Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Taoiseach’s visit to Pantibar

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    I have to say to me it feels like it's a preparation to catch the gay vote next year... Not feeling super confident it's without an ulterior motive given the last year that's been in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Nomis21


    Gay vote is 10%

    He risked alienating much of the other 90%

    Especially where he comes from in Co Mayo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    In all fairness though, it was his parties LGBT groups Christmas party. It's not that unusual for a boss to show up at his staff Christmas party. I'm no fan of Enda Kenny- I actually quite dislike him and FG- but i don't think it's as bad as everyone is saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    He just went into a bar, a gay bar but still just a bay. Its hardly anything to be excited about. He's not exactly a trail blazer for gay rights is our Enda coming for a Catholic conservative background.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Yay more normalisation in advance of the referendum. I'm hoping that people will just be gay love-bombed over the next few months to the extent that they won't bother going out to vote no.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Nomis21


    I think most people won't bother to vote as they either don't care because they are not gay or see it as a foregone conclusion to be passed, but of those that do vote it will be an overwhelming 'Yes'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    ^ "Overwhelming"? Care to share some o' them laurels you're resting on?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    There isn't any gay vote as such.

    A lot of people, particularly older, still have notions about gay people and gay bars..from the funny, to the stereotypical to the offensive. So seeing the Taoiseach having a drink in a gay bar must strike a blow to those notions, helping to break down remaining barriers.

    A few years ago, many straight people wouldn't contemplate going to a gay bar for fear of being called gay. This belief is increasingly becoming a thing of the past.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭Daith


    The election is in 2016. He needs to do his best for the referendum to get the gay vote.

    His party had drinks in a pub and he joined.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,147 ✭✭✭Ronan|Raven


    Not a regular poster in here but saw this on the front page.

    I know a lot of people are cynical about him being there and elections and what not but as already mentioned there was an xmas gathering of his party and he went along.

    What makes me feel very happy is the fact that (and maybe I am not hanging in the correct circles!) the Taoiseach of this country was in a gay bar and there are not riots on the streets from the usual few. Maybe things are changing in this country for the better and it will lead onto a yes vote in the upcoming referendum and allow for LGBT couple to be afforded the same rights those of us on "the other side" of the equation have been and continue to enjoy.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,192 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    J_E wrote: »
    I have to say to me it feels like it's a preparation to catch the gay vote next year... Not feeling super confident it's without an ulterior motive given the last year that's been in it.

    As much as I want to believe this is a positive step without ulterior motives I simply do not, I think Enda has always been reactionary rather than proactive and I believe this is an example of hopping on a popular bandwagon because his party has taken a beating lately.

    He refused to back marriage equality in 2012, the below quote is his response to Michael Martin in the Dail. I guess he ticked that box in Panti yesterday.
    Enda Kenny (2012) - You’re not going to pressurise both me as a citizen or as a leader of government into a box-ticking exercise here to say: ‘line them up now’ because I speak from this seat as government
    Link

    This article in the Examiner from a year ago sums up my thoughts on it pretty well and I'm struggling to see what has changed since then.

    Link

    Last night really does seem like a stunt from someone trying to hop on an issue that the public is (on the face of it) largely behind so it costs nothing to throw his support this direction and get a few brownie points for it.

    If his presence last night does change some opinions and will encourage some votes that's a good thing but lets call a spade a spade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Nomis21 wrote: »
    Gay vote is 10%

    He risked alienating much of the other 90%

    Especially where he comes from in Co Mayo.

    Alienating voters by going to a bar? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    Nomis21 wrote: »
    I think most people won't bother to vote as they either don't care because they are not gay or see it as a foregone conclusion to be passed, but of those that do vote it will be an overwhelming 'Yes'.

    Ah here! There is absolutely no room for complacency.

    None. Nada. Nil. Zero.

    There is no foregone conclusion.

    No referendum in this country can ever be called as a foregone conclusion between 4 and 6 months beforehand!

    The Seanad referendum was a way different story in the polls
    The Childtens rights referendum was a way different story in the polls.

    If people assume it will be a foregone conclusion and do not do all they can to support a yes vote then it will be lost.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,180 ✭✭✭hfallada


    Alienating voters by going to a bar? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    A lot of OAPs are pioneers in this country. My Grandparents were horrific we had a glass of wine at Christmas dinner one year. So the fact that the head of the Government is a "gay bar" is going to be a shock for a lot of people.

    Regardless of whether it was a publicity stunt or not. It normalise gay people, something which most people in rural Ireland have never had to encounter. If you are living an isolated place in the west of Ireland. Chances are the only thing you are hearing about the referendum is "attack on traditional values" and "attack on marriage" from the Bishops of the catholic church. Individuals we all know are far from the leaders in morality. The Taoiseach is highly respected by a lot of old people and may switch some no voters to yes voters.

    Politicians change their values constantly. Im sure there is plenty of politicians in the US who were against interracial marriage, but now have friends of other races. We live in a rapidly changing society and there is nothing wrong with changing your views over time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    I really think there is so much nonsense being spouted about this.

    I'd say the vast majority of fg voters won't stop voting for FG because Enda went to a bar owned by another Mayoman.

    As for the bit about this being a stunt. Give me a break. A group in his party were celebrating the end of a year and he joined them for the celebrations.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭Daith


    He refused to back marriage equality in 2012, the below quote is his response to Michael Martin in the Dail. I guess he ticked that box in Panti yesterday..

    I think he ticked it in 2013 when he said
    He made his position public last night by telling business people at a function in Dublin that he was going to hold a referendum on the "equality issue of gay marriage" in 18 months.

    "I support that very strongly and we'll campaign for that when it comes," he said.

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/kenny-defies-church-in-gay-marriage-vote-29730373.html

    I very much agree that it was him joining his party on a night out. Yes there was opportunities for photos but there always is.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5 SliabhnamBan


    When someone, especially the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of a country, drags his feet on an issue and refuses time after time to state whether he will campaign for or against an issue (i.e. Marriage Equality) then I think we have to be cynical about his visit to a gay bar.
    Yes, Enda Kenny has said he will campaign for the passage of the Marriage Equality bill which will allow gay people the same civil marriage rights as straight people, but, it took him forever to decide to do so. I remember, time after time, Taoiseach Enda Kenny being asked whether he would support Marriage Equality or not and I remember, time after time, that he refused to answer the question. That to me is not the reaction of someone who believes in equality. It is the reaction of someone who has no passion for equality and who doesn't really "get" the importance and relevance of it all. The fact that he took so long to make up his mind on the issue makes me suspicious that he was waiting to see what way the wind was blowing. And if the direction of the wind is so important to him then he is not really committed to the issue. Enda Kenny is a sham leader. He panders to the crowd and regularly displays a sneering arrogance in the Dail which makes me cringe. He is a divisive force in this country and I do not support him but I do think his visit to Panti Bar was welcome.
    The fact that our Taoiseach's visit to a gay bar merits an article in the national newspapers and prompts such a discussion online is clear evidence of how far we have to go to be really treated as equals. I welcome the Taoiseach's visit to Panti Bar but let's be honest he is no knight in shining armour crusading for gay rights. He's a cynical politician trawling for votes at a time when many of his suporters are deserting him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭Daith


    When someone, especially the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of a country, drags his feet on an issue and refuses time after time to state whether he will campaign for or against an issue (i.e. Marriage Equality) then I think we have to be cynical about his visit to a gay bar.

    Yes, Enda Kenny has said he will campaign for the passage of the Marriage Equality bill

    So even after he said he will campaign for it, it doesn't mean anything?

    I welcome the Taoiseach's visit to Panti Bar but let's be honest he is no knight in shining armour crusading for gay rights. He's a cynical politician trawling for votes at a time when many of his suporters are deserting him.

    I also think it's cynical to suggest he's trawling for votes instead of joining his party colleagues on their Christmas night out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    Why do people get so wound up at the idea of a politician either changing his mind, or trying to secure votes for his party?

    Can anyone here honestly say, hand on heart, they have never changed their mind about a political or moral question? I know a couple of years ago I had very different opinions about trans people, about travellers, about what was right and wrong. 10 years ago I scoffed at the idea of a mtf trans person identifying as a lesbian. Now I know how stupid I was. I changed my mind. Why is it so odd or questionable that Enda Kenny has done the same about marriage equality?

    And even if he hasn't, even if it is for votes and to get the legislation passed- who cares? He's a politician. Elections are like one big job interview. Are you telling me you've never fudged an interview question, or said you had nonissue with x, in order to get the job? He's also the leader of a whole party, of course he wants legislation passed and votes to come in. Nobody wild bat an eyelid at a director of a company trying to get more customers.

    Btw as I said before I'm not defending Enda Kenny the man, or FG. I intensely dislike them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    J_E wrote: »
    I have to say to me it feels like it's a preparation to catch the gay vote next year... Not feeling super confident it's without an ulterior motive given the last year that's been in it.

    Who cares?

    It's great progress that out votes are being cynically targeted. 20 years ago we would be targeted for something else.

    And its not like we aren't going to cynically use politicians come the referendum next year. Given that we are facing a vote on the legitimacy of our relationships, I am delighted that politicians are trying to align themselves with our cause, regardless of the reasons for it.

    Politicans will also go where the votes are, and if they think there are more votes on being pro-LGBT rights than anti, than I for one am very happy because life in Ireland could be a lot worse for us if it was the other way around.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    When someone, especially the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of a country, drags his feet on an issue and refuses time after time to state whether he will campaign for or against an issue (i.e. Marriage Equality) then I think we have to be cynical about his visit to a gay bar.
    Yes, Enda Kenny has said he will campaign for the passage of the Marriage Equality bill which will allow gay people the same civil marriage rights as straight people, but, it took him forever to decide to do so. I remember, time after time, Taoiseach Enda Kenny being asked whether he would support Marriage Equality or not and I remember, time after time, that he refused to answer the question. That to me is not the reaction of someone who believes in equality. It is the reaction of someone who has no passion for equality and who doesn't really "get" the importance and relevance of it all. The fact that he took so long to make up his mind on the issue makes me suspicious that he was waiting to see what way the wind was blowing. And if the direction of the wind is so important to him then he is not really committed to the issue. Enda Kenny is a sham leader. He panders to the crowd and regularly displays a sneering arrogance in the Dail which makes me cringe. He is a divisive force in this country and I do not support him but I do think his visit to Panti Bar was welcome.
    The fact that our Taoiseach's visit to a gay bar merits an article in the national newspapers and prompts such a discussion online is clear evidence of how far we have to go to be really treated as equals. I welcome the Taoiseach's visit to Panti Bar but let's be honest he is no knight in shining armour crusading for gay rights. He's a cynical politician trawling for votes at a time when many of his suporters are deserting him.

    This is actually quite ridiculous. There was never any suggestion Enda Kenny was going to actively campaign against marriage equality.

    I think theres a deep cynicism in giving out that Enda didnt actively support marriage equality and giving out now that he does.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with politicians and parties actively asking lgbt people to vote for them based on a platform of improving lgbt rights. Instead of sitting at a keyboard and unconstuctively moaning about how cynical it is people could actively use it to improve that platform.

    We are at an amazing juncture in history - parties are actively looking for support based on their lgbt rights platform.
    Think about this.
    Think how lucky we are that this is happening.
    Think how politicians are hammering on our doors rather than us hammering at their doors and getting no answers.
    Think how this could be used to our advantage.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    When someone, especially the Taoiseach (Prime Minister) of a country, drags his feet on an issue and refuses time after time to state whether he will campaign for or against an issue (i.e. Marriage Equality) then I think we have to be cynical about his visit to a gay bar.
    Yes, Enda Kenny has said he will campaign for the passage of the Marriage Equality bill which will allow gay people the same civil marriage rights as straight people, but, it took him forever to decide to do so. I remember, time after time, Taoiseach Enda Kenny being asked whether he would support Marriage Equality or not and I remember, time after time, that he refused to answer the question. That to me is not the reaction of someone who believes in equality. It is the reaction of someone who has no passion for equality and who doesn't really "get" the importance and relevance of it all. The fact that he took so long to make up his mind on the issue makes me suspicious that he was waiting to see what way the wind was blowing. And if the direction of the wind is so important to him then he is not really committed to the issue. Enda Kenny is a sham leader. He panders to the crowd and regularly displays a sneering arrogance in the Dail which makes me cringe. He is a divisive force in this country and I do not support him but I do think his visit to Panti Bar was welcome.
    The fact that our Taoiseach's visit to a gay bar merits an article in the national newspapers and prompts such a discussion online is clear evidence of how far we have to go to be really treated as equals. I welcome the Taoiseach's visit to Panti Bar but let's be honest he is no knight in shining armour crusading for gay rights. He's a cynical politician trawling for votes at a time when many of his suporters are deserting him.


    If someone changes their mind on same-sex marriage, that should be welcomed and left at that IMO.

    I'm sure they have reached the conclusion that their previously held views about gay people are now wrong and they are possibly embarrassed about what they used to think. It's a feature of many middle aged and older people in Ireland and I don't think it's constructive or wise to condemn that generation who now support same-sex marriage, but once held homophobic views.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    If someone changes their mind on same-sex marriage, that should be welcomed and left at that IMO.

    I'm sure they have reached the conclusion that their previously held views about gay people are now wrong and they are possibly embarrassed about what they used to think. It's a feature of many middle aged and older people in Ireland and I don't think it's constructive or wise to condemn that generation who now support same-sex marriage, but once held homophobic views.

    But my issue isn't that Enda may have changed his mind (which is absolutely not a problem) but I don't think he has. I think there's a falseness to it and that bothers me. Enda is a reactionary, not a revolutionary. The idea of being used as a group makes me uncomfortable, whether or not it is a significant appearance. Enda has been famously quiet/reserved about gay marriage and homosexuality in general, tripping over himself to avoid it, and now suddenly he's in Pantibar for the LGBT party? I'm not buying that his mindset has genuinely changed here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭lyinghere


    J_E wrote: »
    But my issue isn't that Enda may have changed his mind (which is absolutely not a problem) but I don't think he has. I think there's a falseness to it and that bothers me. Enda is a reactionary, not a revolutionary. The idea of being used as a group makes me uncomfortable, whether or not it is a significant appearance. Enda has been famously quiet/reserved about gay marriage and homosexuality in general, tripping over himself to avoid it, and now suddenly he's in Pantibar for the LGBT party? I'm not buying that his mindset has genuinely changed here.

    "Pick your battles" and all that. He wouldn't have went if he wasn't lending his support , he has made his mind up and it's beneficial for us so I think you should focus your energy elsewhere really !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    lyinghere wrote: »
    "Pick your battles" and all that. He wouldn't have went if he wasn't lending his support , he has made his mind up and it's beneficial for us so I think you should focus your energy elsewhere really !

    That's not true at all - it's a photo op. I don't have to 'just accept' it if it happens to have an offsetting effect, I'm bothered at how people are lapping it up without being critical to a degree. It's the exact same as what he's been doing re: talking to homeless recently. I nearly guarantee you were he not in trouble politically, he wouldn't have dared touch the place with a bargepole. Does that kind of attitude not bother anyone?
    floggg wrote: »
    And its not like we aren't going to cynically use politicians come the referendum next year. Given that we are facing a vote on the legitimacy of our relationships, I am delighted that politicians are trying to align themselves with our cause, regardless of the reasons for it.

    I think it's a little blasé to use 'we' and who 'we are using' in such a way, that's another debate though best left in person.


    I'll reserve my final judgement to when I actually see actions, not token appearances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    J_E wrote: »
    That's not true at all - it's a photo op. I don't have to 'just accept' it if it happens to have an offsetting effect, I'm bothered at how people are lapping it up without being critical to a degree. It's the exact same as what he's been doing re: talking to homeless recently. I nearly guarantee you were he not in trouble politically, he wouldn't have dared touch the place with a bargepole. Does that kind of attitude not bother anyone?

    It bothers me but what bothers me more is the 'isn't he great' fawning over the man. As I said in my earlier post it's just a bar. It's not really that big a deal. So far we still have no date for the ssm referendum, why is he dragging his heels if he cares so much. He had said in the past that he is a committed Catholic so I would like him to be honest about his intentions. Until then I can't see this as anything to be excited about.


  • Registered Users Posts: 307 ✭✭feardeas


    The Taoiseach went to a gay bar. I'm not a supporter of his but let's be fair, this would not have happened a decade ago nor maybe even five years ago. As for courting a vote. Doubt it is a homogenous vote no more than any other group. For me I'd consider it symbolic. Also don't forget the man is of and from middle Ireland. It is there that the referendum will be won or lost. If hearing that gets people to think about their view fair enough.

    When a man in his 60s, from the west of Ireland, can walk into a gay bar to have a drink with colleagues or friends who happen to be gay well then that is something to be welcomed. In time it may not be news worthy but surely it is at the moment.

    Mind you if he had an idea what the polls later in the week were going to say I'd imagine he'd have stayed for more than one drink.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,366 ✭✭✭ninty9er


    Looking at the political landscape I'm not sure Enda is completely comfortable.

    Joan Burton will lead the cabinet, Simon Coveney has said he wants to lead the FG campaign and I'm sure Jerry Buttimer will be vocal.

    From my own political point of view I know Micheal Martin is 100% committed and passionate about getting this referendum passed. He has been vocal on a number of occasions since becoming leader and I recently saw him stand up from the floor of a panel discussion he was observing to interject on the importance of marriage equality and equality in general for our society.

    Niall Collins, Thomas Byrne, Dara Calleary; these are not people in an urban easy environment for this referendum, but are firm on this, much like all parties, there are those who are ultra conservative, but they will not feed the core campaign.

    In fairness to Enda, it's clear he's personally uncomfortable, but he did say he will be supporting the referendum.

    IMO SF is the party most likely to lose support this, not based on any polls or data, just a gut feeling.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48 McKrab


    Even if he isn't personally comfortable with the idea, shouldn't we still welcome the fact that he's distancing his personal views from his public views?

    It's similar to when he said that he was a Catholic and a Taoiseach, but not a Catholic Taoiseach. That he was a Taoiseach for all of the people.

    To be honest, I think it's a good thing when a politician can recognise that their own personal views don't coincide with the majority of the electorate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭Daith


    ninty9er wrote: »

    IMO SF is the party most likely to lose support this, not based on any polls or data, just a gut feeling.

    I'm not convinced of that. I think we need SF being on board to actually win this thing.

    What will lose this are politicians who won't campaign for it, esp those in middle Ireland. With the possible exception of Labour, I don't think there's any party with all members being 100% in favour of marriage equality.

    The other thing of course is that it needs straight politicians saying vote yes. It can't be the same people we've heard from all the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Its lip service. Its like the pope talking about how much the church respects and includes women and homosexuals, its not worth anything without the change to back it up. Same here. I think its great to see the leader of the country in a gay bar, its a huge change from years ago but without real action to back up his so called support I fail to see why its being considered a game changer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭lyinghere


    As I said "pick your battles". We're all somewhat intelligent and can understand Enda obviously wouldnt have been there if it wasnt in his political interest to be there. I dont think we should be saying he's a great lad for going, but it has to be good that gay bars are not being treated as some sort of freaky place that the 'normal' people dont go to ever!



    J_E wrote: »
    That's not true at all - it's a photo op. I don't have to 'just accept' it if it happens to have an offsetting effect, I'm bothered at how people are lapping it up without being critical to a degree. It's the exact same as what he's been doing re: talking to homeless recently. I nearly guarantee you were he not in trouble politically, he wouldn't have dared touch the place with a bargepole. Does that kind of attitude not bother anyone?



    I think it's a little blasé to use 'we' and who 'we are using' in such a way, that's another debate though best left in person.


    I'll reserve my final judgement to when I actually see actions, not token appearances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg



    Indeed.

    To everybody upset about being used, it seems you either dont undestand how politics works or place an inflated value on your sexuality as a political commodity.

    Politicians "use" all demographics and issues on a daily basis. Its how the political system works. Most of the time, people dont really care as long as their interests are advanced. So OAPs dont care if a politicians uses them by calling for an increase to the pension, first time buyers dont care if a politician uses them by advocating for stamp duty relief. And local constituents dont really care if the politician is personally against that incinerator/turbine as long as he votes/campaigns against it (and preferably gets a few others to vote/campaign against it to).

    I dont know what age all the people so upset by this are, or whether you just have short memories, but given where "we" are coming from in terms of lgbt rights and equality (30 years ago defending criminalisation was the vote getter), the fact that we politicians see it their political advantage to advance our causes is something to be welcomed.

    So we dont have to feel any personal gratitude to Enda, but we should recognise the significance of the moment. Personally, I see it as even more significant that it was an opportunistic pr*ck (make no mistake, I don't like the man) who was the first to do so as Taoiseach rather than a "true believer" because it indicates just how much things have changed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭robp


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Its lip service. Its like the pope talking about how much the church respects and includes women and homosexuals, its not worth anything without the change to back it up. Same here. I think its great to see the leader of the country in a gay bar, its a huge change from years ago but without real action to back up his so called support I fail to see why its being considered a game changer.

    Meh ironically I see the church projecting far more value and dignity to LGBT to people than some elements in the LGBT movement itself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    robp wrote: »
    Meh ironically I see the church projecting far more value and dignity to LGBT to people than some elements in the LGBT movement itself.

    Talk is cheap.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭robp


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Talk is cheap.

    Well look at it with a measured view and you will see that. Analyse people's welfare and you will see the fruits of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    robp wrote: »
    Well look at it with a measured view and you will see that. Analyse people's welfare and you will see the fruits of this.

    I haven't seen anything of the sort. There are some nice sound bites about compassion yada yada but the substance of it is very much opposed to our welfare.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,106 ✭✭✭Daith


    floggg wrote: »
    I haven't seen anything of the sort. There are some nice sound bites about compassion yada yada but the substance of it is very much opposed to our welfare.

    Same sex Civil marriage is a grave injustice apparently


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    robp wrote: »
    Meh ironically I see the church projecting far more value and dignity to LGBT to people than some elements in the LGBT movement itself.

    What do you mean?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E



    Hating this whole 'being gay is a non-thing get over it' vibe the article presents. Find that kind of attitude quite ignorant to be honest, even if it doesn't have bad intentions. It's a bit rich sitting on a perch and claiming that the gay lifestyle is exactly the same because it isn't for many people. If being gay is not such a big deal, the world wouldn't still be agonising over the sexuality of famous people and the name-calling and the stereotyping etc.


  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭lyinghere


    J_E wrote: »
    Hating this whole 'being gay is a non-thing get over it' vibe the article presents. Find that kind of attitude quite ignorant to be honest, even if it doesn't have bad intentions. It's a bit rich sitting on a perch and claiming that the gay lifestyle is exactly the same because it isn't for many people. If being gay is not such a big deal, the world wouldn't still be agonising over the sexuality of famous people and the name-calling and the stereotyping etc.

    Really think you've missed the point here!

    "Gay people are the same as straight people and deserve the same legal rights and entitlements - their relationships should be treated with the same level of respect and dignity, by the State, as those of their heterosexual friends."

    She's not saying being gay is a non event which is actually an attitude that pisses me off also, its mostly just spouted by straight people who reckon gay people are just looking for attention i reckon.

    But she is saying gays as basic human being are not fundamentally different from straight people. Which shockingly still needs to be said despite all the peceived goodwill toward the LGBT community in 2014.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭robp


    floggg wrote: »
    I haven't seen anything of the sort. There are some nice sound bites about compassion yada yada but the substance of it is very much opposed to our welfare.

    Baffling. You are entitled to your opinion on values but not entitled to re-imagine objective health measures e.g. mental and physical health etc. I don't mean to tar brush all of the LGBT movement but some of mainstream elements that try to claim authority have some culpability.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,934 ✭✭✭robp


    lyinghere wrote: »
    Really think you've missed the point here!

    But she is saying gays as basic human being are not fundamentally different from straight people.

    Oxymoron.


  • Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭lyinghere


    robp wrote: »
    Oxymoron.

    How? You believe gays are fundamentally different from Straight people ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    robp wrote: »
    Baffling. You are entitled to your opinion on values but not entitled to re-imagine objective health measures e.g. mental and physical health etc. I don't mean to tar brush all of the LGBT movement but some of mainstream elements that try to claim authority have some culpability.

    Lol.

    So anything tangible and specific that you can actually point to that the church have done to advance the dignity of gay people or what not then?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭J_E


    lyinghere wrote: »
    How? You believe gays are fundamentally different from Straight people ?

    Socially and culturally, they are. I don't know why some try so hard to mask this fact over. I don't personally see it as a bad thing. I love that being gay makes me different, and able to see the world from a different perspective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,129 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    J_E wrote: »
    Socially and culturally, they are. I don't know why some try so hard to mask this fact over. I don't personally see it as a bad thing. I love that being gay makes me different, and able to see the world from a different perspective.

    Its true there are different social and cultural norms. However its also true that many lgbt people prefer the social and cultural side of heteronormativity and cisnormativity.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭floggg


    Its true there are different social and cultural norms. However its also true that many lgbt people prefer the social and cultural side of heteronormativity and cisnormativity.

    I don't see my self as being in any way different culturally or socially. I know there are some gay people who do, and more power to them, but they are a sub-group and don't define any gay people.

    I also don't think I identify with heteronormativity either. I don't try to blend in or accept being straight as any sort of any defining characteristic of my social or cultural group (which is basically just middle class native irish).

    I'm proud of who I am and my sexuality, but I don't think it defines who I am or who I am not.

    So in very much in agreement that it should be a non-issue and I shouldn't be seen as any different from my straight friends and family.*



    * though that ideal has yet to be realised in practice


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Well sure, where there is politics there is always PR. The idea for him to visit Panti Bar was not his, it was maybe an advisor thinking it would be some positive publicity in advance of referendum, or maybe it was an invitation that was extended to him by a gay person in the gay community who is also affiliated with Fine Gael party, regardless, he decided to visit so I guess it is a positive thing! Won't sway my decision on whether or not to vote FG in next election though, I will decide nearer the time and take a vast range of things into consideration.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement