Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

12829313334107

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Road. Nowt further than the truth! Ha ha!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    We’re not buying attack jets
    We’re not buying jet trainers
    We’re not buying interceptors

    There’s zero political will for this.

    The defence forces is in rag order, critical manning levels in the IAC and NS, massively underfunded, a broken RDF, crippled by pensions, hamstrung by the DOD at all levels and not deemed worthy of a full ministerial position by gov.

    Move on lads- it’s not happening, we’ve as much chance of buying nukes at this stage


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    punchdrunk wrote: »
    We’re not buying attack jets
    We’re not buying jet trainers
    We’re not buying interceptors

    There’s zero political will for this.

    The defence forces is in rag order, critical manning levels in the IAC and NS, massively underfunded, a broken RDF, crippled by pensions, hamstrung by the DOD at all levels and not deemed worthy of a full ministerial position by gov.

    Move on lads- it’s not happening, we’ve as much chance of buying nukes at this stage

    About those nukes. Well I know I guy that knows guy that's married to a gal that knows a guy.. just saying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Gary kk wrote: »
    About those nukes. Well I know I guy that knows guy that's married to a gal that knows a guy.. just saying

    Is it time for a "Nuclear Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles for the Air Corps?" Thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I guess we have no immediate threats but things can and do change. Our most likely invader would still be the UK and in that case a small air force of fighters would probably be knocked out very quickly. Still, even the DR Congo have 6 fighters and if say a rogue passenger jet threatened to say fly into say the Dail we have nothing to intercept it with now. A few Hawk jets even or some advanced drone(s).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    Most likely invader the UK?

    Do you work for the Russian Government by any chance?
    You know, the one who wanted to expand it's embassy in a leafy Dublin suburb to 5 times it's current size to accommodate the extra spies that could cross into the UK unnoticed on Ryanair?
    The Ones who's military aircraft frequently fly, transponders off through Irish Controlled airspace, at great risk to all civilian traffic who use it?
    The ones who's Navy frequently carries out military exercises in Irish waters, often leaving a large trail of heavy fuel oil in their wake?
    The ones who ACTUALLY KILLED PEOPLE in the UK who disagreed with their government?

    The brits are responsible for lots of things over the years,But we have very little to fear from them militarily, as a state, today.


    We have never been invaded by Russia and almost certainly never will be. Who knows what a destabilized UK could do in the future?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    You know we aren't supposed to talk about them, because if you-know-who hears about it...you never know what you'll get.
    They'll take you off to the you know where.
    for you wouldn't know how long.
    So for You-know-who's sake don't let anyone, hear you talking about the ICBM base at Abbeyshrule.

    The first rule of Abbeyshrule is: You do not talk about Abbeyshrule. The second rule of Abbeyshrule is: You do not talk about abbeyshrule. Third rule of Abbeyshrule is: The rustic inn does a nice pint


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    Thanks for the laughs lads 😂


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    roadmaster wrote: »
    The first rule of Abbeyshrule is: You do not talk about Abbeyshrule. The second rule of Abbeyshrule is: You do not talk about abbeyshrule. Third rule of Abbeyshrule is: The rustic inn does a nice pint

    You mean Abbeyshrule that’s guarded by the RDF Ranger Tier 1 assault group?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,357 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ah jaysis, Abbeyshrule, I haven't heard mention of that in a long time. Not since Will Smith zapped me with the red light on the end of his vaping pipe.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    punchdrunk wrote: »
    You mean Abbeyshrule that’s guarded by the RDF Ranger Tier 1 assault group?


    I first read about them over on IMO in the early 2000's apparently their camouflage is called "civvys" so they blend in & ive been told they can stand still & when they do with the camouflage it sort of bends light like in predator. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    Psychlops wrote: »
    I first read about them over on IMO in the early 2000's apparently their camouflage is called "civvys" so they blend in & ive been told they can stand still & when they do with the camouflage it sort of bends light like in predator. :eek:

    I heard they still use sawn-off Bren guns and BAP’s taped onto hurleys


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Oh Abbeyshrule back in the day F15's and A10's


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    roadmaster wrote: »
    Oh Abbeyshrule back in the day F15's and A10's

    What about the stealth bombers?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    sparky42 wrote: »
    What about the stealth bombers?

    Shhhhhhhhhh!

    secret!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    sparky42 wrote: »
    What about the stealth bombers?

    Did the yanks ever bring a F117?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,466 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    roadmaster wrote: »
    Did the yanks ever bring a F117?

    not officially, they are flying in Nevada and Oklahoma an awful lot. Lots of planespotters have photos of them flying low level


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭blindsider


    https://twitter.com/EHSBspotter/status/1376491583969845255

    2 x Tupolev 'Bears' decided to go play with 2 x Belgian F-16s this morning.

    RAF had some planes up too, but don't think they got involved. Still some activity off NE Scotland...? (ADS-B)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Time to rev up the Irish Strike Force!


  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 78 ✭✭Jerrykay6


    Sounds great. Sure we should get the navy a few aircraft carriers while we're at it. Load them up with F22s.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Glad to hear about more Eire signs being restored. Did they restore the one on Bray Head that was exposed in a gorse fire a couple of years ago? I hope so! I might volunteer to help out with further restorations.... Keep safe Y'all!


  • Site Banned Posts: 78 ✭✭Jerrykay6


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    No point. F22 isn't carrier capable.
    Thanks for your input though.

    F35 excuse me


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    We should get the Viggen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    We should get the Viggen.

    Loud old boy. I'd prefer the Draken, always loved that aircraft.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭punchdrunk


    Jerrykay6 wrote: »
    Sounds great. Sure we should get the navy a few aircraft carriers while we're at it. Load them up with F22s.

    Is this Johnnybigwallets alt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Saab Gripens and a few BAE Hawks?


    UTube below with a view..


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srMoZhn4kzI


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Thank you for posting that... A jolly interesting discussion about a very thorny and difficult problem. I'd go for the advanced Korean trainer / interceptor meself out of the various options in the video.


  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Jawgap wrote: »
    And what exactly is the threat we're defending against, in your view?

    The unknown.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Jonny Russian. Innit obvious?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    The unknown.


    A rogue or far right British state or Statelet anxious to reestablish the old status quo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,143 ✭✭✭Psychlops


    Glad to hear about more Eire signs being restored. Did they restore the one on Bray Head that was exposed in a gorse fire a couple of years ago? I hope so! I might volunteer to help out with further restorations.... Keep safe Y'all!


    My hero.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Yawlboy


    The RAF is to retire 24 Tranche 1 Typhoons - The Air Defense model. Those planes aren't too old and were expected to be in service until 2040 following recent upgrades. Would be ideal for Ireland with training, servicing and maintenance available next door.....

    Plus we could act as "Aggressor" in training exercises with the RAF

    https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/uk-defence-command-paper-raf-to-axe-older-typhoons


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Yawlboy wrote:
    The RAF is to retire 24 Tranche 1 Typhoons - The Air Defense model. Those planes aren't too old and were expected to be in service until 2040 following recent upgrades. Would be ideal for Ireland with training, servicing and maintenance available next door.....

    Maybe we need to build a few houses first, and maybe employee a few more health workers, before we considering buying military death machines!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Yawlboy


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    Maybe we need to build a few houses first, and maybe employee a few more health workers, before we considering buying military death machines!

    Ireland spends 0.29% of GDP on its Military, one of the lowest in the world. Its military personnel are underpaid and lacking in equipment.

    However we have the 5th highest spend on Healthcare. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)30461-6/fulltext


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Yawlboy wrote: »
    Ireland spends 0.29% of GDP on its Military, one of the lowest in the world. Its military personnel are underpaid and lacking in equipment.

    However we have the 5th highest spend on Healthcare. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)30461-6/fulltext

    oh i agree our personnel should be getting better paid, but forking out millions, possibly billions on flying death machines, na you re grand thanks, let other countries do such stupid things.

    yup, and our health care system needs even more money, and we cant keep taxing people more for it either


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    oh i agree our personnel should be getting better paid, but forking out millions, possibly billions on flying death machines, na you re grand thanks, let other countries do such stupid things.

    yup, and our health care system needs even more money, and we cant keep taxing people more for it either

    No the health care doesn't need more money it need a course In financial management


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    Gary kk wrote: »
    No the health care doesn't need more money it need a course In financial management

    it actually doesnt really, because its not like a private sector business, having a functioning health care system is a critical economic and societal need, as not having one, causes major economic shocks such as lockdowns etc!


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    it actually doesnt really, because its not like a private sector business, having a functioning health care system is a critical economic and societal need, as not having one, causes major economic shocks such as lockdowns etc!

    Yeah ok buddy go troll elsewhere


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Yawlboy


    Yawlboy wrote: »
    The RAF is to retire 24 Tranche 1 Typhoons - The Air Defence model. Those planes aren't too old and were expected to be in service until 2040 following recent upgrades. Would be ideal for Ireland with training, servicing and maintenance available next door.....

    Plus we could act as "Aggressor" in training exercises with the RAF

    https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/uk-defence-command-paper-raf-to-axe-older-typhoons

    But getting back to my original point, the Typhoon would be an excellent choice for air defence fighter. Reckon the UK would let them go very cheaply to us.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Yawlboy


    Dohvolle wrote: »
    Defense?
    oops Typo, thanks fixed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,905 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    looks like ive triggered some in here, thats a good sign! thank god folks like yourselves arent within an arses roar of government, fighter jets are not peace keeping machines folks, theyre designed to maim and kill, period. lets grow up and try do as much as possible to prevent their use in the first place, by using this money to create critical societal needs, and let the war games just be for the real kids


  • Registered Users Posts: 48 feckwunker


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    it actually doesnt really, because its not like a private sector business, having a functioning health care system is a critical economic and societal need, as not having one, causes major economic shocks such as lockdowns etc!

    You're such an idiot it hurts my brain to comprehend that you exist.


  • Registered Users Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    looks like ive triggered some in here, thats a good sign! thank god folks like yourselves arent within an arses roar of government, fighter jets are not peace keeping machines folks, theyre designed to maim and kill, period. lets grow up and try do as much as possible to prevent their use in the first place, by using this money to create critical societal needs, and let the war games just be for the real kids

    I think you will find this thread is about policing Irish air space with interceptors not ground attack jets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,023 ✭✭✭blindsider


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    looks like ive triggered some in here, thats a good sign! thank god folks like yourselves arent within an arses roar of government, fighter jets are not peace keeping machines folks, theyre designed to maim and kill, period. lets grow up and try do as much as possible to prevent their use in the first place, by using this money to create critical societal needs, and let the war games just be for the real kids

    Try telling that to the government who regularly fly strategic bombers around our coast - with the transponder switched off - to see what reaction they can get.

    Australia had a cyber attack last week which took out TV.

    Do you know how many underseas communications cables pass through our waters? If someone decied to test their resilience, we'd be in some pickle!

    I'm not suggesting we spend billions on a war-mongering army, but at least let's have the basic capacity to defend ourselves. Austria, Sweden and Finland are neutral, non-aligned countries - we could learn something from them.

    https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/emea/helsinkis-brand-new-childrens-hospital-case-study-patient-centric-design

    €170m for a world-class Children's Hospital - how much will ours cost? €2bn?
    https://www.rte.ie/news/2021/0209/1196082-childrens-hospital-pac/

    Let's re-think where the problems and inefficiencies are!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Notmything


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    looks like ive triggered some in here, thats a good sign! thank god folks like yourselves arent within an arses roar of government, fighter jets are not peace keeping machines folks, theyre designed to maim and kill, period. lets grow up and try do as much as possible to prevent their use in the first place, by using this money to create critical societal needs, and let the war games just be for the real kids

    You do realise that the rifles soldiers carry fire bullets not fluffy balls of cotton, That the apcs/ifv are also designed for one purpose and thats not to deliver flowesrs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Grimscribe


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    looks like ive triggered some in here, thats a good sign! thank god folks like yourselves arent within an arses roar of government, fighter jets are not peace keeping machines folks, theyre designed to maim and kill, period. lets grow up and try do as much as possible to prevent their use in the first place, by using this money to create critical societal needs, and let the war games just be for the real kids

    So what do you say we do in the event some unfriendly lads with flying death machines (designed to maim and kill) start maiming and killing over here? Do we make them a pot of tea and tell them how much we're spending on healthcare to try make them jealous?
    This might come as a shock but adequately defending a country from unfriendly lads may require maiming and killing, or so I've heard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Grimscribe wrote: »
    So what do you say we do in the event some unfriendly lads with flying death machines (designed to maim and kill) start maiming and killing over here? Do we make them a pot of tea and tell them how much we're spending on healthcare to try make them jealous?
    This might come as a shock but adequately defending a country from unfriendly lads may require maiming and killing, or so I've heard

    Nobody with the force projection capabilities to start "maiming and kill over here" would be the slightest bit worried by the number of fighters we could procure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,288 ✭✭✭source


    Nobody with the force projection capabilities to start "maiming and kill over here" would be the slightest bit worried by the number of fighters we could procure.

    That doesn't mean we shouldn't provide our services with the correct tools to do their job.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2 Grimscribe


    Nobody with the force projection capabilities to start "maiming and kill over here" would be the slightest bit worried by the number of fighters we could procure.

    You can use this same logic to argue against even having a military. Why bother even putting up a fight if someone bigger will be able beat you anyways? Obviously it doesn't carry much weight since just about every country has a military and most of those are capable of defending their airspace


  • Advertisement
Advertisement