Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Robots will take our jobs

24

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,622 ✭✭✭Ruu


    Leave us alone! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭REXER


    Birneybau wrote: »
    What if they make robot politicians?!?!

    No more corruption and buying votes then!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭Davarus Walrus


    Andrew McAfee, a director at MIT speaks about this quite a bit. Very interesting. He's here at a TED talk giving an overview. Yes, but don't worry is the crux of his argument.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 970 ✭✭✭Senecio


    I spent 8 hours yesterday getting from Dublin to Lyon via Geneva because of French ATC strikes. Spent 9 Hrs in a pointless meeting today. Tomorrow I have to spend 6+ hrs coming home after getting out of bed at 4am and I have conference calls through to 11pm once I get back.

    When can the robots start?


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 4,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Mr. G


    I don't approve.

    For the sake of humanity and physiological reasons I think robots should not replace human workers. I am all for the use of IT, but robots is a step too far.

    For instance, if my passport application in the passport office in Cork gets lost, I don't want to speak to a robot.

    The use of controlled robots in key-hole surgery I approve of.

    Where they replace workers in ordinary jobs, that's a no no. Just no.

    There would not be as much to do. You can get bored pretty quickly after a few years out of a job.

    I prefer it the way it is. That's my 2c anyway


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    Mr. G wrote: »
    I don't approve.

    I prefer it the way it is. That's my 2c anyway

    It's gonna change and we can't prevent it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,377 ✭✭✭zenno


    Mr. G wrote: »
    I don't approve.

    For the sake of humanity and physiological reasons I think robots should not replace human workers. I am all for the use of IT, but robots is a step too far.

    For instance, if my passport application in the passport office in Cork gets lost, I don't want to speak to a robot.

    The use of controlled robots in key-hole surgery I approve of.

    Where they replace workers in ordinary jobs, that's a no no. Just no.

    There would not be as much to do. You can get bored pretty quickly after a few years out of a job.

    I prefer it the way it is. That's my 2c anyway

    Many folk have tons of hobbies they love doing, so I'd say they would be very happy to spend all their free time doing what they really love doing, as most people now can't find enough time to do the things they love because of so many hours working.

    If a person is just put on this earth to work till they die, then that's a very boring thing to think about. More time for myself is way better without doubt.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    zenno wrote: »
    Many folk have tons of hobbies they love doing, so I'd say they would be very happy to spend all their free time doing what they really love doing, as most people now can't find enough time to do the things they love because of so many hours working.

    Yeah, it wouldn't be like being unemployed but like being a carefree kid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭bur


    I just hope when i get hooked up to the Marix it's the one that lets me learn kung-fu.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Sir Arthur Daley


    A Factory i do maintenance in bought in 4 Robot welders, 8 people lost their jobs, Robots dont have any sick head on a monday morning, dont take 20 fag breaks in the day or dont take offence to being called a Scab.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    No, no, no. It might not be long before robots can do most of the things people can do and much more cheaply too. So what are we to do with the millions of unemployed they create???
    It's a bit off yet. Even if they build a robot that could physically move like a human building in human intuition which is what our big advantage is is much more difficult.
    Mr. G wrote: »
    For instance, if my passport application in the passport office in Cork gets lost, I don't want to speak to a robot.

    The use of controlled robots in key-hole surgery I approve of.
    You don't trust a robot to file your passport papers correctly but you do trust them to open you up? Robots would be ideal for managing the kind of paper work that takes place at passport office, they wouldn't get bored, they'd have a personal record of what they did, you could monitor what they do and make improvements at a national level. Doctors need to have experience and can make jumps of logic that computers can't. If a computer ran into a problem during your surgery it could freeze, or worse, it could could chose the wrong pre-programed procedure to attempt to fix the mistake.
    Where they replace workers in ordinary jobs, that's a no no. Just no.
    Why? Robots are ideal for mundane work. We have companies that pay it's CEO €5,000 a week and a guy sweeping the floors on €300 but they're essentially the same machine. It's like using a tractor to do everything from working the fields to bringing sick people to the hospital.
    There would not be as much to do. You can get bored pretty quickly after a few years out of a job.
    There's plenty people could be doing if free from mundane jobs that serve no purpose. We have people manufacturing useless and erelivant products to fill up a market place. Our need for everyone to have a job means we're producing so much pointless crap.
    I prefer it the way it is. That's my 2c anyway
    It's hard to say that when you don't know what it would really be like.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    Yes, but don't worry is the crux of his argument.

    Great video but he doesn't say anything about what we're gioing to do with all those unemployed. Do we throw them on the scrapheap and chuck them a few crumbs to eat or do we share the wealth and provide them with a decent income. The latter is clearly the right thing to do but with people's current attitudes towards the unemployed the former is most likely to happen.

    When machines take over much of the labour market we'll need to get rid of this idea that everybody has to pay their way. We should all be able to benefit from the wealth generated by technology.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    I hear they use foreign robots too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,787 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    Great video but he doesn't say anything about what we're gioing to do with all those unemployed.
    The only way the human species has a future is by moving into space. There's a limit to what we can do here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,377 ✭✭✭zenno


    But eventually there won't be enough places that need people any more. When most of the work to run society is done by machines what will people do to earn a living? The economic system will have to change into something very different to what it is now. Instead of having to fight to acquire money to survive the government could provide everyone with a basic guaranteed income and anything you manage to earn on top of that will be a bonus.

    Basically, we could all become welfare recipients of the wealth created by the machines
    .

    In this scenario as you mentioned, That could work.
    the money saved from not having to pay wages to robots would be enormous. More money in the economy.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    ScumLord wrote: »
    ...building in human intuition which is what our big advantage is is much more difficult.

    It's getting closer everyday and might be here sooner than you'd think. Pattern recognition software is getting more and more powerful at a exponential rate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭SilverScreen


    As an engineer I approve. I wonder how much one can be paid for taking care of the robots.
    They'll develop robots to look after the robots.

    I reckon in the future a lot of large companies will only consist of an expensive super-computer in a room, and a man and his dog. Who can guess what the man and his dog is for? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 919 ✭✭✭Joe prim


    They'll develop robots to look after the robots.

    I reckon in the future a lot of large companies will only consist of an expensive super-computer in a room, and a man and his dog. Who can guess what the man and his dog is for? :)



    The crack?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    The man fukks the dog, amirite?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭SilverScreen


    Joe prim wrote: »
    The crack?
    The dog will be there to guard the computer and to stop people from stealing it. The man will be there to feed the dog,


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Sir Arthur Daley


    Why not a Robot Dog?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    I reckon my job is safe enough :D I think IT will take a huge hit though ironically enough :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭SilverScreen


    WikiHow wrote: »
    Why not a Robot Dog?
    Too expensive for the job it's doing. Who's going to guard the robot dog?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Sir Arthur Daley


    Who's going to guard the robot dog?

    The Man?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 17 The Antigay


    WikiHow wrote: »
    The Man?

    Why not robot man?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,667 ✭✭✭Skatedude


    As an engineer I approve. I wonder how much one can be paid for taking care of the robots.

    As someone who spends a lot of time fixing robots, not paid enough.
    And besides, the robot gets better health benifits


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,720 ✭✭✭Sir Arthur Daley


    Why not robot man?

    Why not Robot man-dog?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,113 ✭✭✭SilverScreen


    Why not robot man?
    You'll need a dog to guard the robot man in case someone breaks in and steals him.

    Could give him a laser gun though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    There ,ll be a man and a robot dog.
    AT this rate there, will be few people left working in factorys,
    so who,, will have money to buy the big corporation,s products.
    we have big companys like ibm, nbc, hiring interns,
    zero hours contracts ,
    Workers are losing rights, jobs, while big corporations work on devices to automate work,
    make more advanced ,robots, to reduce no of workers needed.
    ITS worse in the usa where students are borrowing 100k to get a degree for a job that may not exist .

    maybe in 20 years , with gps, driverless cars, busdrivers, will be replaced by
    automated bus, s.
    There,ll be robots making robots ,to make consumer goods.
    Look at netflix etc itunes, etc the idea of going to a shop to buy, rent videos, music , may seem quaint in 10 years.
    Maybe consoles, game shops wont exist in ten years,
    you,ll be able to buy any game as a digital download to play on a pc ,
    with a sony or xbox os on it.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 862 ✭✭✭Grand Moff Tarkin


    I won't worry until we start to call the robots cylons.


Advertisement
Advertisement