Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Calling grown women "girls", offensive?

12346»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    Yes, but what's important here is context. Those terms have no patronising/demeaning history behind them whereas the term girl or "good girl" can have demeaning/sexist undertones and was often using to dismiss a women's input or opinion by suggesting she was young or naive. While old boys/boy's toys have more comrade undertones and most importantly have been used and created by men as opposed to applied to them.


    Wait, are you telling me that "Jobs for the Boys" and "old boys club/ network" have no derogatory or demeaning context? Expressions that are widely used to imply that a group of males only achieved what they did because of some chummy little arrangement to exclude women?

    And for every "good girl" I can point you to a "good lad" used in an equally patronising way.

    To suggest that these are nice chummy terms created and used by men is quite frankly delusional! Many of them have been openly used to slur men. I'm reminded of the sexist tripe spouted a while back by teachers union leader Sheila Nunan
    "Ms Nunan added: “It wasn’t the honours maths that made the Irish women the way they are today, let me tell you. It was the boys who did the honours maths led the country to ruination”."

    (of course in her patronising rant she conveniently forgot the Gillian Bowlers and Patricia Quinns/ Gayle Killileas who were 'so influential' when the times were good, but often just poor weak little flowers to transfer assets to when the **** hit the fan)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 272 ✭✭YurOK2


    The worst is having some sleazy wheezing oul fella call you a "good girl" and feeling the need to make contact with you somewhere, like on your back or your arm or your arse. Durty durtbags.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    I would agree with this. It doesn't send me into a rage or anything to be told I'm a "good girl" by random strangers and acquaintances, but it still bothers me slightly. I have always felt that you would not say to a man over 18 that he was a "good boy", would you? You'd say he was a "good lad" so "good woman" is on par with that and thus it sounds less demeaning. I will accept the term "good girl" just about from people who are elderly but people who are under 50, or even worse close to my age calling me a "good girl" is bothersome to me. However in a group setting being called "girls" or "the girls" doesn't bother me. Though I can always pick out the charmers in a group when they call a group of women "ladies" ;) It tough to figure out in those contexts of a group setting whether it is better to address a group of women as girls or ladies.

    Good lad is not, and will never be on par with good woman. The only on par comment would be good man. A lad is a young male, thus the statement is directly analogous to "good girl". From dictionary.com:
    "c.1300, ladde "foot soldier," also "young male servant" (attested as a surname from late 12c.), possibly from a Scandinavian language (cf. Norwegian -ladd, in compounds for "young man"), but of obscure origin in any case. OED hazards a guess on Middle English ladde, plural of the past participle of lead (v.), thus "one who is led" (by a lord). Liberman derives it from Old Norse ladd "hose; woolen stocking." "The development must have been from 'stocking,' 'foolish youth' to 'youngster of inferior status' and (with an ameliorated meaning) to 'young fellow.'" He adds, "Words for socks, stockings, and shoes seem to have been current as terms of abuse for and nicknames of fools." Meaning "boy, youth, young man" is from mid-15c. Scottish form laddie, a term of endearment, attested from 1540s. "


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,235 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    wp_rathead wrote: »
    I'm sure the folk who identify as "Otherkin" won't be too happy with that :pac:

    I saw some film or other years ago with aliens that addressed/referred to humans as "Bags of mostly water"! :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭Poochie05


    I prefer 'workplace proximity associates' myself!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    jimgoose wrote: »
    I saw some film or other years ago with aliens that addressed/referred to humans as "Bags of mostly water"! :)

    Your alien friends sound like good craic, what movie did you guys watch together?


Advertisement
Advertisement