Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Joe Rogan Experience Podcasts

1246740

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    I know it's only a short video re: statistics, but unfortunately I can't listen at the moment.

    Would anyone be kind enough to give a breakdown of the stats he mentions, specifically regarding teenage girls.

    Many thanks.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    Paully D wrote: »
    I know it's only a short video re: statistics, but unfortunately I can't listen at the moment.

    Would anyone be kind enough to give a breakdown of the stats he mentions, specifically regarding teenage girls.

    Many thanks.


    Basically, from 2011 onwards the self harm rates with girls between 10 -14 grew by 60 something percent. In this case, self harm means hurting themselves but not fatal.


    This boils down to the advent of social media and commercial accessibility to smart phones. This focus is on girls as they generally will be more snide towards each other and girls focus their struggle internally, on themselves. Boys will release their struggle on others which means their self harm rates are much lower.


    The recommendation is more physical freedom for kids under 10 and no social media accounts until High School.


    It's a fascinating listen, it's everything I've been trying to say to my partner but laid out simply and in basic terms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    It's probably the best Joe Rogan podcast I've ever listened to, both fascinating and will be helpful when my kids are older.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Basically, from 2011 onwards the self harm rates with girls between 10 -14 grew by 60 something percent. In this case, self harm means hurting themselves but not fatal.


    This boils down to the advent of social media and commercial accessibility to smart phones. This focus is on girls as they generally will be more snide towards each other and girls focus their struggle internally, on themselves. Boys will release their struggle on others which means their self harm rates are much lower.


    The recommendation is more physical freedom for kids under 10 and no social media accounts until High School.


    It's a fascinating listen, it's everything I've been trying to say to my partner but laid out simply and in basic terms.


    The stats are even worse than that. Self harm grew by 189% in 10-14 year old girls. That age group never knew a world without social media.



    Boys tend to bully each other physically by punching each other in the face, whereas girls tend to bully by damaging each others social relationships i.e. creating rumours, spreading lies, doctoring photos. The likes of instagram magnify this exponentially. They can even do it anonymously so without repercussion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Thank f*ck I don't have daughters, jaysus!


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Boom_Bap wrote: »
    Basically, from 2011 onwards the self harm rates with girls between 10 -14 grew by 60 something percent. In this case, self harm means hurting themselves but not fatal.


    This boils down to the advent of social media and commercial accessibility to smart phones. This focus is on girls as they generally will be more snide towards each other and girls focus their struggle internally, on themselves. Boys will release their struggle on others which means their self harm rates are much lower.


    The recommendation is more physical freedom for kids under 10 and no social media accounts until High School.


    It's a fascinating listen, it's everything I've been trying to say to my partner but laid out simply and in basic terms.

    I didn't really get how this was a conclusion. Everything else made sense to me except this. I don't see how more personal freedom for children is the antidote to all those damning statistics.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,406 ✭✭✭DyldeBrill


    The standard of these podcasts is getting better and better. Not only has the set evolved but the guests he's getting in are second to none!

    Podcast with Jordon Peterson was a goodie if people are interested.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,246 ✭✭✭ardinn


    DyldeBrill wrote: »
    The standard of these podcasts is getting better and better. Not only has the set evolved but the guests he's getting in are second to none!

    Podcast with Jordon Peterson was a goodie if people are interested.


    Just in case you were not aware there a 5 jp jre podcasts - all 5 are excellent

    877
    958
    1006
    1139
    1208


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    I didn't really get how this was a conclusion. Everything else made sense to me except this. I don't see how more personal freedom for children is the antidote to all those damning statistics.


    It brings more social awareness, responsibility and confidence to kids.
    I used to shelter my kids, but in the last year I've allowed them more freedom, but with check-in restrictions. The change in them is unbelievable in how they just get up and do things, are less dependent on devices, more confidence and much improved social communication.


    For example, my son yesterday evening wanted to go to a friends house that is across a main road and in another estate.
    As soon as he got there, he got on the wifi of the family, sent me a message that he was there. Then before leaving, he sent me another message to call him so that he could let me know what he was doing. It was no bother to him, a year ago I would have freaked out at that prospect :)



    So I can understand what he is saying here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Mike Tyson


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,372 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Mike Tyson

    Joe looks the same size as Tyson there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭magic_murph


    The Kanye West podcast is going to be an absolute Sh1t Show. NO matter what Joe ask's Kanye will have his own answer and more than likely it wont be linked to the question.
    He's a complete fool that's totally disconnected with reality.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    The Kanye West podcast is going to be an absolute Sh1t Show. NO matter what Joe ask's Kanye will have his own answer and more than likely it wont be linked to the question.
    He's a complete fool that's totally disconnected with reality.

    Have you ever watched an interview he has done he does answer the questions he is asked.

    But you seem to have already made your mind up that he is going to be a rambling crazy man that isn't going to answer the questions Joe asked him.

    I'm very much looking forward to it because we'll a glimpse into how the mind of one the greatest rap artists of our generation works.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,672 ✭✭✭seannash



    I'm very much looking forward to it because we'll a glimpse into how the mind of one the greatest rap artists of our generation works.


    Debatable :)
    But to your point I do think he will answer his questions put to him but Id be very surprised if he comes from a position of facts and evidence which I feel Rogan always asks of his guests.


    I personally dont really care what he has to say as its a bit like having the worlds greatest footballer on and asking him about whats wrong with society. Why does his opinion matter really, He should talk about what hes an expert in which would be football
    I dont want or need to know about the state of Hip hop in 2019, I know my history on the topic and dont really want to hear about his thoughts on the future.
    But I get a lot of people will be interested but I dont think he should be put up as an authority on anything outside of Hip hop or expensive runners and absolutely terrible clothing. And Rogan's best shows in my opinion are the ones where he has experts on.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    There's going to be a stream of absolute nonsense coming out of Kayne's mouth and I can't wait to see it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 Emtec


    I'm very much looking forward to it because we'll a glimpse into how the mind of one the greatest rap artists of our generation works.

    I don't like him or, for the most part, his music, but you're doing the man a disservice by calling him a 'rap artist'. He's completely and successfully transcended hip hop. His greatest contribution to popular music has been from behind the mixing desk, producing music that's now only tangentially related to the genre he started out in. He's adventurous and experimental in a way that commercial rap artists no longer are.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Jack Dorsey was pretty interesting if not a bit diplomatic. I enjoyed Travis Barker but I used to a be big blink 182 fan in my youth.

    Any time I see one listed as ".....is a stand-up comedian, writer.... ", no thanks!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    He is still trying to justify the Jack Dorsey interview with tonight's guest. He's brought on another lad who interviewed Dorsey who is now saying "Well I don't really know how much Dorsey really knows about how individual cases are banned".

    I'm with Alex Jones!!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He is still trying to justify the Jack Dorsey interview with tonight's guest. He's brought on another lad who interviewed Dorsey who is now saying "Well I don't really know how much Dorsey really knows about how individual cases are banned".

    I'm with Alex Jones!!

    If they repeatedly break terms of service, they get banned. Particularly when violence is incited in the real world. Alex Jones did this. That's what I gathered.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    If they repeatedly break terms of service, they get banned. Particularly when violence is incited in the real world. Alex Jones did this. That's what I gathered.

    Yeah but they cited the case of Kathy Griffin was called for the doxing of the Covington Kids, who was not banned. Jack Dorsey said on the Rogan podcast that doxing was a reason why they banned people. It seems that there are different rules for liberals and minorities.

    Joe has got a huge amount of heat over that podcast. it's just not good enough for him to play dumb instead of asking the hard questions.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't know anything about that example but was an isolated incident. Alex Jones repeatedly broke terms of service. Emphasis on repeatedly.

    Where has joe gotten a huge amount of heat?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,246 ✭✭✭ardinn


    I don't know anything about that example but was an isolated incident. Alex Jones repeatedly broke terms of service. Emphasis on repeatedly.

    Where has joe gotten a huge amount of heat?

    The jd podcast was taken down 3 times - I believe at one stage it had 34k dislikes - that is incredible - for joe to spend an hr explaining and apologizing for a pod speaks volumes - the redban and forrest pods carried the dislikes over - i cant remember a pod where joe apologieses so much or at least tries to explain the interview.

    He blames yt for editing and taking down the pod and also removing comments

    He is being absolutely hammered over it!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,331 ✭✭✭jeremyj1968


    I don't know anything about that example but was an isolated incident. Alex Jones repeatedly broke terms of service. Emphasis on repeatedly. Where has joe gotten a huge amount of heat?

    Lot of attacks from his peers, dislikes were multiples of likes (which is very odd for him), and accusations of doctoring the comments - People were saying that Joe and Jamie were removing comments, but it seems like they just changed the way that the comments were sorted. And of course the fact that Jack Dorsey has a share in one of the companies that sponsors JRE which is a huge conflict of interest. He was FAAAR too soft on him, and allowed him plead ignorance on anything negative. I don't think that he would have accepted this from any other guest.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'd no idea it go so much hate. I thought the Jack Dorsey podcast was really interesting. I've no interest in twitter myself but it opened my eyes to the effect and influence it has. Radiolab did a podcast on the evolution of facebook's censorship path. It's really fascinating and almost impossible to create rules to fit all.
    Lot of attacks from his peers, dislikes were multiples of likes (which is very odd for him), and accusations of doctoring the comments - People were saying that Joe and Jamie were removing comments, but it seems like they just changed the way that the comments were sorted. And of course the fact that Jack Dorsey has a share in one of the companies that sponsors JRE which is a huge conflict of interest. He was FAAAR too soft on him, and allowed him plead ignorance on anything negative. I don't think that he would have accepted this from any other guest.

    Joe has never been tough on guests. That's the way he operates. Rarely is it an argument. He's agreeable. This isn't Vincent Brown. Joe will often reflect back in a further podcast the issues he had with a particular guest, but he'll rarely address it in the moment. Take how it talked about Elon Musk to Sam Harris. He wants his guests to enjoy themselves and talk about interesting things. Joe isn't trying to be Ben Shapiro or Jordan Peterson. It's chat, not a debate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,480 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    The latest pod is brilliant. Talks for an hour on just the podcast itself. Highly recommended.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,580 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    The latest pod is brilliant. Talks for an hour on just the podcast itself. Highly recommended.


    I found it more interesting than the Doorcey pod it's self.

    He was pretty stoned by the end of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭TomSweeney


    Wow, don't have links but easy to find, 3 guests lately - Brian Cox
    Sam Harris
    Tim Pool

    Fantastic episodes!

    edit cos I'm a nice guy :P

    https://youtu.be/02ux1dKNPXo Tim Pool

    https://youtu.be/ZA106wrMUe4 Sam Harris

    https://youtu.be/wieRZoJSVtw Brian Cocks


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Found it very difficult to listen to Tim Pool. Very annoying voice. Similar to Ben Shapiro.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Found Yang to be very interested. He's preaching to choir regarding UBI with me though. Not a hope the US will elect him considering how invested they are in the American dream. I'd love to see him debate some of his points though. I've known for some time that automation was on the way but I never made the connection between Trump being elected and it's rise before. Welfare state is the future folks :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    Yang is the decent democrat they need.

    This is someone I would vote for if I was American, this is a candidate that can beat Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    Yang is the decent democrat they need.
    This is someone I would vote for if I was American, this is a candidate that can beat Trump.

    Americans have had a black president, but I think they are a long way off electing an Asian president. You have to remember that Trump is the current president, and a huge amount of the population wanted/wants him as president.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,809 ✭✭✭Hector Savage


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2019/02/07/alex-jones-and-joe-rogan-are-in-the-midst-of-a-hilarious-feud/
    Celebrity feuds are usually as soulless and manufactured as their pop song lyrics, but in the case of podcaster/comedian Joe Rogan and professional lunatic Alex Jones, the spat is genuine, and far too amusing not to follow.

    professional lunatic :D:D:D:D


    Edit- actually reading further in the article, they say
    Joe Rogan has always enjoyed chatting with pseudoscientists and eccentrics ....


    .... unhinged individuals have the opportunity to spread their gospel.

    hmmm hinting that's the majority of the guests.
    I wonder who these "pseudoscientists" and "eccentrics" are ?

    Sam Harris ?
    Roger Penrose ?
    Brian Cox ?
    Neill DeGrasse Tyson ?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yang is the decent democrat they need.

    This is someone I would vote for if I was American, this is a candidate that can beat Trump.


    There's no way Americans would get behind him. He'd be called a thief and a socialist and he'd be done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,385 ✭✭✭✭D'Agger


    Really enjoyed the Travis Barker podcast - he speaks in a really calm manner and presents himself well - you'd think he has a podcast himself but I suppose he's been in the media a long time so perhaps that's where his media skills come into play. Very interesting chat between them.

    Haven't listened to the Dorsey one because I don't really give a shít about Twitter tbqh and the backlash Rogan got from it kind of backs up that view for me. The Sam Harris one, where he discusses it and they discuss pay models online (I'm only a bit into it), is very interesting so far. I like Harris and it's interesting to hear Rogan talk about the podcast and how it works for him given it's probably the yardstick for a lot of people looking to setup a podcast.

    Brian Cox being on recently was also a real treat, made me feel dumb, kept having to go back 15 seconds to listen again because I didn't understand first time around fully


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,760 ✭✭✭Effects


    I wonder who these "pseudoscientists" and "eccentrics" are ?

    I'd imagine it's referring to a lot of the health people he has on. Like the ones who say stuff like it's fine to eat as much fat in your diet as you want as long as you don't eat any sugar.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 911 ✭✭✭Bassfish


    Only getting around to the Elon Musk episode now! Just listened to the first hour so far. Have to say the first hour was a bit of a slog for me. Does it continue along these lines or does it pick up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,672 ✭✭✭seannash


    Bassfish wrote: »
    Only getting around to the Elon Musk episode now! Just listened to the first hour so far. Have to say the first hour was a bit of a slog for me. Does it continue along these lines or does it pick up?

    Nope, I found him very irritating to listen to and unless you're oblivious to where technology is going he didn't really say anything I hadn't heard before


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    He defo has a lot of snake oil salesmen on. Anybody remember Dave Asprey and the mycotoxins?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,715 ✭✭✭✭Ally Dick


    I found the Billy Corgan one very interesting


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,246 ✭✭✭TomSweeney




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,909 ✭✭✭Gwynplaine


    Listening to the Brian Cox podcast here now. Love it. I'll try Elon Musk next.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,480 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    I love this podcast.

    The guests aren’t always great and after a while I’ll turn off but every 3rd or 4th podcast is just brilliant...and it’s always the ones you least expect. Joe is great at getting guests into a comfort zone and just listening.

    Of course you’ll always have the questions like “Did you ever try DMT” and “Did you know there’s a breed of monkey that does this crazy thing...”. But that’s just Joe!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    It's entirely possible...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭ianob7


    Ush1 wrote:
    It's entirely possible...


    What is ??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,289 ✭✭✭koutoubia


    Ush1 wrote: »
    He defo has a lot of snake oil salesmen on. Anybody remember Dave Asprey and the mycotoxins?
    In one of the podcasts with Rhonda Patrick (deffo not invovlved in snake oil selling) he absloutley slams Dave Asprey and his mycotoxins and his 'marketing' of bullet proof coffee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    ianob7 wrote: »
    What is ??

    It's what Rogan says after he reams off some scutter that is usually completely impossible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    koutoubia wrote: »
    In one of the podcasts with Rhonda Patrick (deffo not invovlved in snake oil selling) he absloutley slams Dave Asprey and his mycotoxins and his 'marketing' of bullet proof coffee.

    I remember he had that sceptic guy on and he got a bit heated and petty because he was dubious of a previous guest who was a friend of Rogans saying with some vitamin he couldn't get drunk and no hangover an all this nonsense. The sceptic guy said that he sounded like a quack trying to sell his stuff. Rogan insisted he didn't sell it.

    Course it turns out he did actually sell the supplement.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,476 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    koutoubia wrote: »
    In one of the podcasts with Rhonda Patrick (deffo not invovlved in snake oil selling) he absloutley slams Dave Asprey and his mycotoxins and his 'marketing' of bullet proof coffee.

    I'm dubious of anyone Rogan is a sycophant around as they are usually selling something, a sponsor or a business Rogan may be involved in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 715 ✭✭✭ianob7


    Ush1 wrote: »
    It's what Rogan says after he reams off some scutter that is usually completely impossible.

    It is one of his favourite lines


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Call me an idealist but I really, really, really, really doubt Rogan is getting paid to put have someone on the podcast just to sell something. He doesn't need to do it.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement