Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

BA fire in Las Vegas

«134567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,721 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Was just watching this, looks like one of the engines caught fire. Luckily they were able to abort the takeoff and everyone got off the plane safely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    That flight seems to have more than it's fair share of technical problems, this time last year one had to turn back over Scotland due to a fire too I seem to recall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,721 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Not just that route, the BA flight from Vegas to Heathrow seems to be pretty unlucky too. Bomb threat in July meant it had to divert to Montreal (my husband was on this flight, scary experience) and another was diverted to Shannon in june due to a death onboard. There was a fire in the toilets en route another time too. I know they aren't technical issues but it's cursed I tell ya! Think I'll stick to Virgin Atlantic next time I go home :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,299 ✭✭✭✭The Backwards Man


    ceadaoin. wrote: »
    Not just that route, the BA flight from Vegas to Heathrow seems to be pretty unlucky too. Bomb threat in July meant it had to divert to Montreal (my husband was on this flight, scary experience) and another was diverted to Shannon in june due to a death onboard. There was a fire in the toilets en route another time too. I know they aren't technical issues but it's cursed I tell ya! Think I'll stick to Virgin Atlantic next time I go home :eek:

    I'm going to Vegas on the Heathrow route this year, was always Gatwick before. Might look into getting a coal boat instead! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,931 ✭✭✭Terrontress


    There are recordings of ground control and the 777 on The Guardian. The straightforwardness and professionalism is fantastic to listen to. The controller is directing other traffic, switching to advising of Heavy Fire Services being on their way, then back to other ground control.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 386 ✭✭Nichard Dixon


    What's the protocol in this case. Everyone pile out via every available chute or only on the side away from the fire?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,926 ✭✭✭vektarman


    One noticeable thing was the number of evacuated passengers on the Tarmac that had their onboard luggage with them, how were they allowed down the chutes with their wheelie cases, wouldn't carrying your luggage through the cabin cause an obstruction during an evacuation?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    What's the protocol in this case. Everyone pile out via every available chute or only on the side away from the fire?

    It may vary between individual company SOP's. For us, the cabin crew at the door will make an assessment if it is usuable or not.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,303 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    What's the protocol in this case. Everyone pile out via every available chute or only on the side away from the fire?

    Cabin crew are trained to assess and makes decisions on what exits to open in an evacuation, they will decide what's safe to open and evacuate as many people as possible from their respective doors in as short a time as is possible


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,303 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    vektarman wrote: »
    One noticeable thing was the number of evacuated passengers on the Tarmac that had their onboard luggage with them, how were they allowed down the chutes with their wheelie cases, wouldn't carrying your luggage through the cabin cause an obstruction during an evacuation?

    It would cause a huge obstruction and a broken zip etc. could rip or burst the inflatable slide.... It's impossible to police this during an evacuation, there simple is not time or space to stop people with bags...... It's sheer ignorance on the part of passengers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 386 ✭✭Nichard Dixon


    Is there a case for electronic locking of luggage storage on planes, both for emergencies and plonkers getting up while taxiing etc?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭arubex


    Locker10a wrote: »
    It's sheer ignorance on the part of passengers

    It is a nuisance and affects evacuation, but I understand why passengers do it.

    They are facing the prospect of being dumped back into a foreign country for a stay of interderminate length, with only what they have in their pockets to identify themselves to authorities, communicate with family and buy basic provisions.

    After 21 days they can submit a claim for lost baggage and hope that they can find receipts for everything that was in their luggage, plus for the luggage itself.

    Or - just grab the backpack.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    arubex wrote: »
    It is a nuisance and affects evacuation, but I understand why passengers do it.

    They are facing the prospect of being dumped back into a foreign country for a stay of interderminate length, with only what they have in their pockets to identify themselves to authorities, communicate with family and buy basic provisions.

    After 21 days they can submit a claim for lost baggage and hope that they can find receipts for everything that was in their luggage, plus for the luggage itself.

    Or - just grab the backpack.
    That's why I always have my shoes on and wallet, phone and passport in my pockets for take off and landing.
    A bit of easy preparation goes a long way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    12002892_10153765476108714_3033120918736925359_n.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,734 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    17 years old, damaged fuselage as well as the engine/wing... I don't think we'll be seeing this fly again unfortunately


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 710 ✭✭✭BZ


    L1011 wrote: »
    17 years old, damaged fuselage as well as the engine/wing... I don't think we'll be seeing this fly again unfortunately

    Have to agree the damage is substantial can't see this bird back in the air again.


  • Posts: 5,334 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Am sure there is some one in BA about to ring the insurance claim hotline this morning. Are airplanes insured like cars?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 546 ✭✭✭sebcity


    I'm flying to the States on Friday.
    Due to get this BA2276 flight home next Saturday


  • Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    arubex wrote: »
    It is a nuisance and affects evacuation, but I understand why passengers do it.

    They are facing the prospect of being dumped back into a foreign country for a stay of interderminate length, with only what they have in their pockets to identify themselves to authorities, communicate with family and buy basic provisions.

    After 21 days they can submit a claim for lost baggage and hope that they can find receipts for everything that was in their luggage, plus for the luggage itself.

    Or - just grab the backpack.

    I'm sorry what !! You understand why they do it ! The plane is on fire and it's OKAY to stop and hold up an EMERGENCY EVACUATION while they are grabbing their cabin bags waddle down an aisle slowly with them just so they aren't SLIGHTLY inconvienced because they won't have a book or iPad for a few days.

    There NEVER is any justifiable reason to STOP in an emergency, they do it in front of me I'm barging them out of the way. Their convenience is not worth someone else's life.

    It's not a nuisance it's ignorance and potentially life endangering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,955 ✭✭✭cml387


    Hearing the tape this morning, was one of the flight crew from Dublin perchance?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,016 ✭✭✭Pat Dunne


    sebcity wrote: »
    I'm flying to the States on Friday.
    Due to get this BA2276 flight home next Saturday
    Why the sad face, there will be a BA flight waiting for you at the gate next Saturday, regardless. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    sebcity wrote: »
    I'm flying to the States on Friday.
    Due to get this BA2276 flight home next Saturday

    And??...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,955 ✭✭✭cml387


    I'm sorry what !! You understand why they do it ! The plane is on fire and it's OKAY to stop and hold up an EMERGENCY EVACUATION while they are grabbing their cabin bags waddle down an aisle slowly with them just so they aren't SLIGHTLY inconvienced because they won't have a book or iPad for a few days.

    There NEVER is any justifiable reason to STOP in an emergency, they do it in front of me I'm barging them out of the way. Their convenience is not worth someone else's life.

    It's not a nuisance it's ignorance and potentially life endangering.

    I read a piece this morning from a Guardian journalist who was on the plane who commented on this. His point was that in a panic people do not necessarily think straight. You don't know how you'd respond until it happens. Easy sitting behind a keyboard to imagine what you'd do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    sebcity wrote: »
    I'm flying to the States on Friday.
    Due to get this BA2276 flight home next Saturday

    Well you wont be now :p:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,734 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Well you wont be now :p:pac:

    Itll be a hifly/titan craft even if BA dont find slack in the schedules to use one of their own


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,303 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    I'm sorry what !! You understand why they do it ! The plane is on fire and it's OKAY to stop and hold up an EMERGENCY EVACUATION while they are grabbing their cabin bags waddle down an aisle slowly with them just so they aren't SLIGHTLY inconvienced because they won't have a book or iPad for a few days.

    There NEVER is any justifiable reason to STOP in an emergency, they do it in front of me I'm barging them out of the way. Their convenience is not worth someone else's life.

    It's not a nuisance it's ignorance and potentially life endangering.

    I'm with you on this , if I'm ever in a situation like this flight and another passenger blocks me or others by retrieving their luggage they will receive from me a kick of the greatest force I can fathom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭Long Time Lurker




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 821 ✭✭✭eatmyshorts


    whb69v.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,752 ✭✭✭irishgeo



    One reports says they opened one of the rear doors on the fire side of the plane and smoke started coming in so everyone had to go out the front.

    Why open the door in the first place. Smoke is a bigger killer than fire.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,148 ✭✭✭flanzer


    sebcity wrote: »
    I'm flying to the States on Friday.
    Due to get this BA2276 flight home next Saturday

    Relax, you're more likely to be killed in the car on your way to the airport


Advertisement