Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Hydrogen breakthrough.

Options
  • 22-05-2016 06:35PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,616 ✭✭✭✭


    Sort of.Irish bloke reackons he's invented a plug in device that can improve petrol engine efficiency by 50% and diesels by 15%.
    Hydrogen definitely seems to be the future of transport,makes electric cars even less viable if it works.


«1

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    A fancy hot water bottle, a stock photo of Nigel Mansell and a packet of fags.

    You've outdone yourself this time kneemos.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 781 ✭✭✭CINCLANTFLT


    But what does this have to do with the price of peas in China?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Whoever designed that website needs to be taken out and shot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,699 ✭✭✭Doylers


    Whoever designed that website needs to be taken out and shot.

    Im assuming you didn't remove "mobile" from the url :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,227 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Does the thing need the cigarettes to run or what? A 20 a day habit will eat in to any savings....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Duiske


    So Mick beyond in Killorglin can fit a mini-hydrogen bomb to his '02 daysul Avensis ? What could possibly go wrong !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,826 ✭✭✭Archeron


    But what does this have to do with the price of peas in China?

    Better energy efficiency means transport costs go down, thus reducing the price of those very peas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Hercule Poirot


    If it was any good the oil companies would have killed him months ago


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,558 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    Pure snake oil. Loads of people in different countries have all "invented" the same nonsense before, and despite their claims to the contrary you can't break the laws of thermodynamics.

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/a3428/4271579/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭Dirty Dingus McGee


    Alun wrote: »
    Pure snake oil. Loads of people in different countries have all "invented" the same nonsense before, and despite their claims to the contrary you can't break the laws of thermodynamics.

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars/a3428/4271579/

    In this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭Dirty Dingus McGee


    I remember seeing on Top Gear (the only time I ever watched it) these Honda Clarity (I think ) cars that were run on hydrogen and you pumped it into the car like a petrol pump.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,369 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    kneemos wrote: »
    makes electric cars even less viable if it works.

    Making petrol burning engines slightly more efficient doesn't change the fact that they are still taking carbon dioxide from beneath the earth and releasing it into the atmosphere. It is untenable in the long run. Not to mention that petrol burning engines are dirty, with thousands of moving parts, and need to pump fumes into the air.

    Modern electric cars have far few moving parts and don't spray anything into the air. Tesla electric cars have a single engine about the size of a watermelon on the axle - that's it. It's just a superior technology. Something about burning gasoline seems so primitive once you've looked into the sleek and silent technology of modern electric cars.

    Not that any of this matters, given that this fella's invention is total tosh and I'll eat his prototype if it turns out to be genuine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,582 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    I can totally accept that it's possible to improve the efficiency of an internal combustion engine. I see nothing in that that about a control system to adjust the amount of H2 and O2 being produced to match the fuel being injected into the engine and therefore have to assume it's almost never at an optimal ratio. There's countless variants of this device out there already, just search HHO on this forum. Given the current emissions legislation and the documented slights of hand being pulled by major manufacturers, yes that was NOx but those were being masked to make better CO2 numbers, if there was anything in this, it would be shipping in cars from Wolfsburg already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,637 ✭✭✭brightspark


    While fuel efficiency may not be everyones priority I imagine that someone purchasing trucks for a fleet would factor in the running costs as well the initial purchase price when deciding which truck to buy.

    Car and truck manufacturers spend millions on R&D using the best engineers they can hire, all trying to get a competitive edge on each other. For this reason I doubt if the motor industry would "bury" any new engine/fuel designs that lead to greater fuel efficiencies.

    How likely is it then that an unemployed architect has achieved something none of the engineers have done?

    Also the laws of thermodynamics must be obeyed, the engine is supplying the power via an alternator to the hydrogen generator (electrolysis) which then creates the additional fuel for the engine?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    He's claiming a more efficient electrolysis device. Hydrogen is the fuel (the article refused to name it).

    You still need energy to get the hydrogen out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,779 ✭✭✭Pinch Flat


    Duiske wrote: »
    What could possibly go wrong !!

    Absolutely nothing

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindenburg_disaster


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,222 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    I can't be the only one here who looked at the thread title thinking of nuclear fusion, and then got more disappointed than Louis van Gaal yesterday evening. :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,637 ✭✭✭brightspark


    He's claiming a more efficient electrolysis device. Hydrogen is the fuel (the article refused to name it).

    You still need energy to get the hydrogen out.

    Yes and even if he got the efficiency of the electrolysis up to 100% there are inefficiencies in the engine and in the alternator which supply the electrolysis device so it can't work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,208 ✭✭✭✭Cienciano




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,738 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    But what does this have to do with the price of peas in China?
    Give peas a chance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,616 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Cienciano wrote: »


    Says he has it fitted to trucks on lease and gets a percentage of the fuel savings,this is from three years ago.
    Have to wonder why every truck isn't using it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,637 ✭✭✭brightspark


    kneemos wrote: »
    Says he has it fitted to trucks on lease and gets a percentage of the fuel savings,this is from three years ago.
    Have to wonder why every truck isn't using it.

    No need to wonder...it doesn't work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 384 ✭✭SeamusG97


    No need to wonder...it doesn't work.
    Correct. It's all bull**** - move on folks, there's nothing to see here...... Here's something from the archives.

    http://truedemocracyparty.net/2011/09/vapor-fuel-system-tom-ogle-full-story/

    Next up, Homeopathy. Cure your illnesses with water. Followed by 'Lose ten pounds of fat by following this Weird TIP, and finally Danny Healy Rae's long-term weather forecast (2016-2066) for South Kerry.

    We need better education and public awareness on these things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,616 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,570 ✭✭✭The Sidewards Man


    SeamusG97 wrote: »

    We need better education and public awareness on these things.

    I will create Facebook awareness on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Jimoslimos


    Zillah wrote: »
    Modern electric cars have far few moving parts and don't spray anything into the air. Tesla electric cars have a single engine about the size of a watermelon on the axle - that's it. It's just a superior technology. Something about burning gasoline seems so primitive once you've looked into the sleek and silent technology of modern electric cars.
    Tesla electric cars aren't exactly groundbreaking either. Essentially a load of Li-ion laptop batteries driving the motor. The electric battery is an older technology than the ICE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    Federal Trade Commission had a few words about fuel economy devices :

    December 20, 2011

    FTC Stops Marketers From Selling Phony Fuel Economy Devices

    https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2011/12/ftc-stops-marketers-selling-phony-fuel-economy-devices

    According to the FTC's complaint (filed in 2009), Dennis Lee, Dutchman Enterprises LLC, and United Community Services of America Inc., doing business as UCSA Dealers Group LLC, falsely claimed their Hydro-Assist Fuel Cell (HAFC) turns water into "water gas" with five times the potential energy of gasoline. The court subsequently halted the allegedly illegal practices and froze some of the defendants' assets pending further litigation.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 99,738 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Jimoslimos wrote: »
    Tesla electric cars aren't exactly groundbreaking either. Essentially a load of Li-ion laptop batteries driving the motor. The electric battery is an older technology than the ICE.
    Not by much. Volta invented the battery in 1800.

    De Rivaz had an ICE in a vehicle back in 1807 and it had electric ignition.



    Anyway this invention is about more efficient production of hydrogen using less electricity. It's not about how efficient it's use in transport is.

    Low-Overpotential High-Activity Mixed Manganese and Ruthenium Oxide Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline Media


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,827 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager


    Is there a newsletter to which I can subscribe?

    (Unless spoof thread - in which case, I knew that.)

    Not your ornery onager



Advertisement
Advertisement