Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

when is a woman too fit?

2456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,899 ✭✭✭✭BBDBB


    Links234 wrote: »
    and some look terrific

    Samantha Wright is incredibly beautiful btw



    being a gentleman, I was about to offer to carry that for her..........but me old injury is playing me up in this cold weather you see ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    I think the Olympic sprinters are utterly magnificent creatures. Train on! :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,363 ✭✭✭✭cantdecide


    Some women just have a 'look' that lends itself to particular shapes better than others.

    I tend to like the curves but I'd have no problem whatsoever with muscley women but sweet duckface Jesus, give the muscle+Ronseal look a miss.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,533 ✭✭✭SV


    https://www.facebook.com/sheliftsbroofficial?fref=ts

    God damn. Amazing physiques! Think it's extremely attractive but I'd prefer to be with someone who wouldn't make me feel so inadequate :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭poundapunnet


    It's funny how guys seem drawn to them allright :o

    I'm a girl though ;) just a pervert one!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 192 ✭✭galwayredgirl


    I'm a girl though ;) just a pervert one!


    Oh well, whatever you're having yourself and all that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    SV wrote: »
    https://www.facebook.com/sheliftsbroofficial?fref=ts

    God damn. Amazing physiques! Think it's extremely attractive but I'd prefer to be with someone who wouldn't make me feel so inadequate :P

    They all have lovely bottoms! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Links234 wrote: »
    Samantha Wright is incredibly beautiful btw

    She is indeed - a beautiful lady who can clean and jerk 170 pounds.

    She also has a very impressive snatch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    She is indeed - a beautiful lady who can clean and jerk 170 pounds.

    She also has a very impressive snatch.

    As the fella said, she can't wrestle but you should see her box! :pac::pac::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 816 ✭✭✭dr strangelove


    When she can crack yer walnuts with her butt-cheeks.

    Yep, waaaaaay too fit then.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭Tombi!


    Same thing I imagine a lot of women would say about men: when they start with steroids it's usually too much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,296 ✭✭✭Frank Black


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    my experiences with the strong chicks has involved endless pre sex wrestling, ball kicking and leg crushing


    Try to ensure the sex is consensual next time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,349 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I know I’m going to be very general here but when compared to other countries I’ve lived in there’s still a massive misconception amongst Irish women that lifting weights or in fact any exercise beyond walking/yoga will make them look like body builders. In Ireland there seems to be a much bigger push towards controlling food than increasing exercise.

    I much prefer the look of a girl who’s fit from exercising than one who’s thin from tight control of food.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,237 ✭✭✭✭jimgoose


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    ...I much prefer the look of a girl who’s fit from exercising than one who’s thin from tight control of food.

    Damn straight. Nothing as freaky as the sight of a young wan in a miniskirt who manages to be both borderline emaciated and riddled with cellulite.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,386 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I wanna know this answer too.

    I am an averagely physically fit woman, 32, but I'm tiny. Real thin, tiny waist, tiny build, but my bones don't show. I showed a (male) friend a photo last night, me when I was overweight.

    He said he prefered it to my current, fit, healthy build. He liked the curves. But I look at it and I was genuinely overweight!!
    One of two things I reckon, a) that's his genuine attraction to larger women(know a couple of guys like this) or b) the cultures idea of "curvy" has gone heavier over the last generation, so the idea of "normal" has also gone heavier. It's cultural too. IME Irish men prefer/are more OK with heavier women. A woman that would get plenty of attention from guys here wouldn't be looked at twice in Italy or Ukraine kinda thing.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,386 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    jimgoose wrote: »
    riddled with cellulite.
    Now take this with a grain of salt if you will, but in my experience *ahem* women who lift weights have far far less of that than women who starve themselves or even those who run as a sport. I've actually seen cellulite near vanish on a woman who took up lifting weights. Her skin overall got better too. OK it was experience of a small group of women, but it was noticeable. My theory at the time was lifting weights increases the bodies production of testosterone* and human growth hormone and this is what had the effect? I gather small doses of HGH is used on the sly by models because of it's youthful effects.

    The other advantage with building lean mass is muscle burns calories just sitting there, even when you're asleep. Male(and I presume female) bodybuilders have to eat huge amounts of grub in training to keep up with the calorific demand of their muscles. On a smaller scale with ordinary women lifting weights it means that counting calories is not even close to the issue it would be if you were just on a diet.





    *the ladies have testosterone too, only in much smaller amounts than men, so no danger in turning into a muscle monster. Hell if it was that easy men with their higher test levels would all look like Rambo with little effort. :D There are vanishingly few all natural bodybuilders in competitions. Vitamin S is required to get to those sizes and huge, gargantuan effort and dedication. Pump me full of roids and I'd just become an angry fat bastard, as opposed to my current angry skinny bastard.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭looking_around


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Now take this with a grain of salt if you will, but in my experience *ahem* women who lift weights have far far less of that than women who starve themselves or even those who run as a sport. I've actually seen cellulite near vanish on a woman who took up lifting weights. Her skin overall got better too. OK it was experience of a small group of women, but it was noticeable. My theory at the time was lifting weights increases the bodies production of testosterone* and human growth hormone and this is what had the effect? I gather small doses of HGH is used on the sly by models because of it's youthful effects.

    Contrary to popular belief exercise does not remove cellulite. Once developed, you're fcuked.
    causes
    A major contributing factor is a) hormones and b) diet thats high in carbohydrates/low in fiber./crappy blood circulation.
    But again once developed, it's there and it ain't going anywhere.
    exercise doesn't help.

    myths

    what exercise does, is reduce appearance, but it is still there.


  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Cyrus Plain Martian



    Still says strength training highly recommended for it


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,386 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Contrary to popular belief exercise does not remove cellulite. Once developed, you're fcuked.
    causes
    Just reporting what I saw with my own eyes LA. There was a very clear reduction of it. I wonder in the exercise doesn't work studies(though I didn't see any links to actual studies) did they include all types of exercise or break it down into types? On the rise in testosterone theory, men rarely get cellulite(if you have it get then get thee to a physic stat) and one reason is down to more collagen and test builds same, so even a tiny amount bumped up by weights might have an effect by building more collagen?

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wibbs wrote: »
    The other advantage with building lean mass is muscle burns calories just sitting there, even when you're asleep. Male(and I presume female) bodybuilders have to eat huge amounts of grub in training to keep up with the calorific demand of their muscles. On a smaller scale with ordinary women lifting weights it means that counting calories is not even close to the issue it would be if you were just on a diet.

    Women aren't going to build a massive amount of actual lean mass from lifting though. Even the ones who lift semi-competitively if they want to not look like they're on steroids will be the same size as a fit 16 year old boy, not a 20 something year old who is all about the lifting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭looking_around


    bluewolf wrote: »
    Still says strength training highly recommended for it

    I never said it strength training wasn't best to reduce the appearance, was commenting that it's still there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,810 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    If they look anything remotely like Jessica Ennis, that's fine by me! Anything like Arnold Swarzenegger you've probably gone too far:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 590 ✭✭✭stpaddy99


    she is gorgeous isn't she


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    Not a fan of women who could be called muscular, fit and toned - yes, but not muscular. It's a bit of a moot point because most women won't get muscular from exercise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 731 ✭✭✭Butterface


    How much is too much is all down to taste. Having said that I went out with a gymaholic once and whilst she was uber sexy she was the most insufferable bore. The only thing she ever spoke about was spinning or squatting etc etc.

    Some friends of mine (a couple) started getting into fitness last year and they now have nothing to talk about apart from what they are doing in the gym or what 10k they're training for. They are always posting inspirational photos to Facebook or congratulating themselves on a great night at the gym.. I had to hide them. I met up with them a few months ago and all of their other interests seem to have fallen to the wayside, and they really have become insufferable bores.

    I go to the gym and play for a few teams during the summer but I have no interest in talking about fitness techniques unless it's to a gym instructor! It's like it becomes an obsession to some people!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,301 ✭✭✭Daveysil15


    A woman like this is fine. Very athletic and toned but not too muscular.



    TBH even some of the female GAA players are too stocky for my liking. Nothing wrong with a woman who lifts weights as long as she doesn't have big stocky shoulders or veins popping out of her arms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 ✭✭✭Vomit


    I cannot stand body builders, both are grotesque in my eyes. They can't even walk normally \=.

    They only walk funny when going out on stage to compete - they are in a constant stand of tension to make their muscles pop out more.
    But women just lifting a few weights. I do find, their body becomes more manly. And they lose their waist/shape somewhat.
    Couldn't be more wrong. The opposite is true in most cases. Muscle only adds shape to whatever frame a woman already has.
    I think women look best, thin, but with a bit of fat on them. (women are meant to have what is it 25% body fat anyway, as oppose to mens 10%) Women need the curves, or we're just looking at 'men' who can get preggers. XD.
    Again, a misunderstanding of body composition - when you see a woman with shapely calves and thighs, that is muscle. There is no amount of fat a woman can gain to improve her figure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,461 ✭✭✭--Kaiser--


    She looks fantastic, except for the six pack. I think that indicates that her body fat is unheathily low (e.g. no menstruation, can lead to osteoporosis etc..). Nothing wrong with a little softness to a women's abdomen


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40 Oprahs_Vagina


    stpaddy99 wrote: »
    Ok I presume the red blooded hetro males here love a good fit woman
    tastes vary....some like the big boobed booty vixen...others the stick insects
    many like the tight fit package
    But what about birds with muscle? where does one draw the line?

    bodybuilders often look frankly awful due to roids....but what about the naturally muscular birds?

    does it bother you to have sex with such a woman?

    Ive been with a few laydees but im no looker....no doubt theres some stallions here whove bedded half od Dublin
    my experiences with the strong chicks has involved endless pre sex wrestling, ball kicking and leg crushing
    in some cases she had stronger lower body but my upper body saved me from humilification lol

    so whats your take on muscle on women? when is enough enough and when is it too much?

    :D


Advertisement
Advertisement