Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pay the Broadcast Charge or shut down RTE?

13

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 602 ✭✭✭hotbabe1992


    Well we could start by compelling RTE in a court of law,if people can get injunctions to compel RTE to start laying it out on a subscription basis,ie you pay you get to view,you dont pay you dont get to view -simple.

    The reason why they didnt implement it this way is simple RTE are looking for bigger salaries..

    I just think to myself what justifies this,the programming hasnt gotten any better,so why should we be forced into paying,remember every person in ireland has to pay for this whether they own a tv or not.

    I know an old guy who doesnt have tv or internet or anything and he just reads newspapers he has stacks of them,why the hell should he have to pay??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    In the event of global nuclear warfare who's gonna give the warning?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    kneemos wrote: »
    In the event of global nuclear warfare who's gonna give the warning?

    Twitter/facebook/myriad of media sites on net.
    BBC
    Itv
    Ch4
    Tv3
    TG4
    Besides RTE would Prob broadcast the warning 18 hours after detonation, we'd all be walking around gnawing on each others knees by that point, wandering the earth aimlessly with snotty noses and matted hair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Well we could start by compelling RTE in a court of law,if people can get injunctions to compel RTE to start laying it out on a subscription basis,ie you pay you get to view,you dont pay you dont get to view -simple.
    We could compel RTE to introduce a subscription based funding model under what law exactly? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Phoebas wrote: »
    We could compel RTE to introduce a subscription based funding model under what law exactly? :confused:

    Jude.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭UCDVet


    I don't know what anyone else will do; but I'm not paying the broadcast charge. And from what I can gather, there isn't anything they can do about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    UCDVet wrote: »
    I don't know what anyone else will do; but I'm not paying the broadcast charge. And from what I can gather, there isn't anything they can do about it.

    Presumably they can prosecute you for non payment?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,736 ✭✭✭Irish Guitarist


    The reasoning behind the broadcasting charge seems to be that anyone with a computer or mobile phone is going to watch television programmes on them. Even if this were true it's highly unlikely that many people would download RTE programmes.

    The idea that everyone that has a device which is capable of letting them watch any programme from the history of recorded television would choose to download episodes of Fair City or Off The Rails is ludicrous.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭UCDVet


    Phoebas wrote: »
    Presumably they can prosecute you for non payment?

    That presumes a lot. The various groups of the government don't communicate well (if at all). I'm paying LPT for a house I don't own because I lived their two years ago.

    The broadcast charge is supposed to be payed by the person who lives in the house; not the owner. There isn't a reliable central database of who is renting what, plenty of landlords don't register with the PRTB or whatever it is and renters move frequently enough that by the time they manage to do anything, they'll be on to some other place.

    They claim that 20% of people who should be paying the TV license aren't paying. But 1 in 5 households in Ireland have no jobs.

    This isn't going to be any more enforceable than the TV license. 'Oh nah, I didn't live at 123 Fake Street two years ago....I was at 45 Some Other Place. No, I don't have a lease, I was just staying with a friend'.

    That's all it takes. And it's not at all uncommon for people to have housemates/roommates where the landlord has direct interaction with one person and that person brings in friends, like informal subletting.

    It's per-household, not per-person. *I* don't have to pay; just someone from my house. But not 'my' house, as in a house I own, just the house I was staying at during the time. If I don't pay my fee, and you spend a weekend on my couch - are you legally obliged to pay?

    And it's not going through PAYE because, well, if they did that, they wouldn't decrease the number of people not paying. 80% already pay. They want more than that....and plenty of households have no workers.

    This will be JUST like the TV license. They won't know who is where, they'll send vague letters threatening the 'resident'. If they get a name, they'll use that name, and I'll be getting letters addressed to the guy who lived here 2 years ago, telling me to pay the Broadcast charge.

    A giant waste of time, all around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    UCDVet wrote: »
    That presumes a lot. The various groups of the government don't communicate well (if at all). I'm paying LPT for a house I don't own because I lived their two years ago.

    The broadcast charge is supposed to be payed by the person who lives in the house; not the owner. There isn't a reliable central database of who is renting what, plenty of landlords don't register with the PRTB or whatever it is and renters move frequently enough that by the time they manage to do anything, they'll be on to some other place.

    They claim that 20% of people who should be paying the TV license aren't paying. But 1 in 5 households in Ireland have no jobs.

    This isn't going to be any more enforceable than the TV license. 'Oh nah, I didn't live at 123 Fake Street two years ago....I was at 45 Some Other Place. No, I don't have a lease, I was just staying with a friend'.

    That's all it takes. And it's not at all uncommon for people to have housemates/roommates where the landlord has direct interaction with one person and that person brings in friends, like informal subletting.

    It's per-household, not per-person. *I* don't have to pay; just someone from my house. But not 'my' house, as in a house I own, just the house I was staying at during the time. If I don't pay my fee, and you spend a weekend on my couch - are you legally obliged to pay?

    And it's not going through PAYE because, well, if they did that, they wouldn't decrease the number of people not paying. 80% already pay. They want more than that....and plenty of households have no workers.

    This will be JUST like the TV license. They won't know who is where, they'll send vague letters threatening the 'resident'. If they get a name, they'll use that name, and I'll be getting letters addressed to the guy who lived here 2 years ago, telling me to pay the Broadcast charge.

    A giant waste of time, all around.
    One of the reasons put forward for introducing the broadcasting charge was that the TV licence is cumbersome to collect (hence the c.20% non compliance rate).
    When its levied on all households then this should be much easier. They will presumably have access to the various TV licence/ HHC / LPT / PRTB databases to aid collection.

    I'm not at all convinced by arguments that they'll have difficulty demonstrating who the liable person in a household is. If no voluntary declaration is made, they can presumably levy the person whose name is on the LPT or PRTB record.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭DieselPowered


    So the broadcast charge is based on homes because they can receive signals of tv/radio etc.

    So what about the car? You can listen to RTE on the radio and some new cars have Internet/tv as well so you could watch RTE player.

    Are they going to bring out a separate broadcast charge for all cars too?

    There is no difference between a house and car or your smart phone to that effect to receive broadcast signals anymore so where is this ever going to end?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    So the broadcast charge is based on homes because they can receive signals of tv/radio etc.

    So what about the car? You can listen to RTE on the radio and some new cars have Internet/tv as well so you could watch RTE player.

    Are they going to bring out a separate broadcast charge for all cars too?

    There is no difference between a house and car or your smart phone to that effect to receive broadcast signals anymore so where is this ever going to end?
    People who have cars are also presumably already members of households. :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    Phoebas wrote: »

    I'm not at all convinced by arguments that they'll have difficulty demonstrating who the liable person in a household is. If no voluntary declaration is made, they can presumably levy the person whose name is on the LPT or PRTB record .

    Good old fashioned democracy eh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Good old fashioned democracy eh.

    Yep. The range of collection powers go into the bill, its voted on by our elected reps, becomes law and is enforced.

    Obviously some people will (somehow) find that using existing data sources to aid collection to be undemocratic, but I wouldn't take them too seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,080 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    Would be favour of just downsizing it and reducing what we pay. Tell the overpaid fools there to fcuk off and leave someone else pay you


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭UCDVet


    Phoebas wrote: »
    One of the reasons put forward for introducing the broadcasting charge was that the TV licence is cumbersome to collect (hence the c.20% non compliance rate).
    When its levied on all households then this should be much easier. They will presumably have access to the various TV licence/ HHC / LPT / PRTB databases to aid collection.

    I'm not at all convinced by arguments that they'll have difficulty demonstrating who the liable person in a household is. If no voluntary declaration is made, they can presumably levy the person whose name is on the LPT or PRTB record.

    In theory - absolutely.

    In practice - no way.

    Remember, we're not talking about the 80% of Ireland who has decent houses and nice apartments. I'm talking about the poorest 20%, the ones the have shady landlords, that move every year or two. I'm a poor immigrant - my first landlord had me slide 220 euro each week under the door of a utility closet on the top floor. PRTB wasn't involved.

    LPT is payable by the owner of the property.
    This fee is payable by the resident. Just like the old TV tax was.

    So, let's use me as an example. My wife has a PPSN and I have a PPSN. We rent and we're going to move at the end of this year. I have a job, she doesn't.

    We move and instead of my renting a place, *she* rents a place. She gives the landlord her PPSN. Maybe the landlord registers with PRTB, lots don't. Whatever. We don't pay the broadcast charge. At some point, they send letters to our place saying 'Pay the fee'. At which point they don't even know who we are. Just that nobody payed at that address.

    So they request the information from PRTB, and let's say the landlord did register us properly. Okay, my wife's name is on the lease and she has no job. No funds to deduct.

    One in five households have no jobs in Ireland. And keep in mind, 80% of people are already paying the TV license. They are trying to get higher than 80%, so we're talking about the poorest (who can't pay) or the scummiest (who will fight really hard to not pay). So, what are they doing to do next?

    Summon my wife to court?

    Now, in theory, in this day and age, they could have a real-time monitoring app that would show who lives where and when they fees are paid and all that jazz. But let's be honest, that's not how things work in Ireland. The folks at revenue screwed up and have been deducting LPT from my paycheck....and it will take MONTHS before it's sorted out. I know from first hand experience....our government moves very slowly.

    In 6, 9 or 12 months we'd have moved somewhere else. And the new person would be receiving threatening letters; just like I still get about the TV License (I don't own a TV, so I'm not breaking any laws, but it doesn't matter what I do, they keep sending me stuff addressed to the last guy that lived here). And I've been here nearly two years now.

    And, okay, let's just say they do get a bench warrant or summons or whatever it is. My wife goes to court and says, 'No, I didn't live there. Me and my boyfriend had a big fight and I moved out. I went back to me Mum's'

    I haven't heard details on how exactly they will determine who has to pay...but I'm confident they'll screw it up. Just like they've screwed up LPT. LPT will get sorted though, because someone does own the property. But keeping track of tenants is a lot, lot harder.
    Where a householder fails to pay, the legislation would oblige them to provide the requisite details of their properties, including the occupiers, so that the charge can be collected

    If nobody pays, they go to the landlord and say, 'Umm, who should we go after'.

    The landlord says, 'Go after UCDVet's wife!'

    My wife says, 'I was living at my parents, and they paid. My apartment was a secondary residence I used only while attending class during the week. Per the legislation, I don't have to pay.'

    Of course, that's presuming they ever track down my wife.

    You'll also have a bunch of people who say they can't pay. People on the dole, people on pensions, they'll say, 'I can't afford to pay'. And what do you do to them? Throw them in jail? Hardly a good way to save money. Take them to court....okay. And some of them REALLY won't be able to pay. Then what?

    Time will tell, but I'll be shocked if they get a higher compliance rate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    Sleepy wrote: »
    Pay the Broadcast Charge or shut down RTE?


    Shut it down, I don't watch RTE.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,576 ✭✭✭Paddy Cow


    mikeym wrote: »
    Everyone who owns a Tv regardless of whether they own a Tv or not, is going to have to pay up or go to court.

    Simple As.
    Fixed your post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    Why does every thread on this start with the assumption that the only thing RTE produce is Television?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭bigroad


    There is no way i am paying those wasters 160 euro to use or have a mobile phone,because thats what it boils down to.We shouldnt have to subsidise any semi state.,planes,buses,trains,rte,ect ect,.If the workers dont like the wage drop then let them be faced with a nice jobridge number like the rest of us.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    bigroad wrote: »
    There is no way i am paying those wasters 160 euro to use or have a mobile phone,because thats what it boils down to.We shouldnt have to subsidise any semi state.,planes,buses,trains,rte,ect ect,.If the workers dont like the wage drop then let them be faced with a nice jobridge number like the rest of us.
    busses and trains need subsidy, they tried not giving a subsidy back in the 60s, it failed

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,006 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Tv3 manage to survive well with no funding,so why cant RTE?
    same could be asked about the BBC, while RTE do produce and import a lot of ****, they do produce some good programs and support a lot of cultural things that wouldn't be commercially viable that if they didn't get funding they wouldn't be able to do meaning it ends up the same as TV3, TV3 can survive without funding as they only produce and import stuff that is commercially viable

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    same could be asked about the BBC, while RTE do produce and import a lot of ****, they do produce some good programs and support a lot of cultural things that wouldn't be commercially viable that if they didn't get funding they wouldn't be able to do meaning it ends up the same as TV3, TV3 can survive without funding as they only produce and import stuff that is commercially viable

    If there was ever an argument for public funding of public service broadcasting, it is TV3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Phoebas wrote: »
    If there was ever an argument for public funding of public service broadcasting, it is TV3.

    Ireland AM and Vincent Brown puts RTE to shame in fairness to them.
    Think I heard somewhere that they were hanging on by the skin of their teeth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    kneemos wrote: »
    Ireland AM and Vincent Brown puts RTE to shame in fairness to them.
    Think I heard somewhere that they were hanging on by the skin of their teeth.
    I never watch Ireland AM so I can't comment. VB isn't my cup of tea but it is good example of public service broadcasting from TV3. All the same, RTE produce vastly more public service broadcasting output then TV3 and most of the content that comes out of TV3 is really dire.

    I'd be in favour of a system where the public funds were spread out more evenly - maybe a competitive market for funding where RTE and TV3 competed for funding. It might raise both of their games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭flutered


    as rte tv and radio are the mouthpiece of whatever goverment is in power it will be kept alive regardless of the cost to the public.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 313 ✭✭my teapot is orange


    I would happily shut down RTE, but we would just need to ensure there was always some organization broadcasting News and current affairs programmes to hold the government to account and to let people take an interest in the running of the country. Even for a couple of hours a day. I don't need documentaries/sitcoms/soaps/films/childrens TV/etc. Most of it is bought in and available as part of your Sky/UPC anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,884 ✭✭✭spank_inferno


    flutered wrote: »
    as rte tv and radio are the mouthpiece of whatever goverment is in power it will be kept alive regardless of the cost to the public.

    Thats why they are the State Broadcaster..... Not so much public broadcaster.

    Aside from 'Nationwide' I cant think of any TV output that is not there to chase ratings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    UCDVet wrote: »
    So, let's use me as an example. My wife has a PPSN and I have a PPSN. We rent and we're going to move at the end of this year. I have a job, she doesn't.

    We move and instead of my renting a place, *she* rents a place. She gives the landlord her PPSN. Maybe the landlord registers with PRTB, lots don't. Whatever. We don't pay the broadcast charge. At some point, they send letters to our place saying 'Pay the fee'. At which point they don't even know who we are. Just that nobody payed at that address.

    So they request the information from PRTB, and let's say the landlord did register us properly. Okay, my wife's name is on the lease and she has no job. No funds to deduct.
    If they follow the LPT model, they'll just attach to earnings (for anyone who has earnings) or social welfare.
    UCDVet wrote: »
    One in five households have no jobs in Ireland. And keep in mind, 80% of people are already paying the TV license. They are trying to get higher than 80%, so we're talking about the poorest (who can't pay) or the scummiest (who will fight really hard to not pay). So, what are they doing to do next?

    Summon my wife to court?
    Bringing people to court seems an old fashioned and inefficient way of doing it. The better way in these cases is to take it directly from social welfare payments.
    UCDVet wrote: »
    Now, in theory, in this day and age, they could have a real-time monitoring app that would show who lives where and when they fees are paid and all that jazz. But let's be honest, that's not how things work in Ireland. The folks at revenue screwed up and have been deducting LPT from my paycheck....and it will take MONTHS before it's sorted out. I know from first hand experience....our government moves very slowly.
    Yeah - I read that thread over on the taxation forum. So you should fully understand that they don't have to chase people to try and persuade them to pay and then go down lengthy legal processes.
    They just raise an assessment based on the best available information and then take the money from source. Thereafter, its up to the taxpayer to demonstrate that they're not liable.
    UCDVet wrote: »
    And, okay, let's just say they do get a bench warrant or summons or whatever it is. My wife goes to court and says, 'No, I didn't live there. Me and my boyfriend had a big fight and I moved out. I went back to me Mum's'
    No warrants necessary (and certainly not bench warrants). No courts necessary. No excuses necessary either. They just take it, as you know.
    UCDVet wrote: »
    You'll also have a bunch of people who say they can't pay. People on the dole, people on pensions, they'll say, 'I can't afford to pay'. And what do you do to them? Throw them in jail? Hardly a good way to save money. Take them to court....okay. And some of them REALLY won't be able to pay. Then what?
    Or they could just take it out of their social welfare pensions.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,754 ✭✭✭oldyouth


    I wouldn't give a monkeys if RTE shut down forever, providing some other broadcaster picked up the Angelus


Advertisement
Advertisement