Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread IV

1221222224226227319

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    vienne86 wrote: »
    I feel a bit sorry for Kilcoyne - he really put the refs his hand up. A bit inclined to give away penalties


    FYP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    phog wrote: »
    The provinces have a lot to answer for really in that we're stuck if one of Reddan or Murray goes down injured.

    I don't follow?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    I don't follow?

    He is assuming that we're taking two scrum-halves not for tactical reasons but because Boss and Marmion are crap, and that the provinces have failed in delivering decent alternatives.

    I'm not sure what the basis is for that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Personally, I'd either have brought Bent to cover both sides and dropped Furlong, or brought Kilcoyne as LH and dropped Furlong.

    I just can't see the logic in bringing three fully fit tightheads when Healy is still very much in doubt.

    I can see the logic in it. Its boom or bust with Healy. He will need to play a couple of games anyway to get match fit. If he breaks down, he is out at this stage and a match fit Kilcoyne can be in the squad in 48 hours.

    It is better to have Kilcoyne staying matchfit back in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,078 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    jm08 wrote: »
    I can see the logic in it. Its boom or bust with Healy. He will need to play a couple of games anyway to get match fit. If he breaks down, he is out at this stage and a match fit Kilcoyne can be in the squad in 48 hours.

    It is better to have Kilcoyne staying matchfit back in Ireland.

    Healy must be tearing it up in training.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭shuffol


    It'll be great to see if Furlong could force his way into the 23. He did decent against Wales despite only returning from injury. Schmidt obviously rates him very highly considering the other players he's sacrificed to take him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,290 ✭✭✭aimee1


    jm08 wrote: »
    I can see the logic in it. Its boom or bust with Healy. He will need to play a couple of games anyway to get match fit. If he breaks down, he is out at this stage and a match fit Kilcoyne can be in the squad in 48 hours.

    It is better to have Kilcoyne staying matchfit back in Ireland.

    well healy was scrummaging last week so they must be confident he will be ok.

    Unless Healy breaks down completely, Furlong will be providing LH cover, that seems to be whats happening anyway


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    jm08 wrote: »
    I can see the logic in it. Its boom or bust with Healy. He will need to play a couple of games anyway to get match fit. If he breaks down, he is out at this stage and a match fit Kilcoyne can be in the squad in 48 hours.

    It is better to have Kilcoyne staying matchfit back in Ireland.

    What if Healy picks up a minor unrelated injury though. If we want to keep him in the squad but can't play him were in trouble.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 210 ✭✭Tompatrick


    Podge_irl wrote: »
    I'm genuinely pretty shocked at that. And frankly think the two looseheads and two scrum halves selection is dangerous and a bit stupid.

    Most tightheads can play loose head easily enough. It doesn't work the other way around.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    Anyway, back to happy, positive things.

    Congratulations to Paul O'Connell on his fourth world cup (not that it was in doubt but anyway...) - himself and BOD the only Irishmen to achieve this I think?

    Third RWC for Best and Reddan while Healy, Cronin, Ross, Ryan, Heaslip, O'Brien, Murray, Sexton, Earls and Rob Kearney make their second appearances.

    Debuts for McGrath, Strauss, Furlong, White, Toner, Henderson, Murphy, Henry, O'Mahony, Jackson, Madigan, Payne, Cave, Henshaw, Dave Kearney, Fitzgerald and Zebo.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,338 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    What if Healy picks up a minor unrelated injury though. If we want to keep him in the squad but can't play him were in trouble.

    Just put Furlong on the bench - if it takes more than 10 days to recover, it isn't minor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,212 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Tompatrick wrote: »
    Most tightheads can play loose head easily enough. It doesn't work the other way around.

    Exactly. Switching from TH to LH is much easier than the other way round. And someone else mentioned Furlong had played LH for the u20 which would have only been a couple of years ago. I imagine he has spent a lot of time there over the past couple of months in the training camp. I don't think it will be an issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 818 ✭✭✭ronanc1000


    Pre squad call I said Boss would be dropped, but I didn't see Cave getting a place, I would have dropped Boss to bring in Trimble IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,030 ✭✭✭✭phog


    I don't follow?

    Boss, Williams, TOL, Marmion, Marshall, Cooney, etc.

    Some wouldn't get onto a good H/Cup team not to mind represent their country in a World Cup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,191 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    ronanc1000 wrote: »
    Pre squad call I said Boss would be dropped, but I didn't see Cave getting a place, I would have dropped Boss to bring in Trimble IMO.

    I suppose the problem was a lack of a second outright 12. Madigan is too useful on the bench and the other options involve a bit of shuffling. Cave just lets us rest henshaw for the smaller games.

    What i would say is that if either Earls or Fitz had been clearly better than the other then the other would have been left at home and Trimble brought. It looks a little like he couldn't choose between the two so he picked both.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    phog wrote: »
    Boss, Williams, TOL, Marmion, Marshall, Cooney, etc.

    Some wouldn't get onto a good H/Cup team not to mind represent their country in a World Cup.

    Well, none of them bar Cooney (which is debatable) are even first choice for their provinces, really so it's not a surprise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Tompatrick wrote: »
    Most tightheads can play loose head easily enough. It doesn't work the other way around.

    They really can't. Different angles, different pressure on them. It's easier to do, certainly, but if they could do it easily enough, they would.

    Remember the last RWC when we brought Tony Buckley to cover loosehead? He was deemed the best option of any tighthead at loosehead and he was abysmal there.

    Guys like Matt Stevens or Gethin Jenkins who have genuinely been able to play both sides to a high level are very rare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,030 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Buer wrote: »
    Well, none of them bar Cooney (which is debatable) are even first choice for their provinces, really so it's not a surprise.

    We've four provinces and end up with only two scrumhalves that can be relied on for the world cup.

    There's a huge step back in quality from Murray to any of the pretenders.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭total former


    Buer wrote: »
    Well, none of them bar Cooney (which is debatable) are even first choice for their provinces, really so it's not a surprise.

    I think it's a shocking indictment of Ulster rugby that they haven't produced someone capable of displacing Ruan Pienaar...

    We've just named the strongest RWC squad in our history and a lot of the players left behind would have walked into previous squads, I think the provinces are doing just fine in producing players. Some people are just never happy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    phog wrote: »
    We've four provinces and end up with only two scrumhalves that can be relied on for the world cup.

    There's a huge step back in quality from Murray to any of the pretenders.

    Are the provinces supposed to just conjure scrum halves out of thin air? I don't see what Munster could have done to make Sheridan or Williams any better than they are for example, I wouldn't blame Munster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 seanm187


    Buer wrote: »
    Remember the last RWC when we brought Tony Buckley to cover loosehead? He was deemed the best option of any tighthead at loosehead and he was abysmal there.

    Guys like Matt Stevens or Gethin Jenkins who have genuinely been able to play both sides to a high level are very rare.
    Tony Buckley just wasn't a very good prop to begin with, so that voids that argument. I have never seen Gethin Jenkins every play anywhere other than loosehead also..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭padser


    phog wrote: »
    We've four provinces and end up with only two scrumhalves that can be relied on for the world cup.

    There's a huge step back in quality from Murray to any of the pretenders.

    We have four provinces. Their top scrumhalves are

    1) Conor Murray - Has Lions caps, would likely be Lions starter if there was a tour now
    2) Eoin Redden - 4 Europeans cups with two different teams
    3) Piennar - one of the best scrum halves in the world
    4) Marrmion - not great to be fair

    After that, we are complaining that the second and third scrumhalves at each province are not up to test level.

    Not really a huge surprise....Same with most positions


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    phog wrote: »
    We've four provinces and end up with only two scrumhalves that can be relied on for the world cup.

    There's a huge step back in quality from Murray to any of the pretenders.

    Such is life. We've only one guy who we could really count on at inside centre. Cave only ever started a couple of low level internationals there.

    We've only 4 provinces, we're never going to be able to have great depth in specialist positions. At 2, 9, 10 and 12 we've only got 2-3 lads who can realistically play there in a big test match at this point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    Bit obvious perhaps, but just for the record, these were the surprises for me:
    White instead of Moore.
    Furlong instead of Bent.
    Cave instead of Boss or Marmion.
    Dave Kearney instead of Trimble.
    Both Earls & Fitz together instead of Jones plus one of Earls or Fitz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,910 ✭✭✭Utah_Saint


    padser wrote: »
    We have four provinces. Their top scrumhalves are

    1) Conor Murray - Has Lions caps, would likely be Lions starter if there was a tour now
    2) Eoin Redden - 4 Europeans cups with two different teams
    3) Piennar - one of the best scrum halves in the world
    4) Marrmion - not great to be fair

    After that, we are complaining that the second and third scrumhalves at each province are not up to test level.

    Not really a huge surprise....Same with most positions

    I def think ulster could have done more to utilise Ruan to develop a top quality Scrum Half...

    Outside of Ruan ulster probably have the worst Scrum Half options


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,078 ✭✭✭✭vienne86


    Bit obvious perhaps, but just for the record, these were the surprises for me:
    White instead of Moore.
    Furlong instead of Bent.
    Cave instead of Boss or Marmion.
    Dave Kearney instead of Trimble.
    Both Earls & Fitz together instead of Jones plus one of Earls or Fitz.

    I agree with the first three. I expected Kearney to be included, but didn't think Jones would travel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 469 ✭✭smiley_face


    The scrum half thing I can live with, both the key guys are fully fit and it's not the most attritional position. I don't agree with it but there's some logic.

    The loosehead call is a massive gamble. I just don't get it.

    I'd have to agree, but only thing I can think of is that Tadhg is solid enough to start or bench at Loose Head against Canada and Romania, and bench at Loose Head against Italy and France. Break glass in case of emergency only.
    McGrath can last 80 minutes if he has to, if Healy can't play.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I guess they may feel that Murray and Reddan can play every game at 9 and 21, perhaps Reddan starting the first 2 with Murray on the bench and then switching round.

    I don't think Madigan will play there unless there's an emergency. Not sure why we'd take that risk.

    The risk at loose head is far greater. Much more attritional position. I like Furlong but I don't particularly enjoy the idea of finding out what he's like out of position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭Leslie91


    The surprises as I see it... the choice of props.

    Was sure it'd be Healy Killer McGrath Ross Moore (if fit and if not White, who looked v poor at the w/e). Did not see Furlong making it.

    I know the back 3 was a big call, but still surprised Trimble is odd man out. Thought he would have made it over one of Earls/Fitz.

    Surprised at Cave over a 3rd 9.


  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 55,122 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't understand the selections for LH. It makes no sense.

    Is this going to be the defining moment of the 2015 world cup? In the past it was undercooked players, are we going to be looking back in 5 years time at the strange selections made at loosehead and 9? :(


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement