Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 2014 - Mod Note in OP, 1/09

1279280282284285334

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    If I said manager has been appalling, is that better? :confused:

    You're really just arguing semantics here for no reason

    I think some of the criticism levelled at the manager is unwarranted.

    We were playing pretty poorly at this stage last season too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,134 ✭✭✭NabyLadistheman


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Apparently he stayed behind this week for extra training & tactical instructions.

    Really think some fans & Rodgers trying to make him a scapegoat.

    "Was he playing centre half?” or words to this effect were what Rodgers said this week after the Madrid match. It's easy for you to state certain things and forget others just to fit your anti-Rodgers propaganda. Rodgers has publicly slated his defence and said they need to do better. I don't see how this is making Ballotelli the scapegoat?

    Balotelli by your own admission was a disgrace last weekend. His lack of effort & attitiude on Wednesday were poor as well. If Ballotelli is a scapegoat it's his own doing. Every 'top' forward is in line for criticism especially someone as controversial as Ballotelli.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,315 ✭✭✭Soft Falling Rain


    I just read an excerpt of Aguero's book in The Mirror on Balotelli, brilliant stuff! He's off his box (Mario that is).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,645 ✭✭✭RollieFingers


    "Was he playing centre half?” or words to this effect were what Rodgers said this week after the Madrid match. It's easy for you to state certain things and forget others just to fit your anti-Rodgers propaganda. Rodgers has publicly slated his defence and said they need to do better. I don't see how this is making Ballotelli the scapegoat?

    Balotelli by your own admission was a disgrace last weekend. His lack of effort & attitiude on Wednesday were poor as well. If Ballotelli is a scapegoat it's his own doing. Every 'top' forward is in line for criticism especially someone as controversial as Ballotelli.

    Now don't get me wrong, the level of the performance from Ballo against was Madrid was still nowhere near the required level, but I actually thought it was his best 45 mins for us yet! He was linking up with Sterling well, nice ball in for Allen etc. It seemed he was trying more to play a team role!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    We are definitely going to lose today, I can feel it. And the bad streams will make it ten times worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    I think some of the criticism levelled at the manager is unwarranted.

    We were playing pretty poorly at this stage last season too

    Quite frankly considering performances this season & the fact there is no sign;

    1) the manager is actually addressing the issues we're having

    2) that we're improving in any way

    ...Rodgers is probably deserving of more criticism than he has gotten to date.

    The fact you think the relatively limited criticism he has gotten has been unwarranted is borderline embarrassing.
    "Was he playing centre half?” or words to this effect were what Rodgers said this week after the Madrid match. It's easy for you to state certain things and forget others just to fit your anti-Rodgers propaganda. Rodgers has publicly slated his defence and said they need to do better. I don't see how this is making Ballotelli the scapegoat?

    Balotelli by your own admission was a disgrace last weekend. His lack of effort & attitiude on Wednesday were poor as well. If Ballotelli is a scapegoat it's his own doing. Every 'top' forward is in line for criticism especially someone as controversial as Ballotelli.

    Have you seen Rodgers comments to the media about Ballotelli's signing? You seen anything similar from him about Lovren or Sakho?

    I presume you're aware yesterday that he scoffed at the notion of bringing in a defensive coach saying it wasn't needed, all that was required was some coaching but that he didn't have the time with CL commitments :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    We are definitely going to lose today, I can feel it. And the bad streams will make it ten times worse.

    It will be ok, we lost against Hull last season.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    It will be ok, we lost against Hull last season.

    Not at home we didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Quite frankly considering performances this season & the fact there is no sign;

    1) the manager is actually addressing the issues we're having

    2) that we're improving in any way

    ...Rodgers is probably deserving of more criticism than he has gotten to date.

    The fact you think the relatively limited criticism he has gotten has been unwarranted is borderline embarrassing.

    We are going through a very ropey patch of form. That kind of thing happens in football. All our rivals (United, Spurs, Everton, Arsenal) are going through the same or worse.

    You have to accept that the number of new signings we have made will mean that it will probably take time to click.

    That doesn't excuse our defensive frailties, but our biggest problems this season have been at the other end of the pitch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,022 ✭✭✭✭Iused2likebusts


    Tactically it's not happening and Rodgers has to take it on the chin. He'll turn it around though, I'm sure of that.

    The players as a unit are not playing the same intensity and aggressiveness as last season. Maybe it's down to confidence but I'll say this; Stevie G and Johnson laughing and joking with Ronaldo at 1-0 really pissed me off, and it makes me think they all just need a kick up in the hole. Dropping some heads would be a start.

    Stevie g and Johnson laughing and joking is a non event it means nothing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 ✭✭✭✭Grayditch


    1-0, or 2-1 Hull.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    That doesn't excuse our defensive frailties, but our biggest problems this season have been at the other end of the pitch.

    Just to clarify, you don't think our defence has been our biggest issue this year? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    Just to clarify, you don't think our defence has been our biggest issue this year? :confused:

    Our attack has been at least as bad and has cost us at least as many points, probably more. Given how bad our defense has been, that's saying something.

    There is massive room for improvement in all areas of the pitch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    Our attack has been at least as bad and has cost us at least as many points, probably more. Given how bad our defense has been, that's saying something.

    There is massive room for improvement in all areas of the pitch.

    This is like how last season you were convinced the defence was fine & it was more fire power that was needed :rolleyes:

    Needless to say, you were wrong then & you're wrong now. Getting our defence right needs to be a priority.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Not at home we didn't.

    But our other fixtures or results haven't corresponded with last season, yet everything is going to be ok because we were supposedly still playing bad at this point last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    This is like how last season you were convinced the defence was fine & it was more fire power that was needed :rolleyes:

    Needless to say, you were wrong then & you're wrong now. Getting our defence right needs to be a priority.

    How was I wrong?

    I said last season and I say now that scoring goals, and lots of goals is the one surefire way to finish in the top places in the league. It's an approach that United used successfully for years, its an approach we used last season. Attack is more important than defense in my opinion.

    Having said that, I don't think the defense is fine and I doubt I said that last season either. Rodgers has to get the defense right with the personnel he has though, so I wouldn't be buying new defenders in January or anything like that. Lovren and Sakho are good defenders and if he can't create a functioning (not necessarily a great defense, just a functioning one) defense out of them then you'd wonder if he ever will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    But our other fixtures or results haven't corresponded with last season, yet everything is going to be ok because we were supposedly still playing bad at this point last year.

    When did I say everything was fine?

    Though we actually had a very friendly start to the season last year and it's been a little harder this year.

    Do you think we were playing well at this time last season? Do you not agree there have been numerous times under Rodgers were we have looked like a very ordinary team, often for stretches of games. We have come through them before and there is no reason to think we won't this time. I think last season created an expectation (performance-wise) that we are going to struggle to meet. I think we need to take a look at our circumstances, look at the teams around us and realise that things aren't that bad, even though we do have big problems in certain areas of the team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,048 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Our attack has been at least as bad and has cost us at least as many points, probably more. Given how bad our defense has been, that's saying something.

    There is massive room for improvement in all areas of the pitch.

    That's nonsense, if our attack doesn't function and our defence does its job the worst we can do is get a nil all draw. If our defence doesn't work then we have West Ham, Villa, Madrid, QPR...

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,329 ✭✭✭wcarey1975


    That's nonsense, if our attack doesn't function and our defence does its job the worst we can do is get a nil all draw. If our defence doesn't work then we have West Ham, Villa, Madrid, QPR...

    The problem with that scenario is that the defence can play perfectly for 90-92 minutes but play bad for 1 minute and lose the game 1-0. Whereas the opposite is true with the attack. Ideally fix both at the same time or at least fix the attack and work on damage limitation for the defence whilst working a solution.

    W


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    How was I wrong?

    You were wrong because our defence cost us the league title last year. Our goal scoring was fine, but a lack of solidity at the back undid us in the end.
    I said last season and I say now that scoring goals, and lots of goals is the one surefire way to finish in the top places in the league. It's an approach that United used successfully for years, its an approach we used last season. Attack is more important than defense in my opinion.

    Utd's league success has been built of solid foundations. Solid defences. Solid midfields. Ferguson & everyone involved at Utd over the years have said as much. Goals win games, defences win titles is his regular catchphrase I believe.

    Attack being more important than defence is your opinion solely because goals are the glamorous part of the game & you're fickle like that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    That's nonsense, if our attack doesn't function and our defence does its job the worst we can do is get a nil all draw. If our defence doesn't work then we have West Ham, Villa, Madrid, QPR...

    If our attack does work then those draws and defeats are turned into wins, even if we concede

    3 points for a win vs 1 point for a draw. It's much more important to attack well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    If our attack does work then those draws and defeats are turned into wins, even if we concede

    3 points for a win vs 1 point for a draw. It's much more important to attack well

    Both are important. But for 2 years our defence has been shambolic & throughout that time you've said our focus should be on getting more from our attack. Silliness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    You were wrong because our defence cost us the league title last year. Our goal scoring was fine, but a lack of solidity at the back undid us in the end.



    Utd's league success has been built of solid foundations. Solid defences. Solid midfields. Ferguson & everyone involved at Utd over the years have said as much. Goals win games, defences win titles is his regular catchphrase I believe.

    Attack being more important than defence is your opinion solely because goals are the glamorous part of the game & you're fickle like that.

    Our defense did not cost us the league title. A slip from Gerrard in a game we had utterly controlled followed by our inability to score cost us the league. Amazing that line is still being trotted out.

    Regarding United, in the early fergie days yes, but United haven't had a midfield for a decade and they've not always had a defense. They have however always been willing to risk one point to earn three and more often than not that approach paid off

    As for your last paragraph, lol.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,144 ✭✭✭DVDM93




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,645 ✭✭✭RollieFingers


    Our defense did not cost us the league title. A slip from Gerrard in a game we had utterly controlled followed by our inability to score cost us the league. Amazing that line is still being trotted out.

    Regarding United, in the early fergie days yes, but United haven't had a midfield for a decade and they've not always had a defense. They have however always been willing to risk one point to earn three and more often than not that approach paid off

    As for your last paragraph, lol.

    Very harsh to say Gerrard cost us the title! What about Kolo's brain fart against WBA? Hendo's red card against City? The loss to Hull? To blame one individual for costing us the league is wrong!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Very harsh to say Gerrard cost us the title! What about Kolo's brain fart against WBA? Hendo's red card against City? The loss to Hull? To blame one individual for costing us the league is wrong!

    Not blaming Gerrard. He was one of our best players last season and proved a lot of people, myself included, wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,073 ✭✭✭Devilman40k


    Our defense did not cost us the league title. A slip from Gerrard in a game we had utterly controlled followed by our inability to score cost us the league. Amazing that line is still being trotted out.

    Sorry but no.... 1 incident did not cost the title

    If that's the case

    Mignolet v Man City,Kolo v WBA, the team v Hull , Rodgers 1st half tactical naivety v Villa. Those last 10 mins v Palace

    should all be pointed to

    If the defence that leaked 50 goals last season had held in those games the Chelsea result would not have mattered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Sorry but no.... 1 incident did not cost the title

    If that's the case

    Mignolet v Man City,Kolo v WBA, the team v Hull , Rodgers 1st half tactical naivety v Villa. Those last 10 mins v Palace

    should all be pointed to

    If the defence that leaked 50 goals last season had held in those games the Chelsea result would not have mattered

    Losing to Chelsea cost us the league, end of story. It was in our hands and within our grasp


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Losing to Chelsea cost us the league, end of story. It was in our hands and within our grasp

    Rodgers tactical naivety has to be called into question in that game big time along with plenty of other games.

    Then you can look at Gerrards slip the sloppy defending etc etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Rodgers tactical naivety has to be called into question in that game big time along with plenty of other games.

    Then you can look at Gerrards slip the sloppy defending etc etc.

    Not really sure how we could have played that game differently to be honest. We weren't gung ho and I think sitting back and inviting pressure would have been asking for trouble


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement