Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Greece could be expelled from Schengen

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭MilesMorales1


    Christ. What an absolute mess this is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Irish Praetorian


    Clearly we need to do nothing, make sure everything stays exactly the same, nothing is wrong, and if you disagree you're a big dirty racist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Carlos Orange


    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Irish Praetorian


    psinno wrote: »
    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.

    We might want to consider doing away with that as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,867 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    psinno wrote: »
    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.

    Of course they can. Why can't countries say no more refugees?

    What legal sanction is there if they don't take any?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    psinno wrote: »
    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.

    Not true, Poland for example has refused to take any.
    This should be something the world over deals with and not just the eu.
    Shut down all immigration/asylum from these places temporarily so that the governments here can get a handle on things.
    Turkey is just letting them slip on through to us and in return we've promised the turks billions.
    If a boat is sent from turkey to Greece then the Greeks should send that boat right back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Carlos Orange


    bear1 wrote: »
    Not true, Poland for example has refused to take any.

    Like everything it is all in the details. Asylum seekers aren't the same as refugees and people moving from a safe country to a richer country are economic migrants. Fairly few people walk across a land border into Poland without transiting through many safe countries.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    psinno wrote: »
    Like everything it is all in the details. Asylum seekers aren't the same as refugees and people moving from a safe country to a richer country are economic migrants. Fairly few people walk across a land border into Poland without transiting through many safe countries.

    But how many of these migrants are economic migrants? Which safe country have they come from?
    My point though is that the eu should suspend any asylum/immigration etc due to the security risk.
    We don't know who we have let in and what we have seen in the last few months are terrorist attacks in Paris, festivals cancelled in Brussels, sexual crimes in cologne and now stories of the same coming from Helsinki.
    We cannot be the hospice of the world, this fcuk up has cost us all and it will cost us more.
    The Schengen zone being temporarily suspended will have huge economical consequences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Carlos Orange


    bear1 wrote: »
    The Schengen zone being temporarily suspended will have huge economical consequences.

    Possibly but we aren't in it. No difference to us.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    psinno wrote: »
    Possibly but we aren't in it. No difference to us.

    True, but it would still affect us.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    You can tell a lot about a man when you see him under pressure.

    Same goes for an institution.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 333 ✭✭BigJackC


    psinno wrote: »
    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.

    The majority of the "refugees" who come to Europe are not fleeing from war. They have left their home country for economic reasons. This has been said by EU Commissioner Frans Timmermans in an interview with the NOS in the Netherlands. You can absolutely shut them off and ensure that they come through the correct channels and mechanisms. There is a visa process for a reason.

    http://nos.nl/artikel/2082786-timmermans-meer-dan-helft-vluchtelingen-heeft-economisch-motief.html

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/most-fleeing-to-europe-are-not-refugees-eu-official-says-1.2511133


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,129 ✭✭✭my friend


    psinno wrote: »
    Countries have a legal responsibility to take refugees so they can't just turn it off.

    No they don't


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭Fleawuss


    The eastern expansion of the EU into politically and socially volatile regions is beginning to be seen as the disaster it always promised. The Balkans dragged Europe into the abyss 100 years ago: it remains a dangerous quagmire. Greece cannot defend its maritime borders and its economy is a contagion. Sometimes you have to leave someone out to save the rest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34 FluffyMcCardy


    As Big Jack says, many of these people, young men in particular are not refugees but economic migrants many of them apparently who think women are fair game. Real refugees should be be looked after but also remember sometimes there's a reason they've had to escape and they may not be innocent victims. Bear in mind that when IS is broken up as it surely will they will be fleeing in our direction because we're the only fools who won't line them up and shoot them out of hand.

    People need to get real about this. The wrong people are already in Europe but it's nowhere near the problem it will be unless the EU starts to clamp down on the problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Nice - let Greece bear the entire burden of the migrant crisis - on top of the already massive unemployment, and deteriorated economic conditions - it's like the EU are deliberately trying to create a failed state there.

    For the continental mainland, the Schengen area is one of the bigger-draws of being in the EU - what is the remaining point of the EU without it?

    Failed currency union (its remaining purpose seems to be more aimed at controlling/hamstringing member state governments/democracies), failed union of internal-travel/borders - overall it's looking more and more like a failed project in growing need of dismantling (but which will only come at great economic cost). Should have stayed with the common-market/EEC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭Irish Praetorian


    Nice - let Greece bear the entire burden of the migrant crisis - on top of the already massive unemployment, and deteriorated economic conditions - it's like the EU are deliberately trying to create a failed state there.

    For the continental mainland, the Schengen area is one of the bigger-draws of being in the EU - what is the remaining point of the EU without it?

    Failed currency union (its remaining purpose seems to be more aimed at controlling/hamstringing member state governments/democracies), failed union of internal-travel/borders - overall it's looking more and more like a failed project in growing need of dismantling (but which will only come at great economic cost). Should have stayed with the common-market/EEC.

    No I think what the EU is trying to achieve is to stop this unending influx of everyone and their mum through Greece and up into Europe. If we can't have an effective border at Greece then we will have to redraw one deeper in Europe. An EU free travel area does not mean free for the rest of the world as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Jaysus. It really is one gigantic mess. Eastern Europe is shaking fists at Russia, China is pretending their house isn't on fire and all is well, the middle east and parts of North Africa has nearly collapsed. Central Africa has boko harem, etc.


    How's South America doing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭wendell borton


    The EU does a deal with Turkey yet sticks fellow members in the back. The whole situation is a win for Turkey, they get to see their greatest foe destabilised and weakened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    BigJackC wrote: »
    The majority of the "refugees" who come to Europe are not fleeing from war. They have left their home country for economic reasons. This has been said by EU Commissioner Frans Timmermans in an interview with the NOS in the Netherlands. You can absolutely shut them off and ensure that they come through the correct channels and mechanisms. There is a visa process for a reason.

    http://nos.nl/artikel/2082786-timmermans-meer-dan-helft-vluchtelingen-heeft-economisch-motief.html

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/most-fleeing-to-europe-are-not-refugees-eu-official-says-1.2511133

    There's no visa process for here. You have to be employed by an Irish company before you come here or be a student. There's no way to actually emigrate here.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Jaysus. It really is one gigantic mess. Eastern Europe is shaking fists at Russia, China is pretending their house isn't on fire and all is well, the middle east and parts of North Africa has nearly collapsed. Central Africa has boko harem, etc.


    How's South America doing?
    Not so good, there's a nasty virus doing the rounds over there that could have a major global impact, not least the need for the complete eradication of mosquitoes.

    Chile is grand though, we should all move there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Does Ireland have a plan B? Do we have a plan to pull back from the EU and start using our own currency and all that stuff that comes with being a sovereign country?

    If we don't we should. I think it would be in the interests of national security and financial leverage/sovereignty if the 'masters of mankind' in the EU knew we had some sort of 'fuck this - we're outa here' plan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    Chile is grand though, we should all move there.

    Isn't there a WHV for there now??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭RoyalMarine


    Why not just let them all in to Ireland?

    They can all move over here.

    And we can all move over there.

    Just leave the current government here and we can set up a lovely place there.
    Lots of oil, lots of sun and we don't need to worry about 'the north' anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,360 ✭✭✭KingBrian2


    Europe needs a single passport system that Nations can opt in or out of. Different societies have different criteria and experiences of emigration. Applying to the whole of Europe is archaic. Poland, Hungary and Croatia don't need all these refugees. Britain on the other hand can take in as many as they like if they want. What can't remain in place is the Calais camp which is disrupting the flow of trade and ability of European citizens to move across the continent safely. Bulgaria is also in a state with all those Syrian migrants camping out desiring to get into the heart of Europe. They should be deported back to Syria.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    Isn't there a WHV for there now??
    Yep.

    Very highly developed country, the California of the Southern Hemisphere.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Does Ireland have a plan B? Do we have a plan to pull back from the EU and start using our own currency and all that stuff that comes with being a sovereign country?

    If we don't we should. I think it would be in the interests of national security and financial leverage/sovereignty if the 'masters of mankind' in the EU knew we had some sort of 'fuck this - we're outa here' plan.
    I think there was rumour of such a plan, as a last-ditch emergency measure, back in 2012 or such - given the potential for a Euro breakup - but I don't know if there's anything like this still actively in place.

    A currency transition when stuck in something like the Euro, is a majorly destructive event, which can take beyond 6+ months to complete - and we'd be set-back economically for 3-5+ years (looking more and more like it's worth the cost though - as staying in the Euro, looks like it means ceding democratic control of the country).

    If we could depend on the ECB not rendering our banking system completely non-functional, like they did with Greece last year, then we could start operating a parallel currency tomorrow (temporarily keeping the Euro as a side-currency) - and even use that to grow our economy and return to full employment.

    The ECB rules Europe now though, and no government can run a parallel currency - thus restoring sovereign power - without the risk of the ECB doing what they did to Greece.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    Yep.

    Very highly developed country, the California of the Southern Hemisphere.

    Is it??
    Be the best way to learn a language IMO


    When I think of chile I always think of them miners and the lad that waited until near the end to be rescued as his wife and the wan he was having an affair with were both waiting on him


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,360 ✭✭✭KingBrian2


    I think there was rumour of such a plan, as a last-ditch emergency measure, back in 2012 or such - given the potential for a Euro breakup - but I don't know if there's anything like this still actively in place.

    A currency transition when stuck in something like the Euro, is a majorly destructive event, which can take beyond 6+ months to complete - and we'd be set-back economically for 3-5+ years (looking more and more like it's worth the cost though - as staying in the Euro, looks like it means ceding democratic control of the country).

    If we could depend on the ECB not rendering our banking system completely non-functional, like they did with Greece last year, then we could start operating a parallel currency tomorrow (temporarily keeping the Euro as a side-currency) - and even use that to grow our economy and return to full employment.

    The ECB rules Europe now though, and no government can run a parallel currency - thus restoring sovereign power - without the risk of the ECB doing what they did to Greece.

    Operating a new currency by massive devaluation. Greece knew the rules when they entered the Zone so did France and still they let spending get out of control. Regardless of the banks the gvt should have reigned back all the spending that was going on. Spain was every bit as bad as Greece yet they managed to achieve some balance in the economy. Even the wonderful Swedes and Finns have experienced economic problems and worked through them all by cooperating with the ECB. Greece decided to snub the offer to repair the damage caused by the previous administration.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,764 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    bear1 wrote: »

    I suppose its all moot. How can you threaten expulsion from something which has ceased to function properly? Schengen is going to be toast in practice by the end of another summer of migrant madness anyway, followed by BRexit from EU (if Cameron does not chicken out of holding referendum this year). That crisis and terrorism (or threats of terrorism) will almost certainly finish both off this year.


Advertisement
Advertisement