Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Britain bans sex acts in porn

1…6781012

Comments

  • #272
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    RDM_83 again wrote: »
    Do people consider anal sex or using toys a fetish/tabboo though things that actually feel different and are directly sexual.
    And lot of fetishes don't seem to actually involve that much actual fcuking :confused:
    A good example of what I meant is something like Exhibitionism, unless you hold the notion that people watching you have sex isn't "normal" on some level its just sex with no added enjoyment (and more draughts :p )

    I completely agree with the each to their own attitude though

    Yeah I guess I understand what you mean, people would probably say they like exhibitionism because it turns them on, but you're arguing about the 'why' does it turns them on....

    Maybe you're right. It would certainly explain a lot, perhaps would also go quite a ways to explaining how a lot of what used to be very kinky now seems much more mainstream (purely guessing here :o) as fetishes progress because some things aren't taboo anymore?


  • #273
    Micky Dolenz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,079 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    I went through a phase of midget porn but I gave it up. It was easy to drop, shur it was only a small thing.


  • #274
    J Mysterio
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,190 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    wexie wrote: »
    Just in this thread there have been a good few people to google fisting, I myself had to google blumpkin (:eek:)

    Just googled that there :pac:


  • #275
    token101
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭token101


    If porn producers had any sense, they would tweet Cameron fisting pictures until his social media guy's head melts and he tries to fist Dave himself and urinates on him as he leaves for his new life of debauchery. #FistsOfTory

    Also, this may be the greatest article of all time on anything. There's an FAQ!! AN FAQ :pac::pac:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-of-sex-acts-just-got-banned-in-uk-porn-9897174.html?cmpid=facebook-post


  • #276
    magick
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭magick


    At least Cake Farts are still safe


  • Advertisement
  • #277
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    token101 wrote: »
    If porn producers had any sense, they would tweet Cameron fisting pictures until his social media guy's head melts and he tries to fist Dave himself and urinates on him as he leaves for his new life of debauchery. #FistsOfTory

    Also, this may be the greatest article of all time on anything. There's an FAQ!! AN FAQ :pac::pac:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/a-long-list-of-sex-acts-just-got-banned-in-uk-porn-9897174.html?cmpid=facebook-post
    Myles Jackman, a UK-based obscenity lawyer

    teehee :D

    Apparently it's not all bad though, apparently 'gentle' spanking is still okay (phew)
    Other acts banned included spanking beyond a gentle level


  • #278
    bodice ripper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    I can't believe anyone had to look up any of the terms referenced in thread.


    It's a miracle I amn't out choking women to death...


  • #279
    shruikan2553
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    You arent even banned from watching it, just from making it. You can kill yourself from dehydration while watching a women get spanked, caned, agressively whipped which causes her to squirt etc etc

    The only people it hurts is the makers.


  • #280
    bodice ripper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    shruikan2553 wrote: »
    You arent even banned from watching it, just from making it. You can kill yourself from dehydration while watching a women get spanked, caned, agressively whipped which causes her to squirt etc etc

    The only people it hurts is the makers.

    It sets a scary precedent.


  • #281
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    bodice ripper wrote: »
    I can't believe anyone had to look up any of the terms referenced in thread.


    It's a miracle I amn't out choking women to death...

    ah in fairness, did you know what a blumpkin is?

    Or am I really that out of touch with what cool with da kids these days?
    And how do you concentrate really? On one or the other?


  • Advertisement
  • #282
    P_1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Ridiculous decision. If you don't like it don't watch it, don't destroy the livelihoods of people who are causing no harm to anyone and having quite a lot of fun in the process


  • #283
    bodice ripper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    wexie wrote: »
    ah in fairness, did you know what a blumpkin is?

    Or am I really that out of touch with what cool with da kids these days?
    And how do you concentrate really? On one or the other?

    Yep. I haven't be unfortunate enough to watch one, but I read.

    What am I concentrating on?


  • #284
    Chorcai
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭Chorcai


    Ban fisting but not footing ? Silly ban is silly!


  • #285
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    bodice ripper wrote: »
    Yep. I haven't be unfortunate enough to watch one, but I read.

    What am I concentrating on?

    on the eh...well...the....

    nevermind

    you damn kids with your healthy bowel movements :mad:


  • #286
    bodice ripper
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭bodice ripper


    wexie wrote: »
    on the eh...well...the....

    nevermind

    you damn kids with your healthy bowel movements :mad:


    Oh. No, being alone on the toilet is one of my few standards....


  • #287
    AlanS181824
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 5,575 ✭✭✭AlanS181824


    The story itself is a load of nonsense but the replies make this thread haha.


  • #288
    FullblownRose
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭FullblownRose


    hatrickpatrick wrote: »
    I'm a guy who's into kinky sex where a lot of the things on that list would be done to me by a woman. You'd be amazed how common fantasies like that are among guys, actually, although it's still not mainstream enough for a lot of guys to be comfortable admitting it.
    The British government is essentially saying there's something wrong with my sexuality by banning this stuff - essentially adding to that stigma.

    In fact now I think of it, I've almost never heard of facesitting in the context of a guy sitting on a woman's face.

    So being spanked is "demeaning" and "nasty" - sure, but that's the point. Some people get off to that, and they are by no means bad people. :confused:


    P.M sent ;)


  • #289
    Earl Turner
    Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭Earl Turner


    PopePalpatine wrote: »
    Vomit, if you want to tackle "disrespect towards women", try this guy first:

    Someone's never been in Manchester city centre at closing time.


  • #290
    mrkiscool2
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭mrkiscool2


    FullblownRose wrote: »
    P.M sent ;)
    Honestly, I was waiting for a reply like that. Fair play.

    I also just want to voice that not only is this a really ridiculous law, but it is also an affront to free speech. Porn is a consumable media (heh) and therefore falls under the parameters of free speech. For a first world country (who have done great things in terms of other things the past few years) to do such a thing is beyond belief! Also, if their intention was to make porn less demeaning against women (which I always argue against, but it seems to be their reasoning) they have actually just made it even more demeaning by taking away things like squirting (which is not urine and something that 15% of females experience regularly during orgasms) and face-sitting.


  • #291
    FullblownRose
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,501 ✭✭✭FullblownRose


    mrkiscool2 wrote: »
    Honestly, I was waiting for a reply like that. Fair play.

    I also just want to voice that not only is this a really ridiculous law, but it is also an affront to free speech. Porn is a consumable media (heh) and therefore falls under the parameters of free speech. For a first world country (who have done great things in terms of other things the past few years) to do such a thing is beyond belief! Also, if their intention was to make porn less demeaning against women (which I always argue against, but it seems to be their reasoning) they have actually just made it even more demeaning by taking away things like squirting (which is not urine and something that 15% of females experience regularly during orgasms) and face-sitting.

    Check yours too :P


  • Advertisement
  • #292
    Earl Turner
    Closed Accounts Posts: 151 ✭✭Earl Turner


    P_1 wrote: »
    Ridiculous decision. If you don't like it don't watch it, don't destroy the livelihoods of people who are causing no harm to anyone and having quite a lot of fun in the process

    I don't think people have fun making porn to be honest. If you read accounts from pornstars it's pretty boring and degrading work.


  • #293
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    mrkiscool2 wrote: »
    Honestly, I was waiting for a reply like that. Fair play.

    I also just want to voice that not only is this a really ridiculous law, but it is also an affront to free speech. Porn is a consumable media (heh) and therefore falls under the parameters of free speech. For a first world country (who have done great things in terms of other things the past few years) to do such a thing is beyond belief! Also, if their intention was to make porn less demeaning against women (which I always argue against, but it seems to be their reasoning) they have actually just made it even more demeaning by taking away things like squirting (which is not urine and something that 15% of females experience regularly during orgasms) and face-sitting.

    aside from all of that, which I agree with, it's just completely pointless as it's not going to do anything for the availability of said porn in any territory.

    On top of that I find the whole idea of a censorship board (no doubt composed of stereotypical British academics) sitting down to review some of Brazzers and Bangbros (or whatever the UK equivalent is) finest to see what's acceptable, just completely hilarious.

    I expect there was lots of tuttutting and frowning and all of them went home to give their OH's or themselves a good seeing to.
    (or maybe they went home to get a good peeing to)


  • #294
    ZeroThreat
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    Earl Turner wrote: »
    I don't think people have fun making porn to be honest. If you read accounts from pornstars it's pretty boring and degrading work.

    The script generally sucks to top it all off. :D


  • #295
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    ZeroThreat wrote: »
    The script generally sucks to top it all off. :D

    I was actually chatting to mrs Wexie about this a while ago. According to her if there were actual movies with an actual script and story (and reasonable acting ) that just happened to have lots and lots of gratuitous hardcore action it'd be a lot more palatable to quite a few women.

    (any recommendations by PM please, Christmas holidays and long evenings ahead :D)

    Forgot to mention, apparently, plumbers are not so much of a turn on as the porn industry would have you believe, neither are pizza delivery boys


  • #296
    Venus In Furs
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,028 ✭✭✭Venus In Furs


    Not a fan of the hardcore stuff but a ban on particular acts (female ejaculation? :confused:) fails to take into account that there are people who are really into doing this stuff on camera, and it's still going to be done, so surely it would be safer for it to be continued within a regulated industry?


  • #297
    Orion
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,807 ✭✭✭✭Orion


    Sheep Lover wrote: »
    "Just bate it into me, John."


    "You fcuking gobsihte, you've cum all over the good bedsheets"

    And you left the immersion on ... That's a paddling!


  • #298
    Cookie_Monster
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,740 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    I went through a phase of midget porn but I gave it up. It was easy to drop, shur it was only a small thing.

    would have thought you would be used to handling small things...


  • #299
    Jen Pigs Fly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭Jen Pigs Fly


    Can someone explain "caning" to me?

    I should know but I now feel like an inexperienced 16 year old :o


  • #300
    GarIT
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭GarIT


    xxxJennyxxx wrote: »
    Can someone explain "caning" to me?

    I should know but I now feel like an inexperienced 16 year old :o

    To be struck with a thin wooden stick or cane.


  • Advertisement
  • #301
    Cyber Ghost
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 382 ✭✭Cyber Ghost


    I love the dialogue in British porn

    "Go on stick your finger up my bum"


Advertisement
Advertisement