Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Gameweek 11 transfers

1235721

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,244 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    Surprised that FPL players are impetuous creatures with short memories :p

    I rid myself of Costa two weeks ago and it's worked well so far. The intention was to bring him straight back but the codespeak coming from Mourinho has put enough doubt in me to think that he could be a risky proposition for his price. He was taken off yesterday with the game in the melting pot, Remy is certainly worthy of game time, I wouldn't consider it a significantly weaker Chelsea team when Costa is rested for Remy anyway.

    He was taken off when Chelsea went 2-1 ahead so not sure I'd agree the game was in the "melting pot". Hazard had scored in the 75th minute and Costa came off in the 78th. It's quite natural when you have a lead in a tough game with 12 mins left to put on a slightly more defensive minded player.

    Considering its Costa's first game for Chelsea since 5th October, I'd also be of the opposite opinion to you in that I'd see it as a huge plus that he got 78 minutes.

    Watching the highlights on MoTD, he appears to have played well. He assisted the assister for the first goal and also gave Oscar a decent back heel where he could have scored.

    He put a decent cross into the box that Ivan I think it was should have scored from as well. Not to mention he made a run in the second half where Hazard could have slipped him in but made a poor pass to William instead.

    The MoTD commentator stated that he had a great first half but tired in the second which is natural given he was in hospital last week apparently.

    Given Chelsea didn't play that well to create many chances, I'm delighted as an owner of him that he was as involved as he was and I certainly wouldn't ship him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,748 ✭✭✭Swiper the fox


    Lemlin wrote: »
    He was taken off when Chelsea went 2-1 ahead so not sure I'd agree the game was in the "melting pot". Hazard had scored in the 75th minute and Costa came off in the 78th. It's quite natural when you have a lead in a tough game with 12 mins left to put on a slightly more defensive minded player.

    Considering its Costa's first game for Chelsea since 5th October, I'd also be of the opposite opinion to you in that I'd see it as a huge plus that he got 78 minutes.

    Watching the highlights on MoTD, he appears to have played well. He assisted the assister for the first goal and also gave Oscar a decent back heel where he could have scored.

    He put a decent cross into the box that Ivan I think it was should have scored from as well. Not to mention he made a run in the second half where Hazard could have slipped him in but made a poor pass to William instead.

    The MoTD commentator stated that he had a great first half but tired in the second which is natural given he was in hospital last week apparently.

    Given Chelsea didn't play that well to create many chances, I'm delighted as an owner of him that he was as involved as he was and I certainly wouldn't ship him.

    I thought he had a great game yesterday to be fair, his lay off for Oscar in the first half was something you'd never expect from a big man. One thing noticed is that Fabregas and him seemed to be trying to recreate the goal against Arsenal at every opportunity and it resulted in a swift end to the attacking move.
    I've been fierce impressed with Costa but that doubt surrounds him and with Aguero, Pelle and Wellbeck(yes I know) I'm content with my front three right now and it allows me to have Hazard, Alexis and Baines


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,268 ✭✭✭IsMiseMyself


    Keeping Costa. Eternal optimism re: that fella. Probably will come back to haunt me, as it has done the last three weeks but oh well. :pac:

    Bought Sanchez and Wanyama in last night. Wanyama is a bit unfortunate, but he's only temporary till the next gameweek. Hate making transfers so early but they were both rising and I only had .1 in the bank. Let's hope Sanchez doesn't keel over on Tuesday night or anything like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1 rcorbett91


    Opinions on this team for next week??

    Forster (Hamer)
    Baines Chambers Dummett (Hutton Yun)
    Sanchez Fabregas Downing Diame (Siggy)
    Aguero Costa Pelle

    Siggy on bench for one week only, then probably will downgrade Diame to improve defence


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    Right, I've looked at this from every angle and I'm struggling to get Sanchez in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    In this screenshot, Sanchez has replaced Sterling. The ideal would be to have that front seven. Sterling's drop in value last night didn't effect me because of the price I got him at, but I'm at a 0.1 disadvantage with Sanchez' rise.

    Anybody seeing anything I'm not seeing? I'm contemplating forgetting Sanchez and waiting for Walcott to return, but I need to do Sterling -> somebody in the meantime.

    7SU9i9.png


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,915 ✭✭✭✭menoscemo


    I can't believe people kept Costa all the way through his injury, only to sell him after his first game back. Makes absolutely no sense.

    I am actually planning on getting Costa back into my team as I think he is a season keeper once fit. I'll wait until Friday though because by the looks of things his price will drop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,505 ✭✭✭✭km79


    menoscemo wrote: »
    I can't believe people kept Costa all the way through his injury, only to sell him after his first game back. Makes absolutely no sense.

    I am actually planning on getting Costa back into my team as I think he is a season keeper once fit. I'll wait until Friday though because by the looks of things his price will drop.

    his price went up to 10.9 Friday night and he is halfway towards another rise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,766 ✭✭✭RossieMan


    Right, I've looked at this from every angle and I'm struggling to get Sanchez in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    In this screenshot, Sanchez has replaced Sterling. The ideal would be to have that front seven. Sterling's drop in value last night didn't effect me because of the price I got him at, but I'm at a 0.1 disadvantage with Sanchez' rise.

    Anybody seeing anything I'm not seeing? I'm contemplating forgetting Sanchez and waiting for Walcott to return, but I need to do Sterling -> somebody in the meantime.

    What you're trying to do is practically impossible.
    You can't get 3 10+ midfielders and 2 10+ strikers in the same team and still have a decent defence.

    I'd take Di Maria out for Sanchez. Much better potential value there i feel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,505 ✭✭✭✭km79


    RossieMan wrote: »
    What you're trying to do is practically impossible.
    You can't get 3 10+ midfielders and 2 10+ strikers in the same team and still have a decent defence.

    I'd take Di Maria out for Sanchez. Much better potential value there i feel.

    after this weekend united have 3 home games in 4 vs palace hull and Stoke
    whilst being chronic at the back united are very good going forward especially at home
    I'm delighted to see so many selling di maria
    I'll probably captain him next week


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,158 ✭✭✭✭hufpc8w3adnk65


    Sterling is playing crap. I also have tiote in midfield too get rid of! Who would people recigmend? I've 2 free transfers. I have tadic adm and schniderlin already. I've .7 in the bank.Sanchez and downing are the obvious choices but can't bank roll it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,589 ✭✭✭✭Necronomicon


    RossieMan wrote: »
    What you're trying to do is practically impossible.
    You can't get 3 10+ midfielders and 2 10+ strikers in the same team and still have a decent defence.

    Yeah, that's the conclusion I've been coming to.
    RossieMan wrote: »
    I'd take Di Maria out for Sanchez. Much better potential value there i feel.

    I'd be drawn more to this move if it wasn't for the respective fixtures next week; I'd be worried about removing ADM before Palace at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,766 ✭✭✭RossieMan


    United haven't been scoring heavily though, i still don't see them as high scoring games.
    They could easily lose a couple of those thats how poor their defence currently is.

    Its very hard to have 3 midfielders in your team. I've Haz, Fab and Sanchez in mine. But don't have Costa up front.

    Have Aguero, Pelle and Berahino and am relatively happy. definitely looking at ways of getting Costa back though.

    Siggy is decent value to get rid of now, can see him dropping back a few points soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭bored_newbie


    Right, I've looked at this from every angle and I'm struggling to get Sanchez in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    In this screenshot, Sanchez has replaced Sterling. The ideal would be to have that front seven. Sterling's drop in value last night didn't effect me because of the price I got him at, but I'm at a 0.1 disadvantage with Sanchez' rise.

    Anybody seeing anything I'm not seeing? I'm contemplating forgetting Sanchez and waiting for Walcott to return, but I need to do Sterling -> somebody in the meantime.

    7SU9i9.png

    I'd be tempted to swap Pelle for someone like Sakho as Southampton's fixtures will turn soon. If you want Sanchez badly enough that is...but you could probably still afford it next week for a free.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,158 ✭✭✭✭hufpc8w3adnk65


    I'd be tempted to swap Pelle for someone like Sakho as Southampton's fixtures will turn soon. If you want Sanchez badly enough that is...but you could probably still afford it next week for a free.

    No matter if the fixtures turn or not I can see pelle scoring all season!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 837 ✭✭✭bored_newbie


    MrMac84 wrote: »
    No matter if the fixtures turn or not I can see pelle scoring all season!



    Yeah I can too. I think Sakho/Berahino will score a good few over the season too so it's all about picking the players you don't want to do without and scrimping on a few positions so you can get them, right?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,081 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    I'm struggling to get XXXXXX in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    That's pretty much the name of the game at present.
    It's a balancing act, the one thing in favour of Sanchez is that he'll probably net you a 0.5 rise/0.2 profit or 0.6rise/0.3profit (for anyone who got him
    Yesterday) over this week and the international break. Providing he has any sort of return next weekend and stays injury free.

    I've said I'll go to Walcott but I'm going to wait till his (AS) returns drop and people start to make the move. Becoming more risk adverse. Can't push my luck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,244 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    Right, I've looked at this from every angle and I'm struggling to get Sanchez in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    In this screenshot, Sanchez has replaced Sterling. The ideal would be to have that front seven. Sterling's drop in value last night didn't effect me because of the price I got him at, but I'm at a 0.1 disadvantage with Sanchez' rise.

    Anybody seeing anything I'm not seeing? I'm contemplating forgetting Sanchez and waiting for Walcott to return, but I need to do Sterling -> somebody in the meantime.

    7SU9i9.png

    I have nearly that exact team but must have got players in earlier than you. Only difference is I have Dummett to your Clyne and Marney as cheap mid. I have 0.1 banked.

    Forster Elliott
    Dummett Chambers Moore Wisdom Naylor
    Di Maria Fab Sanchez Siggy Marney
    Costa Aguero Pelle

    The defence is weak alright but 4 of that five and Forster returned clean sheets yesterday! One even got 18 points!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    Dónal wrote: »
    Held off yesterday because I wanted to see what happened today. Will probably do a panic switch today of di maria and Ramsey to Sanchez and eriksen for a 4 pointer. Any other combo would be an 8 point hit. Struggling to fit in di maria otherwise.

    Yeah that's the thing. To have both ADM & Sanchez requires in most cases an 8 pointer.
    That said can't you downgrade a def to allow Ramsey -> Sanchez? I don't know how much you have in bank though...

    Lemlin wrote: »
    He put a decent cross into the box that Ivan I think it was should have scored from as well.
    Ah you! Stop rubbing salt into my wounds :pac:! That scenario would have just 1.5ed my overall score :rolleyes:...
    rcorbett91 wrote: »
    Opinions on this team for next week??

    Forster (Hamer)
    Baines Chambers Dummett (Hutton Yun)
    Sanchez Fabregas Downing Diame (Siggy)
    Aguero Costa Pelle

    Siggy on bench for one week only, then probably will downgrade Diame to improve defence

    Downing + Diamé + Siggy is midpriced MF overkill IMO. How much you have in bank? You said you wish to downgrade Diamé, can you upgrade Siggy in the meantime (to Eriksen for example)?
    RossieMan wrote: »
    Right, I've looked at this from every angle and I'm struggling to get Sanchez in without compromising other areas more than I'd be happy with.

    In this screenshot, Sanchez has replaced Sterling. The ideal would be to have that front seven. Sterling's drop in value last night didn't effect me because of the price I got him at, but I'm at a 0.1 disadvantage with Sanchez' rise.

    Anybody seeing anything I'm not seeing? I'm contemplating forgetting Sanchez and waiting for Walcott to return, but I need to do Sterling -> somebody in the meantime.

    7SU9i9.png

    What you're trying to do is practically impossible.
    You can't get 3 10+ midfielders and 2 10+ strikers in the same team and still have a decent defence.

    I'd take Di Maria out for Sanchez. Much better potential value there i feel.

    Yeah I was in a similar boat and decided to get rid of ADM. I have a masterplan to get him back for GW13 (so that I only miss his home clash vs Palace).

    As RossieMan said it's otherwise almost impossible to get your desired team. Or...
    1. Downgrade Pellè to either Berahino/Sakho/Austin (they are all facing reasonably favourable runs of fixtures).

    2. Downgrade Siggy to Downing (again good fixtures ahead and on form - to phrase it differently he's scored as well as Hazard over 10 GWs -) and Clyne to a £4.2m def (if my maths are correct), Southampton fixtures will get tougher and you'll be covered by Forster anyway while Burnley, QPR, AV, WH, Newcastle are ahead of a more favourable run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭SpaceCowb0y


    Lemlin wrote: »
    I have nearly that exact team but must have got players in earlier than you. Only difference is I have Dummett to your Clyne and Marney as cheap mid. I have 0.1 banked.

    Forster Elliott
    Dummett Chambers Moore Wisdom Naylor
    Di Maria Fab Sanchez Siggy Marney
    Costa Aguero Pelle

    The defence is weak alright but 4 of that five and Forster returned clean sheets yesterday! One even got 18 points!

    When did you get Sanchez in? I can't afford to do a straight swap of Sterling to Sanchez! I was thinking of it last week but the only way i can do it is to transfer ADM out now! Still need to shift Sterling too so i reckon it could be downing in for the short term anyway!

    ADM --> Sanchez
    Sterling --> Downing!


    Need to shift Sigurdsson next week!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    When did you get Sanchez in? I can't afford to do a straight swap of Sterling to Sanchez! I was thinking of it last week but the only way i can do it is to transfer ADM out now! Still need to shift Sterling too so i reckon it could be downing in for the short term anyway!

    ADM --> Sanchez
    Sterling --> Downing!


    Need to shift Sigurdsson next week!

    What about your defense? No cash can be saved there?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,244 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    When did you get Sanchez in? I can't afford to do a straight swap of Sterling to Sanchez! I was thinking of it last week but the only way i can do it is to transfer ADM out now! Still need to shift Sterling too so i reckon it could be downing in for the short term anyway!

    ADM --> Sanchez
    Sterling --> Downing!


    Need to shift Sigurdsson next week!

    Last night. Took a -4. Kaboul and Sterling out for Sanchez and Dummett. It's risky but I couldn't wait with price rises.

    I would have preferred to do Siggy to Downing rather than Kaboul to Dummett but that left me 0.2 short for Sterling to Sanchez.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭SpaceCowb0y


    iroced wrote: »
    What about your defense? No cash can be saved there?

    Not really i've gone the budget route for the best part of the season

    Kaboul -- Wisdom -- Taylor -- Chambers -- Duff


    Kaboul tops the list at 5mil:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,244 ✭✭✭✭Lemlin


    Not really i've gone the budget route for the best part of the season

    Kaboul -- Wisdom -- Taylor -- Chambers -- Duff


    Kaboul tops the list at 5mil:rolleyes:

    I used him to free up a mil!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    Lemlin wrote: »
    Kaboul tops the list at 5milrolleyes.png
    I used him to free up a mil!

    That's what I was going to say. Is this £1m enough to allow Sterling -> Sanchez?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭SpaceCowb0y


    Lemlin wrote: »
    Last night. Took a -4. Kaboul and Sterling out for Sanchez and Dummett. It's risky but I couldn't wait with price rises.

    I would have preferred to do Siggy to Downing rather than Kaboul to Dummett but that left me 0.2 short for Sterling to Sanchez.
    Lemlin wrote: »
    I used him to free up a mil!


    you must have made a bit more to play with than myself so far then, I'd still be .3 short with that move! Fuck it anyway!

    I can do a straight swap of ADM to Sanchez but Sterling needs to go too anyway before he starts hemorrhaging price hits and Downing seems in form! Hopefully ADM has a few blanks the next couple of weeks to justify it as I'm terrified dropping him!



    The only other option i have is to downgrade Sigurdsson to Jedinak but i feel i'd be almost playing a 3-3-3 formation most weeks with him on the pitch

    I guess it boils down to what's stronger

    A) Fab -- Sanchez -- Sigurdsson -- Downing

    B) Fab -- ADM -- Sanchez -- Jedinak


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭iroced


    you must have made a bit more to play with than myself so far then, I'd still be .3 short with that move! Fuck it anyway!

    I can do a straight swap of ADM to Sanchez but Sterling needs to go too anyway before he starts hemorrhaging price hits and Downing seems in form! Hopefully ADM has a few blanks the next couple of weeks to justify it as I'm terrified dropping him!

    Don't want to force you into taking hits (actually don't know how many FTs you have this week) but
    Sterling -> Sanchez
    Siggy -> Downing
    Kaboul -> e.g. Dummett
    with still £0.3m in the bank if my maths are correct.
    would allow you to keep ADM ;).

    - edit -

    Just saw your edit. Yeah Jedinak could make it work. I'd rate Downing more though and think over the next 3 games should pay back comfortably the 4 pts shift between the 2 options.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭SpaceCowb0y


    iroced wrote: »
    Don't want to force you into taking hits (actually don't know how many FTs you have this week) but
    Sterling -> Sanchez
    Siggy -> Downing
    Kaboul -> e.g. Dummett
    with still £0.3m in the bank if my maths are correct.
    would allow you to keep ADM ;).

    HA i literally just looked at that move before you posted! And your maths are spot on!

    Definitely looks better, 8 point hit though!

    Have only taken a hit once so far this season! It was also an 8 point hit and i scored 70ish that week i think!

    Maybe ill just do it! i was contemplating an 8 point hit last week bringing Chambers, Sanchez and Diame in but bottled it and just borought Chambers in.

    Maybe I'll just man up and take this hit this week!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Gone for:

    Sterling -> Sanchez
    Pelle -> Austin

    Taking my first -4 of the season.

    I didn't really want to get rid of Baines from a defensive standpoint and I didn't want to get rid of Costa either. That left Pelle as the one to go.

    I've had to do it a couple of weeks earlier than I'd like, but my hand was forced.

    I'm under no illusions that Pelle will probably score better, but I'm hoping that Austin's upcoming fixtures will mean the difference isn't too much. I also think Sanchez + Austin will outscore Pelle + Sterling and thus, my move has been made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,553 ✭✭✭✭Copper_pipe


    ShaneU wrote: »
    Can't really do it without dropping a forward, di maria or hazard, which I wouldn't do.

    Suppose you could drop Jagielka and Betrand to 4.2's and Sigurdson to a 5 and Tadic to Sanchez, not worth it.
    I would do Costa to Berahino or Sakho and Siggy to Sanchez but I can understand why people are reluctant to get rid of Diego
    Ace2007 wrote: »
    Siggy, Tadic and Jag out for Sanchez, steven taylor (Newcastle) which leaves you with 5.3 - so can get in the likes of Jedinak, Milner, shevley, Zaha - lots of different levels of players

    or take out Pieters instead of jag which leaves you with 4.6 for Wanyama

    Taylor is 3.9 - and newcastle have kept 2 cleans sheets in last 3 games he's played, and are winning, so can't see him being dropped.


    Im very tempted to go ahead with this

    Tadic > Wanyama
    Siggy > Sanchez
    Jagielka > Dummett

    Clyne to Dummett would probably be better though
    5d382ae66bf689c75832766cf1138f26.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,029 ✭✭✭✭Ace2007


    Im very tempted to go ahead with this

    Tadic > Wanyama
    Siggy > Sanchez
    Jagielka > Dummett

    Clyne to Dummett would probably be better though
    5d382ae66bf689c75832766cf1138f26.png

    I suggested pietes as Stoke defensively haven't been great whereas Everton have two clean sheets in three games and jag got bonus points


Advertisement