Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Vatican issues document rejecting idea that people can choose or change gender

1356

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    Elemonator wrote: »
    All politics aside, I have heard as close as 2%. I helped do some research for this topic while in college.

    If you want to visualise that, that's about the same percentage of people who are redheads.

    There's no way it's anywhere near that high.

    Typical exaggeration to make their cause seem more important.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭_blaaz


    There's no way it's anywhere near that high.

    Typical exaggeration to make their cause seem more important.

    On an international context maybe.....some south pacific nations would have large transgender communties afaik.....but be a near non issue in western culture?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Always curious why people get so annoyed over these church statements. Like yeah that's what they think, that's partly why they're deeply unpopular and their business model is failing in Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,324 ✭✭✭Tilikum17


    cgcsb wrote: »
    Always curious why people get so annoyed over these church statements. Like yeah that's what they think, that's partly why they're deeply unpopular and their business model is failing in Europe.

    30 years from now they’ll be virtual non existent in this country.

    Moving onto countries in Africa that haven’t a pot to piss in.

    Rotten *****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Tilikum17 wrote: »
    30 years from now they’ll be virtual non existent in this country.

    Moving onto countries in Africa that haven’t a pot to piss in.

    Rotten *****.

    Nonsense. They'll still be here. People will still have a need for spiritual guidance, whether or not it only exists in their own heads............

    They'll be known as progressive trans-religionaries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Take control of the schools and hospitals and they are gone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,522 ✭✭✭paleoperson


    Tilikum17 wrote: »
    30 years from now they’ll be virtual non existent in this country.

    Moving onto countries in Africa that haven’t a pot to piss in.

    Rotten *****.

    Same goes for trans people. It's already on the downturn.

    Trans ideology is a crud.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I reckon he's going to say "I was just being sarcastic, I thought it was obvious".

    It obviously wasn't and you knew people could misinterpret you. When you act like that you're trolling, even if you put your hand up to it afterwards that doesn't make it not a troll.

    We're in a world with many crazies so pretending that someone else should know that you aren't one is just misleading and trolling.

    I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

    Bear in mind I grew up in a world where gay people hid their sexuality. My daughter volunteers in a Community group, where they have an LGBT group. Strangely enough, one member, who happens to be gay, admitted last night that she didn't fully understand what it was to be trans - so how are the rest of us meant to understand it, when any deviation from " Of course, you can change the meaning of words to mean what ever you want" results in accusations of trolling?

    I'm not trolling. I don't care what people do with their lives, if they're not hurting others - but if I'm happy to accept how other people view life and sexuality, I expect the same level of respect in return.

    As to this business of children receiving sex change hormones - that's crazy. I've raised tomboys who wished they were boys, who are now mothers, and laugh at their tomboy antics.

    I'm sure there are genuinely people who are trans - but I don't believe they can be identified as young children. I've also known people who come out as gay as teenagers, who decide a few years later that they're heterosexual, just as some have come out as gay, and actually are gay.

    Or, to put it another way - wait until kids are mature enough to make a responsible decision before rushing down the sex change route.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,271 ✭✭✭Elemonator


    There's no way it's anywhere near that high.

    Typical exaggeration to make their cause seem more important.

    I really doubt that. 2% is backed by academic studies.

    Older research systems seemed to suggest that the rate of intersex was roughly about 0.5% of the population but that research only referred to one intersex trait which was ambiguous genitalia. It can come in various forms however (sex chromosome composition, gonadal structure, hormone levels, and the structure of the internal genital duct systems and external genitalia). 1.7%
    is an estimate given was Anne Fausto Sterling at Brown University who specialises in biology. Another academic puts it at a higher rate again. You can check out the article “How Sexually Dimorphic Are We?” published in the American Journal of Human Biology by Blackless.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    As to this business of children receiving sex change hormones - that's crazy. I've raised tomboys who wished they were boys, who are now mothers, and laugh at their tomboy antics.

    Kids do not receive sex change hormones in this country unless you're talking about 16 yr olds. Depends on your definition of kid :)
    Or, to put it another way - wait until kids are mature enough to make a responsible decision before rushing down the sex change route.

    Kids(that definition again) do not get sex change surgery either until they're 16 but I don't think they has ever been a case of an Irish 16 yr old getting sex change surgery. If there was, we would have heard the loud condemnation from the tabloids, the Vatican supporters and the tiny minority of posters here who are obsessed with condemning trans issues.
    Elemonator wrote:
    I really doubt that. 2% is backed by academic studies.

    In this country, there has been from the last count under 400 people changing gender by obtaining gender recognition certs. A recent controversial Primetime program stated about a dozen children under 18(likely 16-18 yrs old) who changed gender, that's out of 900,000 plus pupils. That tiny number of people generate such rage and vitriol in some people, quite amazing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,391 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    FFred wrote: »
    Man has Willy.
    Woman has front bum.
    End.

    :D:D


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    klaaaz wrote: »
    Kids do not receive sex change hormones in this country unless you're talking about 16 yr olds. Depends on your definition of kid :)



    Kids(that definition again) do not get sex change surgery either until they're 16 but I don't think they has ever been a case of an Irish 16 yr old getting sex change surgery. If there was, we would have heard the loud condemnation from the tabloids, the Vatican supporters and the tiny minority of posters here who are obsessed with condemning trans issues.



    In this country, there has been from the last count under 400 people changing gender by obtaining gender recognition certs. A recent controversial Primetime program stated about a dozen children under 18(likely 16-18 yrs old) who changed gender, that's out of 900,000 plus pupils. That tiny number of people generate such rage and vitriol in some people, quite amazing.

    16 is still a kid, in my book.

    They're still exploring who they are, and some of them are still exploring their sexuality.

    Better be sure someone wants a sex change, than have regrets later. I.M.O., of course.


  • Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,947 Mod ✭✭✭✭Neyite


    Of course the Vatican was going to say this. Dunno why anyone is surprised. It's a Cis-men only club.They've kept women out of the clergy for millennia. In the era of self-ID and acceptance of gender fluidity they can't risk a woman getting in by transing, or risk people already in the club becoming women. Because then the cis-women will want in as well. And that would really make the old farts in Rome shít themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    klaaaz wrote: »
    That tiny number of people generate such rage and vitriol in some people, quite amazing.

    And there's the poor victim syndrome again.
    In fairness I imagine most people consider trans people to be something of an amusement like someone with turrets syndrome.
    There's no rage and vitriol.

    But when the "extremists" in the trans community state and push for the state to legal enforce their view that they are 100% indistinguishable from whatever sex/gender they identify with, then people will call them out over it.

    Neyite wrote: »
    Of course the Vatican was going to say this. Dunno why anyone is surprised. It's a Cis-men only club.They've kept women out of the clergy for millennia. In the era of self-ID and acceptance of gender fluidity they can't risk a woman getting in by transing, or risk people already in the club becoming women. Because then the cis-women will want in as well. And that would really make the old farts in Rome shít themselves.

    A feminist hijacking a trans thread... it's handbags at dawn here.

    If anything I reckon keeping women out of the church was to keep men in it.
    If priests were allowed to marry and have kids then there would be more reason/pressure from the missus for them to leave the priesthood.

    So I'd argue the complete opposite, the Vatican kept women out to enslave men.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    And there's the poor victim syndrome again.
    In fairness I imagine most people consider trans people to be something of an amusement like someone with turrets syndrome.
    There's no rage and vitriol.

    So trans people are to be laughed at and mocked at in your view, so much bitterness in you. That's quite sad.
    But when the "extremists" in the trans community state and push for the state to legal enforce their view that they are 100% indistinguishable from whatever sex/gender they identify with, then people will call them out over it

    That has been law since 2015 here in Ireland, nothing extreme about granting people their civil rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    I'm Catholic, but I would disagree with the Vatican on this, and their views on homosexuality


  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭NaFirinne


    where does the whole trans thing start getting ridiculous though.

    I mean a grown 40 year old identifying as a 3 year old girl.

    I women identifying as a donkey.

    All I do is try an respect people the way I would like to be respected. Doesn't mean I understand or comprehend their decisions.

    I wonder sometimes though are we enabling people that have a mental illness instead of helping them over come it. I guess time will tell.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    NaFirinne wrote: »
    where does the whole trans thing start getting ridiculous though.

    I mean a grown 40 year old identifying as a 3 year old girl.

    I women identifying as a donkey.

    All I do is try an respect people the way I would like to be respected. Doesn't mean I understand or comprehend their decisions.

    I wonder sometimes though are we enabling people that have a mental illness instead of helping them over come it. I guess time will tell.

    None of that is transgender.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    klaaaz wrote: »
    So trans people are to be laughed at and mocked at in your view, so much bitterness in you. That's quite sad.

    Where did I say laughed at and mocked ?
    There's a difference between regarding someone with amusement and laughing/mocking them to their face.

    At most, I don't like the social media attacks on peoples reputation/career when the trans activists target them.

    Some of the adjectives you leak like bitterness and sad are actually quite telling, you're projecting your own feelings.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    Where did I say laughed at and mocked ?
    There's a difference between regarding someone with amusement and laughing/mocking them to their face.

    At most, I don't like the social media attacks on peoples reputation/career when the trans activists target them.

    Some of the adjectives you leak like bitterness and sad are actually quite telling, you're projecting your own feelings.

    What's so amusing about transgender people that causes you to laugh at them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭GrumpyMe


    "Vatican rejects idea people can choose or change genders"
    Fair's fair!
    "People reject idea Vatican can choose or change breads"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    klaaaz wrote: »
    What's so amusing about transgender people that causes you to laugh at them?

    Didn't say I laughed at them either.
    Brendan O'Carroll pretends to be a woman and I certainly don't laugh at him.

    Men in drag have always been the subject of comedy especially old BBC material.
    Comedy can be something that's too incredible / ridiculous to fully accept.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    Didn't say I laughed at them either.
    Brendan O'Carroll pretends to be a woman and I certainly don't laugh at him.

    Men in drag have always been the subject of comedy especially old BBC material.
    Comedy can be something that's too incredible / ridiculous to fully accept.

    Drag is not transgender.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    klaaaz wrote: »
    Drag is not transgender.

    But throw in some hormones and a few snips from a surgeon and what's the difference?


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Ruraldweller56


    What can you say anymore about the RCC. They are just determined to destroy themselves from the inside. Remember they control our schools.

    The Vatican has issued an official document rejecting the idea that people can choose or change their genders and insisting on the sexual “complementarity” of men and women to make babies.

    Pope Francis has repeatedly argued the position that people cannot choose their genders.
    The document called for a new alliance among families, schools and society to offer a “positive and prudent sexual education” in Catholic schools so children learn the “full original truth of masculinity and femininity”.

    It called gender fluidity a symptom of the “confused concept of freedom” and “momentary desires” that characterise post-modern culture.

    It rejected terms such as “intersex” and “transgender” and said the purpose of the biological “complementarity” of the male and female sex organs was to ensure procreation.






    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/religion-and-beliefs/vatican-rejects-idea-people-can-choose-or-change-genders-1.3921015

    Thank God. Some common sense at last.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    Thank God. Some common sense at last.

    bigotry, actually


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Ruraldweller56


    branie2 wrote: »
    bigotry, actually

    Ah give over man. Lots of us are sick to death of listening to this crap.

    Live and let live my hole.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    And lots of us are sick of hearing about transgender people being called mentally ill, when they're actually not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Ruraldweller56


    branie2 wrote: »
    And lots of us are sick of hearing about transgender people being called mentally ill, when they're actually not.

    Wow. Go them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,551 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    branie2 wrote: »
    And lots of us are sick of hearing about transgender people being called mentally ill, when they're actually not.

    Gender dysphoria is a recognised mental illness


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,305 ✭✭✭✭branie2


    not by the WHO though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,551 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    branie2 wrote: »
    not by the WHO though

    It was in the DSM for decades until activists lobbied to have it removed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭Dante7


    branie2 wrote: »
    And lots of us are sick of hearing about transgender people being called mentally ill, when they're actually not.

    Where do you think their dysphoria resides? In their liver?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,482 ✭✭✭Gimme A Pound


    Dante7 wrote: »
    Where do you think their dysphoria resides? In their liver?
    Why not treat them just with psychiatric drugs so? It's part of it yes but recognised medically that it's not the full story.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    It was in the DSM for decades until activists lobbied to have it removed.
    This is the exact same claim that people have made in the past about homosexuality being removed from the dsm... A working group concluded that moving to gender identity disorder and keeping the classification to maintain supports for the affected person made the most sense. Nothing to do with lobbyists, just that knowledge has changed.
    Where did I say laughed at and mocked ?
    There's a difference between regarding someone with amusement and laughing/mocking them to their face.

    At most, I don't like the social media attacks on peoples reputation/career when the trans activists target them.

    Some of the adjectives you leak like bitterness and sad are actually quite telling, you're projecting your own feelings.

    In fairness, the fact you're amused by people who are transgender or have tourettes is a terrible reflection upon you...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,229 ✭✭✭Sam Quentin


    Believe it or not,.. there are millions upon MILLIONS of people who agree with and follow the Catholic churches teachings and believes. Spin that and twist that whatever way you want. It's not gonna change. Amen.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    Ok. (Prepares to be annihilated!)

    This old Fogey can't keep up with all the definitions of sexuality that keep appearing.

    *raises hand*

    Me too

    Urban dictionary is handy for all the unfamiliar words

    America today, rest of world tomorrow


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Believe it or not,.. there are millions upon MILLIONS of people who agree with and follow the Catholic churches teachings and believes. Spin that and twist that whatever way you want. It's not gonna change. Amen.

    But very few in Ireland that will blindly follow everything as demonstrated by last two referendums.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,972 ✭✭✭mikemac2


    Hobosan wrote: »
    Have you accepted Jesus Christ as our Lord and savior?

    That’s more Protestant tbh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    batgoat wrote: »
    In fairness, the fact you're amused by people who are transgender or have tourettes is a terrible reflection upon you...

    I'm also amused by your opinion of me and give it the same level of credibility and respect.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    I'm also amused by your opinion of me and give it the same level of credibility and respect.

    Ignorance is nothing to be proud of.


  • Registered Users Posts: 938 ✭✭✭Ruraldweller56


    batgoat wrote: »
    This is the exact same claim that people have made in the past about homosexuality being removed from the dsm... A working group concluded that moving to gender identity disorder and keeping the classification to maintain supports for the affected person made the most sense. Nothing to do with lobbyists, just that knowledge has changed.



    In fairness, the fact you're amused by people who are transgender or have tourettes is a terrible reflection upon you...

    Definitely nothing to be amused about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    klaaaz wrote: »
    Ignorance is nothing to be proud of.

    It's not.
    But I am well informed and capable of making up my own mind on the subject.
    Definitely nothing to be amused about.

    People slipping on banana peels, cars being caught in the bus lane by the guards,
    men wearing dresses, peoples pant splitting... it's all in the same ballpark.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    It's not.
    But I am well informed and capable of making up my own mind on the subject.



    People slipping on banana peels, cars being caught in the bus lane by the guards,
    men wearing dresses, peoples pant splitting... it's all in the same ballpark.

    People who have Tourettes are like people who slip on banana peels? People who identify as a different gender are too? Even though it's a very real thing... You sound neither well informed or like a nice person..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    batgoat wrote: »
    You sound neither well informed or like a nice person..

    Demonizing people with other opinions is a classic denial tactic.
    Don't forgot to throw in "transphobe" too.
    Or maybe rebrand it to "trans-denier" as it hooks into the legitimacy of other terms like anti-vaxxers, anti-evolutionists and holocaust-deniers.

    As a man I know no procedure on earth will transform me into a woman regardless of whatever self image I might have.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Demonizing people with other opinions is a classic denial tactic.
    Don't forgot to throw in "transphobe" too.
    Or maybe rebrand it to "trans-denier" as it hooks into the legitimacy of other terms like anti-vaxxers, anti-evolutionists and holocaust-deniers.

    As a man I know no procedure on earth will transform me into a woman regardless of whatever self image I might have.

    You're the guy who says he's amused by both transgender and people with Tourettes... I'm literally just saying how your statements come across...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    batgoat wrote: »
    You're the guy who says he's amused by both transgender and people with Tourettes... I'm literally just saying how your statements come across...

    Welcome to human nature 101, at least for most men.
    Don't read the newspapers you'd probably faint in shock.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,423 ✭✭✭batgoat


    Welcome to human nature 101, at least for most men.
    Don't read the newspapers you'd probably faint in shock.

    Cool, I'll just leave it at. I don't treat vulnerable people as objects of amusement. It's a pretty cruel view to take.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,628 ✭✭✭klaaaz


    Welcome to human nature 101, at least for most men.
    Don't read the newspapers you'd probably faint in shock.

    So says the person offended by people with tourettes or anyone who is different to his mighty wonderful self.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 991 ✭✭✭TuringBot47


    batgoat wrote: »
    Cool, I'll just leave it at. I don't treat vulnerable people as objects of amusement.

    I don't treat them as objects of amusement either.
    There's a difference between opinions and behavior.
    klaaaz wrote: »
    So says the person offended by people with tourettes or anyone who is different to his mighty wonderful self.

    I'm not offended by trans in general at all, only the trans activists who target people, celebrities even those in the health care sector who don't subscribe to their doctrine. People has lost contracts, jobs, businesses damaged etc.

    Using social media and the legal system as a weapon against them.


Advertisement