Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Britain bans sex acts in porn

1…6791112

Comments

  • #242
    Aongus Von Bismarck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    One eyed Jack wrote: »
    They're ACTORS Aongus. It's not real.

    Grown adults that can't tell the difference between reality and fantasy, also very revealing.

    I never said it was real.

    Still doesn't take away from the fact that these lads can only blow their beans by looking at someone getting roughed up. Then they get all offended when someone tells them that they're disturbed.


  • #243
    Roquentin
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭Roquentin


    this thread is so funny


  • #244
    catallus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    "Blow their beans" Haha, good one, Aongus.

    Some light choking wouldn't go astray, let me tell you.


  • #245
    looking_around
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭looking_around


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    I never said it was real.

    Still doesn't take away from the fact that these lads can only blow their beans by looking at someone getting roughed up. Then they get all offended when someone tells them that they're disturbed.

    not just lads.
    And what of the people that consent to those acts being done to themselves?

    and who are you to define what's "disturbing".
    If people are happy, who are you to say otherwise?


  • #246
    catallus
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Spinachliver wrote: »
    How should sex be viewed and had in your opinion?

    60 fps? ;)


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,623 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    Then they get all offended when someone tells them that they're disturbed.

    Says the creep that controls what his girlfriend eats :rolleyes:


  • #248
    One eyed Jack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,305 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    I never said it was real.

    Still doesn't take away from the fact that these lads can only blow their beans by looking at someone getting roughed up. Then they get all offended when someone tells them that they're disturbed.


    I think you're reading far too much into people's posts and interpreting them in new and unusual ways. I don't think anyone is taking Vomit seriously. I'm certainly not anyway. I don't think anyone here is qualified to say who is, or isn't disturbed.


  • #249
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Lyaiera wrote: »
    I do think it's appalling how many people think they're impervious to the effects of the media and broader society. Like they're free from influence. No-one is.

    That's why advertising doesn't work ;)


  • #250
    Aongus Von Bismarck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    looking_around wrote: »
    not just lads.
    And what of the people that consent to those acts being done to themselves?

    and who are you to define what's "disturbing".
    If people are happy, who are you to say otherwise?

    If people fantasise about having the sh*te beaten out of them or choking someone in order get sexual gratification, then yes, they are disturbed and would be better off talking to a shrink instead of whacking off to online porn in their bedrooms.


  • #251
    looking_around
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭looking_around


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    If people fantasise about having the sh*te beaten out of them or choking someone in order get sexual gratification, then yes, they are disturbed and would be better off talking to a shrink instead of whacking off to online porn in their bedrooms.

    Even if they're happy? with no permanent damage?
    Are you saying they're happiness is wrong, and they have no right to do what they want with their body?

    Who decided what right and what's wrong when it comes to sex?

    You realise aggressive sex is quite common in nature? Why is it wrong for humans to also have aggressive sex?
    I mean, we have one benefit over other animals, we can at least consent.


  • Advertisement
  • #252
    Fat Christy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    I never said it was real.

    Still doesn't take away from the fact that these lads can only blow their beans by looking at someone getting roughed up. Then they get all offended when someone tells them that they're disturbed.

    Those who jack off to porn are now disturbed?

    I wasn't very disturbed today tbh, although yesterday the phone never quit ringing. If I stop jacking off to porn will people interrupt/disturb me less? I don't like being the disturbed especially when I'm....errrr.............umm.......:pac:


  • #253
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    If people fantasise about having the sh*te beaten out of them or choking someone in order get sexual gratification, then yes, they are disturbed and would be better off talking to a shrink instead of whacking off to online porn in their bedrooms.

    And you, of course, have several degrees in psychology to back up this bold statement?

    And for your information, I do most of my whacking off in the living room.
    On occasion, if I want to treat myself, I move to the office and sit on my swirly chair.


  • #254
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    One eyed Jack wrote: »
    I think you're reading far too much into people's posts and interpreting them in new and unusual ways. I don't think anyone is taking Vomit seriously. I'm certainly not anyway. I don't think anyone here is qualified to say who is, or isn't disturbed.

    Hahaha, I only just caught your username.

    You're either a big Western fan or supremely qualified to participate in this thread :D


  • #255
    Cookie_Monster
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,740 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Regardless of it being pron or not how can they still have a censorship board in the modern world. Draconian in the extreme, they should only be allowed rate stuff to restrict by age. Still being able to ban books / films etc is police state stuff.


  • #256
    RDM_83 again
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,116 ✭✭✭RDM_83 again


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    If people fantasise about having the sh*te beaten out of them or choking someone in order get sexual gratification, then yes, they are disturbed and would be better off talking to a shrink instead of whacking off to online porn in their bedrooms.

    Why does it matter if it doesn't effect other people though :confused:
    That said there is nothing more boring and revealing than people talking about how sexually liberated they are, if you really don't care other peoples judgments shouldn't make a blind bit of difference to what you.
    Personally I think its because to get enjoyment simply out of something being tabboo or kinky you have to feel at least partly hold that view yourself, otherwise its just sex (thats not a judgment but you can't really get offended by people thinking X act is not "normal", if the reason you do it is exactly because its not vanilla)


  • #257
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Cookie_Monster wrote: »
    Regardless of it being pron or not how can they still have a censorship board in the modern world. Draconian in the extreme, they should only be allowed rate stuff to restrict by age. Still being able to ban books / films etc is police state stuff.

    well......no I'd have to disagree with you there. I'd say if there wasn't there'd be plenty of lefty,righty,tighty loonies releasing all kinds of crazy ****, hate speech, incitement to violence etc. etc.

    Although perhaps they could just be dealt with through regular judicial channels

    But that wouldn't stop it from being released in the first place.

    I think a censorship board isn't necessarily a bad thing. But it should be made up of consistently stoned arts students, snowboarders and 70's throwbacks.

    If they collectively don't think it's on then maybe it doesn't need to be released.


  • #258
    Micky Dolenz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,079 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    What's the craic with fisting? It makes no sense to me and i'm pretty fcuking odd.


  • #259
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    RDM_83 again wrote: »
    otherwise its just sex (thats not a judgment but you can't really get offended by people thinking X act is not "normal", if the reason you do it is exactly because its not vanilla)

    But what if you just do it because you like the feeling of X appendage in Y orifice or A fluid on B bodypart?

    You know, cause it feels good?

    There seem to be many fetishes out there that I think are absolutely insane or disturbed (plushies and furries WTF?) but to each their own.

    As long as I'm not disturbed by it then...woohoo, knock yourselves out, if that's what floats your boat.


  • #260
    Aongus Von Bismarck
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭Aongus Von Bismarck


    Look, I'm actually not in favour of banning anything, but I do find some of the stuff you'd see online pretty extreme. Thinking that people spending their Sunday afternoons jacking off & watching a teenager being slapped around the place isn't going to warp their minds, then you're deluded.


  • #261
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    What's the crack with fisting? It makes no sense to me and i'm pretty fcuking odd.

    apparently to some people the feeling of a wet pussy encasing their hand is highly erotic :confused:

    I tried with an apple pie but it didn't do much for me


  • Advertisement
  • #262
    Fat Christy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    What's the crack with fisting? It makes no sense to me and i'm pretty fcuking odd.

    Usually pretty stretched afterwards.


  • #263
    The Moldy Gowl
    Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    Fat Christy wrote: »
    Those who jack off to porn are now disturbed?

    I wasn't very disturbed today tbh, although yesterday the phone never quit ringing. If I stop jacking off to porn will people interrupt/disturb me less? I don't like being the disturbed especially when I'm....errrr.............umm.......:pac:

    Use a laptop ffs. Not your phone.

    Hi Christy can I use your phone there fr a second. Clicks on Internet.

    Boards and porn? They will think you are gay or something


  • #264
    Holsten
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,971 ✭✭✭Holsten


    Banning things has worked really well in the past....


  • #265
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    Holsten wrote: »
    Banning things has worked really well in the past....

    Just in this thread there have been a good few people to google fisting, I myself had to google blumpkin (:eek:)

    Any publicity....


  • #266
    Fat Christy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,866 ✭✭✭Fat Christy


    Gowlasauras Rex wrote: »
    Use a laptop ffs. Not your phone.

    Hi Christy can I use your phone there fr a second. Clicks on Internet.

    Boards and porn? They will think you are gay or something

    Yeah but I have my phone set to vibrate....


  • #267
    hatrickpatrick
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    I suspect that there are a lot of people, including those who advocated this new law, who believe that something can be "wrong" even when consensual. Personally I would suggest that such beliefs are not compatible with the free society we currently claim to be living in.


  • #268
    Micky Dolenz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,079 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    Fat Christy wrote: »
    Usually pretty stretched afterwards.


    Way to make me feel inadequate. Why the fcuk would I want that. :p


  • #269
    wexie
    Closed Accounts Posts: 7,478 ✭✭✭wexie


    hatrickpatrick wrote: »
    I suspect that there are a lot of people, including those who advocated this new law, who believe that something can be "wrong" even when consensual. Personally I would suggest that such beliefs are not compatible with the free society we currently claim to be living in.

    Just referring to sexual acts or in general?


  • #270
    Amirani
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,609 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    Aongus Von Bismarck wrote: »
    Thinking that people spending their Sunday afternoons jacking off & watching a teenager being slapped around the place isn't going to warp their minds, then you're deluded.

    Most scientific research would suggest otherwise, and it's not even particularly in doubt. Almost exclusively, there's actually a negative correlation between sexual crime and countries with easy availability and high consumption of pornography - including "violent" pornography.

    http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/comm/malamuth/pdf/00arsr11.pdf?origin=publicationDetail

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016025279190024H

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1973.tb00094.x/abstract

    http://www.christopherjferguson.com/pornography.pdf

    But as usual Aongus, you're the real expert here.


  • Advertisement
  • #271
    RDM_83 again
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,116 ✭✭✭RDM_83 again


    wexie wrote: »
    But what if you just do it because you like the feeling of X appendage in Y orifice or A fluid on B bodypart?

    You know, cause it feels good?

    There seem to be many fetishes out there that I think are absolutely insane or disturbed (plushies and furries WTF?) but to each their own.

    As long as I'm not disturbed by it then...woohoo, knock yourselves out, if that's what floats your boat.

    Do people consider anal sex or using toys a fetish/tabboo though things that actually feel different and are directly sexual.
    And lot of fetishes don't seem to actually involve that much actual fcuking :confused:
    A good example of what I meant is something like Exhibitionism, unless you hold the notion that people watching you have sex isn't "normal" on some level its just sex with no added enjoyment (and more draughts :p )

    I completely agree with the each to their own attitude though


Advertisement
Advertisement