Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Wind farms - ugly truths

17810121347

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭fclauson


    djpbarry wrote: »
    There's plenty of biomass in Ireland's various waste streams - don't really need to be growing more of it.

    Which would these be - most biomass from farms near me gets used locally on other farms


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    fclauson wrote: »
    Which would these be...
    Well, domestic, for starters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    djpbarry wrote: »
    There's plenty of biomass in Ireland's various waste streams - don't really need to be growing more of it.

    If we can make it work - bring it on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭fclauson


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Well, domestic, for starters.

    So you proposal would be to collect biomass (food, garden waste etc) from households and then burn this to create energy ?

    Interested to see the ROI/Costs with this approch


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    fclauson wrote: »
    So you proposal would be to collect biomass (food, garden waste etc) from households and then burn this to create energy ?

    Interested to see the ROI/Costs with this approch
    Probably more cost effective to use it as a carbon source in biogas generation.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    fclauson wrote: »
    So you proposal would be to collect biomass (food, garden waste etc) from households and then burn this to create energy ?

    Interested to see the ROI/Costs with this approch
    The thing is, it breaks down anyway when we put it in a landfill and the biogas is captured. But if we were to divert it away from landfill in the first place, we could probably deal with it a lot more efficiently and avoid methane leaking from our landfills.

    The only caveat I have on all bioenergy waste and residues, is that in theory it should be something of a diminishing resource. We have lots of people working very hard to cut food waste, etc. So it can only ever be a limited sustainable resource that should be used only in the most efficient installations (e.g. CHP, no electricity-only installations) and I believe they should also be electricity-led to provide flexibility to the electricity system as biomass is dispatchable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Macha wrote: »
    The only caveat I have on all bioenergy waste and residues, is that in theory it should be something of a diminishing resource.
    Very good point, but we're always going to have (for example) copious amounts of human waste!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,731 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Very good point, but we're always going to have (for example) copious amounts of human waste!

    Like the one in shankill http://www.secadolodos.com/73052_en/SHANGANAGH-WWTP-%25E2%2580%2593-Digested-sludge-drying/

    We'll never get the materials needed for it to make a difference. The incinerator in rings end was going to be a waste recovery unit how ever that was a disaster and the figures indicated that they would have to divert receyable products to it just to fed it.


    We have 5 or 6 biomass landfill generation stations but the output from them is tiny ,
    http://www.seai.ie/Publications/Renewables_Publications_/Energy_From_Waste/landfillfacts.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    Macha wrote: »
    The thing is, it breaks down anyway when we put it in a landfill and the biogas is captured. But if we were to divert it away from landfill in the first place, we could probably deal with it a lot more efficiently and avoid methane leaking from our landfills.

    The only caveat I have on all bioenergy waste and residues, is that in theory it should be something of a diminishing resource. We have lots of people working very hard to cut food waste, etc. So it can only ever be a limited sustainable resource that should be used only in the most efficient installations (e.g. CHP, no electricity-only installations) and I believe they should also be electricity-led to provide flexibility to the electricity system as biomass is dispatchable.

    I hate to mention the war :D - but we do have waste from cattle - plus we can use Grass silage - with that slurry.

    Drawbacks to doing that obviously - but it is a POTENTIAL option - not saying its good (or bad) - but it is a POTENTIAL option.

    Yes I know it has drawbacks - but could it be improved????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,691 ✭✭✭fclauson


    Old diesel wrote: »
    I hate to mention the war :D - but we do have waste from cattle - plus we can use Grass silage - with that slurry.

    Drawbacks to doing that obviously - but it is a POTENTIAL option - not saying its good (or bad) - but it is a POTENTIAL option.

    Yes I know it has drawbacks - but could it be improved????

    This is all spread back onto the fields to fertilize. No idea if there would be more benefit in using it elsewhere for energy.

    Capturing cows breath would be more effective as that's where there methane comes from


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    fclauson wrote: »
    This is all spread back onto the fields to fertilize. No idea if there would be more benefit in using it elsewhere for energy.

    Capturing cows breath would be more effective as that's where there methane comes from

    Its been a while since I looked it up - but basically Aneorobic digestion is the process in question - ive spelt it wrong.

    Basically the cattle slurry combined with something like Grass silage can be combined - and go through a process - which then generates gas - which can be used for electricity - and if the gas is good enough - can be used as gas - for the gas network afaik.

    Its not a perfect solution however - and does have its drawbacks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,731 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Old diesel wrote: »
    I hate to mention the war :D - but we do have waste from cattle - plus we can use Grass silage - with that slurry.

    our cattle graze most the time so it's impractical to use it, also the energy required to transport it to the facility is greater than that achieved from using it. so its not practical. I've seen the studies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    ted1 wrote: »
    our cattle graze most the time so it's impractical to use it, also the energy required to transport it to the facility is greater than that achieved from using it. so its not practical. I've seen the studies.

    We can look at adjusting the grazing routine - so cattle are in at night (grass can be zero grazed - tractor and zero grazing machine go around cutting and picking up grass and hauling it in.

    Also could possibly look at using more local smaller facilities to reduce the transport distance.

    Of course - like most renewable energy solutions - it does need improvement - getting more performance from less product - like wind turbines do.

    Again not saying its good or bad - it just merits consideration in terms of FUTURE development and (small scale) implantation

    Clearly if you had one big massive plant for the whole country - it can run into issues.

    Germany does a fair amount of it (that doesn't make it good or bad - just demonstrates IT CAN be done)

    Not a fan of biogas or a supporter of it - but feel we need to keep ALL options open for future development

    It certainly has drawbacks - but it is a source of power that could be developed NOW

    So its further down the road of development compared to say Ocean Energy - and is potentially more suited to Ireland now - then Solar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    So fair enough Biogas from cattle slurry and grass silage may be off the agenda - yes I do feel that it merits NOT BEEN ruled out - pending further needed development to make it better - address its flaws.

    But the latter couple of points apply to wind turbines as well - so getting back to those - how can Wind turbine technology be improved - if it can in fact even be improved - to improve the consistency of its performance - and ensure infrasound and noise issues are mimimised and eliminated????

    In short how can wind turbines be made better - it seems to me - part of the issue with wind turbines - is that TOO MANY people accept or tolerate them for what they are now - rather then asking - can the turbines be made better.

    Even small increases in turbine performance for individual turbines could make a difference when added up across a fleet of 1500 to 2000 turbines.

    Id like to see constant development of turbine technology - with a renewed focus on making them more compatible - if that is even possible - with pleasant community living - and improved performance.

    So that we move to a policy of always using the best turbine technology available at the time - so theres an incentive for manufacturers to deliver the best technology at all times


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,515 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    OK we now have Irish numbers that include the effects renewables have on other generators.


    http://www.seai.ie/News_Events/Press_Releases/2014/245m-of-fossil-fuel-savings-from-use-of-renewable-electricity-in-2012.html
    Renewable electricity generation in the Republic of Ireland is estimated to have saved 778 ktoe of fossil fuel,with an associated CO2emissions reduction of 1.94million tonnes. Wind generation is the largest
    contributor, with savings estimated at 586 ktoe of fossil-fueland a CO2emissions reduction of 1.51 million
    tonnes.
    ...
    The value of the fossil fuels not consumed in the Republic of Ireland in 2012 as a result of renewable
    electricity generation is estimated at €245 million, with the value of avoided CO2 emissions being a
    further €15 million.
    ...
    78% of the fuel savings due to renewable electricity arose from the displacement of natural gas, with 20%
    coming from reduced use of coal. The remaining 2% is due to the displacement of peat through co-firing
    with biomass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    OK we now have Irish numbers that include the effects renewables have on other generators.


    http://www.seai.ie/News_Events/Press_Releases/2014/245m-of-fossil-fuel-savings-from-use-of-renewable-electricity-in-2012.html

    Are we meant to be impressed by a mere 2% reduction in imports and a less than 3% reduction in CO2 emmissions??. Despite the massive amount of wind power already installed!!. Other interesting facts about this report in the link below

    http://www.windawareireland.com/building-monster-misplaced-good-intentions/

    Is all this worth having the 4th most expensive power bills in Europe??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Birdnuts wrote: »
    Are we meant to be impressed by a mere 2% reduction in imports and a less than 3% reduction in CO2 emmissions??
    Why express savings as a percentage of total fuel imports? Bit daft expecting wind to have an impact outside of electricity generation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Why express savings as a percentage of total fuel imports? Bit daft expecting wind to have an impact outside of electricity generation.

    Isn't this all about significantly lowering Irelands emissions and cheaper electricity - wind has failed badly on both counts as it has across the EU. SEAI used a particular dispatch model in this analysis that does not cover all the CO2 emissions from a wind based system. Saying wind powered a certain number of homes is also ridiculous given the fact that for extended periods of time wind was contributing figures below 1% of its installed capacity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    Just a question I was thinking of this morning - do we know at all - of any communities that have commercial wind farms with the 100/150 metre type wind turbines in their area and that have

    a) continued to thrive and grow - and continue to be nice places to live

    or

    b) are actually finding the turbines to be an asset to their communities

    Do such communities exist - and if so - what lessons can be learned


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Birdnuts wrote: »
    Isn't this all about significantly lowering Irelands emissions and cheaper electricity - wind has failed badly on both counts as it has across the EU.
    Evidence? Wind is lowering wholesale electricity prices across Europe. And we're just discussing a report that shows that wind has helped reduce Ireland's carbon emissions. You're wilfully ignoring evidence put before you and throwing out unsubstantiated claims to the contrary - and convincing no one in the process.
    Old diesel wrote: »
    Just a question I was thinking of this morning - do we know at all - of any communities that have commercial wind farms with the 100/150 metre type wind turbines in their area and that have

    a) continued to thrive and grow - and continue to be nice places to live

    or

    b) are actually finding the turbines to be an asset to their communities

    Do such communities exist - and if so - what lessons can be learned
    Yes, they're all across Europe! What's different about Ireland? We have lots of people who in recent years have moved to live in the countryside but their livelihoods aren't actually connected to the countryside. They moved for the 'view' and will oppose anything that they perceive as negatively impacting on that view.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Macha wrote: »
    Evidence? Wind is lowering wholesale electricity prices across Europe. And we're just discussing a report that shows that wind has helped reduce Ireland's carbon emissions. You're wilfully ignoring evidence put before you and throwing out unsubstantiated claims to the contrary - and convincing no one in the process.


    .

    Winds costs in terms of subsidies, pylon roll out, back up plants etc. does not show up in bogus wholesale prices as you well know. Which is why wind apologists will always refer to "wholesale" prices as opposed to "retail" prices which is what the consumer and business gets hit with. Ireland would want to cop on fast and learn from the costly mistakes of Germany and more recently Spain.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Birdnuts wrote: »
    Winds costs in terms of subsidies, pylon roll out, back up plants etc. does not show up in bogus wholesale prices as you well know. Which is why wind apologists will always refer to "wholesale" prices as opposed to "retail" prices which is what the consumer and business gets hit with. Ireland would want to cop on fast and learn from the costly mistakes of Germany and more recently Spain.
    Because Ireland has regulated retail prices that means the cheaper wholesale electricity prices aren't always passed on. Who's to blame for that? The Irish government and the energy regulator.

    And do you have any idea how much fossil fuels and other non-renewable technologies have been subsidised over the years and how much they continue to be subsidised? Or how much they need energy infrastructure and add costs to the system?

    Please try to contribute with facts not ill-informed rants. I note that again, your above post has zero references.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Macha wrote: »
    Because Ireland has regulated retail prices that means the cheaper wholesale electricity prices aren't always passed on. Who's to blame for that? The Irish government and the energy regulator.

    And do you have any idea how much fossil fuels and other non-renewable technologies have been subsidised over the years and how much they continue to be subsidised? Or how much they need energy infrastructure and add costs to the system?

    Please try to contribute with facts not ill-informed rants. I note that again, your above post has zero references.

    Ireland is no different to the likes of Denmark and Germany whose retail bills continue to spiral as they add more and more wind to their grid.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,391 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    Birdnuts wrote: »
    Ireland is no different to the likes of Denmark and Germany whose retail bills continue to spiral as they add more and more wind to their grid.
    Still waiting for some facts to back up your claims.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    Macha wrote: »
    Evidence? Wind is lowering wholesale electricity prices across Europe. And we're just discussing a report that shows that wind has helped reduce Ireland's carbon emissions. You're wilfully ignoring evidence put before you and throwing out unsubstantiated claims to the contrary - and convincing no one in the process.


    Yes, they're all across Europe! What's different about Ireland? We have lots of people who in recent years have moved to live in the countryside but their livelihoods aren't actually connected to the countryside. They moved for the 'view' and will oppose anything that they perceive as negatively impacting on that view.

    Whats different about Irish planning of wind farms - is that it appears to be the case that communities are just seen as places to put wind farms.

    Now if communities are living great - with wind farms around Europe - then we need to look at that - and see how we can change our living to do that over here.

    So if we look at Europe and say - they normally are much more inclined to live in Towns and villages over there (in rural areas) then how do we plan that sort of future for Rural communities over here.

    My issue is - we don't have that sort of planning here - we are just focused on getting wind turbines in - and theres no positive thinking - on how you MIGHT create a positive future for communities as communities.

    Rather then just see communities and rural people as a problem - why not lets work together to see if a situation can be developed over time that would see communities and wind projects work okay side by side.

    The problem at the moment that I see - is that wind is just another difficulty rural communities have to work with - the way they are planned is posing yet more difficulties for rural areas - in that we are only looking at communities as places to put turbines.

    That sends a negative signal to communities on how we see their future - if they are just going to be a site for a wind farm - it suggests they are been written off.

    That's just how i feel.

    Btw - poor planning in the past - doesn't excuse poor planning now - in fact if anything - it should lead to better planning if we learn lessons from the past.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,443 ✭✭✭Old diesel


    At the end of the day - its easier to get people on board with wind energy - or any other project - if they can see that their community, their village, their town etc - can still enjoy a positive future.

    So lets plan for the wind energy by all means - but lets also look at how peoples everyday living can be kept pleasant - all im hoping for basically is that we do the best we can to ensure as many residents as possible continue to enjoy pleasant living in their homes.

    Where this isn't possible - where a home that was previously pleasant to live in - is no longer pleasant - then we need to look at compensation for that - whether its CPO at a fair market price - or other forms of compensation.

    And if compensation does need to be paid - we need to factor that againsed the cost of having some turbines off shore

    Please note - the only compensation i would be looking for - is where a home that was previously pleasant to live in - is no longer pleasant to live in due to a project operational in the area.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 96,515 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Birdnuts wrote: »
    Are we meant to be impressed by a mere 2% reduction in imports and a less than 3% reduction in CO2 emmissions??. Despite the massive amount of wind power already installed!!. Other interesting facts about this report in the link below

    http://www.windawareireland.com/building-monster-misplaced-good-intentions/

    Is all this worth having the 4th most expensive power bills in Europe??
    2% / 3% only applies if you include fuel used in transport and heating, industrial processing
    You might as well include asphalt used for road surfacing and wood used in construction in your analysis of Wind's contribution to electricity.


    But the fact that people have gone so out of their way to distort the facts shows that wind is really making a difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Macha wrote: »


    Yes, they're all across Europe! What's different about Ireland? We have lots of people who in recent years have moved to live in the countryside but their livelihoods aren't actually connected to the countryside. They moved for the 'view' and will oppose anything that they perceive as negatively impacting on that view.

    Ireland wind energy policy is developer driven - just like our disastrous Celtic tiger planning system was, and we know how that ended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,048 ✭✭✭✭Birdnuts



    But the fact that people have gone so out of their way to distort the facts shows that wind is really making a difference.

    The facts are that wind is making a negligible difference to Ireland CO2 emmissions, even if you overlook the shortcomings of SEAI analysis which itself has been revised a number of times going on earlier NREAP documents.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement