Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The Plight of the Rohingya

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    goose2005 wrote: »
    Perhaps. But also self-preservation. Afghanistan used to be Buddhist. Indonesia. Northern India/Pakistan. Jihad has also reached to southern Thailand in recent years.

    Stop talking nonsense please. You clearly have no idea of the situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    goose2005 wrote: »
    Perhaps. But also self-preservation. Afghanistan used to be Buddhist. Indonesia. Northern India/Pakistan. Jihad has also reached to southern Thailand in recent years.

    Christians are also persecuted there......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭RomanKnows


    Nodin wrote: »
    Speak for yourself.

    The word Rohingya has been mentioned 24 times in total on boards. In fairness you were one of the people to use it. Once. In the same period you've mentioned Israel 735 times, and Palestinian 546 times. I've no doubt that you care deeply about the plight of the Rohingya though. Will the Irish Left be organising a flotilla to Burma at any stage?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    RomanKnows wrote: »
    The word Rohingya has been mentioned 24 times in total on boards. In fairness you were one of the people to use it. Once. In the same period you've mentioned Israel 735 times, and Palestinian 546 times. I've no doubt that you care deeply about the plight of the Rohingya though. Will the Irish Left be organising a flotilla to Burma at any stage?

    You'll find that the Palestinian situation has been on-going for 40 years. The plight of the Rohingya has only recently reached its current level.

    As for the rest, if you want to start the usual "Why aren't the left complaining about...." diversions, you'll have to use somebody else to do so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    wes wrote: »
    Christians are also persecuted there......

    ...and minority ethnic groups. Sanctions were lifted far too soon IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Obviously their plight is shocking.

    A glance at the bigger picture here would tell us that Muslims do not tend to integrate well where they are a minority (France, Nigeria, China) and minorities do not tend to prosper where they are in the majority (Eygpt, Syria, Iraq, Iran).

    What is it about Islam that it does not seem to encourage harmonious co-existence with those of different faiths (or of a "heretical" Islamic faith) and allows it to be interpreted in such murderous ways? ISIS, for example, have strong doctrinal justification for their crimes.

    Its great rival Christianity has long since been disarmed and pacified in all but the darkest corners of Africa. The political ideologies that inspired similar violence and hatred have been rejected.

    Yet, IslamIc violence and sectarianism continue to a medieval degree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    DeadHand wrote: »
    Obviously their plight is shocking.

    A glance at the bigger picture here would tell us that Muslims do not tend to integrate well where they are a minority (France, Nigeria, China) and minorities do not tend to prosper where they are in the majority (Eygpt, Syria, Iraq, Iran).

    What is it about Islam that it does not seem to encourage harmonious co-existence with those of different faiths (or of a "heretical" Islamic faith) and allows it to be interpreted in such murderous ways? ISIS, for example, have strong doctrinal justification for their crimes.

    Its great rival Christianity has long since been disarmed and pacified in all but the darkest corners of Africa. The political ideologies that inspired similar violence and hatred have been rejected.

    Yet, IslamIc violence and sectarianism continue to a medieval degree.


    It's amazing the similarity between that little rant and comments I've read about anti-Semitism over the years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Its interesting to see that there seem to be so many who are oddly blaming the victims religion, all the while ignoring that Christians and other minorities are also persecuted, so as to have a go at Muslims.

    There is an Ultra nationalist/Religious extremists element using the Rohingya (and other minorities) as a scape goat. Something that various military regimes the world over have done in the past.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,499 ✭✭✭porsche959


    DeadHand wrote: »
    Obviously their plight is shocking.

    A glance at the bigger picture here would tell us that Muslims do not tend to integrate well where they are a minority (France, Nigeria, China) and minorities do not tend to prosper where they are in the majority (Eygpt, Syria, Iraq, Iran).

    What is it about Islam that it does not seem to encourage harmonious co-existence with those of different faiths (or of a "heretical" Islamic faith) and allows it to be interpreted in such murderous ways? ISIS, for example, have strong doctrinal justification for their crimes.

    Its great rival Christianity has long since been disarmed and pacified in all but the darkest corners of Africa. The political ideologies that inspired similar violence and hatred have been rejected.

    Yet, IslamIc violence and sectarianism continue to a medieval degree.

    Nice piece of victim blaming there from the 'woman wearing short skirt deserves to get raped' school of thought.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Very Bored


    One question I would ask of those who are taking the Muslim extremist line is what reason do they give for why the Rohingya have never formed a violent resistance group? Islam is not without its violent groups, in fact there are very many violent factions within Islam which seek (a)to defend what they see as Islamist interests and (b)to go on the offensive where they feel Islamist interests can be pursued. However, the Rohingya have never had such support nor have they pursued such goals in such a manner themselves. They are a persecuted people, in fact using the word persecuted is almost inappropriate but I don't know a stronger word in English, yet they have never fought back, which many persecuted people around the world have done (including us Irish at various stages of our history). Why? Is it because it serves some kind of propaganda? Or is it, infinitely more probably, because they are peace-loving people who don't want to pursue such a path in the first place (not intended as a criticism of those who do stand up for themselves) and, secondly, because of their absolutely disperate state have no avenue of pursuing such a route?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    porsche959 wrote: »
    Nice piece of victim blaming there from the 'woman wearing short skirt deserves to get raped' school of thought.

    It was a generally geopolitical observation.

    One yet to be refuted by anything but sly, personal digs.

    That was actually a disgusting insinuation to make. The argument of an utter arsehole.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭IamNotNumber


    Very Bored wrote: »
    One question I would ask of those who are taking the Muslim extremist line is what reason do they give for why the Rohingya have never formed a violent resistance group? Islam is not without its violent groups, in fact there are very many violent factions within Islam which seek (a)to defend what they see as Islamist interests and (b)to go on the offensive where they feel Islamist interests can be pursued. However, the Rohingya have never had such support nor have they pursued such goals in such a manner themselves.

    Are you aware of the Rohingya history in Burma by any chance? They have formed violent groups in the past.

    The Rohingya insurgency in Western Burma is an armed conflict between the state of Burma and its Rohingya Muslim minority since 1947. Their initial ambition during Mujahideen movements (1947-1961) was to separate the Rohingya-populated Mayu frontier region of Arakan from western Burma and annex that region into newly formed neighbouring East Pakistan (present-day Bangladesh).[4]

    Rohingya groups were again active during the period of the Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971. Recently, during the Arakan State Riots, the aspiration of the Rohingya militant groups, according to various media reports, is to create northern part of Arakan an independent or autonomous state.In 2012, Rohingya emigres in exile declared the creation of the "Islamic Republic of Rahmanland", located in the north of Rakhine State.[7]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_insurgency_in_Western_Burma


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭jank


    Can we blame the West yet for their plight?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    DeadHand wrote: »
    Obviously their plight is shocking.

    A glance at the bigger picture here would tell us that Muslims do not tend to integrate well where they are a minority (France, Nigeria, China) and minorities do not tend to prosper where they are in the majority (Eygpt, Syria, Iraq, Iran). .

    "I had not known that throughout history, the Jews had been expelled from 79 countries, some countries more than once."
    http://www.rense.com/general80/whj.htm

    "But if the authorities are reluctant to use force and restrain the Jews’ devilish wantonness, the latter should, as we said, be expelled from the country and be told to return to their land and their possessions in Jerusalem, where they may lie, curse, blaspheme, defame, murder, steal, rob, practice usury, mock, and indulge in all those infamous abominations which they practice among us, and leave us our government, our country, our life, and our property, much more leave our Lord the Messiah, our faith, and our church undefiled and uncontaminated with their devilish tyranny and malice. Any privileges that they may plead shall not help them; for no one can grant privileges for practicing such abominations. These cancel and abrogate all privileges"
    http://jdstone.org/cr/files/martin_luther/onthejewsandtheirlies11.html
    Go back to Saudi' indeed.

    DeadHand wrote:
    What is it about Islam that it does not seem to encourage harmonious
    co-existence with those of different faiths (or of a "heretical" Islamic faith)
    and allows it to be interpreted in such murderous ways? ISIS, for example, have
    strong doctrinal justification for their crimes.

    "I suddenly recognized that if Hitler had developed a "Final Solution" to the Jewish question, that there had to have been a "Jewish Problem." Could the Jews have in any way behaved in such a manner that would make the countries in which they resided turn against them, or were they just unfortunate, innocent victims? "
    http://www.rense.com/general80/whj.htm

    "Oh, how fond they are of the book of Esther, which is so beautifully attuned to their bloodthirsty, vengeful, murderous yearning and hope. The sun has never shone on a more bloodthirsty and vengeful people than they are who imagine that they are God’s people who have been commissioned and commanded to murder and to slay the Gentiles. In fact, the most important thing that they expect of their Messiah is that he will murder and kill the entire world with their sword. They treated us Christians in this manner at the very beginning through out all the world. They would still like to do this if they had the power, and often enough have made the attempt, for which they have got their snouts boxed lustily. "
    http://jdstone.org/cr/files/martin_luther/onthejewsandtheirlies02.html

    Sounds all too familiar to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    ^^^^

    Yeah, that's a nonsensical comparison.

    My own humble musing didn't give any reasons for the facts stated, didn't label Muslims as anything and certainly didn't suggest a holocaust as a justifiable solution.

    The fact still stands. Muslim communities are not, generally, integrating well where they are in the minority and minority groups do not fare well in Muslim majority countries.

    In my own opinion, this is because Islam, in its devoutest forms, is simply incompatible with Western democracy and all that true democracy entails- tolerance, liberty, equality- and not because Muslims are inherently prone to "devilish wantoness" anymore or less than the adherents of any other faith.

    The few half-functioning secular democracies in the Muslim world mostly require a strong military to forcibly maintain that secular democracy. Minority religious groups tend to live with far greater security in these militarily enforced secular democracies or even the dictatorships than the surrounding theocracies or Sharia plagued failed states.

    Outside the periphery of the Muslim world, in states with sizable Muslim minorities, these states often suffer extremely violent Islamic separatist or revolutionary movements (Nigeria, Chad, Russia, China, India).

    All this would suggest that a great many Muslims do not wish to live in democracies or in societies where their beliefs are not dominant and enshrined in law. We see the beginnings of this in Europe with Sharia patrols in London and Germany, religiously supremacist Muslim rape gangs targeting indigenous children in Northern England and the fact that, in a civilisation where nothing was sacred or safe from mockery, it is now physically dangerous to criticise or satirise Islam.

    The total acceptance of Islam as a sacred, unquestionable thing is being forced upon non-Muslims at the point of the knife and gun. Europe is (with honourable exception) submitting to this intimidation. What will the next submission demanded of us be? Where will it end? Appeasement of fascism does not work and leads to greater demands. Militant Islam is just that: fascism.

    Since you insist on bringing the Jews into it; their ancient communities are dwindling and disappearing in European cities (most notably in Malmo and Paris) under harassment and intimidation from the burgeoning Muslim populations there. Jews are being persecuted to an extent not seen in Europe since the 40s by an unholy alliance of the ever present European extreme Right and imported Islamic Anti-Semitism. The extreme Right are very much the junior partner in this alliance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Recently, during the Arakan State Riots, the aspiration of the Rohingya militant groups, according to various media reports, is to create northern part of Arakan an independent or autonomous state.In 2012, Rohingya emigres in exile declared the creation of the "Islamic Republic of Rahmanland", located in the north of Rakhine State.[7]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohingya_insurgency_in_Western_Burma

    The intercept has cast doubt on the existence of these terror groups:

    In Myanmar, Muslims Arrested for Joining Terror Group That Doesn’t Exist

    Wouldn't be the first time that a military regime invented a terror group to arrest members of a minority.

    I think the following quote from the article is rather interesting:
    The existence of the “Myanmar Muslim Army” has not been confirmed by terrorism experts, human rights groups, or the U.S. State Department. Rohan Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research in Singapore, is the only one to have mentioned it, though fleetingly — he wrote in a recent report that “there also have been unconfirmed reports about the emergence of a new group called Myanmar Muslim Army (MMA), which is reportedly using Thai territory for training Myanmar Muslims.”


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    DeadHand wrote: »
    ^^^^

    Yeah, that's a nonsensical comparison.

    ............

    ....using the plight of some persecuted muslims to rant about muslims, and using being called out on it to rant yet more about muslims......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 853 ✭✭✭LadyFenghuang


    Nodin wrote: »
    ....using the plight of some persecuted muslims to rant about muslims, and using being called out on it to rant yet more about muslims......
    Well said.
    I don't know anything about this group nor have I heard of them before now.

    But much of the excuses for apathy towards them have nothing to do with them. Actions of other Muslims don't justify anything happening to them.

    You can't help everyone , you do what you can.

    I can't add much of value to this I am so unfamiliar with this group of people.

    But I do know Burma is not a good place to live. Under all dictatorships minorities and the majority suffer. The majority might be consoled that they do not suffer as much as the minority. But that is still not freedom. And they adopt the prejudice of their own depressor towards that minority. Not knowing this case I can only speak in universals mostly.

    Ang Su ki is someone I respect if she is silent on this issue it's very wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Nodin wrote: »
    ....using the plight of some persecuted muslims to rant about muslims, and using being called out on it to rant yet more about muslims......

    I made a broader point that related closely to the issue being discussed and then explained and defended it in great detail.

    All you've done is make smug, personal digs and tar me as a bigot by making a bizarre comparison.

    You haven't countered a single point I made and, as usual, contributed nothing but smug snark and nasty personal attacks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    DeadHand wrote: »
    I made a broader point that related closely to the issue being discussed and then explained and defended it in great detail.
    ............

    No, you used this issue as a soapbox, tried to tar all muslims with the same brush etc. Shameful, really.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Nodin wrote: »
    No, you used this issue as a soapbox, tried to tar all muslims with the same brush etc. Shameful, really.

    You can't counter the arguments I made (because I'm right) so you whinge and make personal attacks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 65 ✭✭jonnypacket


    So is the flotilla on the way yet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 853 ✭✭✭LadyFenghuang


    So is the flotilla on the way yet?

    There really is no point to that other than you want to do it. It's very cold.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 65 ✭✭jonnypacket


    Nope, I'm simply exposing the glaring hypocrisy of the Irish Left. Where are the marches down O'Connell St for the Rohingya? Where are the daily news reports? Where is the boycott campaign? A true humanitarian would care about all suffering peoples. The Rohingya don't have the impressive propaganda machine that the Pallys have. Even then, the Irish care don't about the Palestinians unless they can rail against the Jews.

    Egypt closes border crossings with Gaza = whatever
    Israel closes border crossings with Gaza = let's fight the Gardai and burn Israeli flags


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,833 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    Nope, I'm simply exposing the glaring hypocrisy of the Irish Left. Where are the marches down O'Connell St for the Rohingya? Where are the daily news reports? Where is the boycott campaign

    The Left have a strict hierarchy of victims that is based on who is being persecuted and who is doing the persecution.

    As regards position in this unspoken hierarchy The Rohinga have being Muslim their favour (otherwise we'd not have heard of them at all) but aren't being persecuted by white men or, better again, Jews so they get scant mention in comparison to the Palestinians who meet every criteria and are, therefore, the apex victims of the Left.

    Persecuted groups that do not even register on this hierarchy include Syrian Christians, white African farmers, Coptic Christians and the Jews of Europe and the Middle East.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 853 ✭✭✭LadyFenghuang


    Nope, I'm simply exposing the glaring hypocrisy of the Irish Left. Where are the marches down O'Connell St for the Rohingya? Where are the daily news reports? Where is the boycott campaign? A true humanitarian would care about all suffering peoples. The Rohingya don't have the impressive propaganda machine that the Pallys have. Even then, the Irish care don't about the Palestinians unless they can rail against the Jews.

    Egypt closes border crossings with Gaza = whatever
    Israel closes border crossings with Gaza = let's fight the Gardai and burn Israeli flags

    Your argument is a fallacy. You are saying because one cannot do everything one should do nothing. That is like saying if someone on a diet takes a little cream in their coffee that they may as well eat ten pizzas.

    You are dressing a nasty remark up as a political statement when it had nothing to do with what you are arguing. You then want to get away with it by suggesting because we cannot cure every tragic situation in the world that we should not try to do anything or that we are somehow not entitled to try.

    That is fake. That is the fakeness and fallacy in the world. It's the teen angst and hamlet character. Just because the world is imperfect and will always be imperfect does not mean you should do nothing.

    A true humanitarian, is human. If the bar is raised so high that no human can can reach that is a rather convenient excuse to live in a darker world.

    It's like saying you have no right to complain if someone sh*ts on your table in the living room because although your house is very tidy the attic is a mess. That means you are a fake and your house is fake. And it takes the attention away briefly from the person who took a sh*t on the table. They are being 'real'. When in reality they just want to be able to do whatever they want with impunity.

    Those who hold very austere views ( I am NOT saying you personally I don't know you) or say nasty things all day every day cannot hide behind the fact that the world is imperfect and people are imperfect. They cannot point to the one slip up by an otherwise good person or political figure and say 'SEE', that gives me license to do whatever I want I am just being real. You cannot say because people who care cannot do everything that they should do nothing.

    It's not hierarchy it's doing what you can. And yes you have to choose. I can't give all my money to charity. I can only give little bits. And I can't give to every charity either. Sometimes in life you have to make difficult decisions even selfish ones. That does not give you license to be a total jerk or not do anything. Because you can't run everyday does not mean you can't take a walk.

    You have identified a hole in the media on this issue. So I think if you have no other charitable commitments you might consider soap boxing the issue yourself. Be the change you wish to see in the world. And yes you will fail...a lot. That's human. You can forgive yourself for not being perfect without giving up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 394 ✭✭RaRaRasputin


    Easy, let's ask Israel how they'd feel about welcoming the Rohingya to help them escape persecution. History has shown how well it works when persecuted societies are being handed a safe haven. It would be interesting to see how that would work


Advertisement
Advertisement