How dominant are you?

seenitall · 11-06-2015 8:27pm

Lovely

carry on so, I don't think anyone else is watching atm anyway...

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 8:31pm

my teapot is orange wrote: »

Yes, I do. The entire thing is orange.

Well splendid. The teapot is relevant because we decided together prompted by me to talk about it. We decided to talk about because it was fun not pushed too hard and I would have let it go had you not taken up the ball.

I am the teapot queen...not really I am a little teapot..

Anyone want tea and biscuits? Shall I pour??

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 8:33pm

Dominance is a group effort! Domineering is more solo! Dominance harnesses positive energy.

my teapot is orange · 11-06-2015 8:36pm

LadyFenghuang wrote: »

Well splendid. The teapot is relevant because we decided together prompted by me to talk about it. We decided to talk about because it was fun not pushed too hard and I would have let it go had you not taken up the ball.

Getting an answer to a question is not a display of dominance. We all ask questions every day and succeed in prompting others to speak on a topic. Persuade me to get rid of my orange teapot in favour of a colour of your choosing and then I'll be impressed.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 8:41pm

my teapot is orange wrote: »

Getting an answer to a question is not a display of dominance. We all ask questions every day and succeed in prompting others to speak on a topic. Persuade me to get rid of my orange teapot in favour of a colour of your choosing and then I'll be impressed.

Does Orange suit the teapot? Is it ceramic?

What is your favorite color? Do you actually want to change your teapot?

Maybe that would not be good for you?

But then it's just a teapot.

Why did you choose the name?

Rafasafa · 11-06-2015 9:38pm

LadyFenghuang wrote: »

Does Orange suit the teapot? Is it ceramic?

What is your favorite color? Do you actually want to change your teapot?

Maybe that would not be good for you?

But then it's just a teapot.

Why did you choose the name?

How's the weather in Madrid these days?

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 9:42pm

Rafasafa wrote: »

How's the weather in Madrid these days?

ww.youtube.com/watch?v=0LqvUy7jNVI

Add a http//w and rock those hips!

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 9:43pm

Roots DO CRANZ! Din Da Da Da da DUM! brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

the evasion_kid · 11-06-2015 9:46pm

Not very dominant,I let people do what they do,more a case of do what you but don't do it to me a few people in my life had to learn that the hard way down through the years,always found people that needed to be dominated....well a bit pathetic really

Conor Bourke · 11-06-2015 9:51pm

I prefer to be dominated :cool:

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 9:53pm

Alaskimo-cake wrote: »

I prefer to be dominated :cool:

pm sent....cliché i know but i couldn't think of anything else.

And a bit of felching for gents!

Saralee4 · 11-06-2015 9:56pm

my teapot is orange wrote: »

I'm very non-dominant. I don't want to dominate others. But I am equally adamant that nobody will dominate me. Some dominant people are quite surprised by the second bit. They put me in the quiet, easy to push around category, and almost get angry when I refuse to conform, like they are entitled to obedience from me, it's the natural order of things or something.

Yes i think some people assume the lack of need to dominate is a weakness and define you as subordanite as if you must be one if not the other.

Their need to dominate makes them want to obtain your obedience. Because you dont try to dominate them, it confuses them and angers them because you have more power as you dont need to dominate or be dominated. The more extreme, the more black and white thinking.

The more dominant the person feels they need you to be, the more they try to push you to be a subordanite.

j80ezgvc3p92xu · 11-06-2015 10:03pm

I am the most dominant athlete to ever lace up his boots and step into the ring.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:06pm

Saralee4 wrote: »

Yes i think some people assume the lack of need to dominate is a weakness and define you as subordanite as if you must be one if not the other.

Their need to dominate makes them want to obtain your obedience. Because you dont try to dominate them, it confuses them and angers them because you have more power as you dont need to dominate or be dominated. The more extreme, the more black and white thinking.

The more dominant the person feels they need you to be, the more they try to push you to be a subordanite.

It's an equality of different characters. It works when everyone is happy in their role.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:08pm

Saralee4 wrote: »

Yes i think some people assume the lack of need to dominate is a weakness and define you as subordanite as if you must be one if not the other.

Their need to dominate makes them want to obtain your obedience. Because you dont try to dominate them, it confuses them and angers them because you have more power as you dont need to dominate or be dominated. The more extreme, the more black and white thinking.

The more dominant the person feels they need you to be, the more they try to push you to be a subordanite.

Real dominance is not dependent on someone else's submission . A real submissive nature is not dependent on someone else being dominant. I guess it's self identification and what you are comfortable with.

I don't have the need to obtain submission to feel empowered in being dominant.

You never take advantage of people's natures. That goes for bottoms and middles too. Topping from the bottom can be just as domineering.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:09pm

Lyra Inexpensive Knife wrote: »

I am the most dominant athlete to ever lace up his boots and step into the ring.

Fair play!

Saralee4 · 11-06-2015 10:12pm

LadyFenghuang wrote: »

It's an equality of different characters. It works when everyone is happy in their role.

Yes but everyone will never be happy and you cant have one without the other unless you have a group where all people who dont want to dominate others and dont want to be dominated.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:16pm

Saralee4 wrote: »

Yes but everyone will never be happy and you cant have one without the other unless you have a group where all people who dont want to dominate others and dont want to be dominated.

No you don't understand. That's ok. I need them to want it....it's no good otherwise. You gotta be the right type.

It's no good otherwise.

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:17pm

Saralee4 wrote: »

Yes but everyone will never be happy and you cant have one without the other unless you have a group where all people who dont want to dominate others and dont want to be dominated.

It's only a few it works with. That is what gives certain relationships their intimacy.

Saralee4 · 11-06-2015 10:17pm

LadyFenghuang wrote: »

Real dominance is not dependent on someone else's submission . A real submissive nature is not dependent on someone else being dominant. I guess it's self identification and what you are comfortable with.
g.

You will have two dominants up against one another, one will be forced into submission.

you can have a group of submissives where one needs to take some control.

Depends on the extremes. I wouldnt say i fit into either on a spectrum probaly middle ground shifting slightly between the two.

ThinkProgress · 11-06-2015 10:18pm

I tend to dominate when around random people... or at least never allow myself to be dominated.

But if you know me well enough, it can be possible to get past my defense. I'm really a big softy when I trust people. Especially if I like and respect you! (which is quite rare) :P

Anyone else totally think this was about sex?

Saralee4 · 11-06-2015 10:22pm

ThinkProgress wrote: »

I tend to dominate when around random people... or at least never allow myself to be dominated.

But if you know me well enough, it can be possible to get past my defense. I'm really a big softy when I trust people. Especially if I like and respect you! (which is quite rare) :P

Anyone else totally think this was about sex?

Of course everything comes down to sex in the end haha

LadyFenghuang · 11-06-2015 10:23pm

ThinkProgress wrote: »

I tend to dominate when around random people... or at least never allow myself to be dominated.

But if you know me well enough, it can be possible to get past my defense. I'm really a big softy when I trust people. Especially if I like and respect you! (which is quite rare) :P

Anyone else totally think this was about sex?

IT BETTER BE.

It's interesting.

Men and women can prefer totally different roles in the bedroom to life. A lot of hyper masculine men prefer to be bossed but not any other part of life. And vice versa for women. A certain aspect of themselves is either dominant or submissive.

I think sometimes for people who are very ...hard in life ...the way they show softness to someone is submission.

The same for some women.

Son Of A Vidic · 11-06-2015 10:50pm

keithclancy wrote: »

I have a mate who pisses all over the place when at peoples houses

Will you let it rest. I said I was sorry.

Massimo Cassagrande · 11-06-2015 10:56pm

I make everyone I meet kneel and smell my bum.

Alright, I don't, but sure everyone lies on the internet, right?

agent graves · 11-06-2015 11:06pm

How exactly would someone show their dominance? Is it taking the leadership role or something like that?

Junkyard Tom · 11-06-2015 11:36pm

I'm so dominant that I sometimes beat myself up for stepping out of line.

smurgen · 11-06-2015 11:39pm

I don't know.im fairly good as in I make people feel comfortable enough that the tell me all sorts.not sire if that's dominance.i don't dominate anyone in the tradition sense ie.intimidation or emotional manipulation tho