Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Transfer Talk/Gossip/Rumour Thread - Summer 2014 - Mod note in OP

1626365676892

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I loved the Beatles before they were cool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    Suarez didn't go for less than Di Maria.

    I have been on the Di Maria bandwagon for years now.

    He has been one of the main men at Madrid.

    Other clubs hold all the cards when negotiating with United in their current position so we will overpay, if it was my money I would be happier with 50 million but if he performs to the level he is capable of 9 million more is irrelevant in the grand scheme

    Is Iniesta capable of double figure goals? Does that make him any less of a player? Is Di Maria capable of double figure assists, of course he is

    Ooops, that should be Suarez only cost a couple of million more than Di Maria, but you get the point.

    Really? It's been a rather bumpy ride at times.

    Last season, his best season, he was third fiddle, behind Ronaldo and Bale in the pecking order. It's not bad, but it's also not 60 million pound good either.

    You know, it wasn't that long ago that Ferguson said something to the effect of "Hazard, he's a good player but 32 million?" I know who I'd rather have out of Hazard and Di Maria.

    Iniesta isn't the main man at Barcelona that would be the greatest footballer ever, Lionel Messi, but unless you are claiming that Di Maria is equal to, arguably, the greatest midfielder the game has ever seen and certainly one of the very best of his generation, then I think it would be safe to say that Iniesta (at Di Maria's age) would have been worth 60 million pound in todays market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    One thing I still can't understand is how United supposedly have zero negotiating power.

    You would've thought that any club would have had the upper hand in negotiations with Madrid for Di Maria seeing as the player himself wants to leave an Florentino Perez wants him gone?

    If this goes through then United will have overpaid by £30m+ over their last 4 major transfers (Fellaini, Mata, Shaw, Di Maria.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭Alfred Borden


    Great signing for United, one of the best wingers in the world and will offer them some width and pace. Price wont matter if he plays to his potential.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Christy Browne


    Benatia to Bayern confirmed:

    FC Bayern English ‏@FCBayernEN 2m
    DONE DEAL: #FCBayern and @OfficialASRoma have agreed the transfer of MEHDI BENATIA (27)! Defensive ace set to sign a 5-year contract.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,377 ✭✭✭Smithwicks Man


    Benatia to Bayern confirmed:

    FC Bayern English ‏@FCBayernEN 2m
    DONE DEAL: #FCBayern and @OfficialASRoma have agreed the transfer of MEHDI BENATIA (27)! Defensive ace set to sign a 5-year contract.

    Fantastic signing


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    Ooops, that should be Suarez only cost a couple of million more than Di Maria, but you get the point.

    Really? It's been a rather bumpy ride at times.

    Last season, his best season, he was third fiddle, behind Ronaldo and Bale in the pecking order. It's not bad, but it's also not 60 million pound good either.

    You know, it wasn't that long ago that Ferguson said something to the effect of "Hazard, he's a good player but 32 million?" I know who I'd rather have out of Hazard and Di Maria.

    Iniesta isn't the main man at Barcelona that would be the greatest footballer ever, Lionel Messi, but unless you are claiming that Di Maria is equal to, arguably, the greatest midfielder the game has ever seen and certainly one of the very best of his generation, then I think it would be safe to say that Iniesta (at Di Maria's age) would have been worth 60 million pound in todays market.

    You are ignoring context, if Suarez was a model player and hadn't bitten 3 people and then the racism you would have been looking at north of Bales' figure.

    Again you are bringing up this ridiculous argument that a pecking order is unarguably correct all of the time, I'm not commenting on that as I already have when you brought it up both with Mata and now Di Maria.

    Are you making that up?, didn't Fergie pull out of that because of the massive agent fee. Yes Hazard is top class and hasn't reached his ceiling, but as it stands it has to be Di Maria.

    I'm not sure what relevance your last paragraph has, you asked if Di Maria was capable of double figure goals but he is not going to be bought solely for goals. Also midfielders will go for less than attackers, if the best midfielders in the world all moved clubs today I'm almost certain they would all be less than 50 million pounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    You are ignoring context, if Suarez was a model player and hadn't bitten 3 people and then the racism you would have been looking at north of Bales' figure.

    Again you are bringing up this ridiculous argument that a pecking order is unarguably correct all of the time, I'm not commenting on that as I already have when you brought it up both with Mata and now Di Maria.

    Are you making that up?, didn't Fergie pull out of that because of the massive agent fee. Yes Hazard is top class and hasn't reached his ceiling, but as it stands it has to be Di Maria.

    I'm not sure what relevance your last paragraph has, you asked if Di Maria was capable of double figure goals but he is not going to be bought solely for goals. Also midfielders will go for less than attackers, if the best midfielders in the world all moved clubs today I'm almost certain they would all be less than 50 million pounds.

    Di Maria is not better than Hazard. There is no way in hell you would be saying this if he wasn't joining United.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,578 ✭✭✭✭Turtwig


    Ronaldo's mere presence near the half way line provides defence to real Madrid during corners. No team can actually commit heavily to a corner without have the serious threat of a counter attack facing them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    CSF wrote: »
    Di Maria is not better than Hazard. There is no way in hell you would be saying this if he wasn't joining United.

    I said he was better than Bale a year ago, obviously I can see into the future and knew he was going to sign for United


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Fescue


    CSF wrote: »
    Di Maria is not better than Hazard. There is no way in hell you would be saying this if he wasn't joining United.

    I would have Di Maria ahead of Hazard, definitely. I dare say Mourinho would too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I said he was better than Bale a year ago, obviously I can see into the future back then and knew he was going to sign for United

    Can I see where you said this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    You are ignoring context, if Suarez was a model player and hadn't bitten 3 people and then the racism you would have been looking at north of Bales' figure.

    Again you are bringing up this ridiculous argument that a pecking order is unarguably correct all of the time, I'm not commenting on that as I already have when you brought it up both with Mata and now Di Maria.

    Are you making that up?, didn't Fergie pull out of that because of the massive agent fee. Yes Hazard is top class and hasn't reached his ceiling, but as it stands it has to be Di Maria.

    I'm not sure what relevance your last paragraph has, you asked if Di Maria was capable of double figure goals but he is not going to be bought solely for goals. Also midfielders will go for less than attackers, if the best midfielders in the world all moved clubs today I'm almost certain they would all be less than 50 million pounds.

    Ah unfortunately I don't accept "what ifs" as a valid argument.

    Pecking orders are pretty steady and consistent things. Eg. during their shared time at Real Madrid, Ozil would have been ahead of Di Maria in the pecking order, however Ozil moved to Arsenal thus allowing Di Maria to move up the pecking order, however the signing of Bale meant that Di Maria remained in the same position in the Real Madrid pecking order as he had been in when the Summer began. I'll make it simple, has Di Maria ever received top billing over Ronaldo? Has he ever received top billing over Bale? Over Ozil?

    No, that's a quote, if I cared more about this I would find the exact statement but it's certainly out there. I'm not entirely sure how Di Maria is being chosen ahead of Hazard but I will smile and slowly back-peddle away now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    CSF wrote: »
    Can I see where you said this?

    I'm on a phone so can't go looking, it was sometime last year when United were linked with Bale if I'm not mistaken


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,222 ✭✭✭✭Will I Amnt


    CSF wrote: »
    Di Maria is not better than Hazard.

    Many people would disagree with you there and they wouldn't be just United fans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Many people would disagree with you there and they wouldn't be just United fans.

    I'd love to hear from them and have them explain why they think this way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I'm on a phone so can't go looking, it was sometime last year when United were linked with Bale if I'm not mistaken

    I'd genuinely love to see the quote when you have a chance


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    I'll make it simple, has Di Maria ever received top billing over Ronaldo? Has he ever received top billing over Bale? Over Ozil?

    No, that's a quote, if I cared more about this I would find the exact statement but it's certainly out there. I'm not entirely sure how Di Maria is being chosen ahead of Hazard but I will smile and slowly back-peddle away now.

    Yeah in the CL final... Countless other times playing for Real, copa Del Ray final beating Barca last year being another example


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    RasTa wrote: »
    Yeah in the CL final... Countless other times playing for Real, copa Del Ray final beating Barca last year being another example

    That's just him having a good game though. That's not the same as being better over the course of a season


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    Ah unfortunately I don't accept "what ifs" as a valid argument.

    Pecking orders are pretty steady and consistent things. Eg. during their shared time at Real Madrid, Ozil would have been ahead of Di Maria in the pecking order, however Ozil moved to Arsenal thus allowing Di Maria to move up the pecking order, however the signing of Bale meant that Di Maria remained in the same position in the Real Madrid pecking order as he had been in when the Summer began. I'll make it simple, has Di Maria ever received top billing over Ronaldo? Has he ever received top billing over Bale? Over Ozil?

    No, that's a quote, if I cared more about this I would find the exact statement but it's certainly out there. I'm not entirely sure how Di Maria is being chosen ahead of Hazard but I will smile and slowly back-peddle away now.



    Were you not saying on the last page that Bale could take the mantle if Ronaldo leaves, is that not an opinion masqueraded as massive if argument?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭smileyj1987


    I can safely say di Maria will be a great piece of business for man utd and no one can say otherwise .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    RasTa wrote: »
    Yeah in the CL final... Countless other times playing for Real, copa Del Ray final beating Barca last year being another example

    You've confused performance with billing. I mean Alex Song might have been MOTM once in his Barcelona career, it doesn't mean he was the main man in the team or the player who the system is essentially built around, it means he had a good game. Since Ronaldo joined Real Madrid, the side has been built around him and his goal return justifies that, Bale last season also took on a more prominent role in the Real Madrid attack and his stats and performances justify that, just as Ozil's stats and figures justify his more prominent role as the main creator at Real Madrid ahead of Di Maria during his time there. I'm not saying that Di Maria never plays well, I'm not insane.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,562 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    I can safely say di Maria will be a great piece of business for man utd and no one can say otherwise .

    Ok


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Do Madrid publish this pecking order before every game?
    "tonight our star player is ... With support from... Also appearing will be these geeks...."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    Were you not saying on the last page that Bale could take the mantle if Ronaldo leaves, is that not an opinion masqueraded as massive if argument?

    However mine is cemented in reality given that we can clearly see what Bale will be tasked with taking on Ronaldo's mantle when Ronaldo leaves. Yours was an entirely hypothetical situation that would require an entire alternate reality to exist (one in which Suarez doesn't bite people) in order for it to be possible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    RayCun wrote: »
    Do Madrid publish this pecking order before every game?
    "tonight our star player is ... With support from... Also appearing will be these geeks...."

    Yes they do, it's called the team sheet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Since Ronaldo joined Real Madrid, the side has been built around him and his goal return justifies that, Bale last season also took on a more prominent role in the Real Madrid attack and his stats and performances justify that, just as Ozil's stats and figures justify his more prominent role as the main creator at Real Madrid ahead of Di Maria during his time there. I'm not saying that Di Maria never plays well, I'm not insane.

    Going by this logic, Neymar isn't in the top bracket.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭Andersonisgod


    RasTa wrote: »
    Going by this logic, Neymar isn't in the top bracket.

    Oh he is, main man for Brazil and likely to be the one who becomes the centerpiece of the Barcelona attack once Messi is done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,111 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Oh he is, main man for Brazil and likely to be the one who becomes the centerpiece of the Barcelona attack once Messi is done.

    No that would be Suarez. Anyway it's a team game so debating this with you is as pointless as usual.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Oh he is, main man for Brazil and likely to be the one who becomes the centerpiece of the Barcelona attack once Messi is done.

    I think you misunderstood what RasTa said. He wasn't saying Neymar isn't top bracket, he was saying going by your pecking order logic, he isn't in the top bracket.


Advertisement