Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/
Trivial things that annoy you Part 43
Comments
-
Annoyed at the amount of knowledge the guys on here have in relation to ladies undergarments:( Can we have any privacy about how we enhance our bits..at least pretend we are fooling ye:D
Reminded of the trivially annoying inverse relationship between underwear that makes you look good, and looking good in underwear
In a perfect world, we'd wear hold up, hold in, shift it here, shift it there a little pants that are so high up and low down they'd make a chastity belt envious.... in order to seduce the target and then once target is seduced....suddenly have magicked ourselves out of the industrial strength underwear to a simple g-string with no more than 2 square inches to call it's own... Logistical nightmare 0 -
But then on the other hand ONW if the targets were attracted to our personalities rather than physical attributes as so many claim to be it shouldnt matter if theres a harness under that figure hugging outfit...Id say a lot of them have been unpleasantly surprised on a few occasions lol cant say I have any pity for them though:DOldNotWIse wrote: »Reminded of the trivially annoying inverse relationship between underwear that makes you look good, and looking good in underwear In a perfect world, we'd wear hold up, hold in, shift it here, shift it there a little pants that are so high up and low down they'd make a chastity belt envious.... in order to seduce the target and then once target is seduced....suddenly have magicked ourselves out of the industrial strength underwear to a simple g-string with no more than 2 square inches to call it's own... Logistical nightmare 0 -
OldNotWIse wrote: »Reminded of the trivially annoying inverse relationship between underwear that makes you look good, and looking good in underwear In a perfect world, we'd wear hold up, hold in, shift it here, shift it there a little pants that are so high up and low down they'd make a chastity belt envious.... in order to seduce the target and then once target is seduced....suddenly have magicked ourselves out of the industrial strength underwear to a simple g-string with no more than 2 square inches to call it's own... Logistical nightmare
Mmm. Ye Olde Conflicting Requirements. By Jove ONW, you've hit on the variable valve-timing of women's undies! :pac::pac::pac:0 -
OldNotWIse wrote: »Reminded of the trivially annoying inverse relationship between underwear that makes you look good, and looking good in underwear In a perfect world, we'd wear hold up, hold in, shift it here, shift it there a little pants that are so high up and low down they'd make a chastity belt envious.... in order to seduce the target and then once target is seduced....suddenly have magicked ourselves out of the industrial strength underwear to a simple g-string with no more than 2 square inches to call it's own... Logistical nightmare
But at least you ladies have these "tools" at your disposal....what about us?
Miracle Y fronts perhaps? Something to "pump up the volume" so to speak:D0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
eisenberg1 wrote: »But at least you ladies have these "tools" at your disposal....what about us?
Miracle Y fronts perhaps? Something to "pump up the volume" so to speak:D
Well...we might as well all cheat!
0 -
eisenberg1 wrote: »But at least you ladies have these "tools" at your disposal....what about us?
Miracle Y fronts perhaps? Something to "pump up the volume" so to speak:D
Speak for yourself, bah. I have a mickey on me like a tower crane operator's Thermos. 0 -
But then on the other hand ONW if the targets were attracted to our personalities rather than physical attributes as so many claim to be it shouldnt matter if theres a harness under that figure hugging outfit...Id say a lot of them have been unpleasantly surprised on a few occasions lol cant say I have any pity for them though:D
Indeed. You can't shag a personality.
0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
OldNotWIse wrote: »Not a TA but I love the way even grownups never lose the joy of sitting at the back of the class sniggering because someone said willy
<FNORT>0 -
Jaysus :eek:just seen on FB that theres an event taking place this weekend in a hotel not far from me that might suit who ever is willing to do the pre mentioned research of ladies smalls...any of the lads going to swing down there 0
-
Jaysus :eek:just seen on FB that theres an event taking place this weekend in a hotel not far from me that might suit who ever is willing to do the pre mentioned research of ladies smalls...any of the lads going to swing down there
<Locks-and-loads scissors and digital strain-gauge> Soldiers deserve soldiers, SIR!! 0 -
Jaysus :eek:just seen on FB that theres an event taking place this weekend in a hotel not far from me that might suit who ever is willing to do the pre mentioned research of ladies smalls...any of the lads going to swing down there
Having cards printed as we speak..
Mr Eisenberg, of Breast R Us,
Experts in Boobage enhancement,
And arse measurer to the stars0 -
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement