Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Milk Price- Please read Mod note in post #1

1233234236238239334

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Do you realistically think milk will ever be in the 40's again? Any way enough doom and gloom, am off out for our tea, 19 years married

    Hopefully it will but it's the downright uncertainty of the situation and the fact that as farmers we seem to be at the bottom of the food chain that makes me worried. Most people who go to work every day expect to get paid for their work every day and not just sometimes. Otherwise it's just a form of gambling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,799 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Farmer Ed wrote: »
    Hopefully it will but it's the downright uncertainty of the situation and the fact that as farmers we seem to be at the bottom of the food chain that makes me worried. Most people who go to work every day expect to get paid for their work every day and not just sometimes. Otherwise it's just a form of gambling.
    Was talking to my brother in law today, he has a good job with good terms, he was sayinghe has been on the same salary for the last 7 years. I had a bit of a rant that at least he knows what he's getting and when he is off


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 661 ✭✭✭browned


    Went oad this year. Think it'll allow me to milk into my 60's quite easily if that's what I choose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭RightTurnClyde


    Dawggone wrote: »
    On reading the posts here and everyone talking about the one man operation, I would strongly recommend that you take out a 'key man' insurance policy.

    Very important, broke arm here last Sept, I was lucky with the time of year, and insurance covered basic labour. If it had been springtime I would be in trouble for the sake of an extra €80 on the annual premium. Lesson learned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭RightTurnClyde


    Milking cows or selling litres. Upped cow no.s by 15% and litres by 50% in the last year. Long lactation and breeding a cow that will respond to extra feed and calve every 365 days. There are more ways of killing a cat than choking him with butter.

    One doesn't rule out the other. Upped cows by 35% to double production. Trying to get to 1500kgms on the whole farm as cheaply as possible. I was close last year and hoping to hit it this year.
    But sadly Siobhan T has eaten into most of the increase. Running twice as fast to stand still


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    Very important, broke arm here last Sept, I was lucky with the time of year, and insurance covered basic labour. If it had been springtime I would be in trouble for the sake of an extra €80 on the annual premium. Lesson learned.

    Steadily reduced my dad's and increased myown here over the last 3years. But talk of farm insurance going up also though uggghhh, I've already seen my car insurance nearly treble from 350 to 950 last week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Very important, broke arm here last Sept, I was lucky with the time of year, and insurance covered basic labour. If it had been springtime I would be in trouble for the sake of an extra €80 on the annual premium. Lesson learned.

    I'd advise going a little further.

    Prolonged illness or incapacitation.
    Replacement with top manager(s).
    Further training/education of manager(s).
    Consequential loss. Etc. etc.

    These are pricey policies that often can't be dropped, but can also pay as a kinda retirement handshake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    One doesn't rule out the other. Upped cows by 35% to double production. Trying to get to 1500kgms on the whole farm as cheaply as possible. I was close last year and hoping to hit it this year.
    But sadly Siobhan T has eaten into most of the increase. Running twice as fast to stand still


    get used to it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Steadily reduced my dad's and increased myown here over the last 3years. But talk of farm insurance going up also though uggghhh, I've already seen my car insurance nearly treble from 350 to 950 last week.


    how did that happen??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    You mightn't have a choice.

    Retirement age is heading upwards and will probably be 70 fairly soon.

    I may just be doing mainly tractor work by then, and maybe a lot sooner, but I like being outdoors and doing something constructive rather than sitting inside doing Bingo and giving out about the 'young people these days....':)

    there's a man bounding you that must be in his eighties.... he gets thru some amount of work everyday..... putting us all to shame


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,259 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Good for him. I'm sure they will engrave that on his tombstone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,551 ✭✭✭keep going


    Water John wrote: »
    Good for him. I'm sure they will engrave that on his tombstone.

    So what if hes happy, as my u cle used to say if you are happy working you'll never work a day in your life


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,259 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Good luck to him, I really mean that.
    He's happy and that's fine. But it's not to be taken as what is expected, that farmers have to work until they drop.
    That they have to work 100 hours a week to keep the farm afloat.
    No better way to ensure young people would turn away from the land.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,352 ✭✭✭awaywithyou


    Water John wrote: »
    Good luck to him, I really mean that.
    He's happy and that's fine. But it's not to be taken as what is expected, that farmers have to work until they drop.
    That they have to work 100 hours a week to keep the farm afloat.
    No better way to ensure young people would turn away from the land.


    2 sons there and a farm manager as well.... He does more work than all of them put together....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    2, 3 years of this malarkey will wean off a lot of lads, will be approaching 130 this year on my own. Going with flying herd once the rest of calves are moved on. Tough during the spring but hoping it will be worth it time/financially in the future.. if I had a bigger parlour I reckon could manage more but will see. As dawg says no tailpainting/Ai calves moved on quick, dehorning. Just didn't see it feasible getting another block for replacements, also 4 out of 37 not incalf last year and 3 losing spins so that just p""S's ed me off

    As efficiency goes that model will be close to as good as it gets. One labour unit on owned land shoving 180 through, will be hard to beat financially. When it comes to buying replacements will you buy Springers or calved. There's another area you can help the labour situation and improve the ability to "duck and dive"
    (Eg buying calved cows later in spring when you get a spring like thus ones)

    The one chink in that setup is long term sustainability. Down the road, head into your 50s, it'll be hard going physically, but that's a while away.

    You'll make money with that system
    Add your reply here.

    It's tb and associated risks that would stop me from considering the flying herd. Whatever it is we're never more than a couple of years without getting locked up. Any stock bought in when locked up would get no compensation and difficult to offload calves then as well. In the near term contract rearing is the way I could see myself reducing workload but then I go thinking would leasing and taking on someone full time spring part time rest of year be more straight forward than contract rearing as possibly be getting more value for the labour but I seem to be changing opinions on what to do going forward every day. Have to make a call in next 12 months tho


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,457 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Water John wrote: »
    Good for him. I'm sure they will engrave that on his tombstone.

    TBH it is immaterial as long as you are happy at it. I see a lad at work separated from his wife, he is afraid to retire as she will get half of it. She is getting half of it anyway. As long as the grave stone is far away who gives a f@@k. Retirement is not all it is clapped up to be either. Look at Hillary Clinton she will be 69 by the time she is President if she is elected. What will they engrave on her tombstone and will she give a f@@k.
    Water John wrote: »
    Good luck to him, I really mean that.
    He's happy and that's fine. But it's not to be taken as what is expected, that farmers have to work until they drop.
    That they have to work 100 hours a week to keep the farm afloat.
    No better way to ensure young people would turn away from the land.

    No a lot of farmer do not have to It is a choice they make.. In reality it is a choice we all make. I could retire tomorrow........it is just I could not have the life style that I want. Lots of self employed people make that choice.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭Farmer Ed


    TBH it is immaterial as long as you are happy at it. I see a lad at work separated from his wife, he is afraid to retire as she will get half of it. She is getting half of it anyway. As long as the grave stone is far away who gives a f@@k. Retirement is not all it is clapped up to be either. Look at Hillary Clinton she will be 69 by the time she is President if she is elected. What will they engrave on her tombstone and will she give a f@@k.



    No a lot of farmer do not have to It is a choice they make.. In reality it is a choice we all make. I could retire tomorrow........it is just I could not have the life style that I want. Lots of self employed people make that choice.

    Yes true for the most part, but there are also some. Who to the outside world seam very successful but in reality have so much committed to farming financially that they can't get off the thread mill. I know one man who between himself and his two sons milk 300 cows. He will readily admit that sometimes he feels like a slave as the operation has to keep producing milk to make bank repayments. Im sure if he thought about it logically there is a way out. Just it's easy to get stuck in a rut


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭visatorro


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Steadily reduced my dad's and increased myown here over the last 3years. But talk of farm insurance going up also though uggghhh, I've already seen my car insurance nearly treble from 350 to 950 last week.

    My car insurance stayed the same, with aviva. Have health insurance with them aswell which is a hefty policy aswell though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,084 ✭✭✭kevthegaff


    Milked out wrote: »
    Add your reply here.

    It's tb and associated risks that would stop me from considering the flying herd. Whatever it is we're never more than a couple of years without getting locked up. Any stock bought in when locked up would get no compensation and difficult to offload calves then as well. In the near term contract rearing is the way I could see myself reducing workload but then I go thinking would leasing and taking on someone full time spring part time rest of year be more straight forward than contract rearing as possibly be getting more value for the labour but I seem to be changing opinions on what to do going forward every day. Have to make a call in next 12 months tho
    So any stock I buy in won't get compo? What's the time limit?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭Milked out


    kevthegaff wrote: »
    Milked out wrote: »
    Add your reply here.

    It's tb and associated risks that would stop me from considering the flying herd. Whatever it is we're never more than a couple of years without getting locked up. Any stock bought in when locked up would get no compensation and difficult to offload calves then as well. In the near term contract rearing is the way I could see myself reducing workload but then I go thinking would leasing and taking on someone full time spring part time rest of year be more straight forward than contract rearing as possibly be getting more value for the labour but I seem to be changing opinions on what to do going forward every day. Have to make a call in next 12 months tho
    So any stock I buy in won't get compo? What's the time limit?
    Add your reply here.
    That's if you're restricted and buy in stock the bought in stock won't be eligible for compo if they go down in next test. If you are not restricted the bought in stock are fine no issue if you go down in nearest test.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,799 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Milked out wrote: »
    Add your reply here.

    It's tb and associated risks that would stop me from considering the flying herd. Whatever it is we're never more than a couple of years without getting locked up. Any stock bought in when locked up would get no compensation and difficult to offload calves then as well. In the near term contract rearing is the way I could see myself reducing workload but then I go thinking would leasing and taking on someone full time spring part time rest of year be more straight forward than contract rearing as possibly be getting more value for the labour but I seem to be changing opinions on what to do going forward every day. Have to make a call in next 12 months tho
    Johnes would be the main thing stopping me ever buying in again here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,723 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    whelan2 wrote: »
    Johnes would be the main thing stopping me ever buying in again here.

    Thankfully I'm in a position where I have ample stock from now on .ill cull underperformers and sell milking stock,incalf heifers depending on weather ,feed ,how much grass I can grow and milk price .disease obviously is the big risk buying in and also the fact I'd find it hard to buy stock as good as I'd breed and rare myself


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭mf240


    Most older farmers are happy to tip away into there old age.

    theres a local family that specialise in social welfare and obesity . they don't seem particulary happy .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,457 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Quote:
    Originally Posted by RightTurnClyde View Post
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by kevthegaff View Post
    2, 3 years of this malarkey will wean off a lot of lads, will be approaching 130 this year on my own. Going with flying herd once the rest of calves are moved on. Tough during the spring but hoping it will be worth it time/financially in the future.. if I had a bigger parlour I reckon could manage more but will see. As dawg says no tailpainting/Ai calves moved on quick, dehorning. Just didn't see it feasible getting another block for replacements, also 4 out of 37 not incalf last year and 3 losing spins so that just p""S's ed me off
    As efficiency goes that model will be close to as good as it gets. One labour unit on owned land shoving 180 through, will be hard to beat financially. When it comes to buying replacements will you buy Springers or calved. There's another area you can help the labour situation and improve the ability to "duck and dive"
    (Eg buying calved cows later in spring when you get a spring like thus ones)

    The one chink in that setup is long term sustainability. Down the road, head into your 50s, it'll be hard going physically, but that's a while away.

    You'll make money with that system


    What type of beef bull do you intend running with the cows. I presume that all calves will be sold at 10 days. What happens if you are restricted when cows are calving

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,239 ✭✭✭Willfarman


    Did ye all see the 2 page cost cutting advise in in last weeks journal? "SAVE 15000"
    sweet Jesus. Don't fence. 10 euro a cow. Don't spread nitrogen. 10 euro a cow. Don't fix machinery when it inevitably breaks down.. 10 euro a cow. Don't have a third pint of a Saturday night. 3 euro a cow.. And always ride the wife down the hill to save the welly boots... .005 euro a cow

    Was it written by a transition year student or wtf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,259 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yep, there is €15K you are just pi****g in the wind each year, you stupid farmer.
    That's the short version.

    BTW any further info on the bull making a key contribution to TB resistance.
    The figures suggested were remarkable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,130 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    Water John wrote: »
    Yep, there is €15K you are just pi****g in the wind each year, you stupid farmer.
    That's the short version.

    BTW any further info on the bull making a key contribution to TB resistance.
    The figures suggested were remarkable.

    Well backed up figures in England in tb hot zones, semex showed figures where certain bulls daughter that where if immunity plus sires, got through a severe tb outbreak in one herd with one out of 50 only going down, while other bulls daughters had 60-70% show up as reactors....
    Don't count on ai companies here pushing it health traits don't bump up bulls ebi enough so they really couldn't give a flying f**k researching it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 661 ✭✭✭browned


    Willfarman wrote: »
    Did ye all see the 2 page cost cutting advise in in last weeks journal? "SAVE 15000"
    sweet Jesus. Don't fence. 10 euro a cow. Don't spread nitrogen. 10 euro a cow. Don't fix machinery when it inevitably breaks down.. 10 euro a cow. Don't have a third pint of a Saturday night. 3 euro a cow.. And always ride the wife down the hill to save the welly boots... .005 euro a cow

    Was it written by a transition year student or wtf

    I don't see the issue with the article. As far as I understood the cost savings were suggested by a discussion group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    browned wrote:
    I don't see the issue with the article. As far as I understood the cost savings were suggested by a discussion group.


    For the few years I have been reading it the journal has contained endless "make an extra xyz per cow" mostly AFAIK containing the same list of tips which that article contained..

    They certainly didn't have an article saying "waste 15k per year with the following optional extras" in amongst the how to borrow more for a shed special focuses.

    So I'm a bit bemused, I thought we were pretty fine tuned as producers, I didn't realise that half the stuff we were doing religiously was just for sh##ts and giggles.

    Why don't they have an article aimed at co-ops entitled "get real, your not a wall Street hot shot, your a man in a cheap suit who works in Mitchelstown"

    It could contain a list of optional things not to spend farmers money on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭fepper


    Milked out wrote: »
    Add your reply here.
    That's if you're restricted and buy in stock the bought in stock won't be eligible for compo if they go down in next test. If you are not restricted the bought in stock are fine no issue if you go down in nearest test.
    What's this craic of you starting ur text with " ADD YOUR REPLY HERE"?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement