daylight


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    Do you have any issues with the brightness of the tv? OLED's cannot get nearly as bright as most tvs when it comes bright full picture scenes. How does it fair in daylight watching something?

    Non issue in most rooms , if for some reason you are placing the TV in an incredibly well lit area such as a conservatory or a room with a huge amount of natural light then you need to be slightly more careful, but that being said the brightness levels are increasing ever year in the OLED panels.

    If you have a think about how well lit up the likes of Harvey Norman are and there are no issues there, is the room you are going to be placing it in significantly brighter ? For most the answer would be no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 258 ✭✭gaming_needs90


    grogi wrote: »
    Sound is a weird one, all right. You don't care about it until someday it clicks and you cannot stop caring.

    It is also much more difficult to quantify, which means it can easily turn into slippery slope :D

    This is off topic but have people noticed over the last five years or so how voices in movies/tv shows are near inaudible? Its definitely something to do with the encoding for surround, or something like that. I had to get a soundbar for an old tv just to make it a bit better. Even then I always still had to play around with the EQ so I could properly hear the voices and not turn on subtitles!

    I have noticed it everywhere lately, especially on Netflix :mad: It totally ruins the experience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭Soarer


    This is off topic but have people noticed over the last five years or so how voices in movies/tv shows are near inaudible? Its definitely something to do with the encoding for surround, or something like that. I had to get a soundbar for an old tv just to make it a bit better. Even then I always still had to play around with the EQ so I could properly hear the voices and not turn on subtitles!

    I have noticed it everywhere lately, especially on Netflix :mad: It totally ruins the experience

    Nail on head!

    Watched the new Without Remorse movie the other day. Fukk me, half the dialogue was inaudible!
    Tried it through my 5.1. Turned the centre up full, and turned the surrounds way down, and it still sounded sh1te!
    Might try invest in a decent 3-way centre speaker to see if that will improve things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 847 ✭✭✭WildCardDoW


    This is off topic but have people noticed over the last five years or so how voices in movies/tv shows are near inaudible? Its definitely something to do with the encoding for surround, or something like that. I had to get a soundbar for an old tv just to make it a bit better. Even then I always still had to play around with the EQ so I could properly hear the voices and not turn on subtitles!

    I have noticed it everywhere lately, especially on Netflix :mad: It totally ruins the experience

    I've been reading into it and it's usually bad balancing in terms of surround and from TVs it's just that they have tinpot speakers due to the size.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,157 ✭✭✭srsly78


    Are people actually using this with the built-in speakers?

    LG soundbar works great for me with atmos etc. Note this only works over hdmi, it won't work over optical or wireless. Works fine from native apps. When playing from pc need to change some options to enable pass-through.

    LG C8 - 2 years no burnin. But I don't watch silly channels with logos.

    I can also report that the screen is "cat proof" for whatever that's worth...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    This is off topic but have people noticed over the last five years or so how voices in movies/tv shows are near inaudible? Its definitely something to do with the encoding for surround, or something like that. I had to get a soundbar for an old tv just to make it a bit better. Even then I always still had to play around with the EQ so I could properly hear the voices and not turn on subtitles!

    I have noticed it everywhere lately, especially on Netflix :mad: It totally ruins the experience

    Yes. The mixing recently became unbearable, the side tracks are far too laud.

    That's why I am running a separate centre speaker that's 3dB hot compared to what the calibration says. Makes the dialogue stand out and easier to understand.

    Side note: higher end Yamaha AVRs have a very nice DSP program called Dialog Level Adjustment. It is smarter than just upping the volume of centre track (what most of the AVR do), but identifying where the dialogue is and bumping only that.
    srsly78 wrote: »
    Are people actually using this with the built-in speakers?

    Some are - the LG OLEDs have surprisingly capable speakers. The response curve is reasonably flat at 80 dB SPL - they only lack bass below 80Hz. If only LG added one option and allowed to use built-in speakers with volume controlled audio-out (you can have volume controlled audio-out, but not at the same time as the speakers or functional internal speakers, but with audio-out at full volume). You could then connect a wired sub - it would make a setup that seriously kicks ass, sounds better than any soundbar < €300, have no compatibility and delay issues, takes minimal space and be very tidy - all at the same time.
    srsly78 wrote: »
    LG soundbar works great for me with atmos etc. Note this only works over hdmi, it won't work over optical or wireless. Works fine from native apps. When playing from pc need to change some options to enable pass-through.

    That's surprising cause LG soundbards are not the best when it comes to dialogue clarity. The dialogue channel in virtually all of them (exp. SN9YG) have a massive dip where our hearing is most sensitive or slightly above that, like around 4.5kHz. One can easily hear it, but maybe you haven't compared it to anything else :) Ignorance is a bliss in that case ;)

    With my hatred for Samsung TVs, they IMHO make surprisingly nice soundbars.


  • Registered Users Posts: 99 ✭✭ash2020


    8k displays are coming soon


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    ash2020 wrote: »
    8k displays are coming soon

    Only to squeeze you out of more cash. 4K already exceeds the resolution of human eye.
    For a person with 20/20 vision, while sitting 10 feet away, one would need about a 75-inch display-diagonal for HD, 120-inch for 4K, and a whopping 280 inches for 8K to be able to distinguish the resolution!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    ash2020 wrote: »
    8k displays are coming soon

    More marketing bull . There is barely any widely accessible 4k content. Its generally accepted for 8k to see any benefit the screen is massive and you need to be sitting up against it otherwise the human eye will not even register it.

    There are no major plans for shooting content in 8k , i would not hold off on a tv purchase in waiting for 8k.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭micks_address


    More marketing bull . There is barely any widely accessible 4k content. Its generally accepted for 8k to see any benefit the screen is massive and you need to be sitting up against it otherwise the human eye will not even register it.

    There are no major plans for shooting content in 8k , i would not hold off on a tv purchase in waiting for 8k.

    Also it seems 8k TVs are substantially worse than 4K for most content from reviews I’ve seen... hdr is probably the biggest impact in recent years..ok 4K at 65 inch maybe but for most hd at 55 is still pretty good


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭EarWig


    More marketing bull . There is barely any widely accessible 4k content. Its generally accepted for 8k to see any benefit the screen is massive and you need to be sitting up against it otherwise the human eye will not even register it.

    There are no major plans for shooting content in 8k , i would not hold off on a tv purchase in waiting for 8k.
    https://www.ibc.org/trends/nhk-confirms-plans-for-8k-broadcast-of-2020-olympics-and-paralympics/5559.article


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    EarWig wrote: »
    The olympics is always the showcase event for the next level of HD tv . But nobody will buy a TV on the back of it.

    NHK has recorded in 8k since 2016. But that still hasnt led to it being widely broadcast in even 4k.

    The other issue is providers looking for extra €'s from subscribers for HD, 4k or 8k content. Again it pushes it further into the niche realm. I believe as of this moment there is no single channel broadcasting in 4k for all its content.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    EarWig wrote: »

    Recording in 8k is completely different animal to watching in 8k. More pixels at source give much bigger cropping/zooming capabilities. You can zoom 4x and still have full HD resolution!

    Watching in 8k is completely pointless.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    This is off topic but have people noticed over the last five years or so how voices in movies/tv shows are near inaudible? Its definitely something to do with the encoding for surround, or something like that. I had to get a soundbar for an old tv just to make it a bit better. Even then I always still had to play around with the EQ so I could properly hear the voices and not turn on subtitles!

    This is a combination of issues.

    - TV's becoming super thin, which means very small speakers which are either downward firing or back firing, neither are ideal *
    - More and more content coming specifically mixed for 5.1 or the likes of Dolby Atmos which then don't mix well down to such poor stereo speakers.

    This makes at least a cheap surround bar a most for most TV's

    * Though I was very pleasantly surprised by the quality of the LG OLED's speakers, their AI sound thing actually works quiet well. Fine for day to day watching, though I still went and got a nice soundbar to really make the most of it.
    More marketing bull . There is barely any widely accessible 4k content. Its generally accepted for 8k to see any benefit the screen is massive and you need to be sitting up against it otherwise the human eye will not even register it.

    I would have agreed with you up until about a year or so ago. But it has really changed in the past year and now there is loads of 4k and even more importantly IMO HDR content.

    Netflix, Disney+, Apple TV, Now TV, Amazon Prime are all pumping out loads of 4k/HDR content.

    And of course the PS5/XSX with 4k games + UHD bluray discs.

    Of course if you mostly watch live TV, then yes, you are right, there isn't much 4k there. But personally I can't stand live TV and all the ads any more and other then the odd match and maybe the news from time to time, all my watching is the above streaming services.

    Again that is why I'd say if you are buying a TV like this, you should also be budgeting to sub to the various streaming services + UHD to make the most of the TV.

    As an aside I dropped Sky years ago (use saorview + freesat instead for live TV) and the above streaming services cost less then a Sky package, with better content, in 4k/HDR and no ads, vastly better value IMO. I think Sky is only worth it for sports fans.
    grogi wrote: »
    With my hatred for Samsung TVs, they IMHO make surprisingly nice soundbars.

    Yep, that is why I have paired my LG C9 with a Samsung Q950T soundbar. Incredible sound.

    Though it definitely has it's own annoyances:

    - Power cables are too short :D
    - No auto calibration of the speakers, poor for such an expensive soundbar in this day and age.
    - Poorly positioned screen
    - A pain in the hole to adjust the audio levels, etc.
    - Very poor app with very limited functionality and info there.

    Having said that it sounds fantastic and it looks like they have fixed some of these issues in the new models about to be released.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    bk wrote: »
    This is a combination of issues.

    - TV's becoming super thin, which means very small speakers which are either downward firing or back firing, neither are ideal *
    - More and more content coming specifically mixed for 5.1 or the likes of Dolby Atmos which then don't mix well down to such poor stereo speakers.

    This makes at least a cheap surround bar a most for most TV's

    I'll allow myself to disagree.

    This is a result of poor sound levels, too much effects, too little dialogue. It sells - because at first it looks more exciting. I am often pressed to hear the dialogue while listening on a full-blown Home Cinema setup - hence the ridiculously overexposed centre channel.
    bk wrote: »
    I would have agreed with you up until about a year or so ago. But it has really changed in the past year and now there is loads of 4k and even more importantly IMO HDR content.

    Even if there was abundance of 8K content, it still would be completely pointless. We simply cannot see the difference! Our eyes don't have the angular resolution to see the difference between 4K and 8K when you have whole screen in your vision. Even 4K is often pushing it, but in some scenarios there will be marginal difference (not worth the bandwidth and effort in my personal opinion tough).

    High Dynamic Range, Wide Color Gamut, High Refresh Rate - those are things we can see. 8K - nah.
    Yep, that is why I have paired my LG C9 with a Samsung Q950T soundbar. Incredible sound.

    Though it definitely has it's own annoyances:

    - Power cables are too short :D

    Yet you can replace them with longer ones - AFAIR those are regular 8-style cables. With LG you can't ;)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    grogi wrote: »
    Even if there was abundance of 8K content, it still would be completely pointless.

    I agree on 8k, the comment I was replying to said there isn't much 4k content, I was saying that there is now lots of 4k and more importantly HDR content. So a good time to jump into 4k/HDR now.

    I was late to 4k compared to many, but then I had a lovely Pioneer Kuro, so it was only worth jumping when a good enough TV came along to better it and enough 4k/HDR content. I'll probably be just as late to 8k.
    grogi wrote: »
    Yet you can replace them with longer ones - AFAIR those are regular 8-style cables. With LG you can't ;)

    Sort of, they are L shaped figure 8, but a shorter length on the end then normal, so I had to buy specialist expensive cables specifically designed for it.

    For the TV, I always use a high quality surge protector extension anyway, so no issue there :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,480 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    ash2020 wrote: »
    8k displays are coming soon

    When the 4K was introducted 'they' said 4K was the max amount of pixels the eye could see.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    AllForIt wrote: »
    When the 4K was introducted 'they' said 4K was the max amount of pixels the eye could see.

    And they are sort of right at normal sitting distance you can't tell the difference between 4k and HD from a decent source like a Bluray. Unless I get right up to my TV and pixel peep, I can't tell the difference between my old HD TV and 4k while sitting on the sofa.

    What does make a difference is HDR, it makes for a noticeably improved picture quality.

    Also UHD and 4k streaming services simply sending more data on a 4k stream helps to give more data for a better overall picture.

    And of course if you are upgrading to a newer TV, specially OLED from LCD/LED, it will simply look better because of better technology (panel, processor, etc.).

    You'd want a TV of over 100" to make 8k worth it at normal viewing distances. Of course computer monitors are a different story:

    https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-relationship


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    bk wrote: »
    You'd want a TV of over 100" to make 8k worth it at normal viewing distances.

    More like 220" at 10 ft viewing distance :)
    Of course computer monitors are a different story

    Because you're sitting much closer.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,925 ✭✭✭Soarer


    HDR + OLED Pure Black = Awesome picture quality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    Soarer wrote: »
    HDR + OLED Pure Black = Awesome picture quality.

    Be careful with statements like that, as it all depends how you understand HDR.

    Is it just a marketing term for high maximum brightness or technically correct understanding of dynamic range, which would be more-less equivalent to contrast ratio. If the latter, the OLED Pure Black implies HDR :]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    Nevermind pixel counting. I just played call of duty at 120hz on my new CX and oh my god, I am in love with my new TV!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    MarkY91 wrote: »
    Nevermind pixel counting. I just played call of duty at 120hz on my new CX and oh my god, I am in love with my new TV!!!

    120 Hz is fantastic all right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭Mango Joe


    Coming to this thread late unfortunately - All these rave reviews for LG OLEDs have me very interested again - Where's the best place to pick up a 55" - 65" LG OLED at the minute and which model is the one to go for.

    - Money is no object.

    * Nah - Looking for a bargain - Don't be daft!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,068 ✭✭✭MarkY91


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    Coming to this thread late unfortunately - All these rave reviews for LG OLEDs have me very interested again - Where's the best place to pick up a 55" - 65" LG OLED at the minute and which model is the one to go for.

    - Money is no object.

    * Nah - Looking for a bargain - Don't be daft!

    I personally haven't seen any particular places to get it from on the cheap so I just went with Harvey Norman for my 48" which is annoyingly MORE expensive than the larger models.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭dam099


    grogi wrote: »
    Even 4K is often pushing it, but in some scenarios there will be marginal difference (not worth the bandwidth and effort in my personal opinion tough).

    High Dynamic Range, Wide Color Gamut, High Refresh Rate - those are things we can see. 8K - nah.

    The bandwidth would probably be better utilised as a higher bit rate on HD streams to reduce artefacts and banding (but with HDR and Wide Colour which do make a difference).


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,994 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    Coming to this thread late unfortunately - All these rave reviews for LG OLEDs have me very interested again - Where's the best place to pick up a 55" - 65" LG OLED at the minute and which model is the one to go for.

    - Money is no object.

    * Nah - Looking for a bargain - Don't be daft!

    I got mine from richersounds.ie they have last years CX series reduced, 55" CX for €1299 and 65" CX for €1999, the newly released versions of these are the C1's and they cost €1849 (55) and €2649 (65).

    So about €550 to €650 less for almost the same TV. HDTest just published a video on youtube comparing the C9, CX and C1 and while there are some very small differences, he basically recommended that they are all so close that just buy the one you can get the best deal on.

    Last year I did the same, I bought my C9 just as the CX was released, C9 was €1950 at the time, while the CX was €3000 at the time! No regrets at all, there is so little difference between year models of OLEDs that buying last years models just as the new ones come out is a great way to get a bargain. Has been fantastic during lockdown.
    MarkY91 wrote: »
    I personally haven't seen any particular places to get it from on the cheap so I just went with Harvey Norman for my 48" which is annoyingly MORE expensive than the larger models.

    The 48" are pretty new, unique and niche and are actually harder to make then the 55/65, so as a result you don't see deals on them yet like you would with the 55/65 models.
    dam099 wrote:
    The bandwidth would probably be better utilised as a higher bit rate on HD streams to reduce artefacts and banding (but with HDR and Wide Colour which do make a difference).

    That is basically what you get when you go to 4k streams. They aren't anywhere as good as a UHD disc, more like getting a better quality HD stream. I actually know some people specifically signed up to 4k streaming services, even though they had only HD TV's, downscaling the 4k gave a better PQ then native HD!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    bk wrote: »
    That is basically what you get when you go to 4k streams. They aren't anywhere as good as a UHD disc, more like getting a better quality HD stream. I actually know some people specifically signed up to 4k streaming services, even though they had only HD TV's, downscaling the 4k gave a better PQ then native HD!

    That would be me too... I couldn't care less about 4K, but 'bout Dolby Vision I do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭Mango Joe


    BK thanks for providing all of that info - You're very good.

    Final question folks - There's no way the kids are going to always remember to turn this off, they come and come from the room and would often forget that the TV is on.

    This leads me to think we'd be a classic candidate for burn-in within a year.

    However - I did a small bit of reading and it seems that you can set a moving image screensaver to kick in after a minute or two?

    Can anyone confirm that the TV itself can be set up protect itself against my family!??!

    I don't really want to wait until they move out to go to College.

    Also I see on Reddit that LG in the US were replacing panels due to burn-in issues and also people on there were saying that some retailers extended warranty would cover you for issues - Can anyone on here advise if there's any retailer in particular who would be known for this type of thing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,615 ✭✭✭grogi


    Mango Joe wrote: »
    BK thanks for providing all of that info - You're very good.

    Final question folks - There's no way the kids are going to always remember to turn this off, they come and come from the room and would often forget that the TV is on.

    This leads me to think we'd be a classic candidate for burn-in within a year.

    However - I did a small bit of reading and it seems that you can set a moving image screensaver to kick in after a minute or two?

    Can anyone confirm that the TV itself can be set up protect itself against my family!??!

    I don't really want to wait until they move out to go to College.

    Also I see on Reddit that LG in the US were replacing panels due to burn-in issues and also people on there were saying that some retailers extended warranty would cover you for issues - Can anyone on here advise if there's any retailer in particular who would be known for this type of thing?

    The screen saver is on by default. It won't kick in if you're watching external source, such as Apple TV - but if you stick to built in apps, you will be fine


  • Advertisement
Advertisement