Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Re: Adolf Hitler

2456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Dunno if that's a rhetorical question, but while, overall, yes... there were also individual nazis who did not agree with the horror of what happened ultimately, and signed up in agreement with economic policies and the aim of a happier, more well-off Germany. Don't think genocide was part of the deal at the start.

    Yes, the Nazis were evil. Read Mein Kampf - badly written immature rant that it is - he does make his outlook clear enough. Stalin was a murderous paranoid who Lenin misjudged, overpromoted and failed until too late to see coming.
    Hitler was subtle in his machinations at the outset and a world dealing with the Great Depression were happy to see a strong man in Germany. They overlooked the domestic issues (antisemitism was a commonplace view at the time) in the hope that he'd mature with time. He did - into a demon. Churchill saw the rearmament but was accused of crying wolf(:cool:) and attention seeking.
    Stalin played the dumb yokel around his sophisticate pals happy to let each and every one of the little leeches betray each other. He took on every menial job title going, combining them as he went....until eventually he had all the job titles. One or two little purges sealed the deal.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,872 ✭✭✭strobe


    My primary knowledge of WWII is based on leaving cert history as seen through a foggy haze of drugs. So correct me if I go wrong. But wasn't the deal that when Germany rolled into Poland the Russians were supposed to roll in behind them and secure the eastern flank as they pushed towards France? But Stalin held back as he wanted to see what happened? So if Russia kept their end of the bargain the war would have rolled out without an eastern front? What's the RCC got to do with anything? Put a lot of tanks in the field did they? Big ass crosses on them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    Yup, the secret part of the Non Aggression Pact involved a carve-up of Poland. Stalin was playing for time - he knew Hitler was coming just not when. Given he had to wait until 1944 for his second front, he played it well.
    Hitler screwed up when he declared war on the US needlessly and turned on the Russian Bear. A sane person would have sued for peace and settled for mainland western Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,974 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It's odd that the Catholic Church were against Hitler


    346940.jpg

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Without the Soviets we'd all be speaking Austrian now.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 793 ✭✭✭LadyAthame


    Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact. Hitler broke the pact.Stalin and Hitler had been preparing their alliance since 1938. Stalin had the biggest land army at the time. He told hitler that Soviet troops would respond to any invasion of Poland. Hitler created the pact to do this. He also needed the economic relationship with the USSR for a time. Stalin always knew Hitler would invade the USSR eventually..he wanted time to re-arm. Stalin thought though Hitler would not invade for some time. But he misjudged the ratios of force. France collapsed long before Stalin thought it would. Stalin believed that Hitler would not conduct a two front war at the same time. That was the logical thing to do. But he misjudged that. Operation Barbarossa was Hitlers first great mistake. The Soviets were true to the contract until the last they would not have reacted until Hitler invaded the USSR. It's strange when you consider the Soviet soldiers actions after Hitlers suicide. There was a lot of sexual violence in Germany after the war. The majority was sytematic by the soviets and amounted to 2 million. They raped men , children and women even Jewish survivors. They spared no one. Russian civilians living there were not even spared. In contrast the US counted 11 thousand assaults by their soldiers. The soviet zone of occupation was notorious for it years after.

    Hilters mistakes were starting a war with the USA and the USSR. But his mistakes were also dependant on the mistakes of his allies. Japan made a huge mistake in pearl harbour. Italy made a mistake in invading Greece. They failed and the Greeks overpowered them forcing Hitler to commit troops. It forced Hitler to delay his attack on Russia for five weeks which was disastrous as this brought them into winter. No one wins Russia in Winter. Hitler also messed up Dunkirk. Hitler rarely listened to his generals. This character flaw of not trusting the counsel of experts may have cost him the war. His generals actually told him repeatedly NOT to invade the USSR. The Germans were arrogant in their military technology they were stunned that the USSR had better tanks and better submachine guns than theirs. But delays were the worst mistake. Germany lost almost as many soldiers to winter weather as to the Soviet solders and the Germans did not know how to look after their weapons in the cold the Russians did. He also listened to goring who was a crazy drug addict.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 116 ✭✭edward2222


    Its a pity he didnt destroy the Vatican

    Its not about he didn't, he just can't destroy vatican :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 793 ✭✭✭LadyAthame


    biko wrote: »
    Without the Soviets we'd all be speaking Austrian now.
    Actually more likely we'd would have been gassed. Weird Stalin saved his people from Nazi gassing ..killed millions of them himself. Unbelievable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,561 ✭✭✭hairyslug


    whupdedo wrote: »
    Ah, were the nazis really that bad .........?

    It was the older boys that made them do it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Stalin also sought a pact with France and the UK against Hitler while they were following appeasement, they rejected it and this pretty much forced them into the Molotov Ribbentrop pact.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭GerB40


    hairyslug wrote: »
    It was the older boys that made them do it

    I heard they used to smoke behind the bike sheds at break time too. The more I hear about them....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭Buona Fortuna


    I don't see what the RCC has to do with anything. But Nazi Germany was already a de-facto ally of the USSR at the beginning of WW2, e.g. the Non-Aggression Pact, and they had carved up Eastern Europe between themselves. If Nazi Germany had not invaded the USSR, if they had not entered into an alliance with Italy and Japan, and if they had not declared war on the US, there is a good chance that they would still be around to this day.

    There's been a couple of books written (and I'm struggling to remember their names) that suggested "What if it hadn't been Hitler" - someone with all the same views but not quite the full nut job - probably would still be around :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 Yuri Checkov


    Hitler had no plans for Ireland.

    I am sure Hitler would have won if he had not declared war on the USSR.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,574 ✭✭✭ZiabR


    4512 wrote: »
    Could Hitler's Nazi regime have lasted longer if it had made the Catholic church and the USSR an ally indtead of an enemy?

    Yes, if Germany had not invaded the USSR when they did we would most likely be under German rule. If the 3.5 million + troops and the tanks etc that were sent to the USSR had of been focused on Europe, the Allies would have been overrun.

    Invading the USSR when they did, was the turning point of the war and ultimately resulted in Germany losing the war.


  • Posts: 26,920 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hitler had no plans for Ireland.

    I am sure Hitler would have won if he had not declared war on the USSR.

    I always find that weird. Ireland is pretty strategically placed between Britain and America, so surely it would have been the perfect launching pad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,706 ✭✭✭valoren


    If Germany hadn't declared war on the Russians then they would have won?

    The US and it's allies would have won in the end. Even if Japan hadn't instigated their participation.

    They would have been drawn into the conflict at some point surely given the conflict of ideologies with fascism/communism and democracy etc etc. They wouldn't at that point have committed troops. Why would they?

    The Manhattan Project would have been the ace in the hole.

    Who would declare war on the one nation who actually developed the capacity to destroy any city seemingly at will? With ongoing newer, better and more destructive bombs?

    Dropping a bomb on St Petersburg or Dresden would have hastened the German/Russian surrender no doubt because why spend billions of dollars and not utilise such a weapon?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    another hitler thread...wow...just remember that, as napoleon once said, history is a set of lies agreed upon...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,438 ✭✭✭TwoShedsJackson


    Bambi wrote: »
    And staying pals with japan after they declared war on america probably was'nt a great idea either

    Reminds me of one of my favourite pieces from The Onion:
    The Onion wrote:
    Japan Forms Alliance With White Supremacists in Well-Thought-Out Scheme

    From the East Asian Correspondent, Sept 1, 1939. -- In a course of action praised by many as "far-sighted" and "tactically brilliant," the Japanese government has sworn its allegiance to the Axis powers led by white-supremacist Nazi Germany. In a formal statement, Japanese leaders declared, "We wish to be counted among the loyal allies of this back-stabbing, racist hate nation."

    Following the announcement, Japanese General and military leader Hideki Tojo told reporters, "We are pleased to enter into an alliance with the paranoid, xenophobic government of Nazi Germany. We anticipate a deeply enriching exchange of our military aid with their deep-seated hated of our non-white heritage."

    Tojo went on to say that the "unbeatable team" of Germans and Japanese will one dominate the industrialized world as "Aryans and those hated by Aryans, working together."

    Likening their war instincts to those of "a very advanced clan of yellow apes," German Chancellor Adolf Hitler praised the government and military of Japan.

    "I salute you, chinky-dinky rat men, who have been given life by the confused hand of some long-dead pagan deity," he said. "When Germany stands victorious on a conquered Earth, and Aryan supermen wipe out the undesirable mud races one by one, your like will surely survive to be among the last to be exterminated."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,273 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    There's been a couple of books written (and I'm struggling to remember their names) that suggested "What if it hadn't been Hitler" - someone with all the same views but not quite the full nut job - probably would still be around :(

    Stephen Fry's novel, Making History, deals with just this scenario. A PhD student develops a "window in time" type thing and drops contraceptive pills into the water in Brunau-Am-Inn in Austria, thus ensuring that Hitler is never born.

    A more charismatic, less insane version comes to power, with sexy results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,047 ✭✭✭GerB40


    Hoop66 wrote: »
    Stephen Fry's novel, Making History, deals with just this scenario. A PhD student develops a "window in time" type thing and drops contraceptive pills into the water in Brunau-Am-Inn in Austria, thus ensuring that Hitler is never born.

    A more charismatic, less insane version comes to power, with sexy results.

    Dominion by C.J. Sansom is another book that deals with the aftermath of Germany winning WW2. It's a fascinating look at all the "what ifs" and a very good read too. I'd highly recommend it to anyone whether you're interested in WW2 or not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,222 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    I always find that weird. Ireland is pretty strategically placed between Britain and America, so surely it would have been the perfect launching pad?

    Iceland would have been a more suitable goal for the Nazis.

    To me it's just wishful thinking that the Soviets and the Nazis would have stayed out of each other's way for long. After all, their respective ideologies pitted themselves as mortal enemies to the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,804 ✭✭✭Wurzelbert


    logik wrote: »
    Yes, if Germany had not invaded the USSR when they did we would most likely be under German rule. If the 3.5 million + troops and the tanks etc that were sent to the USSR had of been focused on Europe, the Allies would have been overrun.

    Invading the USSR when they did, was the turning point of the war and ultimately resulted in Germany losing the war.

    the whole german invasion of ireland myth and all that fabricated nonsense...a very western view of the world and basically the product of decades of brainwash and propaganda...most around here have no clue what hitler was all about; in fact i think most don’t know the basics of why and how ww2 even happened...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,056 ✭✭✭✭SeanW


    Heilarious
    I seig what you did there ...

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭FloatingVoter


    GerB40 wrote: »
    Dominion by C.J. Sansom is another book that deals with the aftermath of Germany winning WW2. It's a fascinating look at all the "what ifs" and a very good read too. I'd highly recommend it to anyone whether you're interested in WW2 or not.

    Also Fatherland by Robert Harris - a very convincing alernative history about how a victorious Reich would go about tidying up the skeletons in the closet.

    BTW - the number of Jewish people in Ireland was included in the Wannsee Conference briefing notes. I'm sure that was in case Heydrich needed to consult a Rabbi were he to be strolling down the south circular of a morning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,758 ✭✭✭kingtiger


    Germany would not have lost the war.

    they would of take a bit of a dent when the Yanks dropped an a-bomb on Berlin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    kingtiger wrote: »
    they would of take a bit of a dent when the Yanks dropped an a-bomb on Berlin
    From where?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    From where?

    From a plane


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,731 ✭✭✭✭entropi


    strobe wrote: »
    My primary knowledge of WWII is based on leaving cert history as seen through a foggy haze of drugs. So correct me if I go wrong. But wasn't the deal that when Germany rolled into Poland the Russians were supposed to roll in behind them and secure the eastern flank as they pushed towards France? But Stalin held back as he wanted to see what happened? So if Russia kept their end of the bargain the war would have rolled out without an eastern front? What's the RCC got to do with anything? Put a lot of tanks in the field did they? Big ass crosses on them?
    Courtesy of Brother Maynard, they provided the Holy hand grenade of Antioch!

    (2:47 onwards)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Bambi wrote: »
    From a plane
    I guess it would depend on Sealion being a success. If Britain was out of the picture, then no plane would have the range.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,822 ✭✭✭Mickey H


    If Hitler grew at a slower pace he could have added more strength before targeting further expansion.

    No, he'd just be a man child.


Advertisement
Advertisement