Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland in WW2....

135

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Ah come on, if we're talking WWII heroes, Paddy Finucane deserves a mention. They were selling shamrock covered models of his spitfire in London.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    Mostly agree
    Beyond me how it's "really embarrassing" tbh though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Ah come on, if we're talking WWII heroes, Paddy Finucane deserves a mention. They were selling shamrock covered models of his spitfire in London.

    Indeed, and he admonished his ground crew for painting victory swastikas on his aircraft.

    He was a wing commander at 21 - not bad for an O'Connell's boy. If he'd gone to Scoil Mhuire, he'd have won the war on his own :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 188 ✭✭IrishProd


    Good essay here about Ireland and WW2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    You also had David Lord - nearly 70 years since he was awarded Transport Command's only VC at Arnhem.

    .....and Eugene Esmonde, RN - and a distant relative of my wife.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    [
    I think Ireland did well by avoiding another European fratricide. There was little the newborn country could offer in the way of support either and there was virtually no way the Irish could bring the war over to Adolf to teach him a thing or two. I think the costs would hugely outweigh any possible benefits.

    Btw one of the most awesome military commanders of all time was half Irish. His biography just defies belief.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Carton_de_Wiart



    plus are people so naïve to think less than 20 years after the WOI and civil war which followed and less than 30 years from end of the bloodfest that was WW1 any irish Politian would really vote to row in with the british and send another generation off to fight wars in Europe...it was a very short timeframe from what was a particulary horrific life lost in WW1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 392 ✭✭j80ezgvc3p92xu


    Just to satisfy my curiosity, for argument's sake, lets say Ireland did join the war. How many divisions could it muster? Where would Irish troops have been deployed? Could the Irish beat the German "ubermenschen" in a one-on-one battle?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭se conman


    If we take a step back and look at look at it from a late 1930's Irish point of view, We would have been inviting our "enemy" to re occupy Ireland after less than 30 years. This could have split the people of the country and restarted a civil war. As much as I am not a fan of de Valera, it was a very fine balancing act. A lot of weather info did come from the Republic and Intel from DOD regarding the German Embsay. We were neutral on the side of the allies, as the saying goes.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,895 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    So, Holland was neutral until it was attacked and was forced to enter the fray.
    Otherwise, Holland would have stayed out of it.
    The USA only became involved after Pearl Harbour, a full two years after the war started and only entered the war in Europe because of the German/ Japanese pact.
    Ireland wasn't attacked and had no need to get involved.
    Don't get the "guilty shame" we're supposed to feel over not entering the war.
    Everyone that did had their own agenda.
    And not necessarily a noble one either.

    It's not a matter of "guilty shame", it's evidence, together with the other nations from US to Norway, that neutrality, as a policy of defending national interests, does not work, as it is entirely dependent upon the good will of others. Put simply, countries like the US, Belgium, Norway etc screwed up, bet on a lame horse, and paid for it. Ireland's horse was just as lame, but the wolf was shot before it could catch up to it. In effect, Ireland's policy could not stand on its own, and it was happy enough to bet that unlike the success rates of other nations in Europe, the force of arms of other countries would protect it.

    Imagine refusing to pay taxes, but insisting that there is a moral obligation for a State funded police to protect you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    se conman wrote: »
    If we take a step back and look at look at it from a late 1930's Irish point of view, We would have been inviting our "enemy" to re occupy Ireland after less than 30 years. This could have split the people of the country and restarted a civil war. As much as I am not a fan of de Valera, it was a very fine balancing act. A lot of weather info did come from the Republic and Intel from DOD regarding the German Embsay. We were neutral on the side of the allies, as the saying goes.

    That's a narrow view.

    There was nothing to stop Dev et al coming on board with the Yanks when they became involved and offering billeting, basing and training. Or allowing aircraft to operate from here. Likewise the Canadians could have been facilitated.

    It doesn't automatically follow that if we had joined the Allies that British forces would have been based here.

    As for Divisions.......the Kiwis fielded two initially but reduced that to a single one. If we'd hopped on board say when the US became involved and negotiated for them to equip / re-equip a division or, more likely, a regimental combat team, they would have served under US command, like the French and Brazilians did.

    As for actual combat, plenty of Micks and Paddies served with distinction in the Med - for a country with a distinct lack of mountains the men who served with 38th (Irish) Brigade (and the Irish Regiment of Canada) proved to be fairly formidable mountain fighters even when up against trained German and Austrian mountain / Alpine troops. There's reason to think a force raised here wouldn't have served with equal distinction.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,114 ✭✭✭ivytwine


    Just to satisfy my curiosity, for argument's sake, lets say Ireland did join the war. How many divisions could it muster? Where would Irish troops have been deployed? Could the Irish beat the German "ubermenschen" in a one-on-one battle?

    I also wonder how this would have played out for the British tbh. Obviously the Nazis would have wiped us out in a week. We couldn't stand up against blitzkrieg, I think the Irish navy consisted of around 3 old British ships at that time. So the British would have had to divert their forces from defending Britain itself to defending Ireland, or at least trying to stop the Germans crossing the Irish Sea, as well- Larne, Dublin, Wexford, the entire east coast of the Ireland are only a skip away from Wales and Scotland. Then they would be in Britain itself. If they came from the west that could have been not only disastrous for Ireland, but for the Allied cause as a whole, especially in that 1940 period where Britain stood alone.

    The Nazis did briefly think about invading us but didn't bother. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Green_(Ireland) However, if we had stood with Britain, I think Hitler would have relished squashing another little nation.

    We'd fought too much. And I do not believe we aided the Nazis, heard too many stories about helping the Allies (this is a really interesting piece: http://www.csn.ul.ie/~dan/war/foynes.htm). It was the right decision for us at the time.

    I don't get the Irish obsession with beating ourselves up for our history. You don't hear the Swiss beating themselves up for their neutrality. You don't hear the Americans beating themselves for having an armed revolution. ALL countries, consisting as they do of human beings, have dark chapters, and I don't think ours are particularly bad in the grand scheme of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    Dev did the right thing keeping us out of ww2. well done him. we were on the receiving end of an unofficial economic war by the British for sticking to our guns and not letting them use "their" formal naval bases. but he was right to do so. and we did help the allies out in other ways. and had the Germans managed to defeat the Russians and somehow ended up invading sooner or later resistance would have ensued. it wasnt in our interests to enter world war 2. think it was Churchil himself who said eternal interests over eternal friendships. well said son. I concur. and when all the fighting was done and dusted some of the most evil and heinous nazi minds and thousands of other nazis were divided up among the victorious allies and put to work for them in their new found homes. the nazis were defeated. we remained in one piece. so whats the problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 212 ✭✭DainBramage


    I thought we assisted the Allies in other indirect ways- such as providing weather reports from systems coming in over the Atlantic. doesn't seem like much but was crucial at key times, such as influencing the timing of D-Day.

    the issue of the Atlantic convoys is not straightforward- had the Irish ports been available the goods would still have to brought from Ireland to UK eventually. Still, I wonder how the sailors on the convoys felt though having to round Ireland to get to UK via U-boat infested seas.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,848 ✭✭✭knucklehead6


    I thought we assisted the Allies in other indirect ways- such as providing weather reports from systems coming in over the Atlantic. doesn't seem like much but was crucial at key times, such as influencing the timing of D-Day.

    the issue of the Atlantic convoys is not straightforward- had the Irish ports been available the goods would still have to brought from Ireland to UK eventually. Still, I wonder how the sailors on the convoys felt though having to round Ireland to get to UK via U-boat infested seas.


    Yes, they would have, but what would probably have happened is that the transatlantic convoys would have landed on the west coast, so all the major ports on the west coast (Galway, Limerick, probably Cork as well) would have received infrastructure upgrades and improved road and rail links with the east coast. Cargo would then have been transported TO the east coast for loading onto ships for transport across the Irish Sea, which would have been turned into an allied lake for all intents and purposes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    Yes, they would have,

    To get an idea of the cooperation between ourselves and the UK during WWII, get a detailed history of Ford Motor Works in Cork, we seemingly exported tractor chassis.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    No need for Irish lads to die freeing foreign countries from the Germans when our own was occupied by a similar shower of bastards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,266 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    One worrying thing i've heard from various people over here in the UK is that they were taught in school that Ireland aided the Nazi's in WW2.

    I've gotten into a couple of arguments over it as well with some people who are adament it's true.

    There were a few anti Irish stories bandied around, one of the more laughable ones was concerning U boats getting refuelled in the West of Ireland when people barely had enough oil to keep household paraffin lamps going, let alone fuel a sub.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    It would seem that Germany did not consider Ireland as neutral as we supposedly were to have been.

    One ship among a few:
    HD3SB091207F51E

    15 December 1939
    U-48 stopped the neutral Greek freighter Germaine inward from Albany New York (USA had not yet joined the war) to Cork with a cargo of maize. U-48 sank her falsely claiming that she was en route to England [13]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_maritime_events_during_World_War_II


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,393 ✭✭✭DarkyHughes


    Turns out it was actually Ireland who defeated the Nazi's not the Western allies or the Soviets at all it was all down to us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    one of the more laughable ones was concerning U boats getting refuelled in the West of Ireland :pac:

    My mother fled Dublin after the German bombings, fearing an escalation of the war.

    She was adamant to her deathbed that we supplied German U Boats off Galway and that we were giving too much aid to England so the bombing was a warning to Dev, to even things up a bit.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    jugger0 wrote: »
    No need for Irish lads to die freeing foreign countries from the Germans when our own was occupied by a similar shower of bastards.

    In other words......

    Dev 1942.......
    Dear France and Belgium (oh go on then, Spain as well),

    Thank you for your support for the last couple of hundred years in our struggle to free ourselves of the British. Thanks for inspiring the United Irishmen (even if a good chunk of them were Prods), Emmet and a host of other Irish revolutionaries down through the generations.

    Thanks for educating our priests, feeding and sheltering our fleeing 'Wild Geese,' our noble Earls and all and sundry who made it from this island to mainland Europe.

    We understand you are having a bit of trouble with an unruly neighbour, unfortunately so is Britain, and as the saying goes the enemy of my enemy is......well I'm sure you understand.

    We'd love to help and as soon as the Brits unpoke their noses from the situation we'll be there for you. Until then, keep in touch and call in if you are ever over this way.

    Yours,

    Dev, the Yank.

    PS - Sinead has enclosed some Kerrygold to keep you going for the next 4 years of brutal occupation - D.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,364 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    I don't think anything really could justify Ireland going to bat with Britain in WW2 given Ireland was only partitioned 20 years previously, had a war of independence and civil war and there was naturally a lot of bad blood there. You can't look at historic events through the prism of contemporary realities. Different time, different circumstances.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    I don't think anything really could justify Ireland going to bat with Britain in WW2 given Ireland was only partitioned 20 years previously, had a war of independence and civil war and there was naturally a lot of bad blood there. You can't look at historic events through the prism of contemporary realities. Different time, different circumstances.

    What about 'going to bat' with the Americans, Canadians, Free French, Poles, Norwegians, Danes, Dutch (in spite of King Billy), Belgians, Luxembourgers and - eventually - the Italians?

    What's the reason for refusing to support countries who had been supporters of us over the years?

    Also bear in mind that even if an Irish Division had been raised, fielded and placed under nominal 'British' US, Canadian or NZ command, Divisional commanders retained a right of appeal to their own national governments in the event they disagreed with the orders handed down from the various theatre, group, army and corps HQs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,364 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    It was an allied force and Britain was very much at the front with the US. It's hard to understand today but I can well see why Ireland would choose to stay out. Partition of any country is too much to take let alone when the country that has done it to you seeks your help only 20 years later.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    It was an allied force and Britain was very much at the front with the US. It's hard to understand today but I can well see why Ireland would choose to stay out. Partition of any country is too much to take let alone when the country that has done it to you seeks your help only 20 years later.

    So raising and fielding a force to participate in the Dragoon / Anvil landings in Southern France would've been out?

    Even though it was a wholly US & French operation that Churchill and the British Chiefs of Staff bitterly opposed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,364 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Jawgap wrote: »
    So raising and fielding a force to participate in the Dragoon / Anvil landings in Southern France would've been out?

    Could you expand on this because I don't quite get your point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Could you expand on this because I don't quite get your point.

    Raising a combat formation was only one of many ways we could've helped.

    Even if we decided to raise and field a force it didn't have to be equipped by the British - nor did it automatically follow that any force fielded had to serve under a British commander.

    The US equipped significant Free French and other formations who went on to serve with them - what was the objection to helping the Yanks?

    The Dragoon / Anvil landings are an example of a significant US operation that would have helped a country who had been a historical ally of this country and the success of which helped both frustrate Churchill and stymie the British Mediterranean strategy - I think it's what you might have called a win-win situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,493 ✭✭✭DazMarz


    Ireland in the 1930's and 40's was a broken nation; a generation of the finest young men had died in Civil War and the country was scarred by the experiences of the 1916 Rising, the War of Independence and the Civil War. The last thing this country needed was another war.

    But World War II was different from any war that Ireland would have experienced before. This was a war where every single man, woman and child in a belligerent nation were a legitimate target to the enemy. In previous wars, attacks on civilians were not the norm. They happened, but they were not the normal run of things.

    World War II was a savage, inhuman war. Entire populations were mobilised for the war effort and civilians found themselves in the direct firing line thanks to aerial bombing. Millions upon millions of civilians perished in their homes thanks to indiscriminate bombing raids on cities and towns.

    Ireland, had it entered World War II, would have saw itself become crushed. The country was already teetering on the brink economically anyway, and the raw wounds of the Civil War were still very open. Entering the War on either side would have ripped the country in half (at first), and then saw it brutally attacked and subjugated by one side or another (secondly).

    Had Ireland entered the War on the side of the Allies (at the initial stages, the "Allies", for all intents and purposes, was Great Britain), half the country would have opposed siding with "the real enemy" and the old Civil War divisions would have raised their ugly heads again. Opposition to the war and supporters to entering the war would have ended up killing each other rather than Nazis.

    Aside from the potential Civil War that would break out, the Nazis would have bombed the country into the ground. In fact, the South would have made for easy pickings for the Luftwaffe. A lack of defensive batteries would have seen the cities of Dublin, Cork, Waterford, Limerick and Galway bombed into rubble, along with other larger towns. There was also a possibility that the Germans could have attempted to occupy Ireland to use as a stepping stone to invade Britain (although if Sealion didn't fly, an invasion of Ireland was unlikely... but still).

    The other side is, had Ireland joined the war on the side of the Nazis, that it would have ended even quicker. British troops would have flooded into the South from Northern Ireland, and landings would have been made by the British Expeditionary Force on the South and East coasts, as Britain invaded and re-occupied Ireland. And they would likely have exacted a terrible revenge upon the Irish people for this naked belligerence for supporting the Nazi regime. And Hitler and his generals are unlikely to have been able to do much to stop it, despite being "allied".

    It is also worth noting this: what the hell could Ireland have offered to any war effort? Ireland had no military worth talking about. It would have offered a generation of young men to die on the killing fields of Europe, perhaps, but in terms of aircraft, ships, submarines, tanks, vehicles... nothing of note.

    It made absolutely no sense for Ireland, a young and weak nation in the 1930's, to enter the fray when it was advisable to stay out. The course taken by Ireland during the Second World War was the absolutely correct one. It would have been a folly for Ireland to enter the war, on either side. Doing so simply would have opened the country up for attack, invasion, occupation and subjugation.

    Mistakes were made (Dev signing the book of condolence for Hitler is a real example of WTF), but on the whole, Ireland did right by staying out (and aiding the Western Allies as much as they could).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    DazMarz wrote: »
    But World War II was different from any war that Ireland would have experienced before. Ireland, had it entered World War II, would have saw itself become crushed.

    I remember an article printed by the Cork Examiner claiming to be from a crashed German Junker recently rediscovered at the time [circa 1970] showing pictures of Cork Harbour with bombing targets marked on it, Ford's was one, the City Hall and a few more that I did not know at the time.

    Over the years, never got corroboration on it, but I did see the article and I was a teenager then and really fascinated.

    Like [as a kid a few years earlier] I drew a few Swastikas on my window still one day and got the hiding of my life, my mother was still afraid of being bombed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,364 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    No reasonable person would expect a country like Ireland at that time to ride to the rescue of Britain given what went on so recently. Not realistic. Like I said different times.

    Remember before US entered Britain faced defeat and they were contemplating invading Ireland to set up a last stand.

    For good measure Churchill was always a c!nt to the Irish as well from the treaty. He thought Chamberlain had made a fatal mistake giving us back the ports just before the war.

    Don't forget also WW2 was the first opportunity to really demonstrate Irish independence.


Advertisement
Advertisement