Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Super Saturday build up thread

  • 11-03-2019 11:28am
    #1
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭


    I thought it might be nice to get a thread going just for Super Saturday and all of the permutations. The image below stolen from r/rugbyunion sums it up nicely.

    VxVTkhp.png

    Italy are already locked in for the wooden spoon but France are able to finish 4th.

    They're currently level with Scotland who also have a -20 to -36 PD advantage over France. So I imagine France will want to win well and hope England do them a favour. Italy will also want to avoid a 5th consecutive Six Nations without a win.


«1345

Comments

  • #2
    jr86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    Basically Wales win, they win the championship and Slam. They lose and England win it, barring an absolute miracle at Twickenham

    Interestingly if England had gotten an LBP at wales, we could have a very unusual scenario - if they were to lose to Scotland (with 2 BPs) - where they could still actually win the championship saturday despite winning only 3/5, and two other sides having won 4/5.


  • #3
    swiwi_
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    troyzer wrote: »
    I thought it might be nice to get a thread going just for Super Saturday and all of the permutations. The image below stolen from r/rugbyunion sums it up nicely.

    VxVTkhp.png

    Italy are already locked in for the wooden spoon but France are able to finish 4th.

    They're currently level with Scotland who also have a -20 to -36 PD advantage over France. So I imagine France will want to win well and hope England do them a favour. Italy will also want to avoid a 5th consecutive Six Nations without a win.

    What about drawn matches??


  • #4
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,969 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    swiwi_ wrote: »
    What about drawn matches??
    Screen isn't wide enough. :)


  • #5
    Jump_In_Jack
    Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    That chart has ignored possibilities of draws or Wales picking up a try bonus point and a losing bonus point.
    Just ignoring the points difference between England and the rest, as it's too much to catch now:

    Most likely outcomes now:
    1) Wales beats Ireland to win a Grand Slam
    2) Wales doesn't beat Ireland (by losing or drawing) and England beats Scotland => England wins the 6Nations

    Very unlikely outcomes after that:
    3) Wales gets a TBP and draws with Ireland and England doesn't beat Scotland (by losing or drawing) => Wales wins the 6Nations
    4) Wales doesn't get a TBP and draws with Ireland and England gets a TBP and draws with Scotland => England wins the 6Nations
    5) Wales doesn't get a TBP and draws with Ireland and England doesn't get a TBP and draws with Scotland=> Wales wins the 6Nations

    The most unlikely outcomes of all:
    6) Ireland gets a TBP and beats Wales and England doesn't beat Scotland (by losing or drawing)=> Ireland win 6Nations
    7) Ireland doesn't get a TBP and beats Wales (while keeping our favourable points difference and number of tries scored over Wales) and England gets less than 3 match points => Ireland win 6Nations


  • #6
    stephen_n
    Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    swiwi_ wrote: »
    What about drawn matches??
    There have only been 5 draws in the history of the 6 nations, that would be an unlikely outcome.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Mr Tickle
    Registered Users Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    troyzer wrote: »

    VxVTkhp.png

    How much better would the bottom left Ireland win be than the other one.


  • #8
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Mr Tickle wrote: »
    How much better would the bottom left Ireland win be than the other one.

    If Ireland went over to Cardiff and hockeyed Wales 75-0 I'd name my first born after every single player on the Ireland team.

    That's right, a quinquadec-barrelled name.


  • #9
    thegreycity
    Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭thegreycity


    troyzer wrote: »
    If Ireland went over to Cardiff and hockeyed Wales 75-0 I'd name my first born after every single player on the Ireland team.

    That's right, a quinquadec-barrelled name.

    Treviguple-barreled, no? Can't be forgetting the bench!


  • #10
    arsebiscuits1
    Registered Users Posts: 3,710 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    troyzer wrote: »
    If Ireland went over to Cardiff and hockeyed Wales 75-0 I'd name my first born after every single player on the Ireland team.

    That's right, a quinquadec-barrelled name.

    That poor girl


  • #11
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    Kinghorn, Hogg, and Seymour definitely missing the trip to London.
    Ruaridh Jackson called in, the Scots are focked!


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    thegreycity wrote: »
    Treviguple-barreled, no? Can't be forgetting the bench!

    Why not the wider squad of 37?

    Septitriginti-barreled.


  • #13
    jr86
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭jr86


    razorblunt wrote: »
    Kinghorn, Hogg, and Seymour definitely missing the trip to London.
    Ruaridh Jackson called in, the Scots are focked!

    I think England will give them a trouncing tbh

    They put 60 points on them in the last Twickenham encounter between the sides, and while they'll do very well to replicate that, I just can't see Scotland recovering enough from Saturday - in what was a seriously physical game - to mount up the challenge needed.

    England threw the ball about very well, and mixed up their attack very well on Saturday, and with guys gunning to make one last impression in a competitive international before the RWC, they'll be extremely hungry here regardless of what happens in Cardiff

    Add in Scotland's injuries, and the fact their recent record on the last matchday exactly doesn't make for great reading (only scraped past Italy last year, hammered by Ireland in 2015 and 16, and Wales 2014) and its hard to look past a facile England win imo


  • #14
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    jr86 wrote: »
    I think England will give them a trouncing tbh

    They put 60 points on them in the last Twickenham encounter between the sides, and while they'll do very well to replicate that, I just can't see Scotland recovering enough from Saturday - in what was a seriously physical game - to mount up the challenge needed.

    England threw the ball about very well, and mixed up their attack very well on Saturday, and with guys gunning to make one last impression in a competitive international before the RWC, they'll be extremely hungry here regardless of what happens in Cardiff

    Add in Scotland's injuries, and the fact their recent record on the last matchday exactly doesn't make for great reading (only scraped past Italy last year, hammered by Ireland in 2015 and 16, and Wales 2014) and its hard to look past a facile England win imo

    England by 20.

    Ireland are playing for bragging rights at this point. And as a man heading to Cardiff, nothing would bring me more pleasure than silencing the crowd who came in hoping for a slam and left in third place.


  • #15
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    troyzer wrote: »
    Italy are already locked in for the wooden spoon ......
    .

    i just want to ask a question about this phrase

    all my years growing up getting the "wooden spoon" in the then five nations meant not winning any games.
    these were the days of no points.. just wins and losses... so teams could win one game and avoid the wooden spoon... while still technically coming last in the group.

    nowadays its commonly used to describe the team that comes last ... which is a pity in my opinion as, if it was 20 years ago, italy would have been described as having a chance to avoid the wooden spoon next weekend


  • #16
    razorblunt
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,300 ✭✭✭✭razorblunt


    jr86 wrote: »
    I think England will give them a trouncing tbh

    They put 60 points on them in the last Twickenham encounter between the sides, and while they'll do very well to replicate that, I just can't see Scotland recovering enough from Saturday - in what was a seriously physical game - to mount up the challenge needed.

    England threw the ball about very well, and mixed up their attack very well on Saturday, and with guys gunning to make one last impression in a competitive international before the RWC, they'll be extremely hungry here regardless of what happens in Cardiff

    Add in Scotland's injuries, and the fact their recent record on the last matchday exactly doesn't make for great reading (only scraped past Italy last year, hammered by Ireland in 2015 and 16, and Wales 2014) and its hard to look past a facile England win imo


    I just can't see how their backrow and centers will get any sort of parity.
    Cockansiga on the wing too is a recipe for disaster for them.


  • #17
    Former Former
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i just want to ask a question about this phrase

    all my years growing up getting the "wooden spoon" in the then five nations meant not winning any games.
    these were the days of no points.. just wins and losses... so teams could win one game and avoid the wooden spoon... while still technically coming last in the group.

    nowadays its commonly used to describe the team that comes last ... which is a pity in my opinion as, if it was 20 years ago, italy would have been described as having a chance to avoid the wooden spoon next weekend

    Wooden spoon = finishing last

    Whitewash = losing all games


  • #18
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Former Former wrote: »
    Wooden spoon = finishing last

    Whitewash = losing all games

    i know what the common use of the term is these days.. i was describing what it used to be used as back in the 5 nations days

    edit: i see my understanding still holds in France ie you only get the spoon if youve been whitewashed


  • #19
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    Mr Tickle wrote: »
    How much better would the bottom left Ireland win be than the other one.

    Infinitely!


  • #20
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    There are a lot of nervous Welsh fans on Gwlad.


  • #21
    swiwi_
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,501 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    stephen_n wrote: »
    There have only been 5 draws in the history of the 6 nations, that would be an unlikely outcome.

    350.png


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    stephen_n
    Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    swiwi_ wrote: »
    350.png

    Well Ireland have never won in Cardif under Joe, but they’ve never lost on the final day of the 6 nations under him either. Yes there’s a chance :pac:


  • #23
    joseywhales
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    what is if wales lose with two bonus points,ireland get no bp and england lose?


  • #24
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    joseywhales wrote: »
    what is if wales lose with two bonus points,ireland get no bp and england lose?

    Assuming England didn't get a bonus point, it would come down to points difference between us and Wales where they are 12 ahead.

    Seeing as how it's impossible to close that gap in a scenario where Wales gets a losing bonus, Wales would win.


  • #25
    Jump_In_Jack
    Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    troyzer wrote: »
    Assuming England didn't get a bonus point, it would come down to points difference between us and Wales where they are 12 ahead.

    Seeing as how it's impossible to close that gap in a scenario where Wales gets a losing bonus, Wales would win.

    Actually, 12 points difference is a gap that can be closed while conceding a losing bonus point (winning by 7 points or less).
    If Ireland win by 6 our PD goes up by 6 and Wales' goes down by 6, resulting in a 12 point swing, where we'd be level on PD.
    The next criteria is tries scored, Ireland have 4 tries scored more than Wales as it stands, so it's extremely unlikely that Wales could score 4 tries more than Ireland and still lose by 6 points.

    If Ireland win by 7 points Ireland would have a favourable PD which would win Ireland the 6 Nations regardless of Wales getting 2 bonus points.

    I'd covered this in an earlier post:
    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=109647461&postcount=5


  • #26
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Jump_In_Jack wrote: »
    Actually, 12 points difference is a gap that can be closed while conceding a losing bonus point (winning by 7 points or less).
    If Ireland win by 6 our PD goes up by 6 and Wales' goes down by 6, resulting in a 12 point swing, where we'd be level on PD.
    The next criteria is tries scored, Ireland have 4 tries scored more than Wales as it stands, so it's extremely unlikely that Wales could score 4 tries more than Ireland and still lose by 6 points.

    If Ireland win by 7 points Ireland would have a favourable PD which would win Ireland the 6 Nations regardless of Wales getting 2 bonus points.

    I'd covered this in an earlier post:
    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=109647461&postcount=5

    My head hurts.


  • #27
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i just want to ask a question about this phrase

    all my years growing up getting the "wooden spoon" in the then five nations meant not winning any games.
    these were the days of no points.. just wins and losses... so teams could win one game and avoid the wooden spoon... while still technically coming last in the group.

    nowadays its commonly used to describe the team that comes last ... which is a pity in my opinion as, if it was 20 years ago, italy would have been described as having a chance to avoid the wooden spoon next weekend


    Tell me gramps, how did the wooden spoon work back in black&white? Whoever lost on the last day?


  • #28
    Henry Ford III
    Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,757 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    troyzer wrote: »
    There are a lot of nervous Welsh fans on Gwlad.

    Wow. I think ultimately that will be the difference.


  • #29
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Henry Ford III wrote: »
    Wow. I think ultimately that will be the difference.

    It's crucial of course.

    Seriously though, a few of my Welsh fans are saying the same. They're not confident at all.


  • #30
    Jump_In_Jack
    Registered Users Posts: 3,822 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i just want to ask a question about this phrase

    all my years growing up getting the "wooden spoon" in the then five nations meant not winning any games.
    these were the days of no points.. just wins and losses... so teams could win one game and avoid the wooden spoon... while still technically coming last in the group.

    nowadays its commonly used to describe the team that comes last ... which is a pity in my opinion as, if it was 20 years ago, italy would have been described as having a chance to avoid the wooden spoon next weekend

    Just reading back on a few websites about the 90s etc, and where teams won a match but finished bottom of the table, based on points difference, they were awarded the wooden spoon.
    So for example, a year where two teams only won 1 match, it was points scored versus points conceded which decided who got the wooden spoon.
    I think it has always been the lowest performer, not necessarily the team that loses all their matches.
    In other words, there is a wooden spoon every year, not just on years when a team loses all their matches.
    I think to lose all the matches back in the 90's was also called a whitewash.


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Digifriendly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Digifriendly


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i just want to ask a question about this phrase

    all my years growing up getting the "wooden spoon" in the then five nations meant not winning any games.
    these were the days of no points.. just wins and losses... so teams could win one game and avoid the wooden spoon... while still technically coming last in the group.

    nowadays its commonly used to describe the team that comes last ... which is a pity in my opinion as, if it was 20 years ago, italy would have been described as having a chance to avoid the wooden spoon next weekend

    I maybe wrong but all the time I have been watching 5N/6N 'wooden spoon' meant finishing last and 'whitewash' meant losing every game.


  • #32
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,836 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Jump_In_Jack wrote: »
    Just reading back on a few websites about the 90s etc, and where teams won a match but finished bottom of the table, based on points difference, they were awarded the wooden spoon.
    So for example, a year where two teams only won 1 match, it was points scored versus points conceded which decided who got the wooden spoon.
    I think it has always been the lowest performer, not necessarily the team that loses all their matches.
    In other words, there is a wooden spoon every year, not just on years when a team loses all their matches.
    I think to lose all the matches back in the 90's was also called a whitewash.

    yeah but like i said originally, i recall teams going into the final day on no wins being able to avoid the wooden spoon, even though they came last... it was just the use of the term

    if you read around more youll find that the term wooden spoon is used predominantly in france and italy to describe a team with no wins. (mention here and here)

    maybe its that version of it that im recalling


  • #33
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Digifriendly wrote: »
    I maybe wrong but all the time I have been watching 5N/6N 'wooden spoon' meant finishing last and 'whitewash' meant losing every game.

    I dunno, I think if you win a match and finish last that's fair enough. It's a tough tournament - I wouldn't be suggesting an award for it. It's a borderline rude to be honest. It was Ireland for a long time.


  • #34
    penybont exile
    Registered Users Posts: 732 ✭✭✭penybont exile


    troyzer wrote: »
    It's crucial of course.

    Seriously though, a few of my Welsh fans are saying the same. They're not confident at all.

    Well ...... I'm pretty confident we'll get the job done and by Saturday evening we'll be toasting GS #12


  • #35
    VayNiice
    Registered Users Posts: 262 ✭✭VayNiice


    troyzer wrote: »
    There are a lot of nervous Welsh fans on Gwlad.

    Really? They all seem very confident on my reading.

    The common trend on the Welsh forums when we play them seems to be that the Irish do everything they can to bend the laws e.g hands on the deck, LH boring in, constant side entry etc etc. Apparently we build our game plan around cheating and playing the referee. As if they're a bunch of saints.


  • #36
    Leinstertomas
    Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Leinstertomas


    VayNiice wrote: »
    Really? They all seem very confident on my reading.

    The common trend on the Welsh forums when we play them seems to be that the Irish do everything they can to bend the laws e.g hands on the deck, LH boring in, constant side entry etc etc. Apparently we build our game plan around cheating and playing the referee. As if they're a bunch of saints.

    Hear similar things from Scottish fans who tell me that we "live offside like the southern hemisphere teams" and seem convinced that there's hardly any difference in quality between the two teams. I tell them that if that's the difference between good and bad teams maybe they should start doing same


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    stephen_n
    Registered Users Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Leinstertomas wrote: »
    Hear similar things from Scottish fans who tell me that we "live offside like the southern hemisphere teams" and seem convinced that there's hardly any difference in quality between the two teams. I tell them that if that's the difference between good and bad teams maybe they should start doing same

    How ironic, coming from Scots fans :pac:


  • #38
    Anjobe
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,451 ✭✭✭Anjobe


    VayNiice wrote: »
    ...the Irish do everything they can to bend the laws e.g hands on the deck, LH boring in, constant side entry etc etc. Apparently we build our game plan around cheating and playing the referee.

    Isn't that how every top RU team plays? It is not a good thing that different referees and their varying interpretations of certain laws can have such an influence on a game, but its the way it is and teams must to be able to adapt (and play the referee).


  • #39
    Former Observer
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 474 ✭✭Former Observer


    Know a few French rugby fans and for them, the Wooden Spoon means only one thing: losing all your games. I was taking the piss out of them a few years back when they came last and that's how we got to talking about it. To be fair, that was always my understanding of what it meant too but it didn't stop me from proclaiming that they'd won it nonetheless.


  • #40
    Zzippy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭Zzippy


    troyzer wrote: »
    England by 20.

    Ireland are playing for bragging rights at this point. And as a man heading to Cardiff, nothing would bring me more pleasure than silencing the crowd who came in hoping for a slam and left in third place.

    Apparently winning the GS means a €3m bonus for the winning union. If there is no GS, that money is shared out between all 6 unions. Ireland are playing for more than bragging rights, they are playing for €600k extra for the IRFU.

    I would have no problem with that money being on offer to the squad as a bonus for denying the Welsh a slam :D


  • #41
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Zzippy wrote: »
    Apparently winning the GS means a €3m bonus for the winning union. If there is no GS, that money is shared out between all 6 unions. Ireland are playing for more than bragging rights, they are playing for €600k extra for the IRFU.

    I would have no problem with that money being on offer to the squad as a bonus for denying the Welsh a slam :D

    Don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative Zippy.

    Bragging rights are all that's on offer. Definitely.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    Zzippy wrote: »
    Apparently winning the GS means a €3m bonus for the winning union. If there is no GS, that money is shared out between all 6 unions. Ireland are playing for more than bragging rights, they are playing for €600k extra for the IRFU.

    I would have no problem with that money being on offer to the squad as a bonus for denying the Welsh a slam :D
    troyzer wrote: »
    Don't let facts get in the way of a good narrative Zippy.

    Bragging rights are all that's on offer. Definitely.

    Since you're contradicting each other, would either one or both of you like to produce some sort of evidence. You both seem kinda sure you're right, but you can't both be.


  • #43
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    locum-motion wrote: »
    Since you're contradicting each other, would either one or both of you like to produce some sort of evidence. You both seem kinda sure you're right, but you can't both be.

    Whoosh.


  • #44
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    https://twitter.com/IrishRugby/status/1106198771506077696?s=20


  • #45
    Nermal
    Registered Users Posts: 2,704 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Roof open or closed?


  • #46
    KBurke85
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭KBurke85


    Nermal wrote: »
    Roof open or closed?

    Request has gone in for roof to be closed

    https://twitter.com/noriordan/status/1106200928099749888


  • #47
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    troyzer wrote: »
    Whoosh.

    What does that mean?

    Are you now saying that your last post was a joke that went over my head?


  • #48
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    locum-motion wrote: »
    troyzer wrote: »
    Whoosh.

    What does that mean?

    Are you now saying that your last post was a joke that went over my head?

    Yes. Zippy comprehensively demolished my argument using cold logic, facts and numbers.

    I had no counter argument so I jokingly pretended that facts don't matter.


  • #49
    locum-motion
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,143 ✭✭✭locum-motion


    troyzer wrote: »
    Yes. Zippy comprehensively demolished my argument using cold logic, facts and numbers.

    I had no counter argument so I jokingly pretended that facts don't matter.

    Sorry, I see it now. Made more sense when I went back and read your previous post.


  • #50
    twinytwo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,339 ✭✭✭twinytwo


    I have a sneaky feeling wales will take this one. SOB is done at this stage(happy for him to prove me wrong tomorrow).

    Our one off runners/mass phase wont work against wales we lose the ball they transition go wide and kill us like they almost did last year.

    The one thing we wont do (which we should)is drop the ball behind their defensive line.. that amd we will keep kicking to williams.


  • #51
    troyzer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    twinytwo wrote: »
    I have a sneaky feeling wales will take this one. SOB is done at this stage(happy for him to prove me wrong tomorrow).

    Our one off runners/mass phase wont work against wales we lose the ball they transition go wide and kill us like they almost did last year.

    The one thing we wont do (which we should)is drop the ball behind their defensive line.. that amd we will keep kicking to williams.

    They won't be able to work out wide like last year. Ireland's defense has hugely tightened up.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement