Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Milk Price- Please read Mod note in post #1

1275276278280281334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    working back on your figures I assume your sending in circa 1.2 million litres, taking 100k drawings/ 5.5 cl feed costs/36k rental costs (200) acres that would mean your total costs less feed drawings and rental are sub 12 cent a litre, pretty amazing figures given you have expanded your herd considerably and are carrying a lot of replacement stock
    Assumption is the mother of all fook ups I heard somewhere once


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Should sfp be included seeing it is tied to the land and should be added to the land charge or opportunity cost? Land type should account also?

    Sfp hard to include Kev as everyone's different .ive said it before that the pm results Tegasc print with mikey waving false cops are totally misleading .they don't include a labour charge ,land charge ,debt repayment.all 3 are a cruical cop as without land you've no where to milk cows and without labour you've no slave to run the show and on debt nearly every farmer has some .a standard labour charge for 50 hour week should be included as standard I think and all land should have a standard value say 180/200 an acre .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,462 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    Reading this and dairy guys discussing whether or not to include land and labour costs. Ye should try suckling, Teagasc won't allow discussion beyond Gross Margin. No mention of fixed costs allowed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,285 ✭✭✭alps


    Reading this and dairy guys discussing whether or not to include land and labour costs. Ye should try suckling, Teagasc won't allow discussion beyond Gross Margin. No mention of fixed costs allowed.

    Can appreciate your pain Patsy and wouldn't make light of it....however most guys here won't work for nothing for any sustained period...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,358 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I wonder why Patsy?

    Trying to hide the reality from farmers in any enterprise does them a disservice.
    Give them the info and let them make their own decisions.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    kowtow wrote: »
    Don't agree at all - I wish people wouldn't assume that proper P&L budgeting is for comparison - that's the last thing it's for.

    The purpose of a P&L is to understand the inherent profitability or otherwise of a business. It's for decision making.

    Failing to include a labour or land charge in a pro forma budget would suggest that one could expand ad infinitum, with a milk price of about 25-30c / litre... which would be a critical error if at some point you expected either to be paid for your own labour or to gain a return on (or acquire more) land.

    But where do you draw the line on these notional figures, should you be basing it on the purchase price of your farm given in alot our competitors they buy the whole business and mortage it over x number of years.then if you are acessing long term profitably do you include the replacement cost with new on every implement or building.i suppose what im trying to say can be best exampled by new zealand, relatively cheap system of production but the servicing the capital involved is killing them


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭Jaysus Christ


    Can't believe ye don't know what weekly wage your on. The whole idea is to get a wage. I give myself €1000 a week and I don't have to touch bfp.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,297 ✭✭✭✭Sam Kade


    Can't believe ye don't know what weekly wage your on. The whole idea is to get a wage. I give myself €1000 a week and I don't have to touch bfp.

    That's a nice round figure from farming.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭WheatenBriar


    Sam Kade wrote: »
    That's a nice round figure from farming.

    He's still trolling,I see,I stuck him on ignore
    You don't see his troll posts when you do that,just quoted posts in other peoples replies
    Theres a tab in your user control panel

    Still it gets rid of most of the shoite


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,084 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Had a contractor/dairy who's says their COP was 14c a litre, find it hard to believe most farmers these days:-D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Had a contractor/dairy who's says their COP was 14c a litre, find it hard to believe most farmers these days:-D

    Pile of ****e Kev ,doing himself and dairy farmers in general a total disservice throwing a figure like that our


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,128 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Had a contractor/dairy who's says their COP was 14c a litre, find it hard to believe most farmers these days:-D

    More then likely wasn't accouting for machinery and work done by contracting side of business for dairy farm, diseal/machinery maintaine/repayments come to 3 c/l here on top of contracting costs which 3 c/l as well, a lot of guys have their heads in the sand about their true cop


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    I think the elephant in the room here is if we calculate our cop differently to other countrys. How do we actually know how compedtive we actually are? Also cost is just one element of overall profitability. I agree that people making silly claims about being able to produce milk at unrealistically low costs are not helping any of us.

    You don't hear grape producers in the champaine region competing with each other as to who can produce the cheapest grapes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,791 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Can't believe ye don't know what weekly wage your on. The whole idea is to get a wage. I give myself €1000 a week and I don't have to touch bfp.
    only 1000, you're selling yourself short there lad


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,720 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    whelan2 wrote: »
    only 1000, you're selling yourself short there lad

    Wouldn't get outta bed for less than that


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭Jaysus Christ


    its the least I would take for the hours I put in. I won't be calving this many cows in ten years time. Or maybe none at all.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭Jaysus Christ


    He's still trolling,I see,I stuck him on ignore
    You don't see his troll posts when you do that,just quoted posts in other peoples replies
    Theres a tab in your user control panel

    Still it gets rid of most of the shoite


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll

    You must have been one of these €500+ an acre for 5 year boyos.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    mahoney_j wrote: »
    Wouldn't get outta bed for less than that

    If I remember correctly. Someone with a similar sounding name is quoted as saying the love of money is not a good thing anyway.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 136 ✭✭Jaysus Christ


    Farmer Ed wrote: »
    If I remember correctly. Someone with a similar sounding name is quoted as saying the love of money is not a good thing anyway.

    He also said love thy neighbour.
    Then another lad said don't covet your neighbour wife or commit adultery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    https://www.agriland.ie/farming-news/irish-milk-production-falls-in-april-compared-to-last-year

    May will be a proper gauge as the weather in April knocked things back this year as well as all the milk held till April 15 for qouta. I reckon may will still be up on last year


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,297 ✭✭✭✭Sam Kade


    Farmer Ed wrote: »

    Not sustainable for Dairygold to subsidise milk prices but the farmer can sustain any price :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    keep going wrote: »
    But where do you draw the line on these notional figures, should you be basing it on the purchase price of your farm given in alot our competitors they buy the whole business and mortage it over x number of years.then if you are acessing long term profitably do you include the replacement cost with new on every implement or building.i suppose what im trying to say can be best exampled by new zealand, relatively cheap system of production but the servicing the capital involved is killing them

    The means of finance (i.e. mortgage, lottery win etc, theft by ancestor) is irrelevant, as is the purchase price. You base the land cost on a sensible rental value and the labour cost on some standardised wage - it actually doesn't need endless discussion, it just needs to be there. I've seen the average industrial wage mentioned in Teagasc figures, no reason not to use that.

    Very good point about New Zealand - keep expanding based on cheap (notional) variable costs and when things get tough you find labour has to be paid & fixed costs & capital have to be serviced....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,462 ✭✭✭✭patsy_mccabe


    So for the ignorant, like myself :rolleyes:. Land Cost is the market rental cost of similar land. It doesn't relate to purchase cost of land whatsoever. Is that correct?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭WheatenBriar


    So for the ignorant, like myself :rolleyes:. Land Cost is the market rental cost of similar land. It doesn't relate to purchase cost of land whatsoever. Is that correct?
    Whoever says thats correct is talking daft
    Its a cod applying a rental cost because if you were renting your land you wouldnt have your own enterprise on it in the first place so nothing to apply any cost to
    There is no opportunity cost either unless the rental is higher than the profit you'd make on it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭Injuryprone


    Farmer Ed wrote: »

    That article is only about a year out of date


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    Whoever says thats correct is talking daft
    Its a cod applying a rental cost because if you were renting your land you wouldnt have your own enterprise on it in the first place so nothing to apply any cost to
    There is no opportunity cost either unless the rental is higher than the profit you'd make on it

    If my daddy dies and leaves me a shop full of diamonds, and I sell the diamonds at £10 a kg, 10 1 kg diamonds a day, and I pay the shop girl £100 a day, do I have a profitable business?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭WheatenBriar


    kowtow wrote: »
    If my daddy dies and leaves me a shop full of diamonds, and I sell the diamonds at £10 a kg, 10 1 kg diamonds a day, and I pay the shop girl £100 a day, do I have a profitable business?
    That with respect is a ridiculous comparison
    Not relevant to imaginary land charges as the land owned by the farmer is the tool used to make new income
    The farmer isn't selling a perch a day
    I may aswell say a wellington charge to myself is appropriate as I'm wearing Daddies wellies even though I own them


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    That with respect is a ridiculous comparison
    Not relevant to imaginary land charges as the land owned by the farmer is the tool used to make new income
    The farmer isn't selling a perch a day
    I may aswell say a wellington charge to myself is appropriate as I'm wearing Daddies wellies even though I own them
    The true return would have to be compared to what you would receive if you rented the land out.

    I would get a higher return if I had let my farm out for the last few years. But next year I will be making more than the rental price so it's a moot comparison for me.

    But I have been aware that better returns were there if I wanted/needed them but the farm is now beyond that development stage.

    Tbh, it's an important figure to keep in mind. If you are consistently getting lower returns from the system you're farming than you would from renting, there is a huge opportunity cost in not letting it and finding other work, if that's what you want to do.

    But some people (like me) choose not to rent at times.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement