Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Shelbourne Hotel remove historic statues due to association with slavery - *Read OP**

2456729

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,000 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Choosing to continue using these patriarchal terms is embedding sexism into our culture on every level. :(

    Ah have a drop of Hemlock, you'll be grand but dead. Socrates said so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,053 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    o1s1n wrote: »
    Didn't you get the memo? Everyone in the past was a Nazi and their history must be eradicated.

    Well if someone’s “we can’t eradicate history” virtue signaling is to remain consistent it stands to simple reason it should be able to stand up to the informal ‘Nazi Test’ as it were. There’s a difference between “vaporizing history” and moving statues to less prolific sites.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,654 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Yyhhuuu wrote: »
    Planning permission is most certainly required to remove any part of the protected structure.

    Please lodge a complaint to Dublin city council's planning enforcement section. E mail/ postal address:

    The Enforcement Section
    Planning Department
    Civic Offices
    Block 4, Floor 2
    Wood Quay
    Dublin 8

    There's a fairly hefty irony to DCC's planning section being located at Wood Quay given the archaelogical vandalism that went on in building that office block


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,000 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    There's a fairly hefty irony to DCC's planning section being located at Wood Quay given the archaelogical vandalism that went on in building that office block

    That was a total travesty alright. Pains me to think about what is underneath that behomoth of a building. You have triggered my anger.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭MoonUnit75


    It’s almost like no one notices the fundamentalism taking hold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,130 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Wait till they start going through the art galleries of the world and start removing the masterpieces that depict unsavoury content.

    They already are. Famous Victorian painting of Greek Nymphs and Narcissus was taken down fir being problematic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,258 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Overheal wrote: »
    Well if someone’s “we can’t eradicate history” virtue signaling is to remain consistent it stands to simple reason it should be able to stand up to the informal ‘Nazi Test’ as it were. There’s a difference between “vaporizing history” and moving statues to less prolific sites.

    So decorative statues which have been there for over a century and a half have the same historical display value as political statues thrown up for a brief period in Germany during the Third Reich?

    Nazi statues were never of historical significance at the time as they were barely up relatively speaking before being torn down. It's not the same thing and you're well aware how ridiculous a comparison it is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,514 ✭✭✭MoonUnit75


    Overheal wrote: »
    Well if someone’s “we can’t eradicate history” virtue signaling is to remain consistent it stands to simple reason it should be able to stand up to the informal ‘Nazi Test’ as it were. There’s a difference between “vaporizing history” and moving statues to less prolific sites.

    Great, we’ll start moving ‘problematic’ books to less troublesome shelves, in a bunker somewhere. Good books should be able to pass the new Woke cult test, right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Wait till they start going through the art galleries of the world and start removing the masterpieces that depict unsavoury content.

    The Pyramids need to go ASAP


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,748 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    mc25 wrote: »
    The article did say that they had been planned to be removed for some time...

    I mean that could be corporate BS, but would there be as much talk here if it was statues of unicorns or something equally as ridiculous?

    Planned for some time, like a few weeks

    The hotel’s general manager JP Kavanagh said the decision to take the four statues down had been taken by them alone and there had been no complaints from outsiders about them.

    “It was a decision taken just by us with our owner and operator. This decision has been coming for a number of weeks given what has been happening in the world,” he said.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    For those of you asking “where will this all end” the answer is it won’t. Dublin City Council or any public body simply do not have the guts to insist that these statues, which form part of a protected structure, be reinstated.

    The removal of these statues will further embolden anyone with an agenda to demand cultural items be suppressed, banned and removed.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭1990sman


    white noise omfg so racisht padraig


  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭1990sman


    quick burn the sliced pan before aunt aoife gets here! had no idea she was so political.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Can’t say I agree with removing statues or indeed any form of art or sculpture without very good reason; would much rather see plaques nearby which put them into their correct context and otherwise leave them be. If they’re moved to a museum or park then I wouldn’t have much of an issue either.

    I would be interested to see what if any kind of reaction there will be from Dublin City Council since presumably there was no planning permission sought.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,591 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    The hotel virtue signalling by removing statues that few if any realised had any slavery connotations.

    How about some real virtue. Like employing a diversity officer or paying minimum wage workers 50 cent more an hour? No? Of course not, the statues will have to go to prove how virtuous and multiculturally aware they are.

    Now try booking a traveller wedding in the Shelbourne.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,053 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    MoonUnit75 wrote: »
    Great, we’ll start moving ‘problematic’ books to less troublesome shelves, in a bunker somewhere. Good books should be able to pass the new Woke cult test, right?

    You won’t find Mein Kampf in the kids or young adults sections no.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭KungPao


    Jeez what next? Pretend we weren’t once part of the United Kingdom and blow up Nelson’s Pillar? Spray paint the post boxes green?

    Madness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,748 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    Overheal wrote: »
    You won’t find Mein Kampf in the kids or young adults sections no.

    Wasnt there a call just last week to remove To Kill a Mockingbird from the Junior Cert curriculum? (and Of Mice and Men, though I haven't read it, so I'm not sure what's 'problematic' about that...)

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40021460.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,042 ✭✭✭Carfacemandog


    It's their hotel, it seems a bit silly to me given the context but they can remove them if they want. Though it is funny juxtaposing this thread with others where posters are saying if people want statues taken down they should do it by peaceful means instead of just ripping them out of the ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,801 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    walshb wrote: »
    World is fooking mad....and the maddest thing is that it's going to get madder...

    It is, we are simply lying down and pandering to a bunch of people who we opened our doors, arms, financial resources to and are now prepared self rape our own identity, history, culture and ideology so that they might not get offended... the world / country is bananas.... mental... we are living in truly fûcked up times.

    Only a matter of time before we see companies advertising online for staff and at the bottom of the advertisement the BLM badge. Underneath... “Our policy is to hire 50% or better people who are black / African heritage...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Nesta99


    Racial supremacy, slavery, genocide, eugenic behaviour, wiping out entire species of animal, overthrowing democratically elected governance - time to take the wrecking ball to Colesseum and all that Roman stuff!

    Pardon the term but white washing history is wrong - within reason leave remnants of historical ills as part of the educating of future generations. Explain the significance of these things. They should rename US military bases commemorating confederates that defended slavery, but its should be eg Fort Tuskagee (formally known as Fort Benning) with even an info point or plaque on why renaming happened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 798 ✭✭✭Yyhhuuu


    SafeSurfer wrote: »
    For those of you asking “where will this all end” the answer is it won’t. Dublin City Council or any public body simply do not have the guts to insist that these statues, which form part of a protected structure, be reinstated.

    The removal of these statues will further embolden anyone with an agenda to demand cultural items be suppressed, banned and removed.

    If there has been a breach of planning legislation and a valid complaint is lodged to their Enforcement section they are then obliged to act by investigating and if necessary issuing an enforcement notice, which if not complied with should result in enforcement proceedings. If a member of the public is of the opinion the council failed to take appropriate action then they should lodge a complaint with the Ombudsman.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 798 ✭✭✭Yyhhuuu


    It's their hotel, it seems a bit silly to me given the context but they can remove them if they want. Though it is funny juxtaposing this thread with others where posters are saying if people want statues taken down they should do it by peaceful means instead of just ripping them out of the ground.
    The building is on the Register of Protected structures which I understand to mean planning permission is required to interfere with the fabric of the building.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,053 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Wasnt there a call just last week to remove To Kill a Mockingbird from the Junior Cert curriculum? (and Of Mice and Men, though I haven't read it, so I'm not sure what's 'problematic' about that...)

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40021460.html

    You say you aren’t sure yet it’s explained in the link you offered.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 ChosenWong


    It all seems a bit medieval that these monuments are being pulled down or removed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    Solve the amount of slavery happening in the modern world. The past is past.

    And the bloody Muppets who perpetuate this nonsense haven't a clue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    They were statues of slaves ffs What do you think they were for? Lol. It'll take some really limber mental gymnastics to make the anti BLM argument on this.

    The statues are apparently of Nubian princesses and their slave girls, in other words they're depictions of black slave holders; so in reality it's got nothing all to with BLM.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 161 ✭✭stinkypinky


    Overheal wrote: »
    So they “removed” the statues but you’ve gone for the slippery slope of “demolish all the 18th and 19th century buildings” - seems to be the only storm in a teacup here tbh. The statues aren’t demolished yes just removed from the hotel front?

    It's always the same with these post modernist types encouraging such nonsense, whether it's statues, violent agitators, cancel culture or big burly men competing in Women's sport. They'll throw in a little connotation attempting to downplay such incidents as isolated incidents whilst basking gleefully in the calamity of it all. They have a stranglehold on society and imo it's very dangerous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    Nesta99 wrote: »

    Pardon the term but white washing history is wrong

    Have things gotten so bad that using the phrase ‘white washing’ requires an apology in advance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭tabby aspreme


    Frank McDonald on rte1radio talking a lot of sense, asking what relevance a statue depicting a scene from 4000 years ago, has to modern slavery issues


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    It is worrying to see this US crap making its way into Irish politics and culture. We should all try to reject it as it's toxic and divisive and is almost like a virus, making people obsessed with race and sex.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    OMM 0000 wrote: »
    It is worrying to see this US crap making its way into Irish politics and culture. We should all try to reject it as it's toxic and divisive and is almost like a virus, making people obsessed with race and sex.

    Read the other day that when the League of Ireland starts back this weekend the players and refs will be “taking the knee” for the first 8 games. I think it’s overkill tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,997 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Read the other day that when the League of Ireland starts back this weekend the players and refs will be “taking the knee” for the first 8 games. I think it’s overkill tbh.

    .... and same in Scotland
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53569161

    I love how it says the players can take the knee "should they wish to do so".


    Who isn't going to get down? Its like the poppy now, you haven't got a choice.

    Really think one or two players are going to stand when everyone else is kneeling? The mob would be online immediately calling you a racist and trying to end your career.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Read the other day that when the League of Ireland starts back this weekend the players and refs will be “taking the knee” for the first 8 games. I think it’s overkill tbh.

    Clowns.

    A tiny bit of reading shows BLM are a toxic organisation and US police brutality is a statistical anomoly. And obviously has nothing to do with Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,465 ✭✭✭MOH


    Overheal wrote: »
    Like what, leaving Nazi statues in the Berlin city center?

    There’s a proper place for history and it’s not always in positions of honor.

    Did you seriously just compare statues depicting ancient Egyptian culture to Nazis?


    That's probably the stupidest Godwin-ing of a thread I've ever seen


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    There's a fairly hefty irony to DCC's planning section being located at Wood Quay given the archaelogical vandalism that went on in building that office block

    Well the Vikings were chronic slave traders so i'm glad DCC vandalised wood quay.

    I'd also like to see all our other grandiose symbols of imperialist colonialism demolished; The Custom House, The GPO, Trinity College etc - that would prove our virtue far more effectively than some small statues of African princesses and their servants which no one even knew represented slavery to being with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭OMM 0000


    MOH wrote: »
    Did you seriously just compare statues depicting ancient Egyptian culture to Nazis?


    That's probably the stupidest Godwin-ing of a thread I've ever seen

    There's a lot of extremists here. It's best to add them to your ignore list.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,516 ✭✭✭Outkast_IRE


    Its no different that all the companies jumping onto the pride bandwagon the last few years. They go all out to ensure they get their photos and publicity from it.

    Where were these companies 20 - 30 years ago when these groups actually needed support and doing so meant sticking your neck on the chopping block.

    This current bout of companies trying to be super woke and sensitive is just as sickening. They only make the effort when the tide has already turned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,730 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Heard someone rightly say its the US Hotel owners importing cancel culture into Ireland.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,609 ✭✭✭dubrov


    It sounds like they wanted to remove the statues anyway.
    This is just a means of removing them knowing that the council will be unlikely to object due to BLM.
    The hotel also looks like it is taking the moral high ground

    Genius from management.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Feisar


    They were statues of slaves ffs What do you think they were for? Lol. It'll take some really limber mental gymnastics to make the anti BLM argument on this.

    A depiction of something is not automatically a celebration of it.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Posts: 17,378 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    When they finally go after statues of Roman emporers, the world might finally wake up and end this abhorrent removal of art, culture and history.

    It should be illegal. An international hotel group should not be allowed to remove statues from the 1800s because some Americans have lost the plot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Wait till they start going through the art galleries of the world and start removing the masterpieces that depict unsavoury content.

    Unsavoury content Ooooh Vicar!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    NIMAN wrote: »
    .... and same in Scotland
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53569161

    I love how it says the players can take the knee "should they wish to do so".


    Who isn't going to get down? Its like the poppy now, you haven't got a choice.

    Really think one or two players are going to stand when everyone else is kneeling? The mob would be online immediately calling you a racist and trying to end your career.

    Wait until the Premiership in November. First we will have a minute taking the knee, then a minute for the poppy and then a few minutes clapping for the Front line Heroes and another minute in memory of some oul lad who used sell programmes outside the ground


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,068 ✭✭✭Nesta99


    NIMAN wrote: »
    .... and same in Scotland
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/53569161

    Who isn't going to get down?

    Let them Boogie-Woogie....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    dubrov wrote: »
    It sounds like they wanted to remove the statues anyway.
    This is just a means of removing them knowing that the council will be unlikely to object due to BLM.
    The hotel also looks like it is taking the moral high ground

    Genius from management.

    Really shouldnt they knock the hotel down as it was used by the British in 1916 to shoot down at the Volunteers dug into trenches in St. Stephens Green.
    It was a brilliant manouevre by that great military technician, Countess Markievitz to order trenches be dug in a park surrounded by rows of four storey buildings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Edgware wrote: »
    It was a brilliant manouevre by that great military technician, Countess Markievitz to order trenches be dug in a park surrounded by rows of four storey buildings.

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,700 ✭✭✭Feisar


    ChosenWong wrote: »
    It all seems a bit medieval that these monuments are being pulled down or removed

    Also reminds me of the futuristic film Equilibrium. Anything thought provoking needs to be wiped out.

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Wait till they start going through the art galleries of the world and start removing the masterpieces that depict unsavoury content.


    The Bamiyan Buddahas of Afghanistan:


    Before/After a bunch of ideological loons took offence.


    bamiyan_buddhas.jpg


    These BLM nutters and those that pander to them are no different to the Taliban, in fact I've become pretty convinced that the left are now enforcing their own flavour of 'secular Sharia' and nobody is standing up to the lunacy.

    This crap needs to end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,019 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Proper order.

    They should knock down the Pyramids next.

    An ban Toblerones.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement