Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

why do elites want to cripple us so much

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭Venus In Furs


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Honestly the "elites" are scapegoats for many internalized problems. It's convenient to blame the bankers, the EU, the developers as it was their fault but most of this recession was our own fault. Now that we look to be on the edge of the woods we want to increase public spending and lower social charges. It's madness but I guess the key point ,like the recession before us, is had any government controlled public spending differently they wouldn't have been elected. The same applies for the current group if they don't increase public spending we won't elect them. (We probably won't anyway)
    Then when the bubble bursts again we'll blame whoever else we can but ourselves.
    Crooked bankers, developers, politicians, entrepreneurs, solicitors no doubt love all this "we", "ourselves" stuff - divide and conquer or what!
    Yeh I agree a lot of ordinary people took the piss during the boom, but what about all those people who didn't take the piss at all?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    You as a citizen of Ireland are probably among the top 15-20% of the wealthiest people in the world, so shush. Im sure lots of poor africans working back breaking labour day in day out for 2 cents an hour think of you and everyone you know as the 1% you're talking about.

    Probably? In order to be part of the global 1%, you need assets of about 700k. That's including property. Not exactly exclusive to the elite of Irish society.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 392 ✭✭j80ezgvc3p92xu


    lufties wrote: »
    By us I mean the little people, the 99%..in recent years I've become more aware of how the world is operated..rich getting richer and..you know the rest. I do wonder why the elites of the world want to constantly battle with us as fellow humans to extract money and squeeze as much as possible. You would think that the rupert murdochs/Rothschilds of this planet would have enough wealth to be satisfied, surely they have the sense to realise they are not immortal. Having thought about this a bit, I can only come to the conclusion that its about power and control, and that sociopaths are at the helm.

    Its good to see people waking up and seeing something is not right. I wouldn't say its a case of the rich versus the poor though, that would be buying into the old Communist lie. There is a group of incredibly evil people out there doing incredibly evil things. To get some answers I suggest you should google stuff like the Bohemian Grove, the Georgia Guidestones, the Bilderberg group... That is only the tip of the iceberg.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    ...
    Fewer lower paid unskilled jobs mean that there will always be a stubbornly high unemployment rate, in addition to a larger number of jobs falling into the minimum wage bracket due to the surplus of people to fill them. Increasing the number of low waged jobs will ultimately have a knock on effect that reduces the general living standards of a larger number as wage deflation takes hold.

    Recent economic improvements have temporarily halted the trend, But I suspect that this improvement will be short lived.
    It's less a problem of fewer low-pay unskilled jobs, just more a problem of fewer jobs overall - and this could be solved easily enough, gradually, by putting money into economies through government spending - which can only be done at an EU level, such as through Greek Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis', 'Modest Proposal'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    What's all this about bankers? I'm a banker, as in I work for a bank. This isn't a society of secret handshakes and privately educated toffs quaffing back champagne for breakfast. It's a group of people who have worked hard, excelled academically, put in very long hours, don't want to lose money, and for the main part - enjoy what they do. It isn't elitist either. We have AvB from Galway, CD from Thailand, HK from Ghana. It's the type of multiculturalism that those who despise bankers would love to see. People of every creed, colour and faith working together. Yes, to make money. I won't apologise for that.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    I'm not critical of the money they make - they're private entrepreneurs.
    You need to be a certain type of person to be that successful in business though. I don't even say that as a criticism, just recognition of a reality.
    Ya but have you read up on them? One of them arguably got ahead through corruption/bribes/political-connections (and hasn't been prosecuted), another one of them has been through court multiple times on anti-trust grounds, for arguably creating an anti-competitive monopoly, and the other I haven't even Googled yet ;) (I know the issues with the previous two offhand)

    A lot of people hailed as entrepreneurs today, should be in prison - a lot of the biggest corporations and businessmen, are literally above the law - we, and much of the western world, live in a two-tier legal system.

    We can't accept that as reality, i.e. just how things are, unless we're happy to let democracy be gradually eroded completely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    lufties wrote: »
    Is that you enda? Politicians, banks and media colluded in creating a property bubble from 1998 to 2007, speculators deliberately manipulating and driving up property prices. Most people I know who 'bought', just wanted to have their own home. Stop saying it was the fault of ordinary people. The 'elites' of society gambled and ended up with there money back and unaccountable.
    Let me ask you one very simple question.
    In 2008 how much awareness did you have Ireland's budgeting?
    In other words, how much do we spend on Social Welfare, Education, Health etc and how does it compare to our sources of income?
    Nowadays how much do you have?

    Part of the the problem, then as now, is that too many people live in a fantasy land where they have unrealistic uneconomical expectations. In the case of the recession the pain caused by it was in large part preventable. The problem is nothing would have been done to prevent it. Had Fianna Fail opted to consider policies to put in safeguards in regulation and property, reduce civil sector pay increases we wouldn't have voted for them. That's what I mean by we.

    The 'elites' of society gambled and loss a good chunk of money. But not all of it. Our state finances were a bubble and the sad thing is they're still largely a bubble that no one wants to address.
    Crooked bankers, developers, politicians, entrepreneurs, solicitors no doubt love all this "we", "ourselves" stuff - divide and conquer or what!
    Yeh I agree a lot of ordinary people took the piss during the boom, but what about all those people who didn't take the piss at all?
    Like everything they suffered because of the actions of others. Unfortunately I think the important thing is that we're Irish so collectively it was 'us' our problem. Not everyone Irish was involved but if we keep trying to separate those responsible from those innocent we ultimately fix nothing. As we just keeping trying to circle the wagons. In this regard, the IMF and EU have done us a favour we all the collective group to the point the finger at and unite behind!
    It's less a problem of fewer low-pay unskilled jobs, just more a problem of fewer jobs overall - and this could be solved easily enough, gradually, by putting money into economies through government spending - which can only be done at an EU level, such as through Greek Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis', 'Modest Proposal'.

    The more I think about the more I'm attracted to the idea of a living wage and forgetting about full employment. It's just not going to be feasible anymore to keep full employment in most EU zones. Not unless you make wages uber sht. One way to achieve that would be a fair and decent living wage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,824 ✭✭✭Qualitymark


    Why do we allow elites to exist?

    I can't understand why anyone would want more than say €100,000 a year, tops. After all, you can only sit on one bottom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Honestly the "elites" are scapegoats for many internalized problems. It's convenient to blame the bankers, the EU, the developers as it was their fault but most of this recession was our own fault. Now that we look to be on the edge of the woods we want to increase public spending and lower social charges. It's madness but I guess the key point ,like the recession before us, is had any government controlled public spending differently they wouldn't have been elected. The same applies for the current group if they don't increase public spending we won't elect them. (We probably won't anyway)
    Then when the bubble bursts again we'll blame whoever else we can but ourselves.
    Hmm, I'm surprised to see you take this view? (actually, I'm really surprised to see a whole lot of sensible posters, recently take on this "we're all to blame" type of view :confused:)

    Why do you think we're on the edge of the woods? Europe is heading into deflation, and the economic crisis is about to get a lot lot worse, because QE is not going to stop deflation.

    The cause of deflation is due to a lack of money in the private economy, which causes a reduction in aggregate demand - and there are only two primary ways to get more money into the economy in this environment:
    1: Through bank lending (but there is too much private debt already, so this is a no-go; this is why QE will fail).
    2: Through government spending - this must assisted by a centralized EU investment program (such as the Modest Proposal, from Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis); this is the only way left out of the crisis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,511 ✭✭✭saywhatyousee


    The financial crisis was a deliberate attack against Ireland people like to forment the idea that it happened through years of mis-management Ireland ran a budget surplus in 2007. It was punishment for the rejection of the Lisbon treaty.The bank guarantee was forced on us. The Eu provided the problem so they could provide the solution. Lets face it once we joined the euro we were doomed its enivetable that the Eu was going to form into a united states of Europe you cannot have a shared currency without it. We are just another crisis or two away from it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Hmm, I'm surprised to see you take this view? (actually, I'm really surprised to see a whole lot of sensible posters, recently take on this "we're all to blame" type of view :confused:)

    Why do you think we're on the edge of the woods? Europe is heading into deflation, and the economic crisis is about to get a lot lot worse, because QE is not going to stop deflation.

    The cause of deflation is due to a lack of money in the private economy, which causes a reduction in aggregate demand - and there are only two primary ways to get more money into the economy in this environment:
    1: Through bank lending (but there is too much private debt already, so this is a no-go; this is why QE will fail).
    2: Through government spending - this must assisted by a centralized EU investment program (such as the Modest Proposal, from Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis); this is the only way left out of the crisis.

    Let me pedantic one moment.

    When I say we're to blame. I don't mean we're entirely to blame, what I mean we're in denial as to proportion of which is our fault. I think if you looked closely at the public accounts and budgets leading into the recession you'd notice just how much of a mess we were digging. Had anyone authority moved to fill in the hole we'd have opposed them and likely wouldn't have granted them consecutive terms in office.

    Edge of woods, as in comparison to Greece, Spain Italy Ireland's in a damn good position. Comparison to the rest of world, maybe not so much. We could still find ourselves in a mess, but we've done pretty ok. Assuming Greece doesn't tip this whole thing into the net.

    QE ultimately has to happen for Europe as deflation would, from my rubbish understanding of it, be much much worse. This sadly will mean even further spurts of inequality. I don't see how it can be avoided though. Greece is going to default or get a huge writedown and it'll be interesting to see how that affects the Eurozone in general. I cannot fathom why they didn't just bit the bullet the first time around and let Greek away with a significant writedown. It's the thing that always confused me about politics. Make the hard decisions early, not later on. Had FG brought in the Water Charges first they'd have a better position come the polls. Had Germany/EU given the Greeks a bigger write down first, this one would be a lot easier to sell their to the citizens. Instead, they did too little at first and now any move to do enough will be met with derision because people are thinking "Again!!? This times it's way bigger too!"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭Adamantium


    Go on OP admit you are human and that you too wouldn't want to collect wealth. You're biologically the same as the 1%, not some altruistic angel and I often think that if the people who complained about the elite were born or worked themselves to the same circumstances, they' be the last people to give of themselves to the people below.

    Oh how deviant they are. "Cripple", could be any more emotive? Wait until you lose your health and then you'll laugh at just how mobility (both financial and health) you had! And what little you did with it, how thoughtlessly you bumped through the days!

    There is more than one area to be elite in this life then simply financial you know!
    Unfortunately, and you're not going to like this : They all too require work and brains. Being smart. Getting people to like you.

    You cripple yourself everyday you spend mulling over the actions of some elite that you envy, that ironically you don't even want to part of anyway (apparently) What a waste. Yeah those bastards, if only I'd enough wealth I too would be doing some of the sam.......wait, oh dear.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    What's all this about bankers? I'm a banker, as in I work for a bank. This isn't a society of secret handshakes and privately educated toffs quaffing back champagne for breakfast. It's a group of people who have worked hard, excelled academically, put in very long hours, don't want to lose money, and for the main part - enjoy what they do. It isn't elitist either. We have AvB from Galway, CD from Thailand, HK from Ghana. It's the type of multiculturalism that those who despise bankers would love to see. People of every creed, colour and faith working together. Yes, to make money. I won't apologise for that.
    There is a good book, written by a former banking regulator in the US, William K. Black, who was a regulator during the US Savings & Loans crisis (a property and banking bubble in the 80's), and helped put thousands of fraudsters in jail:
    The Best Way to Rob a Bank is to Own One

    It is an excellent book, which gives you a very good idea of how large-scale fraud works (combined with political corruption), and which rings true in a very big way, with the build up to the current crisis.

    You don't need a conspiracy or machiavellianism among bank employee's, in order to create an environment which is optimal for promoting fraud - bank employees can promote fraud, while believing they are doing an excellent and morally-upright job:
    All you need is a high up CEO and upper management, willing to create perverse incentives, such as (and this being only one example, of many that are required) giving bank employees bonuses/financial-incentives for maximizing the amount of money they loan out (which can lead to things like 100% mortgages, among other unsustainable lending practices) - this alone won't necessarily lead to a crisis, it is one example of a perverse incentive than can help on the way to one though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    I really don't understand the derision and chiding for someone pointing out they disagree with the majority of the world's wealth being in the hands of less than 1% of the population.:confused: It's not begrudgery to point out concerns about that. It's begrudgery if you detest someone because of the position they're in and not any other personal characteristics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    Adamantium wrote: »
    Go on OP admit you are human and that you too wouldn't want to collect wealth. You're biologically the same as the 1%, not some altruistic angel and I often think that if the people who complained about the elite were born or worked themselves to the same circumstances, they' be the last people to give of themselves to the people below.

    Oh how deviant they are. "Cripple", could be any more emotive? Wait until you lose your health and then you'll laugh at just how mobility (both financial and health) you had! And what little you did with it, how thoughtlessly you bumped through the days!

    There is more than one area to be elite in this life then simply financial you know!
    Unfortunately, and you're not going to like this : They all too require work and brains. Being smart. Getting people to like you.

    You cripple yourself everyday you spend mulling over the actions of some elite that you envy, but I don't even want to part of anyway (apparently) What a waste. Yeah those bastards, if only I'd enough wealth I too would be doing some of the sam.......wait, oh dear

    I'm actually not happy with what I earn, for what I do, my employer doesn't pay enough. Having a good comfortable income means less worries and overall a happier life. I recently flew business class to hong kong(a perk of my job), It was truly amazing, loads of champagne and being fussed over.

    Saying this, I don't expect to earn money through devious or off others' backs. I live in London, where scam artists are at every turn looking to make a quick but any money I earn is through hard work, but I do realise that there is more to life than money, that is why I can't understand why humans are willing to start wars for money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭lufties


    StudentDad wrote: »
    This thread reminds me of the story of the two men running from a bear ....

    ah yeah shur..bears/sheep...potato/potata


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Like everything they suffered because of the actions of others. Unfortunately I think the important thing is that we're Irish so collectively it was 'us' our problem. Not everyone Irish was involved but if we keep trying to separate those responsible from those innocent we ultimately fix nothing. As we just keeping trying to circle the wagons. In this regard, the IMF and EU have done us a favour we all the collective group to the point the finger at and unite behind!
    The problem with our economy, is the Euro though - it is not possible to have a functional monetary union, without also having a fiscal union at a central EU level - it should never have been tried.

    This is the only thing that matters economically, in the whole of Europe. There will be no end to the economic crisis, until one of two things happen:
    1: We have a fiscal union or something resembling it (such as the 'Modest Proposal' I linked), or
    2: Countries leave the Euro - and sustain colossal economic damage in the process.
    Turtwig wrote: »
    The more I think about the more I'm attracted to the idea of a living wage and forgetting about full employment. It's just not going to be feasible anymore to keep full employment in most EU zones. Not unless you make wages uber sht. One way to achieve that would be a fair and decent living wage.
    You can do both tomorrow, implementing an EU-wide minimum wage boost (effectively to a living wage), while simultaneously kicking off an EU-wide public investment program like in Yanis' Modest Proposal, to achieve full employment EU-wide.

    There isn't any economic impediment to doing this, only political impediments.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Let me pedantic one moment.

    When I say we're to blame. I don't mean we're entirely to blame, what I mean we're in denial as to proportion of which is our fault. I think if you looked closely at the public accounts and budgets leading into the recession you'd notice just how much of a mess we were digging. Had anyone authority moved to fill in the hole we'd have opposed them and likely wouldn't have granted them consecutive terms in office.

    Edge of woods, as in comparison to Greece, Spain Italy Ireland's in a damn good position. Comparison to the rest of world, maybe not so much. We could still find ourselves in a mess, but we've done pretty ok. Assuming Greece doesn't tip this whole thing into the net.

    QE ultimately has to happen for Europe as deflation would, from my rubbish understanding of it, be much much worse. This sadly will mean even further spurts of inequality. I don't see how it can be avoided though. Greece is going to default or get a huge writedown and it'll be interesting to see how that affects the Eurozone in general. I cannot fathom why they didn't just bit the bullet the first time around and let Greek away with a significant writedown. It's the thing that always confused me about politics. Make the hard decisions early, not later on. Had FG brought in the Water Charges first they'd have a better position come the polls. Had Germany/EU given the Greeks a bigger write down first, this one would be a lot easier to sell their to the citizens. Instead, they did too little at first and now any move to do enough will be met with derision because people are thinking "Again!!? This times it's way bigger too!"
    We were in a budget surplus for most of the 2000's though, and our public debt levels were falling during all that time.
    The budgets were based excessively on property-based income though, definitely - but the primary problem was not even the budget, the problem was the mountain of private debt that got built up.

    Ironically, a budget surplus is considered 'prudent', but that actually sucked money out of the private economy, causing a greater reliance on private debt - so that part of public finances, was actually bad and made the property bubble worse, despite it being something most people think of as good ;)


    The thing about deflation and QE is: QE has not got a chance of working, and never did (it might provide a momentary blip of inflation, but private debt is too high - banks can not lend, so there will be no wider inflation boost) - the only way to avoid deflation now, is to have massive EU-wide public spending boosts, aided at a central EU level.

    So, do you see there, that the only way left to avoid deflation, is massive public spending? (there is no other possible way now, to get money into the economy - not unless you directly hand it to citizens - so we are not even close to being out of the woods)
    You can see also, that this is 100% not on the radar of any EU government or official organization, other than Greece, neither is it something that news media or the public (or - with notable exceptions - many economists) are really talking about; from day 1 of the economic crisis though, this was pretty much the only way out of crisis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭RomanKnows


    Turtwig wrote: »
    I really don't understand the derision and chiding for someone pointing out they disagree with the majority of the world's wealth being in the hands of less than 1% of the population.:confused: It's not begrudgery to point out concerns about that. It's begrudgery if you detest someone because of the position they're in and not any other personal characteristics.

    Check out the globalrichlist .

    Stick your net salary into that. See where you come out. The posters here from Ireland live in one of the most prosperous, safe and democratic countries in the world's most wealthy and egalitarian continent. If you earn the average industrial wage of 37000k then you are in the 1%. Being on the Dole will still have you in the top 15% of earners in the world. You have access to a range of services that most of the world would love to have. One of the last great social democracies. To have the choice to be able to access the Internet to spout out your opinion. And the freedom to do so.

    Stop giving out about the elites. Look at what you are as an elite, and decide what you can do to change it. Otherwise it looks like a cheap and unthinking extensionalist crisis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Isn't the global rich list site a sloppy indicator of a person's status. The cynic in me sees it as a potential polemic site to dissuade people of the idea that inequality is a problem. The more reliable metric I saw was 700,000 Euro in assets to make the 1%


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,947 ✭✭✭20Cent


    Ye know that the 99% v 1% slogan isn't supposed to be taken literally?

    It refers to a section of society that gets so powerful and wealthy that the normal rules of law and behaviour no longer apply to them. The elites who bypass stuff like paying tax obeying laws or are bailed out when they fcuk up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 760 ✭✭✭Desolation Of Smug


    Just to "Godwin" the thread(lol) - if people cared to throw their minds back to the 1930's when Germanys economy was crippled, hyper-inflation was rampant and there was massive unemployment...Hitler(yeah, I did) launched a programme of massive public expenditure - the Autobahns for example. This gradually dragged the economy out of the gutter. Sadly, he shat on the raspberry by getting all aggressive with the neighbours etc, which was what it was..

    Not that that has anything to do with the manipulative cnuts that run the world economy, but the thread had headed off at a tangent anyway. Might as well bung in another.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,453 ✭✭✭Icepick


    Ha, love these self proclaimed "unpopular opinion" purveyors. They know the truuuuuth.
    Your view isn't controversial at all btw.

    Sometimes people question views like that above because they're not particularly well supported - it's not all about being shocked at "controversy".
    Das Kapital is 148 years old and these people think they are controversial revolutionaries...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,981 ✭✭✭KomradeBishop


    Just to "Godwin" the thread(lol) - if people cared to throw their minds back to the 1930's when Germanys economy was crippled, hyper-inflation was rampant and there was massive unemployment...Hitler(yeah, I did) launched a programme of massive public expenditure - the Autobahns for example. This gradually dragged the economy out of the gutter. Sadly, he shat on the raspberry by getting all aggressive with the neighbours etc, which was what it was..

    Not that that has anything to do with the manipulative cnuts that run the world economy, but the thread had headed off at a tangent anyway. Might as well bung in another.
    Hitler also, beginning in 1934, starting printing money effectively, to fund re-armament before the war, by using MEFO Bills - this was only a decade after their hyperinflation, and they were printing money to fund government spending again, and this time doing it sustainably.

    They never even breached 4% inflation during this time that they were printing money - good article on it here:
    https://fixingtheeconomists.wordpress.com/2013/12/11/hjalmar-schacht-mefo-bills-and-the-restoration-of-the-german-economy-1933-1939/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 450 ✭✭RomanKnows


    Turtwig wrote: »
    Isn't the global rich list site a sloppy indicator of a person's status. The cynic in me sees it as a potential polemic site to dissuade people of the idea that inequality is a problem. The more reliable metric I saw was 700,000 Euro in assets to make the 1%

    No, a pure raw indication of net wealth is the only metric that makes any difference. Everything else can be spun to put across an ideology. So you are the 1%. Most of us are. We even sit here spewing out shíte about semantics. Tell that to the poor fúckers who spend 70% of their income on food.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 760 ✭✭✭Desolation Of Smug


    RomanKnows wrote: »
    No, a pure raw indication of net wealth is the only metric that makes any difference. Everything else can be spun to put across an ideology. So you are the 1%. Most of us are. We even sit here spewing out shíte about semantics. Tell that to the poor fúckers who spend 70% of their income on food.

    700k makes it sound attainable and is a metric thrown out to mollify the mugs like us. Trillions is where it's at. Billions for the less good-at-it ones. If the global rich woke up and discovered they only had 700k, they'd jump out the window of their sky-scraper. 700k me hoop. That's a house in Artane and a pension. Global 1%-er eh? Lol. .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,280 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    Its not necessarily about making money although its often a byproduct. It about having a project or challenge and trying to succeed a it. Branson, Ron Dennis, the Dragons Den crew etc could retire in the morning but would probably get very bored toasting on a yacht in the Monaco sun.

    Sometimes philanthropy follows and if so, hats off to them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    What's all this about bankers? I'm a banker, as in I work for a bank. This isn't a society of secret handshakes and privately educated toffs quaffing back champagne for breakfast. It's a group of people who have worked hard, excelled academically, put in very long hours, don't want to lose money, and for the main part - enjoy what they do. It isn't elitist either. We have AvB from Galway, CD from Thailand, HK from Ghana. It's the type of multiculturalism that those who despise bankers would love to see. People of every creed, colour and faith working together. Yes, to make money. I won't apologise for that.

    I'm not saying this applies to you but LOL. I know a few people who got cushy bank jobs because they knew someone working in a bank.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 760 ✭✭✭Desolation Of Smug


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    I'm not saying this applies to you but LOL. I know a few people who got cushy bank jobs because they knew someone working in a bank.


    People working in a Bank aren't "Bankers". They're "Bank workers". People who own a Bank are Bankers. It's a bit like calling the girl/lad who fills out your application for car finance with you as "A Financier". Not aimed at you Steddy, just me waffling in general btw.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭Streetwalker


    It's amazing that when you oppose the system the way it is today you are considered a leftie.


Advertisement
Advertisement