Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How will you vote in the Marriage Equality referendum? Mod Note Post 1

1153154156158159325

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭xrp


    Trudiha wrote: »
    You seemed all fine and reasonable up until this point, the point where the hateful bile started. Hateful, misleading, imprecise, insulting and intolerant. You've let yourself down.
    Saying so doesn't make it true. You'll need to break it down and demonstrate why you're so morally outraged.
    Trudiha wrote: »
    To me this is a really strange view, I don't know where you live but here in Ireland, we haven't gone to hell in a handcart. I live in a nice community, in a country with the lowest divorce rate in Europe, where neighbours look out for each other and no one is fornicating in street. There might be a couple of people fiddling the dole but I'm not convinced that it's a result of the gay agenda, women working or free access to contraception.
    Oh! A low divorce rate is a good thing in your view? Do you think gays go through more or fewer partners?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭xrp


    Think it's more because they have gay friends and relatives and realise that these relationships and families deserve equal status.

    I haven't noticed any massive upswing in people saying they'll vote yes since McAleese came out (:D) in favour of it. It's eerily like people are making their decision on their experience and morals rather than based on liberal media bias. Almost TOO eerie...

    This photo is a bit of an own goal by the YES side:

    90236231.jpg

    I had to laugh at the stupid regal look in her face.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,249 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Why's this fella going on about divorce and age of starting families?

    It's the very fabric of society!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    Can't really attempt to claim the moral high ground after thanking a post referring to gay people as freaks xrp.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭xrp


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    It's the very fabric of society!

    Was that written?

    I'm still waiting on the fella earlier who claimed the bishops have been telling lies to come back to me with a quote.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Don't most Irish marraiges happen after 30 now???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    xrp wrote: »
    Was that written?

    I'm still waiting on the fella earlier who claimed the bishops have been telling lies to come back to me with a quote.

    How many marraige have UK Catholic Bishops refused to complete the civil side of since marriage equality came in there???


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭xrp


    Can't really attempt to claim the moral high ground after thanking a post referring to gay people as freaks xrp.

    Stigma isn't always bad and is beneficial from time to time in ordered, functioning societies. I'm quite open about the fact that I find the behaviour weird and freakish, though I would be very hesitant to use that particular word to a gay I knew for fear of further entrenching them in their wickedness. Removing stigma (e.g. allowing suicide victims to be buried in blinged-up graves) can actually be harmful and encourage others to pursue the same path of destruction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 235 ✭✭Trudiha


    xrp wrote: »
    Do you believe starting a family at 32 is healthy?

    To be honest, I don't have the facts to hand so I really don't know and wouldn't want to take a guess. However, I'm fairly certain that it's not the fault of the gays, same sex marriage or a liberal agenda and that it has nothing whatsoever to do with what we're discussing.

    But if you pushed me, my guess would be that it's a result of high house prices, the unavailability of mortgages and spending longer in education and I'm sure the kids are as lovely as they have ever been.

    You see what you did there, getting me off topic, talking about other things? It's almost like you don't want to have the discussion in hand and are cunningly leading me away from it. I hope the folks who knock at the door aren't so wiley.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    xrp wrote: »
    Moral outrage -induced violence is not a legitimate form of violence. All they're asking is for your vote. I suggest you lock your gate.

    Where's the violence?

    It could be worse - I could be going door to door telling them what I think of them. Way more intrusive.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 166 ✭✭xrp


    Trudiha wrote: »
    To be honest, I don't have the facts to hand so I really don't know and wouldn't want to take a guess. However, I'm fairly certain that it's not the fault of the gays, same sex marriage or a liberal agenda and that it has nothing whatsoever to do with what we're discussing.

    But if you pushed me, my guess would be that it's a result of high house prices, the unavailability of mortgages and spending longer in education and I'm sure the kids are as lovely as they have ever been.

    You see what you did there, getting me off topic, talking about other things? It's almost like you don't want to have the discussion in hand and are cunningly leading me away from it. I hope the folks who knock at the door aren't so wiley.

    *bangs head off desk.

    Good night lads,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,249 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    efb wrote: »
    How many marraige have UK Catholic Bishops refused to complete the civil side of since marriage equality came in there???

    Likewise, how many have they refused here since divorce came in?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,249 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    xrp wrote: »
    *bangs head off desk.

    Harder!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,070 ✭✭✭✭pq0n1ct4ve8zf5


    xrp wrote: »
    Stigma isn't always bad and is beneficial from time to time in ordered, functioning societies. I'm quite open about the fact that I find the behaviour weird and freakish, though I would be very hesitant to use that particular word to a gay I knew for fear of further entrenching them in their wickedness. Removing stigma (e.g. allowing suicide victims to be buried in blinged-up graves) can actually be harmful and encourage others to pursue the same path of destruction.

    You need to meet more gay people. Do you actually think that having sex with someone of the same sex and entering into a relationship with them is on the same level as wearing skinny jeans or something? "I'm not into this but I'll do it because other people are doing it"?

    What is the 'path of destruction' that you're on about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Harder!

    Faster!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,160 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    xrp wrote: »
    Stigma isn't always bad and is beneficial from time to time in ordered, functioning societies. I'm quite open about the fact that I find the behaviour weird and freakish, though I would be very hesitant to use that particular word to a gay I knew for fear of further entrenching them in their wickedness. Removing stigma (e.g. allowing suicide victims to be buried in blinged-up graves) can actually be harmful and encourage others to pursue the same path of destruction.

    # Just keep digging, just keep digging...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,362 ✭✭✭K4t


    xrp wrote: »
    *bangs head off desk.
    Careful now, the desk might suffer brain damage..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 235 ✭✭Trudiha


    Are the gays driving up house prices too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,160 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    You need to meet more gay people. Do you actually think that having sex with someone of the same sex and entering into a relationship with them is on the same level as wearing skinny jeans or something? "I'm not into this but I'll do it because other people are doing it"?

    What is the 'path of destruction' that you're on about?

    Shure don't you know that the Gardaí don't ignore violent hate crimes any more?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,362 ✭✭✭K4t



    What is the 'path of destruction' that you're on about?

    It's the oldest 'argument' in the book. The gays, they go around having sex with anything that moves..


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,070 ✭✭✭✭pq0n1ct4ve8zf5


    # Just keep digging, just keep digging...

    There's a strong field of contenders for the title of 'Least Classy Irrelevant Issue That's Been Dragged Into This Debate', but that one is up there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Trudiha wrote: »
    Are the gays driving up house prices too?

    Gay immigrant gypsies give middle England cancer!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,786 ✭✭✭smokingman


    The ISPCC endorses a yes vote – so those who want to push a “no” vote, their plans for children are contrary to the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children. Let that sink in a bit now… http://www.ispcc.ie/news-media/childrens-issues-in-the-news/ispcc-confirms-its-support-for-a-yes-vote-in-the-marriage-equality-referendum/12761


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper



    What is the 'path of destruction' that you're on about?


    You haven't been taken up the path of destruction? You haven't lived.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 235 ✭✭Trudiha


    efb wrote: »
    Gay immigrant gypsies give middle England cancer!

    Won't they think of Princess Diana?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 235 ✭✭Trudiha


    I've got a fiver on xpr being that cheeky Graham Norton, pushing people into the middle with his parody of extreme views.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,028 Mod ✭✭✭✭G_R


    xrp wrote: »
    Stigma isn't always bad and is beneficial from time to time in ordered, functioning societies. I'm quite open about the fact that I find the behaviour weird and freakish, though I would be very hesitant to use that particular word to a gay I knew for fear of further entrenching them in their wickedness. Removing stigma (e.g. allowing suicide victims to be buried in blinged-up graves) can actually be harmful and encourage others to pursue the same path of destruction.

    Mod

    Xrp, you're thread banned from this post on. Do not post in this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    [sarcasm]
    I reckon it's David Quinn :pac:

    too blatant, maybe John or Breda, one of the less clever ones[/sarcasm]

    I don't think so really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,988 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    xrp wrote: »
    Again, this kind of stuff does your side no favours. What word do you use to describe real bigots like KKK members?

    And what lie has an Irish bishop uttered?

    Homosexuals have the same rights (and responsibilities) as everyone else in society. It's nobody's "right" to walk up the isle of a private church. I don't see the fascination with having homosexual unions blessed by the HSE. Is there some high level human meaning to such blessings (which for some reason attempt to mimic all the pomp and ceremony of a church wedding) that I'm missing? If two men or three men or whatever lesbians want to live their lives together and want to grow old and wrinkly in each other's arms (or whatever it is they do nowadays), that's great. I don't see the point of it and frankly, the world has bigger things to be worrying about than what a tiny number of decadent metropolitan white people get up to. It does become problematic for Catholics when innocent children are used as pawns to cap these unions and socially legitimise them.

    Even if the NO side were to pass, it doesn't really matter. It will just encapsulate the 20+ years of social destruction that has already taken place in Irish society. If YES passes, it would only mark the beginning of our admission that something is wrong and represent the start of the process of repairing the damage.

    Can you show me where, in the proposed amendment to the constitution on civil marriage, it say's that it includes the right to walk up the aisle of a private church' or any church for that matter? It seem's to me that you are trying to drag in the falsehood that churches/religious will have same-sex civil marriage ceremonies foisted upon them by the proposed change in constitutional law.

    I'd also like to know what exactly the birthing age of a woman (32) has to do with the state's citizenry voting on whether to allow same-sex couples access to civil marriage on a par with their opposite-sex couple fellow citizens.

    Oh, I'm too late posting this...... damn this scrolling and aditing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,988 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    You need to meet more gay people. Do you actually think that having sex with someone of the same sex and entering into a relationship with them is on the same level as wearing skinny jeans or something? "I'm not into this but I'll do it because other people are doing it"?

    What is the 'path of destruction' that you're on about?

    I think i read somewhere that Pat Robertson wrote about the path of destruction western civilization and the US was on because of gay people. maybe he/she was quoting Pat.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement