Gangland Shootings in Dublin MOD Warning in Post #1 (updated 29/05/16)

tomofson · 16-05-2016 06:25PM

wicorthered wrote: »

Where do the Hutch faction sit on the Christy Griffin feud a few years back. Are they a third independent gang or were they involved on one side?

I think they would have been known to both sides and vice versa but I dont think they chose a side or where actively involved in the feud.

wicorthered · 16-05-2016 07:19PM

tomofson wrote: »

I think they would have been known to both sides and vice versa but I dont think they chose a side or where actively involved in the feud.

I always wondered what the pecking order was in the north inner city. When Christy was out and in charge, were the Griffins the main gang in the area or was it the Hutchs'.

I'd always thought the Hutch's had gone away, after the Monk apparently went straight, the way this has all kicked off its obvious they haven't. I suppose with Sheriff Street being a relatively small area there was probably a lot of cross over between the gangs.

tomofson · 16-05-2016 07:46PM

wicorthered wrote: »

I always wondered what the pecking order was in the north inner city. When Christy was out and in charge, were the Griffins the main gang in the area or was it the Hutchs'.

I'd always thought the Hutch's had gone away, after the Monk apparently went straight, the way this has all kicked off its obvious they haven't. I suppose with Sheriff Street being a relatively small area there was probably a lot of cross over between the gangs.

The Hutches more or less did go away until a few years ago when the younger ones made a comeback. Griffin was a big up moron but a lot of people believe he didn't really do it which I cant really blame them for thinking whenever the garda want a top criminal off the scene they can easily get someone to make up bull**** so they go away for 10-20 years. It happened to another well known criminal

coniosumadre · 16-05-2016 09:13PM

Poor old PH, three days in custody now. Wonder will he cry like a girl and admit all. That Sunday World cover was probably an attempt to convince him to fess up!

gangstergossip · 16-05-2016 11:27PM

tomofson wrote: »

The Hutches more or less did go away until a few years ago when the younger ones made a comeback. Griffin was a big up moron but a lot of people believe he didn't really do it which I cant really blame them for thinking whenever the garda want a top criminal off the scene they can easily get someone to make up bull**** so they go away for 10-20 years. It happened to another well known criminal

you saying rossi was innocent?

gangstergossip · 16-05-2016 11:28PM

coniosumadre wrote: »

Poor old PH, three days in custody now. Wonder will he cry like a girl and admit all. That Sunday World cover was probably an attempt to convince him to fess up!

i doubt it i dont think anybody would ever admit to something thats going to get them a life sentence even if the evidence was stacked against them

fergiesfav · 16-05-2016 11:29PM

All these initials are confusing. What side has GF taken? I see earlier people say it Hutchs, but the Indo and Sunday world would suggest the Kinahans? Aren't BF and JG the two from opposite sides that own a salon together as reported by the Herald? If BF is with the Kinahans surely GF is to?

16-05-2016 11:40PM

fergiesfav wrote: »

All these initials are confusing. What side has GF taken? I see earlier people say it Hutchs, but the Indo and Sunday world would suggest the Kinahans? Aren't BF and JG the two from opposite sides that own a salon together as reported by the Herald? If BF is with the Kinahans surely GF is to?

Google is your friend.....

bajer101 · 17-05-2016 02:18AM

coniosumadre wrote: »

Poor old PH, three days in custody now. Wonder will he cry like a girl and admit all. That Sunday World cover was probably an attempt to convince him to fess up!

What? Not Fúcking likely. Is this post a joke?

fergiesfav wrote: »

All these initials are confusing. What side has GF taken? I see earlier people say it Hutchs, but the Indo and Sunday world would suggest the Kinahans? Aren't BF and JG the two from opposite sides that own a salon together as reported by the Herald? If BF is with the Kinahans surely GF is to?

The initials aren't that confusing to you if you know who these guys are. Wtf are you talking about about the brothers GF and BF being on opposite sides, or what side GF has taken!! It is not a question of GF taking a side, he is the side FFS!

rondog · 17-05-2016 11:30AM

Not a chance PH will admit to anything.These boys have been in interview rooms since they were kids.They know how to play the system and whereas the average Joe blogs would crumble under pressure these lads know to stay quiet and see out their detention period.

Flatzie_poo · 17-05-2016 11:42AM

bajer101 wrote: »

The initials aren't that confusing to you if you know who these guys are.

bajer101 wrote: »

Wtf are you talking about about the brothers GF and BF being on opposite sides, or what side GF has taken!! It is not a question of GF taking a side, he is the side FFS!

Who are these "FFS" and "WTF" initialed gangsters?

And what's this about a boyfriend and girlfriend being on opposite sides?

:pac:

BattleCorp · 17-05-2016 11:44AM

Flatzie_poo wrote: »

Who are these "FFS" and "WTF" initialed gangsters?

And what's this about a boyfriend and girlfriend being on opposite sides?

:pac:

I think FFS is Fat Freddie's Sister. Not sure who WTF is. Maybe he's FFS's boyfriend. :pac:

humberklog · 17-05-2016 11:51AM

Bit of clarification needed (if its known)- G+B F are surely still with the cartel? No?

eamonnq · 17-05-2016 11:54AM

Bam Bam Mickey wrote: »

Google is your friend.....
http://www.solocheck.ie/Irish-Company/P-And-M-Hair-And-Beauty-Limited-500917

Associated with these Industries: Community Service

rondog · 17-05-2016 11:56AM

humberklog wrote: »

Bit of clarification needed (if its known)- G+B F are surely still with the cartel? No?

They most surely are.

coniosumadre · 17-05-2016 11:58AM

rondog wrote: »

They most surely are.

I thought they were still with the Hutches and GF is now in hiding in the north if the papers are to be believed?

humberklog · 17-05-2016 12:01PM

rondog wrote: »

They most surely are.

Thanks, was getting confused with all the abbreviations.

humberklog · 17-05-2016 12:04PM

coniosumadre wrote: »

I thought they were still with the Hutches and GF is now in hiding in the north if the papers are to be believed?

That's kinda why I was asking too. But I didn't really believe it and then it got me wondering if they were on the hutches side where would that leave their old friend RB.

blinding · 17-05-2016 12:24PM

humberklog wrote: »

Bit of clarification needed (if its known)- G+B F are surely still with the cartel? No?

Who knew that all this would lead to mathematical equations !

If the authorities can put 2+2 together then we may get a result !

rondog · 17-05-2016 12:29PM

RB I heard was still DKs right hand man.G & B F are staying with the money makers kinahans.

Seems the majority will stay where the cash is and the more likely winner in this feud.

Peter Anthony · 17-05-2016 12:39PM

rondog wrote: »

RB I heard was still DKs right hand man.G & B F are staying with the money makers kinahans.

Seems the majority will stay where the cash is and the more likely winner in this feud.

If that is the case then is it safe to assume the Herald was talking bollocks last week about an individual fleeing to Northern Ireland.

fergiesfav · 17-05-2016 12:44PM

Peter Anthony wrote: »

If that is the case then is it safe to assume the Herald was talking bollocks last week about an individual fleeing to Northern Ireland.

I assumed that was JG?

coniosumadre · 17-05-2016 12:45PM

Peter Anthony wrote: »

If that is the case then is it safe to assume the Herald was talking bollocks last week about an individual fleeing to Northern Ireland.

I have doubts... I thought it was a pretty well known fact, and also discussed here a few weeks ago that GF and JG have remained with the Hutches. Wasn't it reported that one of them refused to meet with DK for ages after the murder of GH and when he finally did it was a trap and had a lucky escape??

rondog · 17-05-2016 12:54PM

coniosumadre wrote: »

Peter Anthony wrote: »

If that is the case then is it safe to assume the Herald was talking bollocks last week about an individual fleeing to Northern Ireland.

I have doubts... I thought it was a pretty well known fact, and also discussed here a few weeks ago that GF and JG have remained with the Hutches. Wasn't it reported that one of them refused to meet with DK for ages after the murder of GH and when he finally did it was a trap and had a lucky escape??

It was JG who was pals with GH and PH growing up and who refused to meet with the kinahans at the so called summit.
He was the one the papers are saying was 'heartbroken' at GH murder.JG is a big loss to the Kinahans.

GF I hear was still running around with the kinahans.

As for the Herald and Sundayworld,if you read their stories then absolutely everybody is a 'target' for the kinahans ie Paul rice, Fat Freddie(even though they have buried the hatchet) etc etc

Peter Anthony · 17-05-2016 01:08PM

fergiesfav wrote: »

I assumed that was JG?

I had assumed that but considering days later he was arrested in Dublin it doesn't seem too accurate.

coniosumadre wrote: »

I have doubts... I thought it was a pretty well known fact, and also discussed here a few weeks ago that GF and JG have remained with the Hutches. Wasn't it reported that one of them refused to meet with DK for ages after the murder of GH and when he finally did it was a trap and had a lucky escape??

I have heard at least 4 different accounts of that car park meeting. One saying GF, one saying RB and one saying JG. And another saying it never even took place and was made up.

rondog wrote: »

It was JG who was pals with GH and PH growing up and who refused to meet with the kinahans at the so called summit.
He was the one the papers are saying was 'heartbroken' at GH murder.JG is a big loss to the Kinahans.

GF I hear was still running around with the kinahans.

Wasn't it the case that all of them were friends growing up.

fergiesfav · 17-05-2016 01:09PM

Peter Anthony wrote: »

I had assumed that but considering days later he was arrested in Dublin it doesn't seem too accurate.

Dublin's an hour drive from the north. Not too hard to slip back in.

tomofson · 17-05-2016 02:51PM

Any news on KM after hes close brush with death a month ago? I heard hes back in the country and only spent two weeks in London though I dont know if thats true or not I wouldnt say it is. I'd say hes still over there but he wouldnt be loaded like the top dogs. That is one thing I noticed its handy for the likes of DK and the monk to get into these feuds cause they can F off to anywhere they want with their money and their contacts, its the small timers who have to stay and face the bullet.

tomofson · 17-05-2016 03:19PM

fergiesfav wrote: »

So what are the initials of the regency shooters.

JG, PH any others?

KM JMcG

Rakish Paddy · 17-05-2016 03:21PM

tomofson wrote: »

KM JMcG

Any truth in the rumour that a certain EH either drove guns or people away from the scene?

rondog · 17-05-2016 03:21PM

tomofson wrote: »

Any news on KM after hes close brush with death a month ago? I heard hes back in the country and only spent two weeks in London though I dont know if thats true or not I wouldnt say it is. I'd say hes still over there but he wouldnt be loaded like the top dogs. That is one thing I noticed its handy for the likes of DK and the monk to get into these feuds cause they can F off to anywhere they want with their money and their contacts, its the small timers who have to stay and face the bullet.

Heard he was back but mixed reports on if he plans to follow his mot out to Oz(she fled there due to threats against her) or stand and fight.Id imagine with his record he would have trouble getting into Oz.

Gangland Shootings in Dublin MOD Warning in Post #1 (updated 29/05/16)

Comments