Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Digital Performer

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    well I reckon I may just buy Live or Logic first. get to know that for a month or two before i fully decide on LE. Ill see how far that takes me. If it can do all i need it to then I may forgoe the PT idea.

    im still weighing things up but so far im very impressed by what Live can do. Elastic Audio and not having to stop playback while making changes. Things like that...

    Surely though there are a lot of people that use LE with the likes of Live. Why else would you get a demo copy of it when you buy LE? Digi arent tryig to get you to buy another system instead of theirs are they.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭sei046


    I cant see why Le wouldnt wok perfectly with live? It should work with all daws.

    And your totally against the Apogee,Motu, Full Daw route ye? Is there something that makes it out of the question?

    It just seems like your buying a lot of middle ground stuff when with 5k i would just buy less and better stuff? So that if you ever do want to move up to something different, It certainly wont be because your gear held you back!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    sei046 wrote:
    I cant see why Le wouldnt wok perfectly with live?

    thats my point. By giving you a demo copy of Live I reckn Digi are saying 'Here try this aswell. We recommend you use it alongside LE'.

    I guess im trying to stay away from project studio gear as much as possible. Like i said earlier I dont believe the 002/3 are good enough. The motu 8 pre isnt either.

    This way I can have the software i want AND the hardware I want.

    Apogee dont make a DAW do they??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭sei046


    Well im sure your doing your reasearch anyway and now the possible pitfalls etc! If your looking to jump on the PT wagon i wouldnt do it the way you plan on it. Buying a HD rig will mean almost buying from scratch again as your prob better off just buying a whole integrated system. So bare in mind that this will be one rig, Hd will be another...The 1st probably wont evolve in the last.

    My Chain with 5k would be
    Top Mic
    Top Pre
    Top Soundcard
    Full Featured Daw
    Nice Mixer

    and i would prob also be buying second hand to get an even more smoking rig!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    sei046 wrote:

    My Chain with 5k would be
    Top Mic
    Top Pre
    Top Soundcard
    Full Featured Daw
    Nice Mixer

    and i would prob also be buying second hand to get an even more smoking rig!

    OK. If you had 5k to spend what would YOU get? Leaving out the mic as I have that covered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,401 ✭✭✭jtsuited


    ok just to clear up the ableton and pt thing, as far as i know (i'm 95% sure) ableton is owned (technically) by m-audio. Who in turn are owned by Avid who also happen to own Digidesign. That's why i would predict PTLE won't upgrade the midi capabilities and will continue to do this ableton lite (or digidesign ableton or some other thing like that).

    Digidesign don't view ableton as a competitor and they are correct. For audio editing PTLE really is top dog. And using ableton with PTLE is really a great choice. Also due to the fact that ableton are owned (in a roundabout way i think), you are guaranteed no compatibility problems in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭sei046


    Lynx L22 699 new
    Pre? Have no idea where to start lol. So many CHOICES!
    Logic/SX
    I would get a llittle router desk like an 8 channel with lots of routing and then something like a Tascam Us2400.


    I would need a few days to be MY chain together let alone yours


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,759 ✭✭✭Neurojazz


    I can't belivve u kids are still fighting.

    Get your heads out of your a** and go write some f******g music...

    ;P

    I don't mind any software as long as it works... i found that Digidesign have some rather unethical tactics in regards to their aquisition of code... I won't go into mud slinging but i find that i'd rather support companies who firmly base their business around the musicians... spectrasonics, cubase & SSL are some of my personal faves - having owned stupid amounts of hardware software i setteled down with what works for me... It must be a different mindset to use logic - the music comes out the end no different really.

    If you want to get really anal about things maybe you should look at the creative time you waste arguing and not bringing soulful music to the world.
    Rant.end


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭sei046


    Neuro we are not arguing lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    Strings.ie wrote:

    As previously mentioned, the 001 / 002 & 003 all have optical adat in and out's meaning you have 8 digital in's and 8 digital out's. So you could buy some better converters and connect them to the adat ports of your 002/003 and bypass the built in converters. If you only require 8 channels at any one time this is the way to go.

    is adat preferable to spdif? im thinking of getting an mbox instead of a 002 but it only has spdif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 253 ✭✭Strings.ie


    Maccattack wrote:
    is adat preferable to spdif? im thinking of getting an mbox instead of a 002 but it only has spdif

    Spdif is just a digital stereo connection. Adat can handle 8 individual tracks at 24bit/48khz.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    so does that mean i can add extra pre's and convertors with an mbox?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Niall - Dahlia


    You can use an extra dual channel pre with the MBox through SPDIF.

    You could use a unit with up to 8 mono pre's through an ADAT connection (like the 002 has), although it's reduced to 4 at higher sampling rates.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,322 ✭✭✭Maccattack


    so maybe an mbox isnt a great idea for future expansion (?)

    like i said im trying to get a basic set up that can grow into a pro quality system as money permits (without having to go the HD route).

    at the moment all i need is 2 channels of pro quality i/o. but i want to be able to expand that to 8 or 16 down the track.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Niall - Dahlia


    Maccattack wrote:
    so maybe an mbox isnt a great idea for future expansion (?)

    like i said im trying to get a basic set up that can grow into a pro quality system as money permits (without having to go the HD route).

    at the moment all i need is 2 channels of pro quality i/o. but i want to be able to expand that to 8 or 16 down the track.

    No, the MBox is definitely not a good idea for future expansion. 2 "pro quality" channels as you put it is all you can have. The MBox is for learning Pro Tools (and becoming dependent on it...guilty as charged!)

    In saying that though the 002/003 isn't exactly limitlessly expandable either, you can use ADAT and SPDIF simultaneously allowing for a total of 10 external preamps bypassing the 002 convertors, but that's the max if you're insistent about avoiding the 002's converters (a good idea).

    Maybe when you feel you need to make the step up to 16+ tracks you'll be in a position to consider a HD system, in which case a 002 will do you fine. Maybe by that time Digidesign will have released their next "must have to be pro" system and the HD interfaces will take a tumble in price! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 253 ✭✭Strings.ie


    No, the MBox is definitely not a good idea for future expansion. 2 "pro quality" channels as you put it is all you can have. The MBox is for learning Pro Tools (and becoming dependent on it...guilty as charged!)

    In saying that though the 002/003 isn't exactly limitlessly expandable either, you can use ADAT and SPDIF simultaneously allowing for a total of 10 external preamps bypassing the 002 convertors, but that's the max if you're insistent about avoiding the 002's converters (a good idea).

    Maybe when you feel you need to make the step up to 16+ tracks you'll be in a position to consider a HD system, in which case a 002 will do you fine. Maybe by that time Digidesign will have released their next "must have to be pro" system and the HD interfaces will take a tumble in price! :)

    When the 003 came there was a lot of moaning at the digi forums, people were very disappointed in that the 003 was just a rebranded 002 with very little in the way of new features. Anyway, I recall a Digi staff member posting on the discussion and he pretty much hinted that digi were working on a mid range system.

    Don't hold your breath though, I've been waiting for over 4 years for digi to deliver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 820 ✭✭✭Niall - Dahlia


    Strings.ie wrote:
    When the 003 came there was a lot of moaning at the digi forums, people were very disappointed in that the 003 was just a rebranded 002 with very little in the way of new features. Anyway, I recall a Digi staff member posting on the discussion and he pretty much hinted that digi were working on a mid range system.

    It's a tricky one to call, but I don't see a midrange PT interface being released anytime soon. A midrange system would probably be a bad business move for Digidesign, and they are a business at the end of the day. They wanna shift their HD systems, and a midrange system would eat into HD sales, they don't want to give a middle ground. I think the 003 was proof of that. No reason why it couldn't have been the midrange system everybody was looking for, but Digidesign decided against it.

    Interestingly enough I see more and more threads about people wondering if it's a good idea to get a HD system now, or whether there'll be a new flagship product line they should wait for. But I don't really see that happening any time soon either. But who knows. *cue Digidesign press release announcing new midrange system and uber-HD 768kHz/32-bit system*

    And the award for most off-topic thread on boards.ie goes toooo... :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 253 ✭✭Strings.ie


    It's a tricky one to call, but I don't see a midrange PT interface being released anytime soon. A midrange system would probably be a bad business move for Digidesign, and they are a business at the end of the day. They wanna shift their HD systems, and a midrange system would eat into HD sales, they don't want to give a middle ground. I think the 003 was proof of that. No reason why it couldn't have been the midrange system everybody was looking for, but Digidesign decided against it.

    Interestingly enough I see more and more threads about people wondering if it's a good idea to get a HD system now, or whether there'll be a new flagship product line they should wait for. But I don't really see that happening any time soon either. But who knows. *cue Digidesign press release announcing new midrange system and uber-HD 768kHz/32-bit system*

    And the award for most off-topic thread on boards.ie goes toooo... :D

    Digi's position is indeed tricky but while they dominate the pro end of the market they must be loosing massive sales at the semi pro end of the market.

    I mean, for the same money as a 003 you could have a much more powerful and flexible system whether it's based around logic, DP or whatever. The hardware in/out limitations that digi impose on the LE range must and does put a lot of people off.

    Pro Tools as a tool is wonderful. I love working with it but it's so frustrating that I'm expected to pay a minimum of €10,000 to just allow me to have flexible in & out options. The simple solution for digi would be to release additional hardware add-ons for the Le range. It could still be limited to say 24 in's / 8 outs and sample rates remain no higher than 96khz. Perhaps leave track count limited too.

    It will certainly be interesting to watch their next move, especially when they do replace HD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭cornbb


    I've heard that Apple are planning a major revamp of Logic soon in order to directly compete with Pro Tools. Sounds like a massive uphill struggle, given PT's monopoloy over pretty much every pro studio. Will be interesting to see how they attempt to do this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,849 ✭✭✭condra


    This thread has gone on for so long but it seems many of you aren't using logic and reason when putting forward your points.

    In my opinion, in a few years time, all digital performers will be using Cycleton Live 74 as their main pro tool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,790 ✭✭✭cornbb


    Oh yeah? What are you cubasing this opinion on?

    I'll get me coat


Advertisement