Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Would you tell a stranger their partner was cheating on them?

1468910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭Colser


    Put yourselves in the shoes of the person being cheated on (lets presume youre in an average relationship i.e. none of the above situations)would you prefer to be told about it or not? I would definitely want to know and Im adult enough not to shoot the messenger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    IS it the "right thing" though?

    Look, marriages fall apart. Affairs happen. One of three things tend to happen:

    - It blows over, marriage continues.
    - It's found out, blow-ups happen.
    - Edit: Something else that was on the tip of my tongue but I've now forgotten.


    Either way, it doesn't tend to require a stranger shoving in their oar and ensuring that however it's found out, however it goes, it starts from one of the worst positions possible.

    Few years ago, I was involved in a situation between two partners that resulted in having to hide one of them from the other (who was armed and looking for them) and getting right into the middle of it all. It was messy. It certainly opened my eyes to the fact that there may be an awful lot going on behind the facade of a "normal relationship". Thus I will only interfere in a case of great or immediate need or a request for help.


    There is no comparing a breach of trust in a private relationship to a dropped wallet or to treason to a country. Both are false analogies. You asked for any scenarios where interfering might cause greater harm, and I gave you some off the top of my head. Doesn't matter that they are relatively unlikely. You do not know their relationship. You'll do your "good deed" and feck off into the sunset, feeling pleased that some cheater "got his/hers". You have struck a blow for right and morality. But in the end, it's only really benefited you, feeling that you "did the right thing".

    Now, if it was a friend, or family, or someone I knew, a situation where I could figure out consequences and whether now was the best time to blow everything out of the water, I would. And I'd feel awful for having to give the cheatee the information that will really hurt them. But I do feel that this is information best coming from someone who can help and support the victim in the situation. Not just because it will make me feel better in an awkward situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    See, I just don't see how you could be sure someone is cheating and yet also not pass judgement on their relationship. Are you a robot? If it's an open relationship, no harm done. I mean, what situation do you fear would occur. In what specific relationship dynamic do you think it would be better not to say anything? You see, I can't think of one but I'm open to being convinced of otherwise if you think there is something which I haven't considered here.


    Nah, not a robot or anything, but basically from my perspective - you see enough sh1t and somehow cheating just isn't that big a deal any more. We're talking here about interfering in a complete strangers relationship and me personally I just wouldn't do that without being willing to go all in. I wouldn't just drop that bomb on someone and walk away. I couldn't do that. If I wasn't prepared to go all in, then I stay the hell out and mind my own business.

    And say what? 'We know you're cheating on your husband, stop it'. She'd most likely laugh and even if she didn't, what could she promise: 'Okay girls, I'll stop'. Come on. Approaching the cheater like that would be pointless.


    Yep, I knew even saying it that it'd be pointless, but I figured it'd appease some of those people that'd be like "Well, at least I said something" if you get me? :pac:

    You keep saying they would be making a 'judgement' but I am framing this question in such a way that the person would be sure that your OH is cheating (again, I know it's possible for people to make mistakes, but I am not framing the question in that context). The person would be telling you something that would be quite specific and then leaving. It would be matter of fact for them: your OH has a female contact in her phone that is really a guy and this person has seen her texting some pretty explicit things to them. Boom. You're left there with that information in your head. Now, you're saying you would trust you OH implicitly and dismiss this person out of hand, for no obvious reason? Noble and all as came across to you? As just being mistaken or wrongheaded and then just get on with your life? Never thinking about the woman again?


    Well I mean they're making a judgement in the sense that they're judging my OH as this 'terrible person' and they need to let me know. Eesh, I'll be honest Nacho, I could never stand do-gooders like that. I mean, I'm all for someone helping out if someone comes to them for help, and often people come to me for help without judgement, but these people that inject themselves into other people's relationships because that person's behaviour offends their morality... on balance, I have less time for "morally righteous" types than I do for cheaters tbh.

    As it happens, my phone contains explicit content that to the outside world would look like I'm a right man-whore, but that simply isn't true. I can however understand though how a third party might draw the wrong conclusions were they given access to my phone. Thank fcuk for encryption and remote wipe then :pac:

    Well, you're a better man than me, cause if someone told me that, I don't think I would be able to get it out of my head until I had checked my OH's phone to see of there was any basis for what they had planted in my head. I would simply have to know. Especially as they would have no motive for making it up. I think I would tell my OH afterwards though, what happened, even if I found nothing. Someone says something that specific, I just know I would give it some credence, no matter how painful it was for me. I don't think doubt or fear = lack of love. In fact, I can't understand how someone could just think, 'No way, not a chance they seen what they thought they did and I'm never going to think about them again'. That, seems bizarre to me.


    Nah, that's just it really for me. I don't think I'm "better" than anyone else. I know myself I've done some terrible things in my life, so I'm not going to judge someone cheating too harshly, it'd depend on the circumstances really, but in the case of a complete stranger - I know nothing about them, I don't know what's motivating their decision to cheat, I don't know whether their partner is just turning a blind eye and would be humiliated by me pointing out that his OH is a bit flighty! :pac:

    I know of course in the scenario you present above, yeah, curiosity can get the better of some people sometimes, but I always say to people that they shouldn't go snooping in other people's business, they may not like what they find, and nine times out of ten, they don't, because they're already of a mind that something is wrong, and they're going to filter everything they see through that lens.

    I don't think fear or doubt = lack of love either btw, but it does indicate a lack of trust. For instance, I know my wife loves me, but I also know she doesn't trust me as far as she could throw me! :o

    Anyway, here's a good video I've found which illustrates this dilemma quite nicely I think.

    Couple in a bar having a drink, discussing their upcoming wedding. Soon to be bride goes to toilet, bridesmaid comes in and it becomes clear to customers that they are having an affair. Bride comes back, bridesmaid leaves and soon to be groom goes to the toilet. Will the customers tell her? (three different sets of customers are tested):


    Kinda reminds me of a situation I was in a couple of months back. I'm friends with a couple who were due to be married a month later, and I'd known them both a few years. This particular night anyway his girlfriend shall we say, made her intentions pretty clear as to what she wanted to happen between myself and herself. I basically told her I wasn't interested. I wasn't going to ruin her life and go running to her boyfriend telling him that his girlfriend is flighty and all the rest of it. It turns out since that it was just pre-wedding jitters and all the rest of it and I don't think she really ever actually wanted to cheat in the first place really, good catholic girl like her doing something like that... tsk! :pac:

    Seriously though, yes, she is indeed one of those "morally righteous" types in other respects, but that's not the reason I wouldn't do anything with her, I simply wasn't interested is all.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,300 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Samaris wrote: »
    It certainly opened my eyes to the fact that there may be an awful lot going on behind the facade of a "normal relationship". Thus I will only interfere in a case of great or immediate need or a request for help.
    This plus a gazillion. Other people's relationships can be extremely messy and extremely complex. It's best to avoid interfering in them. Too often it's a case of shoot the messenger even if the aggrieved party agrees with you. You walked in and burst their bubble for a start.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭Colser


    Telling someone isnt about making yourself feel good or being a hero imo, its about letting someone know that they are being made a total fool of by their partner. The only people I would tell to their face would be my own family..if it was being done to a friend /stranger or even to my siblings partners I would do it anonymously.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    zeffabelli wrote: »
    Thing is she is trusting you. She is your friend, while he is not.

    If I were in your shoes, I'd see my loyalty to my friend not to the stranger, and not want to betray her trust.

    Plus with so many unknown variables, for all I'd know he might be cheating too.

    Her problem is the problem of most people when they lie, and that is not wanting to deal with someone else's pain and disillusionment.

    But it certainly must be disconcerting to watch someone's duplicity in action, especially in that context.

    I'd still stay out of it but excersize my right not to be burdened with the knowledge.
    I could never help someone, a friend or otherwise, do something horrible like that to someone else, by remaining silent (though in this situation, it's not bad enough where I'd get involved) - I don't think that is loyalty; someone who is breaching the trust of their partner in such a way, doesn't deserve to have her own trust in a friend left unbreached, who she confides that fact to.

    I would view that as sacrificing my principles and self-respect (because I know I would be complicit in harming the guy, by remaining silent), and that's my no.1 loyalty above everything else - no friend or even partner will have a greater loyalty than that.

    When you are 'loyal' to someone like that, you effectively make yourself complicit in their moral wrongs/crimes; e.g. if you displayed this kind of 'loyalty' to a partner who has committed extensive fraud to gain his riches, then in court you would be treated as an accomplice, if it can be shown that you knew.


    I think true loyalty to a friend or partner, would be to encourage them to live up to better standards - to try and convince them that they are better than that, they are smart enough and good enough to know that is wrong - to push them to be a better person.

    If that didn't work, then (depending how bad the thing they are doing is) I'd write them off as a friend/partner and cut contact, before I ever accept loyalty as a reason to put up with that (even though I've cut contact, I'm not quite there yet with this particular person); only sometime after that, would I consider informing.

    I think that alone shows extensive loyalty, and is a much more true/genuine form of loyalty, than being willing to look past and thus be complicit in serious wrongs that someone is committing (which I think risks being a self-serving/cop-out interpretation of loyalty); there are edge-cases/grey-areas though, like most things, not many in this case though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Tbh, looks like we're fairly polarised on it. Some people would, some people wouldn't. Most of us by the poll wouldn't. I don't think we're going to convince each other as regards something so grey-area and morality-based.

    I can't blame those that would. I wouldn't myself unless I felt it really needed to be done, and I admit, I wouldn't have been reading someone's phone messages over their shoulder like the two girls were, so I'd never be in -that- specific situation. If, say, I was at a party, and I saw someone's husband kissing someone else's wife while the two OHs were out of the room, and they were..well, publically humiliating their partners, I might.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Wouldn't say a word, not my place or my business. Having said that, if I was asked I would not lie.

    I've only ever shopped a guy for cheating once, when his GF (who I knew well) asked me directly. I told her the truth. Cue the messenger getting shot as she almost immediately ran to him, betrayed my confidence and both rounded on me as some kind of lying monster. It culminated in a fairly ugly physical confrontation and the bad feeling exists to this day.

    I wouldn't actively go out of my way to seek out this strife on behalf of strangers. But if I'm asked- I won't lie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    DeadHand wrote: »
    Wouldn't say a word, not my place or business. Having said that, if I was asked I would not lie.

    I've only ever shopped a guy for cheating once, when his GF (who I knew well) asked me directly. I told her the truth. Cue the messenger getting shot as she almost immediately ran to him, betrayed my confidence and both rounded on me as some kind of lying monster. It culminated in a fairly ugly physical confrontation and the bad feeling

    This is no surprise.

    A lot of the time in domestic violence a cases, a third party calls the cops and guess what, the victim turns on the cops.

    I've seen a couple where there was a stalking problem reconcile and now they are happy and fine.

    You just don't know. And you'll end up the scapegoat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373 ✭✭✭The_Captain


    Personally whenever I tell a stranger that he's being cheated on, I make sure to do it publicly and record the whole thing so he's utterly humiliated.
    Then if he turns a blind eye, or tries to work it out for the sake of their children, everyone gets to laugh at him for being pathetic lol


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭qo2cj1dsne8y4k


    Not my circus not my monkeys. Nobody loves the messenger.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Samaris wrote: »
    Doesn't matter if it's sanctimonious or not. It happens. You asked for scenarios where your interference might make things worse. I gave examples, it doesn't matter whether or not you think they're worthless.
    Problem is, all the examples are edge-cases (some which are extremely uncommon scenarios), many that have been dealt with earlier; they are edge-cases that warrant being more cautious, but they aren't really impediments to informing.

    There are a lot of people out there whose lives are harmed though not being informed by cheating, through wasting years and years of their lives with someone (sometimes decades), harm to their health from STD's the cheater picked up, and even having kids (or, unknowingly, someone elses kids...) with someone, among more - all definite cases of harm, some of which (wasting time with someone) occur with a large number of cases of cheating.

    This harm is far more prevalent than any of the edge-cases people provide in favour of not informing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    Problem is, all the examples are edge-cases (some which are extremely uncommon scenarios), many that have been dealt with earlier; they are edge-cases that warrant being more cautious, but they aren't really impediments to informing.

    There are a lot of people out there whose lives are harmed though not being informed by cheating, through wasting years and years of their lives with someone (sometimes decades), harm to their health from STD's the cheater picked up, and even having kids (or, unknowingly, someone elses kids...) with someone, among more - all definite cases of harm, some of which (wasting time with someone) occur with a large number of cases of cheating.

    This harm is far more prevalent than any of the edge-cases people provide in favour of not informing.

    Oh quite, and I won't say that my own opinion isn't affected by previous experience (of getting into the middle of relationship drama, that is). My main point here is that with total strangers, one just doesn't know what the situation is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Wibbs wrote: »
    This plus a gazillion. Other people's relationships can be extremely messy and extremely complex. It's best to avoid interfering in them. Too often it's a case of shoot the messenger even if the aggrieved party agrees with you. You walked in and burst their bubble for a start.
    Hmm...but you've posted many times how you have been the 'other guy' in an affair, so how can you say to others that they should avoid interfering in peoples relationships, when you've done that on many occasions? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Hmm...but you've posted many times how you have been the 'other guy' in an affair, so how can you say to others that they shouldn't interfere in peoples relationships, when you've done that on many occasions? :confused:


    You're twisting what Wibbs said. He said it's best to avoid interfering in other people's relationships. It's a bit like a quote I read recently -

    "Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement" :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,707 ✭✭✭arayess


    Not my circus not my monkeys. Nobody loves the messenger.

    true but if it is a stranger do you really care?

    Give them the knowledge (in good faith) and allow them process it as they see fit?

    I don't see how giving somebody the information is a bad thing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    You're twisting what Wibbs said. He said it's best to avoid interfering in other people's relationships. It's a bit like a quote I read recently -

    "Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement" :D
    I've edited my post to include that context, and it doesn't change the main point of my post at all - that's not 'twisting' words.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,300 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Hmm...but you've posted many times how you have been the 'other guy' in an affair, so how can you say to others that they should avoid interfering in peoples relationships, when you've done that on many occasions? :confused:
    A) I found out after the fact and B) it's an extension of "none of my business" if one of them wants to play away.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭Colser


    I've edited my post to include that context, and it doesn't change the main point of my post at all - that's not 'twisting' words.
    My take on that would be that if it wasnt Wibbs it would have been someone else(sorry Wibbs:D)..The blame lies with the cheater imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Samaris wrote: »
    You asked for any scenarios where interfering might cause greater harm, and I gave you some off the top of my head. Doesn't matter that they are relatively unlikely. You do not know their relationship.

    No, and nether do you. There is far more chance that the truth will do more good in a relationship than it will do harm. I seen a far bit of life myself and in my experience of almost any relationship I have ever known where cheating was involved, the truth coming out would have been better known as early as humanely possible.
    You'll do your "good deed" and feck off into the sunset, feeling pleased that some cheater "got his/hers". You have struck a blow for right and morality. But in the end, it's only really benefited you, feeling that you "did the right thing".

    You're just saying random stuff now. '

    In the end the only one that benefits would be the person informing? What? How? Where are you getting that from?
    But I do feel that this is information best coming from someone who can help and support the victim in the situation. Not just because it will make me feel better in an awkward situation.

    I agree, but there would be no guarantee of that happening, would there, and so that is why if I was a customer in either of the two scenarios I posted above, I would do the very same as the people that spoke up did. There is no question about it. To keep my mouth shut could result in their lives being wasted with a cheat. Fcuk that.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    For instance, I know my wife loves me, but I also know she doesn't trust me as far as she could throw me! :o


    Kinda reminds me of a situation I was in a couple of months back. I'm friends with a couple who were due to be married a month later, and I'd known them both a few years. This particular night anyway his girlfriend shall we say, made her intentions pretty clear as to what she wanted to happen between myself and herself. I basically told her I wasn't interested. I wasn't going to ruin her life and go running to her boyfriend telling him that his girlfriend is flighty and all the rest of it. It turns out since that it was just pre-wedding jitters and all the rest of it and I don't think she really ever actually wanted to cheat in the first place really, good catholic girl like her doing something like that... tsk! :pac:

    Seriously though, yes, she is indeed one of those "morally righteous" types in other respects, but that's not the reason I wouldn't do anything with her, I simply wasn't interested is all.
    Your last sentence implies that you would have done something with that other woman if you were interested - and it's notable that your reason for not doing anything, is not the fact that you have a wife (who appears to not trust you, in your own words...).

    Does your wife have good reason not to trust you - do or would you cheat on her?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Wibbs wrote: »
    A) I found out after the fact and B) it's an extension of "none of my business" if one of them wants to play away.
    Ok, you found out after the fact (i.e. after it had started), but in some cases you said you stayed in the affair once you knew they were attached - i.e. you were knowingly the 'other guy'?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Colser wrote: »
    My take on that would be that if it wasnt Wibbs it would have been someone else(sorry Wibbs:D)..The blame lies with the cheater imo.
    Well, it takes two people to cheat ;) If you're knowingly the 'other guy', you're definitely complicit, and are interfering with a relationship.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭Colser


    Well, it takes two people to cheat ;) If you're knowingly the 'other guy', you're definitely complicit, and are interfering with a relationship.
    Absolutely,but the other guy isnt the cheater and owes nothing to the person being cheated on,what wrecks my head is women that blame the other woman instead of their own partners when they find out,I fully understand that you would hate/despise/wish death on them but you cant actually blame them(unfortunately:().Likewise for men of course...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    No, I'm not "just saying random stuff". It makes you feel better to think that you've done the Morally Righteous thing. I'm not arguing that in your philosophy it IS the MR thing. I'm not so sure, but you can have the manners to not just dismiss me as talking rubbish simply because you disagree that there can ever be a situation where your interference/moral guardianship will make things worse.

    You do not know that it will "do more good than harm". For all you know, it might have blown over, the cheater will feel thoroughly ashamed of themselves for their fling and things will settle back again. You heard the phrase "least said, soonest mended"? I'm not saying this is Right either, but it certainly happens.

    I do not know if it will do "good". Sure, the cheat will be punished, lose his relationship and have only himself/herself to blame. Hurrah, all is right with the world. The cheatee also loses his/her relationship and self-confidence. But at least they're no longer with a cheater.

    Realistically, there is no good in the whole mess, and that IS the fault of the cheater. I respect that you see it as it should be done and would do it. I don't know that I would. But that is my moral boundaries, and I don't think you'll convince me otherwise with the arguments so far. But that's just how things go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Colser wrote: »
    Absolutely,but the other guy isnt the cheater and owes nothing to the person being cheated on,what wrecks my head is women that blame the other woman instead of their own partners when they find out,I fully understand that you would hate/despise/wish death on them but you cant actually blame them(unfortunately:().Likewise for men of course...
    There was another good debate on this recently in a different thread, but the idea that the other guys is not 'owed' anything isn't really a valid argument; everyone is owed a certain minimum level of respect by others - it's just basic empathy and common decency - harming someone by having an affair with their partner, is wrong and that person doesn't deserve you doing that to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    There was another good debate on this recently in a different thread, but the idea that the other guys is not 'owed' anything isn't really a valid argument; everyone is owed a certain minimum level of respect by others - it's just basic empathy and common decency - harming someone by having an affair with their partner, is wrong and that person doesn't deserve you doing that to them.

    God, if there's one thing I hate, it's the concept of "I owe you nothing, you EARN my respect." It surprisingly rarely is extended to not wanting any respect either until oneself has worked for it.

    Base level of respect, manners and humanity due another person, in my eyes. Anyone that insists that I get no respect for them until I proven myself worthy in their eyes can quite frankly go hang. They will have my respect until they lose it. But that's a pretty good way to lose it! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,117 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Your last sentence implies that you would have done something with that other woman if you were interested - and it's notable that your reason for not doing anything, is not the fact that you have a wife (who appears to not trust you, in your own words...).


    Interesting interpretation there :pac:

    Does your wife have good reason not to trust you - do or would you cheat on her?


    I'm shocked that you would even suggest such a thing... :eek:

    Well, it takes two people to cheat ;) If you're knowingly the 'other guy', you're definitely complicit, and are interfering with a relationship.


    If you're the other guy, you're a participant, so it's a different context than if you're a third party informant. You're correct in saying that both are interference in a relationship, but Wibbs as I understood his point was speaking from the point of view of an informant, not a participant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,572 ✭✭✭Colser


    There was another good debate on this recently in a different thread, but the idea that the other guys is not 'owed' anything isn't really a valid argument; everyone is owed a certain minimum level of respect by others - it's just basic empathy and common decency - harming someone by having an affair with their partner, is wrong and that person doesn't deserve you doing that to them.
    I remember that thread but I still feel that if you and me were a couple:D and you had a ons/affair that my issue is with you not the other person ,anyway this is prob derailing at this stage.We will have to reopen the other thread.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    Not my circus not my monkeys.

    You're not allowed to copy. It's in the charter.

    Am only messing with ya, but sure you could say that about anything really. Sometimes, just sometimes, it's okay to get involved, as it will do some good.


Advertisement