Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Strong garda presence at Galway Airport amid illegal Traveller encampment

1234689

Comments

  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think you are confusing me with another poster. I never said they suffer discrimination. I'm not sure where you got those quotes. I said they are segregated by their own choice and that any issues they have are generally their own doing because it is not as a result of any lack of service or facilities offered to them.

    I said the ESRI concluded that they suffer marginalisation and ostracism.

    You did not disagree, you said it was their fault.

    You are now contending that they don't face such issues, in fact they have more available to them than other sectors.

    I said point to legislation that positively discriminates in their favour, as exist for gender or disability issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    Travellers have more rights than "settled" people. That's a fact.

    Travellers don't have more rights than "settled" people. That's a fact.
    goose2005 wrote: »
    Exactly. It's the 95% of travellers that give the decent 5% a bad name.

    funny how the statistics to suit certain agendas are always in the 90s.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    I said the ESRI concluded that they suffer marginalisation and ostracism.

    You did not disagree, you said it was their fault.

    You are now contending that they don't face such issues, in fact they have more available to them than other sectors.

    I said point to legislation that positively discriminates in their favour, as exist for gender or disability issues.

    They segregate themselves from normal society. They choose to live in groups at halting sites and in council house clusters. They choose to ignore social norms. This leaves them in a self imposed marginalised position. Despite this, they are offered facilities and services equal to or greater than the rest of the citizens of this country. I never mentioned discrimination, positive or negative.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,308 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    As an example, in the early 1980's Cavan Town Council built a halting site comprising of twelve 3 bed bungalows in a "C" shaped development. Within ten years these were rendered uninhabitable, with interiors trashed, roofs burned and piles of rubbish etc. So the Council built a complete New development to house these families just across the road. They then had to completely rebuild the first site completely to house more families. No one else on the urban area has had detached council houses provided for them! You are damn lucky ifyou get a semi. These are not sites a mile outside town, they are in a prime spot beside the multiplex and tescos, with Main Street and Aldi about 300 metres walkaway. So more than fairly treated.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nekarsulm wrote: »
    You are damn lucky ifyou get a semi.

    Cavan sounds very grim...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,637 ✭✭✭BMJD


    So now you don't accept the ESRI or European Parliaments findings, as opposed to merely disagreeing with the cause of discrimination in a previous post?


    Any chance of a link to this European Parliament finding?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    You could say that about any single category that faces discrimination or prejudice.

    Black people committing crime in South Central LA choose to be disenfranchised...it's their own culture...
    Native Americans sniffing glue on some wasteland in a reservation choose to be disenfranchised...it's their own culture...
    Indigenous Australians drinking through the night in their shacks choose to be disenfranchised...it's their own culture...

    It works for every single group that has faced marginalisation and discrimination over centuries. Every one.

    That is not a valid historical comparison.

    1) Native Americans were ethnically cleansed indigenous people, their culture delegitimised and they were discriminated against by law, including the seizure of their land. The US went to war with them for generations.
    2) Indigenous Australians were ethnically cleansed indigenous people, their culture delegitimised and they were discriminated against by law, including the seizure of their land, laws sterilising them and seizure of their children.
    3) Black Americans were enslaved for generations, their culture delegitimised, they were discriminated against by law and legal ( Supreme court accepted) "separate but equal" legislation. Laws existed until a few years ago -- less than s decade for sure -- banning intermarriage in most States ( some may still exist).


    Travellers are Irish people who travel around and have anti-social tendencies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Has anybody got a link to traveller sites in Dublin, I have a theory that while they could be built anywhere they are not built in the richest suburbs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,308 ✭✭✭✭Nekarsulm


    Cavan sounds very grim...

    There isn't any social housing built by the Council for at least ten years. When the Council demanded developers provide Social & Affordable during the boom, all the developers bought the required number of houses in a new development called Lakeview, and give them to the Council to fulfil their requirements, and to keep R.A people out of their "up market" schemes. Council didn't care, they got their development fees from he builders, and also the required number of S & A housing.
    Lakeview is almost fully R.A and already a sink estate.
    However the Council did built detached bungalows for the Travellers "halting" site.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 803 ✭✭✭jungleman


    Right...... So they're gone from the airport anyway so?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭thadg


    martin Collins from pave point should on to explain and demand rights shortly:rolleyes:

    This man in Wales got them off his land quick enough;

    http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/business-owner-who-used-digger-10213872


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    I have to laugh at the complete lack of self awareness in much of the hatred.
    Hatred? That's a leap. I never expressed hatred. I simply said "society" is not responsible for problems travellers experience, aspects of traveller culture itself are the cause - lack of education being the main one; there is no state policy to deny traveller children an education. I don't understand why you are so hellbent on denying this. What good does denial do? And I am in favour of the state offering to help out travellers, especially the kids, but I am not in favour of abdication of personal responsibility. An integral part of traveller culture is to segregate itself from non traveller society - what's this stuff about "society" marginalising them?
    I'm not prejudiced...but travellers really are criminals.
    No, plenty of travellers aren't.

    If I hated travellers, I wouldn't want them to have improved lives. I absolutely do - I want anyone in society to have improved lives, but change has to come from within. What is wrong with saying this? It's as if the fair thing would be to say travellers have no responsibility to improve their own situation, the problems do not come from within their own communities, and they are all society's fault and society should take the blame. How would that benefit travellers?
    If there were no supports offered to travellers, you'd have a point, but there are numerous supports offered to travellers, including protected ethnic minority status.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Has anybody got a link to traveller sites in Dublin, I have a theory that while they could be built anywhere they are not built in the richest suburbs.

    There are halting sites in Foxrock/Leopardstown, Killiney, Blackrock and Cabinteely.

    The Killiney one is disused at the moment because of a traveller curse.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Azalea wrote: »
    Hatred? That's a leap. I never expressed hatred...

    Um.

    You are treating my post as a response to yours and rebutting it.

    It was posted the day before your first post on this thread! How could I possibly be referring to you?


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That is not a valid historical comparison.

    For the second or third time, I'll repeat.

    I was comparing "people with higher crime rates". Not "people with the same history".

    So that is not a valid rebuttal. Yes, I know Travellers didn't fight General Custer at Little Big Horn, and I know travellers were not on the Million Man March, and so yes they have different histories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,946 ✭✭✭✭Neyite


    There are halting sites in Foxrock/Leopardstown, Killiney, Blackrock and Cabinteely.

    The Killiney one is disused at the moment because of a traveller curse.

    I guess that's one way of preventing them settling in an affluent neighbourhood.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 488 ✭✭The Sun King


    Ive never had a positive interaction with any member of the travelling community. Lived among them for years and got nothing but hassle, abuse and intimidation.

    Wait. I lie... One time a traveller reversed in to my car, even though I had warned him it was dangerous to back up and he didn't get out clutching his neck and calling the ambulance.

    So that's something...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,116 ✭✭✭RDM_83 again


    I'm not sure many claim it.

    I haven't seen anyone here say "things are the same across both populations".

    I say things are different. Crime rates are higher. As they are amongst black people and native Americans in the States. As they are amongst indigenous Australians in Oz. But in those communities people are much more willing to accept society's role in creating that difference, and what society owes to address issues. Here people are more likely to say "but they get too much, they don't deserve it, they do nothing for themselves, it's not our fault at all"

    Thats a pretty valid point however perhaps there is a more honest opinion voiced in Ireland because they share the same race as the mainstream society.
    Take the black community in the US, they do suffer systemic discrimination including by the justice system but you also have to look at the issues internal to the community, cops in America may be racist but they aren't going around framing black guys for murdering other black guys.
    Or look at the data involving single parent families by ethnicity in the USA, while some of this may be caused by the high rates of black men being imprisoned this can't account for the fact that 67% of black kids are in single parent families, that figure is crazily high and can't simply be blamed on external factors

    Compare it to Hispanic population in the USA which encounters many of the same problems as the Black community, racism, being perceived as criminals, poverty. Yet they have a far superior outcomes (single parent family rate is 40% for example and the other measures show the same thing).

    Other examples of what this idea is the way the Catholic population in NI after generations of systemic discrimination once these barriers were removed now out performs the formerly privileged community in many ways or the Hindu community in mainland Britain which is amazingly successful despite earlier racial discrimination, similarly consider African immigrants in the USA compared to "African Americans" they are doing far better.

    No group should suffer from discrimination but you can't not ignore how the community itself responds to discrimination, does it fracture or does it thrive despite the challenges it faces.

    For the native Australian issue, they suffered relentless oppression but within modern society how does one combine a a desire for all Australians to live to a first world standard without completely erasing Aboriginal culture (which if your not looking at it as a starry eyed searcher for deeper spiritual meaning had a lot of pretty brutal aspects to it and would not be a life most people would choose).
    This is true for the Traveller community in Ireland too to a lesser extent, in the 18th/19th century the settled population was just as into faction fighting and feuding etc and there was roles that the community filled. In the 20th century these roles have disappeared and society in general has changed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    For the second or third time, I'll repeat.

    I was comparing "people with higher crime rates". Not "people with the same history".

    So that is not a valid rebuttal. Yes, I know Travellers didn't fight General Custer at Little Big Horn, and I know travellers were not on the Million Man March, and so yes they have different histories.

    But the general excuse for higher crime rates in the black or native american community is pervious oppression. Thats a valid argument, although it may not be the only reason. In the case of travellers there is no such reasoning.

    Also there is a reason you picked these groups, they have been victims of racism, or genocide. You want to paint criticism of travellers as morally equivalent to criticisms of blacks in the US, or Aborigines in Australia, then to cry foul when the the comparison is declared invalid. There are after all other groups who are accused of being criminal ( say, for instance the Mafia), because they are criminal. Maybe that is an unjust comparison too, but in fact if travellers are not a race, and are following a lifestyle which trends towards anti-social behaviour then its a lifestyle choice.

    And in fact criminality amongst Travellers is extremely high compared to the criminality of these historically oppressed groups )


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    Graces7 wrote: »
    A one sided tale is this. I have had trouble from the mainstream community far worse than from travellers.

    There's a lot more settled people around you though. I am guessing you don't live in a halting site? What's the % of your interactions with pavees v the % with settled people?

    Its like saying you get stung from a bee more than bitten by a shark. Yeah but I don't live in the ****ing sea do I!


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    esforum wrote: »
    There's a lot more settled people around you though. I am guessing you don't live in a halting site? What's the % of your interactions with pavees v the % with settled people?

    Its like saying you get stung from a bee more than bitten by a shark. Yeah but I don't live in the ****ing sea do I!

    I'm sure she's figured out that she doesn't "live in the ****ing sea".

    She simply gave her reaction and her experience, not sure she needs to do the breakdown of interactions so you can prescribe how she should feel about them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    I'm sure she's figured out that she doesn't "live in the ****ing sea".

    She simply gave her reaction and her experience, not sure she needs to do the breakdown of interactions so you can prescribe how she should feel about them.

    sigh.......missed the point completely


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭wexandproud


    esforum wrote: »
    sigh.......missed the point completely
    look back over the thread , he's missed a lot of points . did you ever hear the saying ' there's none so blind as one who doesn't want to see'


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    look back over the thread , he's missed a lot of points . did you ever hear the saying ' there's none so blind as one who doesn't want to see'

    Yup, me and all those studies and reports that conclude that they are marginalised and ostracised.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    look back over the thread , he's missed a lot of points . did you ever hear the saying ' there's none so blind as one who doesn't want to see'

    indeed indeed, so it would seem
    Yup, me and all those studies and reports that conclude that they are marginalised and ostracised.

    Sure sure, criminal records and probation reports will do that to ya. The lack of reading and writing and formal education will also hamper a person in their efforts to find employment or is that discrimination against the uneducated?

    Is it ok Conor if I state that the majority of pavees I have dealt with have been criminals? Not generalising them all, stating a fact about my own interactions.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    esforum wrote: »
    Is it ok Conor if I state that the majority of pavees I have dealt with have been criminals? Not generalising them all, stating a fact about my own interactions.

    Oh it's grand!

    I'm not the one prescribing how another should portray their experiences at all. That was you, when you quoted graces7.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,420 ✭✭✭esforum


    Oh it's grand!

    I'm not the one prescribing how another should portray their experiences at all. That was you, when you quoted graces7.


    hmmm, do you really not understand what my point was or are you just so combative in this thread that you go straight for the jugular?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,024 ✭✭✭✭irishgeo


    Yup, me and all those studies and reports that conclude that they are marginalised and ostracised.

    The travellers used that to their advantage. It's not as if they are not given enough chances. They courts left then off time and time again with excuses of drink and drug problems.

    45 or 50 previous convictions is a joke. No other country in the world would put up with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    Yup, me and all those studies and reports that conclude that they are marginalised and ostracised.
    But travellers in general choose to be. It's well known that they wish to keep their community to itself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,200 ✭✭✭Arbiter of Good Taste


    :confused:

    Statistically a far higher percentage of the Traveller population will be incarcerated compared to the non-traveller population.

    How are you not getting that?

    I don't think that other poster actually understands the meaning of "statistically"


Advertisement
Advertisement