Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread - See Mod Warning in OP, 09/11

1193194196198199333

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    The negatives of finishing outside the top 4 outweight the positives of a 2nd or 3rd place finish, by a distance too.

    On that basis, I'd take 4th if it was offered right now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,220 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    If you had the choice would you take 4th right now?

    Nah, the poor standard elsewhere suggests that if we get our shit together even just a little we should be able to easily make top four. We aren't great, but neither are the rest of the teams.

    I'd rather play the season out, and if we did find some good form who knows what could happen. I don't think we can win the title, but even just challenging will generate the type of confidence that would stand to us next season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    Nah, the poor standard elsewhere suggests that if we get our shit together even just a little we should be able to easily make top four. We aren't great, but neither are the rest of the teams.

    I'd rather play the season out, and if we did find some good form who knows what could happen. I don't think we can win the title, but even just challenging will generate the type of confidence that would stand to us next season.

    The difference this season is the fact that we actually have a functioning midfield,look at yesterday: Di Maria went off & we brought on Herrera.Last season we had TC23 and a half fit Fletcher.LVG bangs on about his "philosophy" but it's actually bearing fruit,the commentators on yesterdays match spoke of the drills before the game and how the players were now comfortable in their roles & interchanging places in systems when needed.
    77% of the ball against a team that tried it's damndest to get it back is impressive and we created chances plus we don't hear excuse of "we tried & hopefully" anymore.Confidence is growing and I can see the league levelling out after Christmas,then we should see the 'real' table as the likes of West Ham,Southampton,Newcastle etc. drop back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭Hococop


    Just saw vidic was not playing for inter today, is he injured or already fallen out of favor?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭paulbok


    I really can't see Chelsea getting caught unless on Feb 2nd, after not signing more strikers, they get a unitedesque injury crisis upfront.

    With 1/3 or the season gone, 2nd should be the aim with 3rd place 'acceptable'.
    Form is coming back, and there will hopefully be a defensive reinforcement in January. Hopefully the injuries clearing up a little, even with a half settled defense line we would be an awful lot stronger.
    Southampton have a tough run coming up and City are not as sharp as they should be.
    The December games will really tell a lot.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    Who is the rivals for third? Arsenal and Liverpool?

    Arsenal have finished 3rd twice in the last 10 years. Liverpool in the last 10 seasons have finished 2nd twice and 3rd twice, then 4,6,7,8. We beat arsenal, yet to play liverpool.

    We have a better team than the 2 of them, and we look to be clicking into place. I think 4th would be a slight disappointment, would much rather 3rd. There isnt really a difference between 3rd and 4th anyway. If we play nice football and lose out to arsenal by 2 points ill be ok with that.

    We will know a lot more in the next 10 games anyway.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,248 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Who is the rivals for third? Arsenal and Liverpool?

    Arsenal have finished 3rd twice in the last 10 years. Liverpool in the last 10 seasons have finished 2nd twice and 3rd twice, then 4,6,7,8. We beat arsenal, yet to play liverpool.

    We have a better team than the 2 of them, and we look to be clicking into place. I think 4th would be a slight disappointment, would much rather 3rd. There isnt really a difference between 3rd and 4th anyway. If we play nice football and lose out to arsenal by 2 points ill be ok with that.

    We will know a lot more in the next 10 games anyway.

    3rd qualifies for the Champions League, 4th gets into the Champions League play offs. Generally the English team qualifies, but Everton didn't in 05/06. I'd rather be safe in 3rd.

    Plus does anyone know what happens if Spurs or Everton win the Europa League? Does England get a 5th place or do the Europa League winners take the spot from the 4th place team?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,760 ✭✭✭Donnielighto


    If utd make it through the Christmas period without being stretched by injuries we should be fine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    Unbelievable time to plunder Dortmund in January


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    We did ****e last year. They do ****e this year. Only one to blame is kagawa.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 762 ✭✭✭jebus84


    Headshot wrote: »
    Unbelievable time to plunder Dortmund in January

    for who,reus is prob the only player we need,and id rather we give the young players we have a chance then spending 50 odd million on hummels and gundogan (who both injury prone),I think McNair and blackett could be great players for us for the next decade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 32,454 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    Isn't Reus injured too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,089 ✭✭✭✭Headshot


    jebus84 wrote: »
    for who,reus is prob the only player we need,and id rather we give the young players we have a chance then spending 50 odd million on hummels and gundogan (who both injury prone),I think McNair and blackett could be great players for us for the next decade.

    Hummels, subotic and Reus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,741 ✭✭✭Hococop


    Mars Bar wrote: »
    Isn't Reus injured too?

    Yep I think he is out for the season now


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25,953 ✭✭✭✭kryogen


    Hococop wrote: »
    Yep I think he is out for the season now

    Not yet, only ruled out till January (for now)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,210 ✭✭✭KH25


    Whatever happened to Gundogan? Last I heard he had a persistent back problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kstand


    I'd be very much inclined to take a risk on Reus and spend whatever it took to get him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,385 ✭✭✭Tom.D.BJJ


    Just checking the tv listings. Is the match tomorrow not on TV? BT have Leicester Liverpool.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    KH25 wrote: »
    Whatever happened to Gundogan? Last I heard he had a persistent back problem.

    Only back from injury a month or 2.

    I think he came out recently and said he had a deal tied up with Madrid before his injury problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,206 ✭✭✭Lucas Hood


    Tom.D.BJJ wrote: »
    Just checking the tv listings. Is the match tomorrow not on TV? BT have Leicester Liverpool.

    It is on tv just not Irish or Uk tv.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Montroseee


    kstand wrote: »
    I'd be very much inclined to take a risk on Reus and spend whatever it took to get him.

    Reus plays on the left though, no great need for him. Gundogan has been very poor since returning btw, would have to wait till the summer at least to see if he can regain form and stay injury free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭kstand


    Montroseee wrote: »
    Reus plays on the left though, no great need for him. Gundogan has been very poor since returning btw, would have to wait till the summer at least to see if he can regain form and stay injury free.

    I'd leave Gundugan well alone and concentrate on Strootman.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Montroseee


    kstand wrote: »
    I'd leave Gundugan well alone and concentrate on Strootman.

    I'd agree with that sentiment. Once there is another CB or RB purchased in Jan I'll be happy, even just as a short term option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    kstand wrote: »
    I'd leave Gundugan well alone and concentrate on Strootman.

    with Fellaini, Blind and Carrick in the mix, would we actually need Strootman at the moment? if we were signing a midfielder, wed need somebody with a completely different skillset to the above 3 and i am not sure if Strootman gives that. also not a good idea to be bringing a player just coming back from injury into our squad right now.

    two top class defenders are top priority and dare i say, unless Falcao turns good, another striker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,699 ✭✭✭advertsfox


    All goals against Hull from my new favourite video taker :)

    http://vimeo.com/113197855


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,181 ✭✭✭Crimson King


    two top class defenders are top priority and dare i say, unless Falcao turns good, another striker.

    Anyone else impressed with his movement when he came on on Saturday? However brief it was, I thought it was a joy to watch and looking forward to seeing him hopefully have a decent injury free run. the man was class and hopefully can prove he still is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,220 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    with Fellaini, Blind and Carrick in the mix, would we actually need Strootman at the moment?

    Yes. We would.

    Lets not settle for the likes of Blind and Felliani, thats the type of thinking that left us in this mess in the first place. They are playing well? Great, but lets still try to improve on them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    Yes. We would.

    Lets not settle for the likes of Blind and Felliani, thats the type of thinking that left us in this mess in the first place. They are playing well? Great, but lets still try to improve on them.

    Definitely. From what I've seen of Strootman he is a level above Blind and Fellaini.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,889 ✭✭✭✭The Moldy Gowl


    Blind and Fellaini are great squad players. The players than can keep a squad together to win a league. Much better than tc23 and ando.

    We could do with buying someone like strootman to replace carrick. No point in settling on blind and Fellaini just because they are doing better than the old crowd.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 35,339 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    You can't have 22 world class players.

    A Strootman would be a very welcome addition though.

    Carrick return has been welcome.

    Thought he was v good against Arsenal.

    EVENFLOW



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement