Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Scottish Independence discussion area

  • 23-04-2014 07:12PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭


    Can't seem to find a good discussion thread anywhere, so as time is getting closer, I'll get the ball rolling here.

    What are your views for/against Scottish independence?

    If you don't have a view, do you think it'll happen?

    Personally, I think Alex Salmond seems to be turning heads at an extremely fast rate, but I'm neutral on the matter.


«134567158

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    Sammond choosing St George's Day to make his first pro independence speech on English soil was harmlessly cheeky !

    Personaly I think the Scots would be mad to break up the Union.

    The UK as a united entity is a much stronger than a splinered cluster of 4 seperate nations.

    Scottish independence will also have a detrimental impact on the Labour Party's representation at Westminster, resulting in the Conservitaves and Lib Dems gaining a greater balance of power there.

    Not good for democracy.

    I don't think it will happen anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭turnikett1


    voila

    I am 100% for Scottish independence... Shame it probably won't happen though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    I asked my wife, "be independent from England?" she asked, "yes." "Ah yes, they should, they always were anyway!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,094 ✭✭✭wretcheddomain


    Lapin wrote: »

    Scottish independence will also have a detrimental impact on the Labour Party's representation at Westminster, resulting in the Conservitaves and Lib Dems gaining a greater balance of power there.

    Only once in Labour history did they require Scottish seats to gain power at parliament; what you've said is a commonly propagated myth that needs to be tackled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 206 ✭✭anishboi


    I don't think people can say "it definitely won't happen" anymore, this time last year maybe yes you could but the yes campaign has gained so much ground since then....

    All it really needs is one more persuasive Salmond speech to bring the polls to 50/50


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭Titzon Toast


    I race online with a load of Scottish lads every night. According to them, it really is 50/50 as to whether they'll split or not.
    I know that's not really an accurate measurement of how things are gonna pan out, but I found it interesting that they're not all just gonna jump ship for the sake of it.
    It's gonna be interesting to watch that's for sure.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    Only once in Labour history did they require Scottish seats to gain power at parliament; what you've said is a commonly propagated myth that needs to be tackled.

    If the Scottish got independence tomorrow, 41 Labour MPs would transfer north of the border from Westminster with twelve from the government parties going to Edinburgh.

    Thats a serious difference, especially when the greater number is from the opposition benches.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    The way people just assume that there's no chance of it happening is mad. It'd be hilarious if those who didn't want independence became utterly complacent in expecting their side to win, and just didn't bother voting on the day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,087 ✭✭✭Spring Onion


    anishboi wrote: »
    I don't think people can say "it definitely won't happen" anymore, this time last year maybe yes you could but the yes campaign has gained so much ground since then....

    All it really needs is one more persuasive Salmond speech to bring the polls to 50/50

    I think it has gained ground in the same way that fool Sean Gallagher did well in the presidential polls. When push came to shove, people opted for who they could trust. I think the Scottish result will be 60/40 No.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    What's the EU said on their end I assume If they vote for independence they will not be automatically invited to the EU and many many targets and such like will be needed to be met if joining is even an option. Same with the currency has it not already been said the pound is not an option. Wont the EU be making it really difficult to join as they Don’t want EU countries splitting up.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭Paramite Pie


    I think it will be a close call, but I do think Scotland will remain in the Union.

    I do think Scotland will choose Independence someday and I do think Scotland could be economically viable. But there's too much doubt in the current economy and most people will vote safe.:)
    What's the EU said on their end I assume If they vote for independence they will not be automatically invited to the EU and many many targets and such like will be needed to be met if joining is even an option. Same with the currency has it not already been said the pound is not an option. Wont the EU be making it really difficult to join as they Don’t want EU countries splitting up.

    When Ireland achieved Independence, we had arrangements made to use the British pound for an interim period until a new currency was established. Scotland could certainly make arrangements, but Westminster won't consider it until the vote is actually passed. Any doubt is a yes vote for the Union.


  • Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Is it not the case that Scottish WOMEN were found to be overwhelmingly in favour of a NO to independence.

    Is it not the case; warriors that in the meantime Scottish MEN leant toward a YES -

    IS IT NOT THE CASE that British media reports on the gender diifference clearly dictating the poll focused on Scottish MEN suffering from BRAVEHEART SYNDROME -- whilst nothing was suggested of a more commonplace PRINCESS SYNDROME that will dictate the outcome.

    I'd have more luck translating Rab C Nesbitt than any of the above :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    I think it will be a close call, but I do think Scotland will remain in the Union.

    I do think Scotland will choose Independence someday and I do think Scotland could be economically viable. But there's too much doubt in the current economy and most people will vote safe.:)



    When Ireland achieved Independence, we had arrangements made to use the British pound for an interim period until a new currency was established.

    Yes I understand that but they are not just leaving the Uk they will be leaving the EU as well wont they. And as I said the pound has been taken off the table has it not. Due to not being able to set the interest rates and so on ?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,859 ✭✭✭Courtesy Flush


    The Scots dont have the balls to leave the UK
    They will sing songs about freedom and independence but they wont vote for it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    I think it will be a close call, but I do think Scotland will remain in the Union.
    No, Barroso shot this one down. Scotland would have to totally reapply from scratch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭Red Nissan


    I'd have more luck translating Rab C Nesbitt than any of the above :confused:

    Ach yes are proply a sasnak, away wi ye.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭kingchess


    I think the yes vote is gaining a lot of ground,the pro union crowd can only promise more of the same, and a lot of scots are left leaning and hate the tories, the uk goverement has said that they can not continue to use the pound if they leave(currency union) but the snp says all this can be settled after independence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭kingchess


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    No, Barroso shot this one down. Scotland would have to totally reapply from scratch.

    and I think that barroso was proved wrong after that statement,anyway,if scotland has to apply from scratch where will the poor spanish fleet get their fish from? I doubt that Europe would kick them out as it would be against the ethos of the european union -hell they even want the Ukraine-


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,038 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    Not really independence now is it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    kingchess wrote: »
    and I think that barroso was proved wrong after that statement,anyway,if scotland has to apply from scratch where will the poor spanish fleet get their fish from? I doubt that Europe would kick them out as it would be against the ethos of the european union -hell they even want the Ukraine-
    When was he proven wrong? Barroso is the man in charge of ensuring the correct adherence to EU treaties. If he was wrong on this issue it would seriously undermine his position and question his capability to stay on in that role.

    I don't think he was though, I was watching italk on euronews lately and the question was brought up to one of the vice presidents of the EU parliment and he confirmed what Barroso said.

    Here's the link:
    http://www.euronews.com/2012/11/28/obsession-with-austerity-is-dangerous-eu-vice-president/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 226 ✭✭preston johnny


    If the Scots want to guarantee a victory in the referendum. they should let the English vote


  • Administrators Posts: 56,583 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I still don't understand what the SNP mean by independence.

    It seems every time I hear it on the news I'm hearing Salmond or some other SNP politician arguing about some perk / benefit of being in the UK that Scotland should keep even after independence.

    It's like the want out, but want to keep one foot in. Or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭Gott


    After I moved to Scotland I was pleasantly surprised to see that Irish people get a vote.

    I've tried to keep an open mind but I keep coming back to Yes. The Tory government has presided over an explosion of poverty, opening of food banks, and a widening wealth gap and are doing nothing to tackle it. Scots have always been far more socially minded than their southern neighbours (historically Labour have been very strong, and the SNP espouses similar principles to old Labour) and I think the opportunity to have a government that leans that way appeals to them.

    I have tried to give Better Together the benefit of the doubt but they are clueless how to sell the union positively. As the three main parties are involved they all have differing views on how the union should be run and haven't offered any unified vision for a post indyref still-in-the-union Scotland. This has resulted in their policies being, at best, vague. Two of my close friends are unionists and when quizzed on "why are we Better Together?" their responses have boiled down to "Because we ARE Better Together!" without saying why.

    Yes canvassers on the other hand tend to be quite persuasive (the idea that the Yes front is anti-English is ludicrous though as with all things some lunatics exist) and can give calm, rational explanations of why Scotland will be a stronger separate nation. Alex Salmond is also very charismatic and is playing shrewd tactics (reaching out to women voters - less likely to vote Yes - by promoting women into his cabinet, for example), something that will enhance its chances.

    The whole thing about the EU - Barroso is trying to appease the Spanish who are sh1tting themselves that Catalonia will follow Scotland's example and leave; quite a few EU theorists and legal experts have come out and said things to the effect that Scotland would have an expedited rejoining process, if forced out at all before the 2016 independence day. Scots are currently EU citizens and to strip them of that right would cause a lot of legal heartache for the EU.

    The Bank of England - which is meant to be independent from the British government - have quietly mentioned that a deal could be done for a currency union. This caused serious embarrassment for the Tories who a few weeks previous had screeched about how Scotland wouldn't keep the pound.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    awec wrote: »
    I still don't understand what the SNP mean by independence.

    It seems every time I hear it on the news I'm hearing Salmond or some other SNP politician arguing about some perk / benefit of being in the UK that Scotland should keep even after independence.

    It's like the want out, but want to keep one foot in. Or something.
    It's a tactic. SNP know there are key issues affecting their campaign so if they can say we will keep these benefits post independence it helps them sell the idea to the public.

    Like any other election once the vote is made the promises are worthless anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    When was he proven wrong? Barroso is the man in charge of ensuring the correct adherence to EU treaties. If he was wrong on this issue it would seriously undermine his position and question his capability to stay on in that role.

    I don't think he was though, I was watching italk on euronews lately and the question was brought up to one of the vice presidents of the EU parliment and he confirmed what Barroso said.

    Here's the link:
    http://www.euronews.com/2012/11/28/obsession-with-austerity-is-dangerous-eu-vice-president/
    Miguel Angel Martinez: “Yes, anyway, the answer is quite simple and that is to say, if a new state appears on the European stage – a new state that is not a member, by definition, since it has split automatically it becomes a third country. Therefore, membership or not would, in my opinion be judged in the same way that we judge accession of any other candidate countries. You know that I am responsible for candidate countries, a country which may be called Scotland or Catalonia would have to go through the same process that currently Turkey and other countries have to go through.”

    seems as we have said they will defiantly have to reapply
    The whole thing about the EU - Barroso is trying to appease the Spanish who are sh1tting themselves that Catalonia will follow Scotland's example and leave; quite a few EU theorists and legal experts have come out and said things to the effect that Scotland would have an expedited rejoining process, if forced out at all before the 2016 independence day. Scots are currently EU citizens and to strip them of that right would cause a lot of legal heartache for the EU.

    How so they will have left the EU they will no longer be a part of an EU country, No way to sugar coat that one. They will be an independent nation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 127 ✭✭Gott


    If the Scots want to guarantee a victory in the referendum. they should let the English vote

    The English in Scotland indicate a large preference for staying in the Union. The more pertinent question is can they be arsed turning out to vote in September.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,618 ✭✭✭The Diabolical Monocle


    Och thas ne gonney happen


    It'll be a 'no'.

    But the number will be scary enough to gain them some respect/act as a warning not to take the piss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭kingchess


    barrose and his claim was ridiculed by an european court judge amongst others,and people reckoned he was playing to his own domestic audience.if he is right or wrong I do not know but I think that scotland will stay inside the EU but re-write a few treaties,beats throwning them out and re-writing every treaty.funny if they stay in and the rest of the uk votes to leave the EU??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,245 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    I think it's all about the economics: no amount of nationalism, or lofty ideals, will keep the wolf from the door if the numbers don't add up.

    In particular, I think Scotland really does need its own currency, independent of the Euro or Sterling. The Eurozone experiment has demonstrated that it's a bad idea to have a currency union without a fiscal union (policies for tax, spending etc.) . The Governor of the Bank of England, got this point right in the speech he gave back in January.

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    kingchess wrote: »
    barrose and his claim was ridiculed by an european court judge amongst others,and people reckoned he was playing to his own domestic audience.if he is right or wrong I do not know but I think that scotland will stay inside the EU but re-write a few treaties,beats throwning them out and re-writing every treaty.funny if they stay in and the rest of the uk votes to leave the EU??
    It's not just Barroso I've linked you to an interview given by one of the vice presidents of the EU parliament.

    What European court judge ridiculed his claim? Who are the others, do you have any links?

    It would not be necessary to re-write anything, the moment Scotland leaves the UK it creates a new country called Scotland. That country is not a member of the EU and would have to re-apply.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement