Wine.

Depends on the individual's palate too. I have two mates who really know their vino. Like collect the stuff and can blind test tell the differences. I've been brought along to blind tastings with far more educated palates in the room and my faves are almost inevitably the very cheapest and the very dearest on the table. Like an 8 quid bottle of plonk and a 400 quid bottle type range. The mid range stuff is OK for me, but not a standout.

From what I recall this is something about the stronger tastes and tannins in both? So long as my tastebuds were overwhelmed I was happy out. The middle range stuff tends to be more mellow or something.

I can't really recall TBH, but they seemed to have a grasp on the reasons and were able to tell whether I would like a wine or not ahead of time. They were also slightly jealous that I could rave about a Tesco special and an aged wine, grape trampled by unicorns. Though where I did note a difference was in aftertaste. The really pricey stuff went down easier and left little bitterness in the mouth. Oh and the fancy stuff was much more hangover free.

This was red wine of course. I refuse to accept the existence of white(Unless it has naturally occurring bubbles). At the Last Supper, it was Judas who brought the Chardonnay.