Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dated a hooker

135

Comments

  • #62
    recylingbin
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭recylingbin


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    pimp that pays in the currency of coddle?

    Pimps dish out beatings, not coddle.


  • #63
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    recylingbin wrote: »
    Pimps dish out beatings, not coddle.

    So you're connecting dots here and going from connecting dots in a children's book and filling in the colours to coming up with the mona lisa?

    How are you coming to your conclusion, because i would find your rationale fascinating?


  • #64
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    Did you or did you not say you gave coddle for a suck?
    Mmm, I think your op is full of bs........
    Plus you're post count does not add up to be taken as a real poster, imo.


  • #65
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Did you or did you not say you gave coddle for a suck?
    Mmm, I think your op is full of bs........
    Plus you're post count does not add up to be taken as a real poster, imo.

    Gave coddle for a f***

    post count determines honesty? really?


  • #66
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Did you or did you not say you gave coddle for a suck?
    Mmm, I think your op is full of bs........
    Plus you're post count does not add up to be taken as a real poster, imo.

    Sorry i should rephrase that as 'post count determines legitimacy' really?


  • Advertisement
  • #67
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    Gave coddle for a f***

    post count determines honesty? really?

    Yes, it does if you are not a ..... But I'm sure you are at this stage! Just which rereg are you?


  • #68
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    Sorry i should rephrase that as 'post count determines legitimacy' really?
    It certainly raises concern..


  • #69
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Yes, it does if you are not a ..... But I'm sure you are at this stage! Just which rereg are you?

    What are your dots? What are the ..... ?
    Should it matter if I'm a rereg?


  • #70
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    It certainly raises concern..

    Your concern is noted


  • #71
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    What are your dots? What are the ..... ?
    Should it matter if I'm a rereg?

    Yes


  • Advertisement
  • #72
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Yes

    Previous account closed..new account open. That matters...ok


  • #73
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    Previous account closed..new account open. That matters...ok

    No, trolling posts matter.... Ok.
    But you know this already....
    Thus... bs


  • #74
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    No, trolling posts matter.... Ok.
    But you know this already....
    Thus... bs

    Call my posts trolling? Fine, reported. See if a mod thinks it's trolling.


  • #75
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    Call my posts trolling? Fine, reported. See if a mod thinks it's trolling.

    Good, cause I have reported a lot of you're posts for the same. Look back on the posts silly poster. Lol


  • #76
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Good, cause I have reported a lot of you're posts for the same. Look back on the posts silly poster. Lol

    You reported mine? Ok will i have to show phone records and link them to websites to prove my honesty? I'm delighted you reported mine because I have no idea how you could come to a conclusion that it is a post worth reporting.


  • #77
    deco nate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,340 ✭✭✭deco nate


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    You reported mine? Ok will i have to show phone records and link them to websites to prove my honesty? I'm delighted you reported mine because I have no idea how you could come to a conclusion that it is a post worth reporting.

    Lol


  • #78
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    deco nate wrote: »
    Lol

    The OP was put up in good faith. Believe it or not is up to the reader. You and others may call BS on it and fair enough. It is as it was...end of.


  • #79
    Mint Aero
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    Oh actually just to point out i got test after and 6 months after that...and then 12 months after that. Actually just tested again so i guess that's what brought it up again to post


    I believed the OP up until this.


  • #80
    eternal
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭eternal


    But



























    did she give good head?


  • #81
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    Mint Aero wrote: »
    I believed the OP up until this.

    I would stop believing myself there also.


  • Advertisement
  • #82
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    eternal wrote: »
    But


    did she give good head?

    The best


  • #83
    sh1tstirrer
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,485 ✭✭✭sh1tstirrer


    WTF is coddle?


  • #84
    eternal
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭eternal


    sh1tstirrer wrote: »
    WTF is coddle?

    A cuddle ending in an orgasm.


  • #85
    evo2000
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,728 ✭✭✭evo2000


    The first warning sign for me woulda been her ole Aids-Ray vision "You look clean"

    That said you d prob wake up one morning and she d have been suckin ur auld lad off for a lift to "work"


  • #86
    CK73
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    Ronin247 wrote: »
    Doesnt really matter if she is sucking or f**king, she is a prostitue.

    Interesting to see where the boundaries lie. Not that it bothers me ;)


  • #87
    CK73
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    SoftMicro wrote: »
    The first time was full sex as a client. I didn't go into the 'ins and the outs' per sé so called it 'massage' in the OP. maybe that actually caused the confusion. So it was sex next time at 50% but got if for the coddle. The rest were normal dates.

    Okay, you were very confusing in that case and personally anyone who offer non protected sex (hooker or not) is a no go for me and I would have ran a mile.


  • #88
    CK73
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    mufcboy1999 wrote: »
    I agree with some of what you said.

    It was more so from the perspective of dating a non hooker/regular girl who also thinks nothing of sleeping around with fellas. They don't do it for money, they do it for the D, but regardless both think nothing of it, money or not. So the comparison of dating a hooker vs a hoe isn't that different of scenario at all.

    The quote "You can't turn hoe into a housewife" is much like a leopard can't change his spots e.g. save yourself the hassle of being hurt in the future because she more than likely will sell her body the same way as a hoe will more than likely leave or cheat on you, that's why for girls with this mind frame towards sex can end in disaster.

    I'm all about second chances too, I just think this situation is better off dead unless the girl stops what she's doing, out of respect to the OP she should if it's to go further.

    Thank you for our explanation, but I do think you need to look a bit deeper with this one.

    A woman who goes out on the pull for no gain other than the sex, is doing it for herself, because she wants to do that. A woman who is working as a sex worker is likely (not always) doing it for the financial gain and likely would happily stop if there was another way to make the money that she needed. It is not necessarily due to wanting to have sex with men, who ever they might be.

    A woman who is accustomed to having sex with anyone interested for their own pleasure is far more likely to stray in a relationship, than someone who is doing it purely for financial gain. I suppose the concern would be, if she ever hits financial problems again, would she be tempted to rectify that with a way she knows works?

    It is a different mindset either way.


  • #89
    CK73
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    recylingbin wrote: »
    Pimps dish out beatings, not coddle.

    Pimps are a thing of the past, they died out with the internet.


  • #90
    SoftMicro
    Closed Accounts Posts: 224 ✭✭SoftMicro


    CK73 wrote: »
    Okay, you were very confusing in that case and personally anyone who offer non protected sex (hooker or not) is a no go for me and I would have ran a mile.

    Yeah sorry for the confusion. Thanks for the replies and yeah you're right


  • Advertisement
  • #91
    bb1234567
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    househero wrote: »
    If you didn't get yourself checked you should go now. Even if you think you didn't do anything that put you at risk... STI's are very very dangerous and some have no symptoms for men

    Yes he should get checked but stop scaring people. Yes they can be dangerous but ALL stds are easily treatable if caught early, including HIV.


Advertisement
Advertisement