Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pay the Broadcast Charge or shut down RTE?

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,952 ✭✭✭Lando Griffin


    There are alot of older folk who would be lost without Radio 1.
    BTW is Larry Grogan still alive and spinning the discs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 862 ✭✭✭constance tench


    Apparently we already pay a broadcast charge through Tax...If you have a Salary of 35,000e you pay 28.96!

    Only found out recently with this handy 'Where Does your Tax Go' tool [Community ,Culture and Environment]
    You can use the slider to adjust the salary.Neat.

    http://www.publicpolicy.ie/where-does-your-tax-go/#middle-link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭wandatowell


    RTE dont have the rights to show premiership highlights anymore so I dont use the telly anymore.

    'cept to play my playstation


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    There are alot of older folk who would be lost without Radio 1.
    BTW is Larry Grogan still alive and spinning the discs?

    Think he has a helper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 25,000 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    Phoebas wrote: »
    Library service
    Contributes to education of the nation: good for economy and society in general.
    Should people who don't go to museums pay for the Museum service?
    see above
    Should people who don't go to hospitals pay for the Health service?
    Contributes to the health of the nation, therefore good in general (funding could certainly be spent better however)
    Should people who don't claim the dole pay for the Social Welfare service?
    Again in the interest of society. If we don't provide a social safety net we drive people to crime.

    RTE provides nothing that society requires.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    kneemos wrote: »
    I think it's good to have a national broadcaster that provides Irish oriented programming,debate and sports coverage.
    If you don't want it no doubt people close to you do,so think of it as a community service.

    Grand so, once everyone helps to subsidise my netflix sub I'll consider subsidising peoples sports coverage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Sleepy wrote: »
    RTE provides nothing that society requires.
    In your opinion.

    On the other hand they are the biggest producer of news and current events content in the country, not to mention sports broadcasting, children' s programming, support for the Arts and so on.
    RTE are the most popular broadcaster both on Radio and TV by a very long way. They also provide one of the most popular websites in the country.

    But apart from that ... they provide nothing that we require.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Sleepy wrote: »
    Contributes to education of the nation: good for economy and society in general.


    see above


    Contributes to the health of the nation, therefore good in general (funding could certainly be spent better however)


    Again in the interest of society. If we don't provide a social safety net we drive people to crime.

    RTE provides nothing that society requires.

    News,sports,music,current affairs,home produced programs...?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    I was originally of mind that they should just make it subscription or advertisement based, but as much as I don't care for RTE, think about what will happen when they become just another private TV station:
    You will have more garbage like from TV3, which is a fair sight worse than even RTE (takes some doing), and you will have the TV channels (including news reporting) eventually under control of a small private oligopoly (not dissimilar to much of the newspapers), where reporting is heavily skewed in one direction.

    So, as bad as RTE are, as much as they may be subservient to government interests, at least our news and media are not yet completely dominated by corporate interests - and that (coupled with the chance that, given enough reform, they can be made to serve the public interest better) is a good reason for keeping RTE. We don't want all our media controlled by private interests.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 971 ✭✭✭cros13


    Apparently we already pay a broadcast charge through Tax...If you have a Salary of 35,000e you pay 28.96!

    Only found out recently with this handy 'Where Does your Tax Go' tool [Community ,Culture and Environment]
    You can use the slider to adjust the salary.Neat.

    http://www.publicpolicy.ie/where-does-your-tax-go/#middle-link

    Really like that calculator. It's like the tax receipt the US government launched a while back.

    According to the calculator broadcasting apparently takes €234.36 from me already.

    I don't have a TV, I don't visit RTE.ie, I don't have a radio either and what I remember of RTE is that they generally fiddled with the balance sheet and spent all the advertising revenue buying old foreign TV.

    I have no problem with funding TG4 or local production but do that through income tax and the budget. Down with stealth taxes!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,525 ✭✭✭JohnBoy26


    kneemos wrote: »
    The two are completely unrelated unless you say that if everybody doesn't pay road tax we won't have roads,in which case I would say yes.

    There is no such thing as road tax. There is a tax called motor tax but little if any of it goes towards roads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,467 ✭✭✭jimmynokia


    Phoebas wrote: »
    In your opinion.

    On the other hand they are the biggest producer of news and current events content in the country, not to mention sports broadcasting, children' s programming, support for the Arts and so on.
    RTE are the most popular broadcaster both on Radio and TV by a very long way. They also provide one of the most popular websites in the country.

    But apart from that ... they provide nothing that we require.

    Tv3 manage to survive well with no funding,so why cant RTE?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,525 ✭✭✭JohnBoy26


    kneemos wrote: »
    News,sports,music,current affairs,home produced programs...?

    Home produced programs? Like what fair city? a poor excuse of a show with cr#p acting and storylines. Lots of other silly cheap home produced programs on air by rte as well over the last few years. Shows such as the all Ireland talent show and that sports quiz thing hosted by grainne seoige were dire and not worthy of the high licence fee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    JohnBoy26 wrote: »
    Home produced programs? Like what fair city? a poor excuse of a show with cr#p acting and storylines. Lots of other silly cheap home produced programs on air by rte as well over the last few years. Shows such as the all Ireland talent show and that sports quiz thing hosted by grainne seoige were dire and not worthy of the high licence fee.

    Still extremely popular.So lots of people do like them which is a good reason to support the license fee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,525 ✭✭✭JohnBoy26


    kneemos wrote: »
    Still extremely popular.So lots of people do like them which is a good reason to support the license fee.

    Popular or not IMO all the programs I mentioned are an insult to the license payer. Rte are producing programs which nowhere near justifies the high license fee due to their distinct lack of quality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 423 ✭✭The Narrator


    They should cut the yearly fee to €30.

    With that they show the news (as they do currently), some sport and other main events like the eurovision (even though most watch it as on BBC anyway).

    The rest of the time they show nothing. Most people have no interest in watching the crap that RTE are making, it's a travesty what we are paying for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Banjo String


    Phoebas wrote: »
    In your opinion.

    On the other hand they are the biggest producer of news and current events content in the country, not to mention sports broadcasting, children' s programming, support for the Arts and so on.
    RTE are the most popular broadcaster both on Radio and TV by a very long way. They also provide one of the most popular websites in the country.

    But apart from that ... they provide nothing that we require.

    Ah Phoebe.

    So late on a Friday night? Don't your FG overlords give you time off?

    RTE is broadcast digitally now, and if the Govt think people want to watch it, scramble the broadcasts, and only subscribers will receive the deciphered programming. Like what setanta do for example.

    The state wishing to criminalise it's citizens who don't wish to receive state controlled media is a load of bollox tbh, and I hope they get their app responses from the people coming into the local elections.

    RTE, FG, Lab, and Pat Feckin Rabbit can go take a Crap in a hat. Tossers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    €160 is wildly disproportionate to the return we get in terms of content quality. They could do the same job on half that. What they couldn't do is pay the bloated public service wage and pension bills they have. That is where the majority of your €160 goes. The quality of some programming such as prime time and some of the radio one stuff is good but nowhere near "€160 with the threat of imprisonment for non payment" good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Ah Phoebe.

    So late on a Friday night? Don't your FG overlords give you time off?

    Do you ever get tired of playing that same old tune?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    jimmynokia wrote: »
    Tv3 manage to survive well with no funding,so why cant RTE?
    RTE would be just another TV3 without public funding for public service broadcasting, and personally I'd hate to see that happen.

    I'd like to see a situation where the funding for public service broadcasting was spread out a bit more and maybe give TV3 some help to up their game on that front.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    JohnBoy26 wrote: »
    Popular or not IMO all the programs I mentioned are an insult to the license payer. Rte are producing programs which nowhere near justifies the high license fee due to their distinct lack of quality.

    Fair City, going by the viewing figures, (and its longevity) is loved by the licence payer. Its not something I'd watch myself and maybe not something that appeals to the Boards.is demographic.
    A lot of the 'rubbish' stuff (the studio based game shows and some of the bought in American stuff) would earn more in Ad revenue than they cost anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭Days 298


    €30 a year should be enough. RTE should have to control its own budget. And what they are paying the "stars" is a joke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭disco1


    Close it... Who wants it. I think as a nation we have endured enough without another 160 e to worry about..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭disco1


    Close it... Who wants it. I think as a nation we have endured enough without another 160 e to worry about..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭disco1


    Close it... Who wants it. I think as a nation we have endured enough without another 160 e to worry about..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭disco1


    Close it... Who wants it. I think as a nation we have endured enough without another 160 e to worry about..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭disco1


    Close it... Who wants it. I think as a nation we have endured enough without another 160 e to worry about..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭Phoebas


    Its all the repeats that piss me off.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 602 ✭✭✭hotbabe1992


    Notice how many repeats are on RTE - it showcases the fact it is not a hardworking station.

    Why pay 160 E for that? People werent even consulted as to whether we want to keep RTE or not,they were just forced when it came to this new tax.

    Its ludicrous if you ask me,what is another 160 E to someone layed off out of work,and whats another 160E to millionaire pat rabbitte,the least he could have done is make this charge more affordable,there are plenty of expenses coming into one's home atm,the last thing we need to be doing is bolstering up the wages of carrot stick millionaire ryan tubridy and marian 4 hours work per week finuncane - its just not on..


    Ask yourself why has this charge over the years got more and more expensive,and has the quality of RTE risen concurrent to the rise in the charge.?

    Answer that honestly.If you ask me the quality of programming at the moment is diabolical,CSI miami repeats,imports from america,reeling in the years repeats,shortland street,what a load of crap!


    If i was to give you a low down of all the RTE stars wages and possible pensions it would make your head spin,and you would be saying 'no wonder we are screwed'.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭suave.4u


    They will not allow the broadcast charge to go.
    It is common sense: If RTE goes private, no amount of advertisement will be enough to pay for their humungous salaries.

    So, public has to pay cause we don't have a single voice.

    END OF STORY!!!!


Advertisement
Advertisement