Freeman Megamerge

Robbo wrote: »

I see DDI are sponsoring a kids football team. Were the members polled on how funds were to be allocated? Does the team have a coach or is the starting team chosen by way of 11 way referendum?

WYFC is a club dedicated to social inclusion and the very nature of involvement and participation in sport for those with fewer opportunities. It is a club run by people who understand what it is like to feel left out due to social or financial difficulties....

...while WYFC is a football club, it is more concerned with fostering community development and the well-being of its members by creating a safe environment for children and parents to participate socially as well as physically, rather than concentrate on competitive football.


**********
Sounds absolutely terrible, destined to be withdrawn halfway through the season when the 3 good players leave to join serious outfits.

relax carry on wrote: »

Looks like the Journal has picked up the story. Complete with the obligatory "protestor" with a heart condition. Am really tired of these gobs**tes!

Protesters ‘forcibly’ removed from Mayo repossession hearing http://jrnl.ie/2125122 via TheJournal.ie

The hell was he doing there in the first place if he was in such a bad way?

He claimed that one man with heart issues and a broken hip had to be hospitalised after he was knocked to the ground during the incident.

found this on reddit thought some of you might get a giggle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBgkAmJUn0&ab_channel=SNAFUradio

it is quite clear that cop is only a minion for the bilderberg group. You can tell by the unusual colour of the frame on his shades. Clearly this sovereign man was targeted..

Robbo wrote: »

Another defeat for the Freemans, longtime favourites of this thread.

Of course everything is under appeal. Possible grounds of appeal may include disputing the existence of a house, a bank or themselves.

Village also have a piece on "man of the people" Jerry Beades and his shoddy treatment of his workers.

He said this had been financed by First Active Building Society and later re-mortgaged with Bank of Scotland for €1,406,000. When the First Active debt had been paid the couple had been left with a surplus in excess of €546,000 which they had spent on themselves over a period of 16 months.

:eek:

I would have got 16 years out of that!

johnciall wrote: »

found this on reddit thought some of you might get a giggle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoBgkAmJUn0&ab_channel=SNAFUradio

I might have stumbled on a theory (Post #3971).

from Tom's own Facebook page

Originally in fuel business until government introduced legislation, then in Taxi business until government introduced legislation, then in construction until Banks, & government failed to recognize legislation, after Taxi deregulation had to sell home to pay debt, bought site and built family home, planning issue and Judge ordered me to knock down part of my family home, had no job, minus credit rating and banks offered me finance to fund a construction project, bought sites and three months later the banks asked me to sign documents just twenty four hours on Face Book and not totally accustomed to standard practice or etiquette, I was granted full planning from Fingal County Council to which I down loaded listing contributions, planning fees, social housing etc. next day refused, planner changed, resulted in Judicial review which I was forced to withdraw along with Investigation by the Irish planners association by my Bank.

whippet wrote: »

from Tom's own Facebook page

Originally in fuel business until government introduced legislation, then in Taxi business until government introduced legislation, then in construction until Banks, & government failed to recognize legislation, after Taxi deregulation had to sell home to pay debt, bought site and built family home, planning issue and Judge ordered me to knock down part of my family home, had no job, minus credit rating and banks offered me finance to fund a construction project, bought sites and three months later the banks asked me to sign documents just twenty four hours on Face Book and not totally accustomed to standard practice or etiquette, I was granted full planning from Fingal County Council to which I down loaded listing contributions, planning fees, social housing etc. next day refused, planner changed, resulted in Judicial review which I was forced to withdraw along with Investigation by the Irish planners association by my Bank.

Poor guy - everybody's against him!

RecordStraight wrote: »

I wonder at what point during the outlined series of calamities did his mind finally crack?

Probably about the time when he figured that he could make money out of it all

Hadn't heard of Integrity Ireland before. Freeman related?

http://www.mayonews.ie/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=22134:lay-litigant-takes-private-prosecution-against-garda&catid=23:news&Itemid=46

Also from the same paper.

TUESDAY, 09 JUNE 2015 13:01
Judge challenged and Ballina court branded a ‘farce’


Local man fails in bid to have property returned in heated district court sitting

A man who has been interviewed as part of an investigation into the alleged sending of a threatening email to two district court judges and a high ranking garda yesterday failed in an attempt to have seized property returned to him.
Joe Doocey of Knocksbarret, Ballina, made an application before Ballina District Court yesterday (Monday) for the return of property seized by gardaí earlier this year.
However, in a very heated hearing, Judge Kevin Kilraine ruled against Mr Doocey, stating that as the matter in question is still being investigated by the Director of Public Prosecutions, he would allow matters to ‘take their own course’.
The court heard gardaí are investigating the sending of a threatening email from Mr Doocey’s account last December to two district court judges and a high ranking garda. These three people cannot be named at the order of the court.
Mr Doocey denies sending the email and intimated that gardaí could have accessed his email and sent it.
Yesterday he was seeking the return of items such as computers and mobiles phones seized from him. Seán McHale, counsel for the State, said some items may be returned but others were being kept to be made available for the DPP to assist with the decision as to whether or not charges will be preferred against Mr Doocey.
Detective Sergeant John Colgan from the National Bureau of Criminal Investigation (NBCI) gave evidence to the court in relation to the property at the centre of the application.
Mr Doocey, who was representing himself, claimed the search warrant for his home was flawed and that the raid on his home was ‘an illegal and unlawful entry’.
Mr Doocey said the NBCI would go to any length to stop people exposing garda whistleblowers and said there was ‘so much more’ information that was going to come out and made allegations of corruption against several high ranking garda officers.
He put it to Det Sgt Colgan that the real reason he was arrested was ‘to get information’ about Integrity Ireland, a group Mr Doocey is a member of, who he said ‘are exposing corruption in the NBCI’.
Det Sgt Colgan replied that Mr Doocey is ‘trying to give everyone the impression that we are worried about Integrity Ireland, I’m certainly not’.
Several members of Integrity Ireland were present in court for the hearing.
There were several interruptions to the hearing from people in the public gallery, including one claim that a garda detective had got Anne Edwards, Mr Doocey’s partner, sacked from her work.
At the outset of the court Joe Doocey asked for permission to record proceedings. He claimed that the court’s digital audio record is ‘tampered with on a regular basis’.
Dismissing this application, Judge Kevin Kilraine said he deals with all litigants ‘fairly and with courtesy’.
However Joe Doocey replied ‘I disagree on all counts’ and later asked the judge was he ‘working without fear or favour’ in his role. Judge Kilraine said he would consider recusing himself from the case if Mr Doocey wanted to make an application. Mr Doocey did not make such an application.
Judge Kilraine dismissed the application, saying he cannot ‘trespass’ on the matter as it is now with the DPP.
He said he would allow the matter to be re-entered in November if no prosecution is brought by the DPP.
At the conclusion of the hearing matters in the court got very heated. Ms Edwards stated that she lost her job because of the investigation while Mr Doocey, pointing at gardaí, said ‘these people are criminals’.
He addressed the judge and said ‘this is a farce of a court and you are in breach of your oath’.
Many of Mr Doocey’s supporters were on their feet expressing their dissatisfaction with proceedings while one woman repeatedly asked the judge ‘why do we take the oath?’ when giving evidence, claiming that the garda witness had lied.