The damage I would do to her/I would smash it...

17-12-2015 08:51AM

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

The phrase doesn't convey that the poster wants to or intends to do any damage to Kate Beckinsale any more than they want top or intend to actually 'pull the mickey off themselves' when Kate doesn't show up for her liaison dangereuse.

It's just a crude phrase.

Oh very possibly true. I appreciate that it may not mean a specific desire to hurt by the poster using it, because it was probably unthinking. But that doesn't mean it's origins are not violent, or at least as you say crude.

17-12-2015 08:52AM

DeanAustin wrote: »

Stop taking yourself so seriously.

Thanks for the analysis!

Now...about the topic?

Turtyturd · 17-12-2015 08:52AM

OP completely ignores post from a woman talking about using such phrases.

17-12-2015 08:53AM

Sex can be crude though, and sometimes rough if that's what you like, and that's ok!

Tarzana2 · 17-12-2015 08:55AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Sex can be crude though, and sometimes rough if that's what you like, and that's ok!

Jaysus, sex on the BRAIN here. :pac:

17-12-2015 08:55AM

This thread is having the exact opposite affect on me than it was probably meant to :pac:

Alf Veedersane · 17-12-2015 08:55AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Oh very possibly true. I appreciate that it may not mean a specific desire to hurt by the poster using it, because it was probably unthinking. But that doesn't mean it's origins are not violent, or at least as you say crude.

There's no thought put into saying it. No one says it and thinks they would genuinely cause damage if the day ever arises that Kate Beckinsale wants to have sex, vigorous or otherwise, with them.

There's no need to attach any more meaning to it than you would if they said "i'd love to treat her lovingly, bring her for dinner, then a stroll along the beach before having gentle sex listening to Lionel Richie"

Menas · 17-12-2015 08:55AM

Tarzana2 wrote: »

Jaysus, sex on the BRAIN here. :pac:

Hangover horniness!

racso1975 · 17-12-2015 08:56AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Sex can be crude though, and sometimes rough if that's what you like, and that's ok!

Whoops given your 3 quick posts being very sexual I'd say you've an awful mornin horn on ya. You'd destroy me the mood your in!!!

17-12-2015 08:56AM

Turtyturd wrote: »

OP completely ignores post from a woman talking about using such phrases.

Huh?

Read the OP again, where was I gender specific?

"A woman said it, that means it's grand so". Was that really your point?

17-12-2015 08:57AM

Be right back - going for cold shower.

17-12-2015 08:58AM

Alf Veedersane wrote: »

There's no thought put into saying it. No one says it and thinks they would genuinely cause damage if the day ever arises that Kate Beckinsale wants to have sex, vigorous or otherwise, with them.

There's no need to attach any more meaning to it than you would if they said "i'd love to treat her lovingly, bring her for dinner, then a stroll along the beach before having gentle sex listening to Lionel Richie"

Oh I certainly take the first point, that it may have been unthinking.

But it's still a violent metaphor. And one that I notice more and more, or it's said more openly. Was it Keyes and Gray who spoke of "smashing it" when they saw a female referee in a football match?

Turtyturd · 17-12-2015 08:59AM

OP appears to have difficulty reading and comprehending points.

Tarzana2 · 17-12-2015 08:59AM

Menas wrote: »

Hangover horniness!

Yeah, my fella gets that whereas I find hangovers to be the greatest vadge-drier ever.

racso1975 · 17-12-2015 09:00AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Be right back - going for cold shower.

God help the loofah brush....don't break it

Alf Veedersane · 17-12-2015 09:04AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Oh I certainly take the first point, that it may have been unthinking.

But it's still a violent metaphor. And one that I notice more and more, or it's said more openly. Was it Keyes and Gray who spoke of "smashing it" when they saw a female referee in a football match?

And?

I don't know what your point is other than it's used a lot.

Do you think it's increasing use normalises sexual violence?

Pac1Man · 17-12-2015 09:05AM

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Not in the slightest. Could you point to the posts you found "pissy" and we can have a look at the language in them?

Here you go. Instances where you come across sarky & smart.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

I know one is not meant to take it literally. Did you know that metaphors can convey violence? Evidently not. Well today you learned something new.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I love that old "no I can't think of one example so I'll say there are loads and you can find them yourself".

First used on day 2 of the internet.

stoneill · 17-12-2015 09:05AM

Kate Bekinsales dad was in prison you know - known as Gobber inside - hard man, hung around with Fletcher.

Mantis Toboggan · 17-12-2015 09:06AM

Between the nanny brigade and the pc brigade the world is well and truly going mad. Maybe we can bring in legislation and prosecute people for saying such crazy things.

Op, have you thought about starting a petition?

Hemerodrome · 17-12-2015 09:10AM

stoneill wrote: »

Kate Bekinsales dad was in prison you know - known as Gobber inside - hard man, hung around with Fletcher.

I find this level of inaccuracy the most offensive thing about this thread. His name was Lenny Godber and he was a scared first timer, not a hard man. Be as wrong as you like about the increase in sexual violence, but Porridge is too important to get wrong.

Gaygooner · 17-12-2015 09:11AM

You be Lee Chapman, I'll be Lesley Ash...

DeanAustin · 17-12-2015 09:14AM

stoneill wrote: »

Kate Bekinsales dad was in prison you know - known as Gobber inside - hard man, hung around with Fletcher.

What a f**king idiot I am. Went Googling this to see what he was in for. Penny dropped after about 5 mins. I feel like the second must stupid person on this thread now.

B@stard.

17-12-2015 09:16AM

tritium wrote: »

Men (and women) have been making crude comments about the quantity and quality if sexual prowess they'd display with their object of desire for pretty much ever. Not really something to get too worked up about.

We really are scraping the bottom of the outrage barrel at this stage.

There's a barrel of outrage??

Why didn't I get some? This is an outrage!!!

17-12-2015 09:16AM

Pac1Man wrote: »

Here you go. Instances where you come across sarky & smart.

I am allowed a little sarcasm in responding to posts of the

Turtyturd wrote: »

OP appears to have difficulty reading and comprehending points.

calibre?

I would have thought "pissy" would kinda involve getting stuck in in a similar manner?

Either way, we can disagree about me...but about the topic?

Korvanica · 17-12-2015 09:17AM

circadian wrote: »

There's a barrel of outrage??

Why didn't I get some? This is an outrage!!!

I think you've had enough already!

osarusan · 17-12-2015 09:17AM

Deleted User wrote: »

Or is it fine and nothing to see here?

This, and nothing else.

Ugly phrases alright, but more than likely said by people who'd either be paralysed with stage fright or cream themselves in seconds if they got anywhere near the object of the expression.

The notion that use of these phrases implies a desire to actually do some kind of damage is just laughable though, and only reachable if you decide against all logic and cultural knowledge to interpret them literally.

Menas · 17-12-2015 09:17AM

circadian wrote: »

There's a barrel of outrage??

Why didn't I get some? This is an outrage!!!

I have been outraged all morning. Get in the outrage queue.

OldMrBrennan83 · 17-12-2015 09:18AM

This post has been deleted.

GLaDOS · 17-12-2015 09:19AM

Its hyperbole, it doesn't mean anything, nothing to worry about.

Alf Veedersane · 17-12-2015 09:20AM

"The damage I'd do to Penny!!!"

DeanAustin wrote: »

Penny dropped after about 5 mins.

The damage I would do to her/I would smash it...

Comments