Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish justice system fails again

  • 12-12-2013 01:59AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭


    Shocking story in The Independent today:

    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/child-porn-king-may-go-free-as-dpp-decides-against-prosecution-29827706.html

    An Irishman, whom the FBI have labelled as the "largest facilitator of child porn on the planet" will not face any charges here after the DPP have come to the baffling decision not to prosecute him, even after he indicated he would be willing to plead guilty to charges of conspiring to distribute and advertise child pornography, as well as distributing and advertising child pornography.

    This, in turn, now makes it extremely difficult to extradite him to the US, where he faces a maximum term of 100 years in prison.

    Can someone explain to me how on earth this guy, who owns a hosting site which is responsible for over 100 websites depicting the abuse, rape and torture of children, gets off scott free in this country?

    This decision honestly defies belief.




«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,183 ✭✭✭✭Lapin


    As I often said before.

    We have one of the best legal systems in the world, but one of the worst justice systems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭D1stant


    This really disappointed me when I saw it. I do not understand why he was not prosecuted here. The Indo article was terrible and didn't explain it

    But as I understand he will almost definitely be extradited for a much longer sentence in the US (at their expense). Let him rot.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 9,904 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manach


    From other sources (and I'm admit I could be wrong here), is that the same technical system has and is being used by dissidents in totalitarian countries to avoid notice from the packet inspection tools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,629 ✭✭✭Hunchback


    D1stant wrote: »
    This really disappointed me when I saw it. I do not understand why he was not prosecuted here. The Indo article was terrible and didn't explain it

    But as I understand he will almost definitely be extradited for a much longer sentence in the US (at their expense). Let him rot.

    Maybe the decision was made so as international scorn wasn't poured on the Irish legal system arising out of what may have been a comparatively paltry sentance if found guilty, compared to the potential sentance he may face in the US


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,591 ✭✭✭ahnowbrowncow


    He wasn't prosecuted here so he could be extradited to the U.S. and be charged there, I thought it was pretty obvious.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    Yep that was the whole point


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    Lapin wrote: »
    As I often said before.

    We have one of the best legal systems in the world, but one of the worst justice systems.

    No justice at all.

    What message does this send out? The world's largest facilitator of child porn was ready and willing to play ball, but sure, there's no need to go any further than that, let's just leave him be.

    I hope the justice minister starts doing his job and looks very seriously into this case. He should be fully co-operating with the US authorities to make sure this guy gets his day in court.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,646 ✭✭✭washman3


    Important to remember that the Irish justice system is really not a system at all, its actually a business.
    Take a look at the earnings of those involved in our 'justice system' and judge for yourself.!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭Bipolar Joe


    Just to make things clear, the guy owns Freedom Hosting, a free, very simple hosting site on the TOR Network. Other people decided to put child porn on it. It's like Rapidshare (Only for hosting websites). You can choose to upload a .RAR file of your holiday photos (Totally fine), or Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy (Illegal). It's not Rapidshares fault.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    The FBI want him, they can't get him if he's prosecuted here. The fact that he was seemingly willing to plead guilty here presumably sounded some alarm bells in the DPP.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,902 ✭✭✭✭Kristopherus


    P_1 wrote: »
    The FBI want him, they can't get him if he's prosecuted here. The fact that he was seemingly willing to plead guilty here presumably sounded some alarm bells in the DPP.

    +1.

    Anyway why should he be tried here and get 5 years with the final 2 suspended, when he's likely to get 100 yrs in the US's worst hell-holes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭D1stant


    Just to make things clear, the guy owns Freedom Hosting, a free, very simple hosting site on the TOR Network. Other people decided to put child porn on it. It's like Rapidshare (Only for hosting websites). You can choose to upload a .RAR file of your holiday photos (Totally fine), or Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy (Illegal). It's not Rapidshares fault.

    Ah come on. Its not his fault? He knew what he was hosting. There's a world of a difference between bootlegging Hollywood releases and this depraved sh1t. He facilitated and aided it.

    "Last month Mr Marques indicated in a letter to the DPP that he would plead guilty, in Ireland, to charges relating to conspiring to distribute and advertise child pornography, as well as advertising and distributing child pornography. "


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    He wasn't prosecuted here so he could be extradited to the U.S. and be charged there, I thought it was pretty obvious.

    That article states the decision not to prosecute here could actually be detrimental in the efforts to extradite him, due to the 1965 extradition act.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2521789/Child-porn-dealer-cited-worlds-biggest-walk-free-Ireland-drops-charges.html
    Irish authorities have revealed Eric Eoin Marques will not be prosecuted under their jurisdiction and may challenge an attempt by the U.S. to get him extradited.

    Last month the 28-year-old, who the FBI has accused of being the 'largest facilitator of child porn on the planet', indicated he would plead guilty to a series of charges under Irish law.
    But Ireland's director of public prosecutions Claire Loftus has now said she will not bring proceedings against him in Ireland - a decision she has not explained.

    It leaves the U.S. facing an uphill battle to extradite Marques because of its stiffer sentencing regime.
    In Ireland, Marques, who has no criminal record, faced a maximum 14-year jail term that would have been reduced significantly by an early guilty plea.
    However, in America the FBI told a court last month that he faced a total at least 100 years - four life terms in Ireland - behind bars if found guilty of the charges he is accused of.

    Unlike Ireland, each of the U.S. charges carries a sentence of between 20 and 30 years and are likely to run consecutively, rather than concurrently.
    Lawyers for Marques are expected to argue that U.S. sentences for similar charges are too harsh in comparison with Ireland's, and that Ireland should refuse to extradite him.

    Further, under Irish law the Justice Minister has the power to refuse an extradition where the DPP has decided not to bring proceedings against a suspect


    The decision not to prosecute could very well see him walk free.



    I just don't understand the thinking behind Ms. Loftus' decision at all.






  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Just to make things clear, the guy owns Freedom Hosting, a free, very simple hosting site on the TOR Network. Other people decided to put child porn on it. It's like Rapidshare (Only for hosting websites). You can choose to upload a .RAR file of your holiday photos (Totally fine), or Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy (Illegal). It's not Rapidshares fault.

    That's not quite true. Freedom Hosting was a lot more than just somewhere that people uploaded their files to. It hosted entire websites, and although it was stated on the site that no 'illegal content' was allowed, the owner failed to take any action against offenders despite him knowing that child porn existed on his servers.

    Rapidshare etc will remove illegal stuff once it's brought to their attention. This guys inaction in that regard is what has landed him in trouble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Two ****ing words for the scum bag

    Extreme rendition

    I'll gladly pay for the CIA flight


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    D1stant wrote: »
    Ah come on. Its not his fault? He knew what he was hosting. There's a world of a difference between bootlegging Hollwood releases and this depraved sh1t. He facilitated and aided it.

    "Last month Mr Marques indicated in a letter to the DPP that he would plead guilty, in Ireland, to charges relating to conspiring to distribute and advertise child pornography, as well as advertising and distributing child pornography. "

    I'd imagine the pleading guilty in Ireland was so he wouldn't be extradited as he knows that the American Criminal Justice System is a ****ing farce.

    He couldn't know what was on the sites, part of the service was that he WOULDN'T look at clients files, he did however say anything reported to him would be removed and anyone who broke any laws would be banned. The service had a strict policy of not allowing anything that was illegal.

    There was nothing found on his personal computers or portable drives.


    If he's a facilitator of child porn then so is google, yahoo and every major content hoster in the world.


    He provided a service, other people misused the service.

    Rather than go after the people who actually broke the law, the FBI go for the easy win and go for the service provider.


    This is no different than the **** who threaten to sue boards because a user posted something they didn't like.


    If it's found that he was actually involved in distributing images and content, then he's guilty, if all he did was provide a hosting service that a small group of people abused, he's an innocent man and should free to live his life.


    From what I have read about this case the only thing this man HAS done wrong is what appears to be pretty substantial tax evasion.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 323 ✭✭hungry hippo 4


    lets hope he dies a horrific death.


  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anyone who actually have a clue care to comment on this? Will this make extradition easier or harder?
    I find it surprising though if they want to extradite him. Looking at some proceedings about people fighting extradition could the fact that he'll receive a sentence 10 times as high in another country for basically the same offence not be an effective strategy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭Montroseee


    From talking to friends in the legal profession, the costs of this case will be in the tens of millions. Let America deal with it.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,622 Mod ✭✭✭✭Amirani


    I hope the justice minister starts doing his job and looks very seriously into this case. He should be fully co-operating with the US authorities to make sure this guy gets his day in court.

    That's for an Irish court to decide, not the Minister for Justice and Equality.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    Seaneh wrote: »
    I'd imagine the pleading guilty in Ireland was so he wouldn't be extradited as he knows that the American Criminal Justice System is a ****ing farce.

    He couldn't know what was on the sites, part of the service was that he WOULDN'T look at clients files, he did however say anything reported to him would be removed and anyone who broke any laws would be banned. The service had a strict policy of not allowing anything that was illegal.

    There was nothing found on his personal computers or portable drives.


    If he's a facilitator of child porn then so is google, yahoo and every major content hoster in the world.


    He provided a service, other people misused the service.

    Rather than go after the people who actually broke the law, the FBI go for the easy win and go for the service provider.


    This is no different than the **** who threaten to sue boards because a user posted something they didn't like.


    If it's found that he was actually involved in distributing images and content, then he's guilty, if all he did was provide a hosting service that a small group of people abused, he's an innocent man and should free to live his life.


    From what I have read about this case the only thing this man HAS done wrong is what appears to be pretty substantial tax evasion.

    A small group? We're talking over 100 websites depicting this stuff!

    See no evil, hear no evil? I think not.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭Bipolar Joe


    That's not quite true. Freedom Hosting was a lot more than just somewhere that people uploaded their files to. It hosted entire websites, and although it was stated on the site that no 'illegal content' was allowed, the owner failed to take any action against offenders despite him knowing that child porn existed on his servers.

    Rapidshare etc will remove illegal stuff once it's brought to their attention. This guys inaction in that regard is what has landed him in trouble.

    Freedom Hosting is huge, and sites on the network are impossible to find unless you have amazing luck, or a list. If you know the site address, you've been looking for it. If you're looking for it, you're not gonna report it. FH is one dude, not a large operation like RS, who have staff to clean up the public's mess. Let's all hold off the "Fuckin' nonces, rabble rabble, burn his balls, rabble rabble" pitchfork bullshit until it comes out that he facilitated beyond having open servers, just like Angelfire did back in the day.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    That's for an Irish court to decide, not the Minister for Justice and Equality.

    Indeed.

    Reactionary nonsense suggesting that we ignore the reason why we have a separation between the government and the judiciary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,626 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Anyone who actually have a clue care to comment on this? Will this make extradition easier or harder?
    I find it surprising though if they want to extradite him. Looking at some proceedings about people fighting extradition could the fact that he'll receive a sentence 10 times as high in another country for basically the same offence not be an effective strategy?

    He shouldn't really be extradited at all. He's an Irish citizen who was resident here when he committed the alleged offences. It'll actually set a very dangerous precedent should he be extradited.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭Bipolar Joe


    His bank account was in Las Vegas, so that might have something to do with the extradition (Dunno that stuff, just riffing).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    He shouldn't really be extradited at all. He's an Irish citizen who was resident here when he committed the alleged offences. It'll actually set a very dangerous precedent should he be extradited.

    He has both Irish and US citizenship and is wanted in Maryland.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    A small group? We're talking over 100 websites depicting this stuff!

    See no evil, hear no evil? I think not.

    100 websites from a service that hosts hundreds of times that many. As a proportion of his services users, they were a small group. As a proportion of people who use tor they are an even smaller group and as a proportion of the people who use the net in it's entirety it's beyond minuscule.

    Going after this guy solves NOTHING, the people who are actually guilty are still out there harming children and just using another service.

    Shut his service down, yeah, sure, he deserves that.

    Put him in a federal jail in the US for the rest of his life?

    **** off, it achieves nothing beyond using someone as a scapegoat in a PR campaign.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭D1stant


    Seaneh wrote: »

    If it's found that he was actually involved in distributing images and content, then he's guilty, if all he did was provide a hosting service that a small group of people abused, he's an innocent man and should free to live his life.

    If he is innocent why did he indicate he would plead guilty to child pornography advertising & distribution? Why would he not fight the case in Ireland?

    I just don't find it credible that he didn't know there were 100 child-porn sites on his servers


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    He has both Irish and US citizenship and is wanted in Maryland.

    He was resident in Ireland when the crimes he was alleged to have committed happened. If they happened, they happened in Ireland, not America.

    He is an Irish citizen, he should be protected by the Irish government and if he has a case to answer, tried by the Irish justice system.



    When they send Seanie Fitz back so he can tried for his crimes, then they can talk about extraditing people.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,506 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    The Silk Road is back up, all the kiddy porn is still there just in a different place.

    Get the onion browser online or in the App Store and you'll see why his arrest has done feck all.

    What I want to know is he into kiddy porn personally, if he's not well then he should be given a medal for protecting our freedom a little while longer.
    You can't facilitate freedom and choose what should be free. He's not God.


Advertisement
Advertisement