Farming Chit Chat sticks it to six.

Reggie. wrote: »

Apperently a new laptop was needed and other things

selectamatic wrote: »

Very true but the sad thing is many more die in even worse ways I do however feel the widespread publication of the photo is in poor taste. Sure it tugs at the heart strings and hammers home the reality of the plight these people are going through but at what point do these sort of stories become almost propaganda like? I strongly believe in the merits of taking in refugee's but the distribution of these refugees needs to be proportional to the host countries size, wealth and above all involvement in middle eastern conflict. Why has there been practically no mention of the U.S taking refugees they had (and still have) the biggest part to play in the destabilization of Syria and Libya for better or for worse it still remains to be seen but it was mainly U.S arms wielded by rebels which overthrew the two respective dictatorships. The refugees should thus be distributed accordingly U.S first followed by U.K, Germany, france etc. and then towards the end Ireland and the other small less military active Eu states. Also this criticism of Hungary by other world leaders is a bit rich as I'm quite sure if Germany was located more to the east in the direct path of the refugees they too would be throwing up razor wire to beat the band.

Blackgrass wrote: »

The Russians are in now giving Assad help in Syria apparently, worst thing that could happen is a 'western' invasion. A huge UN peace enforcement moving to keeping force led by locals is whats needed. As unlikely as that is....