Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Shootings in Paris - MOD NOTE UPDATED - READ OP

1111112114116117240

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,613 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Reports of shooting in a hotel near the eiffel tower. Unconfirmed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,029 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007



    That's what, 0.001%? Assuming even 0.001% of Muslims coming into Europe are extremists, that's 1500 people.

    We've seen what 8 of them could do in Paris last night. We need stringent security checks of all migrants coming to Europe, and the immediate deportation of those who fail to meet the criteria. We can't waste time and resources, this is a clear and present danger to the structure and survival of Europe.

    One of the attackers was a french national - how many french nationals are there - do we stop all french nationals coming to ireland on Holidays?

    You see how stupid that sounds, but your using that logic when talking to Refugees.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,217 ✭✭✭✭m5ex9oqjawdg2i


    Muslims breed extremists though. Its a religion with a seriously problematic extremist tendency.
    If Muslims arent the enemy, Islam certainly is.

    What a rediculous statement to make. Religions don't breed extremists, people do. Extremists are not limited to Islam, they can be found within all religions, all nationalities, all classes of society.

    Make a war on the extremists, not the religion itself or the people who follow that religion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Islam does have a disproportionately high number of terrorists, and Islamic countries do have a worrying number of people who support these radical groups.

    If even 10% of Muslims (Pew polls put the figure much, much higher) are radicalists or sympathetic to radicalists, that's 160 million people we have to worry about. If even 1% of those are willing to kill for Islam, that's 1.6 million people we have to worry about.

    That's what, 0.001%? Assuming even 0.001% of Muslims coming into Europe are extremists, that's 1500 people.

    We've seen what 8 of them could do in Paris last night. We need stringent security checks of all migrants coming to Europe, and the immediate deportation of those who fail to meet the criteria. We can't waste time and resources, this is a clear and present danger to the structure and survival of Europe.

    I wouldn't say it's as bad as all that old chap.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    Uncle Ben wrote: »
    Well here's the option I favour. Actually it's Cameron's. No refugees are accepted from Europe but are actually vetted in reception centres in Africa. And naval vessels tow the refugees back to Libyan ports rather than tow them into Europe. And no status is afforded to those who cannot prove their identity.
    and what about those that aren't in Africa?



    i'm not actually looking for a realistic answer here by the way, that idea is so laughably unworkable and stupid, i'm just looking to hear your entertainingly nonsense rebuttal.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭Carlos Orange


    We can't waste time and resources, this is a clear and present danger to the structure and survival of Europe.

    I think that massively overstates the position.
    We should still probably do something to stop thousands of Europeans being murdered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,613 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    if those figures were even remotely true, we'd have attacks ever single day of the week all across the world, not least in Europe.
    they're complete bullsh1t.

    13,000 civilian deaths in Iraq this year so far mostly at the hands of radicals, would indicate it is a daily problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    Uncle Ben wrote: »
    Well here's the option I favour. Actually it's Cameron's. No refugees are accepted from Europe but are actually vetted in reception centres in Africa. And naval vessels tow the refugees back to Libyan ports rather than tow them into Europe. And no status is afforded to those who cannot prove their identity.

    Here's the option I prefer, don't accept any refugees at all but provide more funding to make the camps in surrounding countries better. That way they'll be in situ to return home after Daesh are eventually defeated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    if those figures were even remotely true, we'd have attacks ever single day of the week all across the world, not least in Europe.
    they're complete bullsh1t.

    I'm not sure if you don't read the news or what, but you are aware there's a lot of wars being waged across the Islamic world, right? Whether it's Kurds attacking Turks in Berlin, or Sunni throwing grenades at Shia in the streets of Sweden, whether it's a suicide bombing in Lebanon, or a rape and murder in the streets of Calcutta. Whether it's a car-bomb in Libya or the downing of a plane in Egypt, whether it's a Taliban attack in Afghanistan, or a tourist centre being bombed in Thailand... We do have attacks almost every day of the week across the world, a lot of it goes unreported, but it is reported regularly enough for us to extrapolate data from it.


    But, of course, facts are racist and xenophobic, so my apologies for causing harm to your frail sensitivities and your nonsensical hand-wringing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    13,000 civilian deaths in Iraq this year so far mostly at the hands of radicals, would indicate it is a daily problem.
    well that would be relevant if a significant proportion of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims were in Iraq :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭dogcat


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    Reports of shooting in a hotel near the eiffel tower. Unconfirmed.
    What? Is there any article on this?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    I wouldn't say it's as bad as all that old chap.

    Remember all those months ago when we said this lackadaisical approach your side proposed to the migrant crisis would lead to ISIS fighters getting into Europe? I sure as fúck do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,613 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    dogcat wrote: »
    What? Is there any article on this?

    On Sky News and twitter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    I'm not sure if you don't read the news or what, but you are aware there's a lot of wars being waged across the Islamic world, right? Whether it's Kurds attacking Turks in Berlin, or Sunni throwing grenades at Shia in the streets of Sweden, whether it's a suicide bombing in Lebanon, or a rape and murder in the streets of Calcutta. Whether it's a car-bomb in Libya or the downing of a plane in Egypt, whether it's a Taliban attack in Afghanistan, or a tourist centre being bombed in Thailand... We do have attacks almost every day of the week across the world, a lot of it goes unreported, but it is reported regularly enough for us to extrapolate data from it.


    But, of course, facts are racist and xenophobic, so my apologies for causing harm to your frail sensitivities and your nonsensical hand-wringing.
    those aren't facts, they're isolated examples. the only place with daily attacks are conflict-zones.
    Islamic extremist attacks outside conflict zones are extremely rare.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Ace2007 wrote: »
    One of the attackers was a french national - how many french nationals are there - do we stop all french nationals coming to ireland on Holidays?

    You see how stupid that sounds, but your using that logic when talking to Refugees.

    The French national wasn't killing in the name of France now, was he? Your argument is a fallacy, they are not comparable instances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 898 ✭✭✭petrolcan


    conorhal wrote: »
    And would like to continue to be so. Why are you so eager to ensure Jack gets blown up by a suicide bomber because you suffer from some kind of irrational emotional incontinence?

    Emotional incontinence, good one.

    There's an awful lot of tarring everything with one brush in this thread.

    There would've been outcry if that'd happened 30-40 years ago with the Irish Diaspora.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,440 ✭✭✭The Rape of Lucretia


    What a rediculous statement to make. Religions don't breed extremists, people do. Extremists are not limited to Islam, they can be found within all religions, all nationalities, all classes of society.

    Make a war on the extremists, not the religion itself or the people who follow that religion.

    May as well go to the root of the problem which is religion itself when it is incapable of resisting tendencies to extremism.
    Religion has been pretty much successfully eradicated in Europe to a retro, museum heritage side of the culture of the continent. What remains is unthreatening and well watered down from it origins.

    We can hope for similar in the future in other parts of the world and other religions. This is how the real problem can be resolved.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭donegaLroad


    Islam does have a disproportionately high number of terrorists, and Islamic countries do have a worrying number of people who support these radical groups.

    If even 10% of Muslims (Pew polls put the figure much, much higher) are radicalists or sympathetic to radicalists, that's 160 million people we have to worry about. If even 1% of those are willing to kill for Islam, that's 1.6 million people we have to worry about.

    That's what, 0.001%? Assuming even 0.001% of Muslims coming into Europe are extremists, that's 1500 people.

    We've seen what 8 of them could do in Paris last night. We need stringent security checks of all migrants coming to Europe, and the immediate deportation of those who fail to meet the criteria. We can't waste time and resources, this is a clear and present danger to the structure and survival of Europe.

    during the Holocaust, a small percentage of Germans were responsible for the unthinkable acts of cruelty towards the Jews.. the large majority of Germans who remained silent were irrelevant, the small minority continued the killing the slaughter continued.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭ihatemyfish


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    So you would rather thousands of refugees are turned away because of madmen? That's not very fair is it.

    Some of the madmen are refugees. Completely opening up our borders has meant that terrorists could enter Europe and slaughter EU citizens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Uncle Ben wrote: »
    Well here's the option I favour. Actually it's Cameron's. No refugees are accepted from Europe but are actually vetted in reception centres in Africa. And naval vessels tow the refugees back to Libyan ports rather than tow them into Europe. And no status is afforded to those who cannot prove their identity.


    Great. When we have an issue with the refugees we will come to you.

    You still have no plan for people just entering illegally. They are well funded and dedicated to their lunatic cause. We can't patrol all the borders all the time.

    I have pointed out why closing the borders won't work repeatedly and people keep insisting on ignoring the fact that they are willing to use illegal means to get into the country.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,842 ✭✭✭corny


    Custardpi wrote: »
    Utter nonsense. These are not aggrieved freedom fighters striking back against imperialism, however much you want them to be so. The efforts which Islamists have gone to to attack the West pale into insignificance when compared to the amount of attacks they have launched on groups with zero connection to Western powers. From Somalia to Kenya, Iraq & Syria Shia Muslims, Yazidis & Christian communities have been attacked by ISIS & other extremist Islamic groups. Their aim is not fighting back against injustice. It is to eradicate non Muslims & those Muslims whose doctrines they disagree with from their territory.

    Please don't put words in my mouth. I never suggested they were freedom fighters.

    My point is the constant interventions, the subjugation of Muslims by the Jewish and Jewish supported states breeds the type of radicalism you mentioned. In short the West is just creating the breeding grounds. Disaffected, impoverished youngsters, no matter their religion, will always turn to some crazy ****.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 760 ✭✭✭youreadthat


    Ace2007 wrote: »
    One of the attackers was a french national - how many french nationals are there - do we stop all french nationals coming to ireland on Holidays?

    You see how stupid that sounds, but your using that logic when talking to Refugees.

    Refugees are a huge, largely undocumented group of people so desperate for safety that they shop around for asylum, and flee a country millions of Europeans seek as a resort, they are also from a religion totally at odds with European identity (even the most pacifist Muslims regard themselves as Muslim first, polls show many more are sympathetic to terrorist causes even if not willing to kill themselves). There is no anti-Irish savage section of French culture and society that would be needed for your stupid analogy to make sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    petrolcan wrote: »
    Emotional incontinence, good one.

    There's an awful lot of tarring everything with one brush in this thread.

    There would've been outcry if that'd happened 30-40 years ago with the Irish Diaspora.

    You mean like every person in a boat is a Refugee fleeing death ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,613 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    well that would be relevant if a significant proportion of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims were in Iraq :rolleyes:

    What?? What about planes being blown up in Egypt or suicide bombings in Turkey or bombing in Bangkok or car bombings in Beirut or the daily crap in Syria. All happening and all at the hands of Islamists. You must be living under a rock.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,843 ✭✭✭Uncle Ben


    during the Holocaust, a small percentage of Germans were responsible for the unthinkable acts of cruelty towards the Jews.. the large majority of Germans who remained silent were irrelevant, the small minority continued the killing the slaughter continued.

    By remaining silent they were making themselves totally relevant to the holocaust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,539 ✭✭✭ghostdancer


    May as well go to the root of the problem which is religion itself when it is incapable of resisting tendencies to extremism.
    Religion has been pretty much successfully eradicated in Europe to a retro, museum heritage side of the culture of the continent. What remains is unthreatening and well watered down from it origins.

    We can hope for similar in the future in other parts of the world and other religions. This is how the real problem can be resolved.

    yeah, pretty much eradicated :rolleyes:

    MBgSh0e.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    those aren't facts, they're isolated examples. the only place with daily attacks are conflict-zones.

    Islamic extremist attacks outside conflict zones are extremely rare.

    No, they aren't. There has been widespread abuse and allegations of children being raped by different ethnic groups in the stadiums where "refugees" are being housed in Germany.

    There has been several attacks this year and last in the name of Islam perpetrated against us as Europeans.

    You can keep arguing a delusional, left-wing point all you wish, but that's not going to change the facts.

    Islam does have a high number of people willing to kill for Allah, Islam does have a terrible reputation, Islam does have millions upon millions of people who support the actions of these groups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,080 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Remember all those months ago when we said this lackadaisical approach your side proposed to the migrant crisis would lead to ISIS fighters getting into Europe? I sure as fúck do.

    I also seem to remember that ISIS quite blatantly SAID the would be sending terrorists amongst the refugees.

    http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/isis-smuggler-we-will-use-refugee-crisis-to-infiltrate-west/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭Rubber_Soul


    Homer wrote: »
    In fairness it's freedom of speech and their opinion.. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it gets censored.

    You don't understand the concept of freedom of speech.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,029 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    The French national wasn't killing in the name of France now, was he? Your argument is a fallacy, they are not comparable instances.

    It doesn't matter what he was killing in the name of, the fact is he was carrying out a terrorist attack.


Advertisement